CDRL.pdf

USCG HEAVY POLAR ICEBREAKER

CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST

FOR INDUSTRY STUDIES

ATTACHMENT J-3

Prepared by:

COMMANDANT (CG-9326)

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD STOP 7800

2703 MARTIN LUTHER KING JR AVE SE

WASHINGTON DC 20593-7800

Distribution Statement A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited

USCG Heavy Polar Icebreaker Industry Studies Contract Data Requirement List

See Restrictions on Title Page Industry Studies CDRL

P00010

This page intentionally left blank.

Industry Studies CDRL See Restrictions on Title Page

CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST (CDRL)

INDUSTRY STUDIES

1.0 Introduction.

This Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL), a tailored equivalent format of the General DD Form, identifies contractor data development and submission requirements in support of the acquisition of Heavy Polar Icebreaker.

This exhibit includes this introduction, CDRL Development/Transmittal Requirements, CDRL Index and the DD Form 1423 CDRL forms for Industry Studies .

Table 3 provides an index of Industry Studies CDRLs.

The definitions for Blocks 10, 12, and 13 acronyms are provided in Tables 1 and 2 of this exhibit.

Unless otherwise specified in individual DD Form 1423’s, CDRLs shall be delivered electronically via the Coast Guard’s Integrated Data Environment (IDE), with email notification to CG-9326. Electronic submittals shall be provided in the format specified on the DD Form 1423 or elsewhere in this contract. Where not specified, the electronic deliverables shall be source files submitted in digital formats compatible with the Coast Guard Standard Workstation, or as agreed to by the Government. Coast Guard Standard Workstations utilize Microsoft Office 2007 products (i.e. Excel 2007, Word 2007, Project 2007, PowerPoint 2007, Access 2007).

Note that Portable Document Format (.pdf) file format is generally unacceptable for data deliverables, except for cover letters bearing a signature. However, all MS Project file type data deliverables shall also be delivered with a .pdf formatted file deliverable.

Some CDRLs refer to a CDRL attachment. These are identified in BLK16 of the CDRL using a standard naming convention beginning with CDRL_ATCH... and are either Microsoft Excel or Word files. A CDRL attachment may provide a template or required content for the CDRL submission. All CDRL attachments are listed in Section J-12 External Reference List.

Unless otherwise specified in the individual DD Form 1423’s, the Contractor responses to the Government comments and associated CDRL Revisions shall be submitted to the Government within 15 calendar days of receipt of the comments.

2.0 CDRL Development Requirements.

Not all elements of the general DD Form1423 are used in this contract. With few exceptions (noted below), elements used in this contract retain the same block number and name as used on the DD Form 1423. For this contract, CDRLs are composed of the following elements:

General DD 1423 Block Information.

This information is standard for all CDRLs and is not replicated on each DD Form 1423.

Block A CLIN: 0001

Block B EXHIBIT: J-2

Block C CATEGORY: Program/Technical Data

Block D SYSTEM: Heavy Polar Icebreaker

Block E CONTRACT: Refer to SF-33, Block 2

Block F CONTRACTOR: Refer to SF-33, Block 15A

Block G PREPARED BY: NOT USED

Block H DATE: Refer to SF-33, Block 28

Block I APPROVED BY: CG-9326

Block J DATE: NOV 2016

Detailed DD Form 1423 Block Information

Block 1 (BLK01) SEQUENCE NO.: BLK01 identifies the CDRL number use the Data Item Number identified in Table 3 to identify the CDRL number in BLK01.”Block 2 (BLK02) TITLE OF DATA ITEM:

Identifies the title of the CDRL, as it is referred to in this contract (DD Form 1423 exception).

Block 3 (BLK03) SUBTITLE: Not used.

Block 4 (BLK04) AUTHORITY: Identifies the Data Item Description(s) (DIDs), or other source for the format and/or content requirements, associated with the CDRL (by number and name) (DD Form 1423 exception).

The DID, as tailored by Block 16 or elsewhere in this contract, provides the content and format for the data deliverables. More than one DID may apply to a single CDRL, and a single DID may be applied in more than one CDRL, though often tailored differently for each application. Data Items shall, in addition, contain content specified in the SOW, Heavy Polar Icebreaker Draft Specification, Addendum 1 and/or the Steel Vessel Rules.

DID references to an “applicable military specification as stated in the DD Form 1423 for technical content,” or similar references, shall be taken to mean the technical content required by the specification, or other technical content requirements, cited in the specification, Addendum 1, Steel Vessel Rules and/or statement of work.

Such specification may be a non-military government, commercial or international specification.

Block 5 (BLK05) CONTRACT REFERENCE: Not used. The Sequence Number provides the contract cross reference to the applicable section(s) of the SOW.

Block 6 (BLK06) REQUIRING OFFICE: Not used.

Block 7 (BLK07) DD 250 REQ: No Used.

Block 8 (BLK08) APP CODE: Identifies whether or not the deliverable requires Contracting Officer’s approval/acceptance before the submission is considered final.

All data deliverables are submitted for acceptance only. See Section E of this contract for definitions and requirements governing acceptance of the Industry Studies data deliverables.

BLK08 is not used.

Block 9 (BLK09) DIST STATEMENT REQUIRED: Identifies the distribution statement required for the deliverable according to the codes below:

“A”: “Distribution Statement A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.”

“D”: “Distribution Statement D: Distribution authorized to CG/DoD and their contractors only due to critical technology (29NOV2016). Other requests shall be referred to Commandant (CG-9326).”

“F”: “Distribution Statement F: Further dissemination only as directed by Commandant (CG-9326) (29NOV2016).) or higher Coast Guard authority.”

For deliverables where no specific distribution statement is specified, distribution statement F shall be used.

The Contractor shall ensure that deliverables are properly marked and handled in accordance with USCG COMDTINST M5260.6 Management of Scientific and Technical Information (STINFO). Per Section H of this contract, data delivered under this contract that contain technical data are subject to the restrictions of the Arms Export Control Act (Title 22, U. S. C., Section 2751). Technical documents shall be marked with the appropriate ITAR Control Statements. Unclassified/Limited Distribution documents shall include the appropriate destruction statement in accordance with COMDTINST M5260.6.

All pages of each delivered electronic file shall contain these necessary markings or a notice indicating where in the electronic file the markings are located (e.g. See Restrictions on Title Page). [P00003]

Block 10 (BLK10) FREQUENCY Identifies the frequency of the data deliverable requirement using the codes in Table 1.

Block 11 AS OF DATE: Not used.

Block 12 (BLK12) DATE OF 1ST SUBM: Identifies the required date of first submission, in days relative to one of the milestones identified by the codes listed in Table 2.

Block 13 (BLK13) DATE OF SUB SUBM: Identified the required date for the 2nd and 3rd submissions in days relative to one of the milestones identified by the codes listed in Table 2.

Block 14 (BLK14) DISTRIBUTION: Not used.

Block 15 (BLK15) TOTAL: Not used.

Block 16: REMARKS: Provides additional requirements and amplifying instructions for any other block.

Table 1 Submittal Codes: Frequency

Blank In BLK10, there are no periodic (e.g., monthly, quarterly, annually) submittals.

WKLY Weekly

BI-WKLY Bi-weekly (every other week)

MTHLY Monthly

BI-MTHLY Bi-monthly (every other month)

ASREQ As required

Table 2 Submittal Codes: Initial / Subsequent Submittal

YYYY/MM/DD Specific Year/Month/Day

DACA Days After Contract Award or Option Award

DARC Days After Recipe of Comments

DPT Days Prior To

RAR Re-submit As Required

3.0 Transmittal Requirements

A transmittal document shall be submitted with each deliverable. The transmittal document shall be limited to one page. If additional space is necessary for information that cannot be incorporated into the data submittal, enclosures to the transmittal document may be appropriate. As a minimum, the following information shall be included on each letter of transmittal:

Contractor’s serial number and date;

Contract number, CLIN number;

Data Item Sequence Number and Title (BLK02) Occurrence for the specific deliverable (for example, a revision letter and date);

References to prior correspondence relating to the deliverable being submitted and, as appropriate, related

CDRLs with a brief explanation of the relationship;

Any pertinent information not included in the text of the deliverable/submittal that may relate to impending change action or resolution of design issues (for example, “Update may/will be required pending resolution of ECP…”);

If not stated elsewhere, indication of whether the submittal is partial, complete, or resubmitted to reflect revisions;

Government acceptance requirements and potential scheduling impact that could affect the work effort if Government response is untimely; and

Subtier tiles and related identification numbers may be provided as an enclosure in the event of multiple submissions under the same deliverable.

4.0 CDRL Index.

Table 3 provides a list of CDRLs associated with IS for Heavy Polar Icebreaker. F

Table 3: CDRL Index for Industry Studies for the Heavy Polar Icebreaker[]

Data Item

Number

Contract Reference

(Tasks)

Data Item Title and Subtitles

A001 3.3 Status Review Agenda, Meeting Minutes, Presentation Material, A002 3.2.1.1 3.2.1.9

Initial Cost As an Independent Variable (CAIV) Assessment

A003 3.2.1.2 3.2.1.5

3.2.1.10

Industry Heavy Polar Icebreaker Baseline Design Description Report

A004 3.2.1.5

Regulatory Design Impact Report

A005 3.2.1.2 3.2.1.5

3.2.1.10

General Arrangements, Inboard and Outboard Profile

A006 3.2.1.2 3.2.1.5

3.2.1.10

Watertight Subdivision and Initial Intact Stability

A007 3.2.1.2 3.2.1.5

3.2.1.10

Area/ Volume Report

A008 3.2.1.2 3.2.1.5

3.2.1.10

Hull Lines (Hull Form Table and Offsets)

A009 3.2.1.2 3.2.1.5

3.2.1.10

Open Water Seakeeping and Maneuvering Analysis

A010 3.2.1.2 3.2.1.5

3.2.1.10

Structural Design Report

A011 3.2.1.2 3.2.1.5

3.2.1.10

Weight and Center of Gravity Estimate

A012 3.2.1.2 3.2.1.5

3.2.1.10

Machinery Space Arrangements

A013 3.2.1.2 3.2.1.5

3.2.1.10

Major Machinery Equipment List (MEL)

A014 3.2.1.2 3.2.1.5

3.2.1.10

Electric Plant Load Analysis (EPLA)

A015 3.2.1.2 3.2.1.5

3.2.1.10

Electrical One-Line Block Diagram

A016 3.2.1.2 3.2.1.5

3.2.1.10

Open Water Speed-Power Estimates

A017 3.2.1.2 3.2.1.5

3.2.1.10

Continuous Level Icebreaking Shaft Horsepower Estimates

A018 3.2.1.2 3.2.1.5

3.2.1.10

Range, Endurance and Fuel Burn Curve

A019 3.2.1.3 3.2.1.6

3.2.1.11

Cost and Schedule Estimates for Design and Construction for Baseline Design Report

A020 3.2.1.4.1 Heavy Polar Icebreaker Initial Study Plan - Propulsion Plant / Power Train Study

A021 3.2.1.4.2 Heavy Polar Icebreaker Initial Study Plan -Electric Plant Configuration / Topology Study

A022 3.2.1.4.3 Heavy Polar Icebreaker Initial Study Plan - Hull Form and Structures Study

A023 3.2.1.4.1 Propulsion Plant / Power Train Study Report

A024 3.2.1.4.1 Machinery Space Arrangements

A025 3.2.1.4.1 Major Machinery Equipment List (MEL)

A026 3.2.1.4.1 Open Water Speed-Power Estimates

A027 3.2.1.4.1 Continuous Level Icebreaking Shaft Horsepower Estimates

A028 3.2.1.4.1 Range, Endurance and Fuel Burn Curve

A029 3.2.1.4.2 Electric Plant Configuration / Topology Study Report

A030 3.2.1.4.2 Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) Impact Assessment Report

A031 3.2.1.4.2 Electric Plant Arrangements

A032 3.2.1.4.2 Master Electric Plant Equipment List

A033 3.2.1.4.2 Electric Plant Load Analysis (EPLA)

A034 3.2.1.4.2 Electrical One-Line Block Diagram

A035 3.2.1.4.2 Main Machinery Arrangements

A036 3.2.1.4.2 Open Water Speed-Power Estimates

A037 3.2.1.4.2 Continuous Level Icebreaking Shaft Horsepower Estimates

A038 3.2.1.4.2 Endurance and Annual Fuel Consumption Calculations

A039 3.2.1.4.3 Hull Form and Structures Study Report

A040 3.2.1.4.3 Hull Lines Plan (Hull Form Table and Offsets))

A041 3.2.1.4.3 Open Water Seakeeping and Maneuvering Analysis

A042 3.2.1.4.3 Stability Calculations

A043 3.2.1.4.3 Structural Assessment - Weight and Strength

A044 3.2.1.4.3 Material Specifications

A045 3.2.1.4.4 Proposed Areas of Further Study Report

A046 3.2.1.7 Follow On Studies Plan

A047 3.2.1.7.1 Cold Weather and Remote Operations Report

A048 3.2.1.7.2 Selected Space Arrangements Report

A049 3.2.1.7.2 Multi-mission Spaces Report

A050 3.2.1.7.2 Aviation Facilities Report

A051 3.2.1.7.2 Topside Arrangements Report

A052 3.2.1.7.2 Bridge Operation and Visibility Report

A053 3.2.1.7.2 Galley and Messing Facilities Report

A054 3.2.1.7.3 Icebreaking Enhancements Report

A055 3.2.1.8 Integration Study Report

A056 3.2.1.12 Advanced Study Report

BLK01-SEQUENCE NO.: A001

BLK02-TITLE OF DATA ITEM: Status Review Agenda, Meeting Minutes, Presentation Material, BLK04-AUTHORITY: DID Number: SEE BLK16 DID Title:

BLK09-DIST STATEMENT REQUIRED:

BLK10-FREQUENCY:

BLK12-DATE OF 1ST SUBM: SEE BLK16

BLK13-DATE OF SUBS SUBM: SEE BLK16

BLK16-REMARKS: []

1. The Status Review Agenda shall include the following:

a. Meeting title, location, place, time, date, and duration.

b. A listing of each major topic to be discussed.

c. Potential problem areas that the Contractor plans to discuss and which may require Government technical area specialists.

2. Status review topics shall be proposed by the Contractor to provide the status of the program efforts. Design review technical topics at a minimum, should include :

a. Status Review #1: 60 DACA Baseline Design to include Cost and Schedule Status (Rev. 0) Progress on Initial Studies Initial CAIV Assessment Review

b. Status Review #2: 120 DACA Initial Study results Baseline Design to include Cost and Schedule Status for (Rev. 1) Following-On Study Plan (if option exercised)

c. Status Review #3: 210 DACA Following-On Study Results (if option exercised) Integration Study Results (if option exercised) Baseline Design to include Cost and Schedule Status for (Rev. 2) (if option exercised) Initial CAIV Assessment Review (if options exercised)

d. Status Review #4: 300 days after contract award (if options exercised) Advanced Study Results

3. Minutes shall reflect items in the sequence covered at the Post Award Conference and the Status Review

Meetings. The minutes shall include the following Status review topics to provide the status of the program efforts.

a. Title of the Meeting, meeting date, purpose, location, duration, summary of the discussions, agreements, list of attendees, resulting action items and copies of action items sheets.

b. Documentation of all programmatic information and technical data provided, recording joint Contractor and Government agreements reached during the meetings.

c. A list of documentation reviewed or distributed at the meeting, including applicable document dates, revisions and source.

4. Identify and include presentation documentation, handouts reviewed or distributed at meeting, including applicable dates, revisions and source of each

BLK12:

The Contractor shall provide the following submittals for the Status Review Agenda:

- NLT 10 DPT each Status Review; RAR NTL 3 DARC Revisions Shall incorporate resolutions of Government comments

The Contractor shall provide the following submittals for the Meeting Minutes:

- NLT 7 days after each meeting. RAR, NLT 7 DARC. Revisions shall incorporate resolution of Government comments.

BLK01-SEQUENCE NO.: A002

BLK02-TITLE OF DATA ITEM: Cost As An Independent Variable (CAIV) Assessment

BLK04-AUTHORITY: DID Number: SEE BLK16 DID Title:

BLK05- CONTRACT REFERENCE:

BLK09-DIST STATEMENT REQUIRED: F

BLK10-FREQUENCY: SEE BLK16

BLK12-DATE OF 1ST SUBM: SEE J-6

BLK13-DATE OF SUBS SUBM: SEE J-6

BLK16-REMARKS:

1st Submission shall include:

1. A cost assessment for the Heavy Polar Icebreaker requirments as described in the ORD and the Draft Systems Specification for the vessel and / or systems as applicable

2. The impact of accelerating the vessel Design and Construction schedule by a year should be investigated.

3. For each of the capabilites identified in the table below identify the cost impact as outlined. For those items that do not dictate a requriment or cost trade identify what impact the identified capability may have in the CAIV assessment.

4. Final update (if required to address Government comments) should be provided IN ACCORDANCE WITH J-6 for the 1st submission.

Capability Requirement Cost Icebreaking >= 8 ft at continuous speed >=

3knots What is the cost to meet objective requirement

Optempo 4,050 hrs objective requirement What is the cost to meet objective requirement

Aviation Handling One Hanger vice 2 Cost reduction Multi-Mission Support Remove req’ts Cost reduction SCIF Remove SWAP Cost reduction Air Search Radar Remove requirement Cost reduction Crew Size 25% reduction Cost reduction

2nd Submission shall update the above to include the results of the Follow On and Integration Study, and the Heavy Polar Icebreaker Indicative Design Elements (if options exercised) and resolve Government comments. Further it should reflect the Industry Heavy Polar Icebreaker Baseline Design Report (Rev.2) findings.

Final update (if required to address Government comments) should be provided IN ACCORDANCE WITH J-6 for the 2nd submission

BLK01-SEQUENCE NO.: A0003

BLK02-TITLE OF DATA ITEM: Industry Heavy Polar Icebreaker Baseline Design Description Report

BLK04-AUTHORITY: DID Number: DI-MISC-80711 DID Title: Scientific and Technical Reports System

BLK09-DIST STATEMENT REQUIRED: F

BLK10-FREQUENCY: SEE BLK16

BLK12-DATE OF 1ST SUBM: SEE J-6

BLK13-DATE OF SUBS SUBM: SEE J-6

BLK16-REMARKS:

1st submission of the Industry Heavy Polar Icebreaker Baseline Design Description Report shall include the following:

1st Submission Alt. A:

1. The Contractor’s selected baseline icebreaker. The description shall document how the selected baseline represents a ship meeting the intent of the draft Heavy Polar Icebreaker System Specification, Attachment J-1.

The level of design maturity shall be documented.

2. If an existing design is used as the baseline, the Baseline Design Report shall document design refinements and system modifications that are required. The methodology for incorporating these refinements and modifications shall be documented.

3. Update (if required to address Government comments) should be provided IN ACCORDANCE WITH J-6.

1st Submission Alt. B:

The Baseline Design Report shall address, at a minimum: arrangements stability, estimated areas and volumes, hull form, seakeeping, structures, weights, machinery, electrical requirements, speed and powering, and endurance.

The Baseline Design Report shall be labeled as Rev. 0 and shall document the methodology and rationale used in refinements. Include a summary of applicable results, conclusions, technical substantiations, and a complete and detailed description of the analytic results, which led to the conclusions.

The Baseline Design Report shall assess the Baseline Design (Rev. 0) against the four Heavy Polar Icebreaker Industry Study Objectives:

Affordability – Identify possible affordability initiatives for reducing acquisition costs as well as overall life cycle cost

Producibility Risk – Consider producibility attributes early in the design and acquisition cycle, considering icebreaker unique design attributes

Technology Risk – Make use of existing state of the market technology/ components with proven performance considering icebreaking and harsh environment operations

Sustainability – Maximize reliability, maintainability and supportability over the service life

The report should specifically address how the propose baseline design can be produced within the existing or modified capabilities of the shipyard facilities.

The Baseline Design Report shall assess the Baseline Design (Rev. 0) against the Attachment J-1 the Heavy Polar Icebreaker Draft Systems Specification and identify any areas where the proposed design may not meet the requirements.

Final update (if required to address Government comments) should be provided IN ACCORDANCE WITH J-6.

2nd submission of the Industry Heavy Polar Icebreaker Baseline Design Description Report shall include the following:

1. The updated report shall be labeled as Rev. 1.

2. The Industry Heavy Polar Icebreaker Baseline Design (Rev. 1) shall be updated based on the information gleaned from the Initial Studies. The contractor shall take the findings of the Initial Studies and update the report to document changes and modifications made since the previous submission.

3. The updated report shall assess the modified baseline design (Rev. 1) against the four Heavy Polar Icebreaker Industry Study Objectives. The report should specifically address how the propose baseline design can be produced within the existing or modified capabilities of the shipyard facilities.

4. The updated report shall assess the modified baseline design (Rev. 1) against Attachment J-1 the Heavy Polar Icebreaker Draft Systems Specification and identify any areas where the proposed design may not meet the requirements.

5. Final update (if required to address Government comments) should be provided IN ACCORDANCE WITH J-6.

3rd submission of the Industry Heavy Polar Icebreaker Baseline Design Description Report shall include the following:

1. The updated report shall be labeled as Rev. 2.

2. The Industry Heavy Polar Icebreaker Baseline Design (Rev. 2) shall be updated based on the information gleaned from the Follow on Studies and the Integration Study. The contractor shall take the findings of the Follow on Studies and the Integration Study and update the report to document changes and modifications made since the previous submission.

3. The updated report shall assess the modified baseline design (Rev. 2) against the four Heavy Polar Icebreaker Industry Study Objectives. The report should specifically address how the propose baseline design can be produced within the existing or modified capabilities of the shipyard facilities.

4. The updated report shall assess the modified baseline design (Rev. 2) against Attachment J-1 the Heavy Polar Icebreaker Draft Systems Specification and identify any areas where the proposed design may not meet the requirements.

BLK01-SEQUENCE NO.: A004

BLK02-TITLE OF DATA ITEM: Regulatory Design Impact Report

BLK04-AUTHORITY: DID Number: DI-MISC-80711 DID Title: Scientific and Technical Reports System

BLK09-DIST STATEMENT REQUIRED: F

BLK10-FREQUENCY: SEE BLK16

BLK12-DATE OF 1ST SUBM: SEE J-6

BLK13-DATE OF SUBS SUBM:

BLK16-REMARKS: [P00002]

The Regulatory Design Impact Report shall address the following:

- Identify and describe the list of emerging regulations used in the report to include but not be limited too:

o IMO Polar Code o SOLAS o MARPOL o ASPPR o POLARIS

- Include a gap anlaysis between Heavy Polar Icebreaker Draft Systems Specification and the list of identify emerging regulations. Messing, the rawing shall indicate number of personnel that can be seated in each space..

- Assess the impact of the identfied gaps on the four Heavy Polar Icebreaker Indistry Study Objectives and the Industry Heavy Polar Icebreaker Baseline Design Report (Rev. 0):

o Affordability – Identify possible affordability initiatives for reducing acquisition costs as well as overall life cycle cost o Producibility Risk – Consider producibility attributes early in the design and acquisition cycle, considering icebreaker unique design attributes o Technology Risk – Make use of existing state of the market technology/ components with proven performance considering icebreaking and harsh environment operations o Sustainability – Maximize reliability, maintainability and supportability over the service life

- Final update (if required to address Government comments) should be provided IN ACCORDANCE

WITH J-6

BLK01-SEQUENCE NO.: A005

BLK02-TITLE OF DATA ITEM: General Arrangement Drawings

BLK04-AUTHORITY: DID Number: DI-SESS-81002 DID Title: Developmental Design Drawings/Models and

Associated Lists

BLK09-DIST STATEMENT REQUIRED: F

1st submission shall include:

1. The initial submission shall be labled Rev. 0.

2. Information and formatting to be included in the General Arrangement Drawings shall conform to those specified in NAVSEA T9070-AB-PRO-010 (NAVSEA Design Practices and Criteria Manual for General Arrangements Design Chapter 070), excluding Table 4 - Area Margins. Level of detail to be shown on the arrangement drawings shall include those specified in Table 6 of NAVSEA T9070-AB-PRO-010, with the following additions:

- Officer and Crew Berthing – Drawing shall indicate number of personnel berthed in each space.

- Messing – Drawing shall indicate number of personnel that can be seated in each space.

- Lounges, Training Areas, Recreation Spaces –Drawing shall indicate number of personnel that can be accommodated in each space.

- Multi-misson spaces

- Anchor System Arrangements – Drawing shall depict and label.

- Mooring and Towing Systems Arrangements – Drawing shall depict and label.

- Boat Handling Systems Arrangements – Drawing shall depict and label.

- Aviation Facilities Arrangements including flight deck and hangar – Drawing shall depict and label

Stores Crane Location and Operating Ranges – Drawing shall depict and label.

- Replenishment at-Sea Systems – Alongside and astern – Drawing shall depict and label.

- Liferaft Locations – Drawing shall depict and label

- Tank Locations - Drawing shall depict and label

The molded height of decks and superstructure levels above the baseline shall be indicated on the inboard profile. Design Waterline (DWL) and Full Load Waterline (FWL) shall be depicted on the inboard and outboard profiles.

3. The General Arrangements Drawing shall include ship compartmentation (including tanks), watertight subdivisions, fire boundaries, external arrangements, general access and escape, adjacency and separation, major machinery and topside equipment, equipment removal, height, dimensions, and line-of-sight. Usable cargo stowage areas shall be listed in addition to applicable cargo storage areas.

4. Final update (if required to address Government comments) should be provided IN ACCORDANCE WITH J-6

2nd Submission shall include:

1. The follow on submission shall be labled Rev. 1.

2. This submission shall reflect changes and modifications made since the previous submission and be based on Industry Heavy Polar Icebreaker Baseline Design Report (Rev. 1).

3. Final update (if required to address Government comments) should be provided IN ACCORDANCE WITH

3rd Submission shall include:

1. The follow on submission shall be labled as Rev. 2.

2. This submission shall reflect changes and modifications made since the previous submission and be based on Industry Heavy Polar Icebreaker Baseline Design Report (Rev. 2).

BLK01-SEQUENCE NO.: A006

BLK02-TITLE OF DATA ITEM: Watertight Subdivision and Intact Stability

BLK04-AUTHORITY: DID Number: ANSI/NISO Z39.18 DID Title: Scientific and Technical Reports - Preparation, Presentation, and Preservation

BLK09-DIST STATEMENT REQUIRED: F

BLK10-FREQUENCY: SEE BLK16

BLK12-DATE OF 1ST SUBM: SEE J-6

BLK13-DATE OF SUBS SUBM: SEE J-6

BLK16-REMARKS:

1st Submission shall include:

1. The initial submission shall be labled Rev. 0.

2. The Watertight Subdivision Intact Stability Analyses shall show compliance with the specification and present the following: assumptions/conditions and the standards on which the stability analyses are based.

This shall include: the stability criteria for intact, overall buoyant envelope, bulkhead deck location, margin line description, details of the load conditions analyzed, assumptions and method for inclusion of free surface affects, details and discussion of intact stability analyses. The analyses details shall include: a discussion of any heeling moments, downflooding points, identification of critical intact conditions, and their governing criteria. Results shall include: a limiting KG curve over the range of operating conditions, comparison of allowable KG to the actual KG, discussion of the use and design, and the discussion of the affect of anti-rolling tanks (if any) on intact stability. The hull form and major appendages shall be included electronically and in the NAVSEA SHCP format. A complete listing of the ship compartments, and their numerical boundaries, used in the stability analysis shall be included. The reports shall be in Microsoft Word or Microsoft Excel format.

2. This submission shall reflect changes and modifications made since the previous submission and be based on Industry Heavy Polar Icebreaker Baseline Design Report (Rev. 1).

2. This submission shall reflect changes and modifications made since the previous submission and be based on

Industry Heavy Polar Icebreaker Baseline Design Report (Rev. 2).

3. The report shall also include a damage stability assessment. This shall include: the stability criteria for damage, overall buoyant envelope, bulkhead deck location, margin line description, details of the load conditions analyzed, assumptions and method for inclusion of free surface affects, details and discussion of the damage stability analyses. The analyses details shall include: a discussion of any heeling moments, identification of flooded compartment combinations, liquid runoff, downflooding points, identification of critical cases of damage, and their governing criteria. Results shall include: a limiting KG curve over the range of operating conditions, comparison of allowable KG to the actual KG, discussion of the use and design, if any, of cross-connected tanks/spaces, and the discussion of the affect of anti-rolling tanks (if any) on intact stability and the initial and final stability after damage. The hull form and major appendages shall be included electronically and in the NAVSEA SHCP format. A complete listing of the ship compartments, and their numerical boundaries, used in the stability analysis shall be included.

BLK01-SEQUENCE NO.: A007

BLK02-TITLE OF DATA ITEM: Area / Volume Report

BLK04-AUTHORITY: DID Number: ANSI/NISO Z39.18 DID Title: Scientific and Technical Reports – Preparation, Presentation, and Preservation

BLK09-DIST STATEMENT REQUIRED: F

BLK10-FREQUENCY: See BLK16

BLK12-DATE OF 1ST SUBM: SEE J-6

BLK13-DATE OF SUBS SUBM: SEE J-6

BLK16-REMARKS:

1st submission shall include:

1. The initial submission shall be labled Rev. 0.

2. The Area and Volume Report shall be delivered with each issue of the General Arrangement Drawings

CDRL A005.

3. The following are appliceble:

a. Areas shall be reported in feet squared, and Volumes shall be reported in feet cubed.

b. The Report shall be a MS Excel spreadsheet with the following tabs:

Title Page

Summary

Ship Space Classification System (SSCS)

Compartment

Deck

The following is additional detail describing required content of each MS Excel spreadsheet tab:

Summary tab: Shall include the total molded volume of the hull and total molded volume of the superstructure. Shall include a summary of Area and Volume by SSCS Groups 1 through 5, and a total sum of Groups 1 through 5.

SSCS, Compartment and Deck tabs: Each tab shall include the following columns SSCS Code, Compartment Name, Area (ft2), Deck Height (ft), Volume (ft3), Deck, Frame, P/S/CL, Remarks.

The SSCS tab shall be sorted by SSCS number. The Compartment tab shall be sorted alphabetically by compartment name. The Deck tab shall be sorted by deck, from highest superstructure deck to lowest hull deck (from forward to aft on each deck).

2nd Submission shall include:

1. The follow on submission shall be labled Rev. 1.

2. This submission shall reflect changes and modifications made since the previous submission and be based on Industry Heavy Polar Icebreaker Baseline Design Report (Rev. 1).

3rd Submission shall include:

1. The follow on submission shall be labled as Rev. 2.

2. This submission shall reflect changes and modifications made since the previous submission and be based on Industry Heavy Polar Icebreaker Baseline Design Report (Rev. 2).

BLK01-SEQUENCE NO.: A0008

BLK02-TITLE OF DATA ITEM: Hull Lines (Hull Form Table and Offsets)

BLK04-AUTHORITY: DID Number: ANSI/NISO Z39.18 DID Title: Scientific and Technical Reports – Preparation, Presentation, and Preservation

BLK09-DIST STATEMENT REQUIRED: F

BLK10-FREQUENCY: SEE BLK16

BLK12-DATE OF 1ST SUBM: SEE J-6

BLK13-DATE OF SUBS SUBM: SEE J-6

BLK16-REMARKS: [P00005]

1st submission shall include:

1. The initial submission shall be labled Rev. 0.

2. The Hull Lines (Hull Form Table and Offsets) Drawing shall include Hull Lines, Rudder and Appendages, Table of Offsets, and Principal Characteristics. The lines shall be completely faired and depict the entire hull. The Drawing shall show faired lines at 20 equally spaced stations, plus half, quarter, and other stations as necessary to adequately delineate the hullform at the bow and stern. The number of stations shall not exceed 40. Station 0 shall be at the Forward Perpendicular, and increase going aft. Waterlines shall be depicted from the baseline to top of the hull in 2 foot increments. The Drawing baseline shall depict the cutter’s molded baseline. The design waterline shall be depicted. Buttocks shall be depicted at no greater than 4 foot increments. The bow shall be depicted on the right side of the drawing. Lines of contours, decks, chines and knuckles shall be shown. The lines shall be drawn in as large a scale as practical, but not less than ¼ inch to the foot. All stations, frames, waterlines, buttocks and any other reference lines are to be clearly identified. Deck camber shall be identified and defined. All control surfaces and appendages (including but not limited to struts, rudders, propeller disk, shaft angles, skegs, fins, thruster tunnels, bilge keels) shall be depicted showing sizes and locations.

3. The Table of Offsets shall contain dimensions for half-breadths, and heights defining the shape of every station, profile, chine, deck edge and knuckle.

4. The Principal Characteristics table shall include at least the following:

a. Length Overall, Length Between Perpendiculars, Beam Overall, Beam at Design Waterline, Design Draft, Design Displacement (in Saltwater), Hull Volume, Hull Wetted Surface, Vertical Center of Buoyancy, Longitudinal Center of Buoyancy, KMt, KML, Longitudinal Center of Flotation, Block Coefficient, Prismatic Coefficient, Sectional Area Coefficient.

5. The Hull Lines (Hull Form Table and Offsets) Drawing shall be delivered in a format compatible with AutoCAD. Reservation notes indicating design development reservations, with items lined out as reservations are resolved shall be included in the Drawing. The 3D hull model definition shall be provided electronically in the native software format and in a format compatible with FastShip.

6. Final update (if required to address Government comments) should be provided IN ACCORDANCE WITH

2. This submission shall reflect changes and modifications made since the previous submission and be based on Industry Heavy Polar Icebreaker Baseline Design Report (Rev. 1).

2. This submission shall reflect changes and modifications made since the previous submission and be based on Industry Heavy Polar Icebreaker Baseline Design Report (Rev. 2).

BLK01-SEQUENCE NO.: A009

BLK02-TITLE OF DATA ITEM: Open Water Seakeeping and Maneuvering Analysis

(Rev. 0)

BLK04-AUTHORITY: DID Number: ANSI/NISO Z39.18 DID Title: Scientific and Technical Reports – Preparation, Presentation, and Preservation

BLK12-DATE OF 1ST SUBM: SEE J-6

BLK13-DATE OF SUBS SUBM: SEE J-6

BLK16-REMARKS: [P00003]

1st submission shall include:

1. The initial submission shall be labled Rev. 0.

2. The Seakeeping Analysis shall include seakeeping performance indices (Mission Operability Index) in tabular and polar plot format which apply the seakeeping limits for all cases required in the specification.

Tabular and polar plot data shall be for 360° in wave heading increments no greater than 15° and from minimum steerage speed to full power or highest speed for operation in increments no greater than 4 kts.

Instances of deck wetness per hour shall be calculated at the transom, fantail, flight deck, boat davits, accommodation ladder, pilot house, aloft-con, and forecastle and reported in tabular format. Instances of slamming shall be calculated at the keel at a location that is 15 percent of ship length aft of the Forward Perpendicular. The Analysis shall include a summary of results for all cases required in the Specification.

3. For open water maneuvering, the Contractor shall prepare estimates of Directional Stability, Turning Performance (including tactical diameter, maximum advance, head reach and zig-zag), and Operational Performance (including docking / mooring, zero-speed rotation, restrained rotation, and thruster performance).

4. The report shall include all assumptions, analytical approach, polar plots and data summary. Where assumptions (in control surface sizing, performance, or any other aspect of the hull form) are necessary due to normal design immaturity, those assumptions shall be described in detail, and conform with typical naval architecture practice.

2. This submission shall reflect changes and modifications made since the previous submission and be based on Industry Heavy Polar Icebreaker Baseline Design Report (Rev. 1).

2. This submission shall reflect changes and modifications made since the previous submission and be based

BLK01-SEQUENCE NO.: A010

BLK02-TITLE OF DATA ITEM: Structural Design Report

BLK04-AUTHORITY: DID Number: DI-SESS-81002 DID Title: Developmental Design Drawings/Models and

Associated Lists

BLK09-DIST STATEMENT REQUIRED: F

BLK10-FREQUENCY: SEE BLK16

BLK12-DATE OF 1ST SUBM: SEE J-6

BLK13-DATE OF SUBS SUBM: SEE J-6

BLK16-REMARKS:

1st submission shall include:

1. The initial submission shall be labled Rev. 0.

2. The Contractor shall provide a Structural Design Report that documents the structural design philosophy of the subject alternative in accordance with the Specification. The Structural Design Report shall include the structural design criteria and requirements, design loading criteria, structural material selection, frame orientation and spacing selection, and summary of calculations and analyses. References for design data shall be noted. Calculations shall verify that the structure meets the applicable rules and that the structure under the design loads meets the design criteria.

3. The Contractor shall provide, at minimum, Midship, Fwd Shoulder, and Aft Shoulder section drawings, Ice Belt and Ice Strengthened area drawing. Midship and other Section Drawings shall identify materials and dimensions for plate and framing members for the typical and ice strengthened structure of the hull and superstructure in way of those sections. In addition to any ABS documentation requirements, the section drawings shall include section views indicating typical framing (ice strengthened and non ice-strengthened) and a typical transverse bulkhead, and any special details associated with these views. A table of the cutter's principal dimensions and design information shall be provided and shall include but is not limited to length (LBP, LOA), beam, depth, scantling draft, design draft and design displacement. The drawing shall be dimensioned and include typical frame spacing information. The strength deck and damage control decks shall be identified as well as ice belt extents.

2. This submission shall reflect changes and modifications made since the previous submission and be based on Industry Heavy Polar Icebreaker Baseline Design Report (Rev. 1).

2. This submission shall reflect changes and modifications made since the previous submission and be based

BLK01-SEQUENCE NO.: A011

BLK02-TITLE OF DATA ITEM: Weight and Center of Gravity Estimate Report

BLK04-AUTHORITY: DID Number: ANSI/NISO Z39.18 DID Title: Scientific and Technical Reports - Preparation, Presentation, and Preservation

BLK12-DATE OF 1ST SUBM: SEE J-6

BLK13-DATE OF SUBS SUBM: SEE J-6

BLK16-REMARKS:

1st submission shall include:

1. The initial submission shall be labled Rev. 0.

2. The Weight and Center of Gravity Estimate Report shall be in accordance with the Society of Allied

Weight Engineers, Recommended Practice No.12.

3. The Contractor shall determine, define the rationale for, and provide a report of weight and KG margins for various stages of vessel design maturity to include but not limited to, Design and Construction and the post-delivery Service Life Allowances.

4. The reports shall be in Microsoft Word or Microsoft Excel.

2. This submission shall reflect changes and modifications made since the previous submission and be based on Industry Heavy Polar Icebreaker Baseline Design Report (Rev. 1).

2. This submission shall reflect changes and modifications made since the previous submission and be based on Industry Heavy Polar Icebreaker Baseline Design Report (Rev. 2).

3. Final update (if required to address Government comments) should be provided NLT IN ACCORDANCE

WITH J-6.

BLK01-SEQUENCE NO.: A012

BLK02-TITLE OF DATA ITEM: Machinery Space Arrangements

BLK04-AUTHORITY: DID Number: DI-SESS-81002 DID Title: Developmental Design Drawings/Models and

Associated Lists

BLK09-DIST STATEMENT REQUIRED: F

BLK10-FREQUENCY: SEE BLK16

BLK12-DATE OF 1ST SUBM: SEE J-6

BLK13-DATE OF SUBS SUBM: SEE J-6

BLK16-REMARKS:

1st submission shall include:

1. The initial submission shall be labled Rev. 0.

2. The Machinery Space Arrangements shall indicate the propulsion and ship service plants. The locations of the uptakes should be provided. The Machinery Space Arrangements shall demonstrate that there is adequate separation of the systems and the the arrangment addresses all survivability requirments. The locations of the uptakes should be provided. The Machinery Space Arrangements shall demonstrate that there is adequate separation of the systems and the the arrangment addresses all survivability requirments.

The Machinery Space Arrangements shall depict the propulsion, ship service power, and major auxiliary equipment items. The drawings shall include plan views, sections, and elevations depicting the arrangement of major machinery, equipment and tankage within the machinery spaces. The drawings shall address personnel access routes, major machinery maintenance areas, equipment removal routes, and combustion air intakes and exhausts.

3. The main machinery space arrangements shall identify any impacts to the general arrangements, shall ensure a survivable plant configuration and demonstrate that adequate space has been allocated for maintenance access and equipment removals.

2. This submission shall reflect changes and modifications made since the previous submission and be based on Industry Heavy Polar Icebreaker Baseline Design Report (Rev. 1).

2. This submission shall reflect changes and modifications made since the previous submission and be based on Industry Heavy Polar Icebreaker Baseline Design Report (Rev. 2).

BLK01-SEQUENCE NO.: A013

BLK02-TITLE OF DATA ITEM: Major Machinery Equipment List (MEL)

BLK04-AUTHORITY: DID Number: See BLK16 DID Title:

BLK09-DIST STATEMENT REQUIRED: F

BLK10-FREQUENCY: SEE BLK16

BLK12-DATE OF 1ST SUBM: SEE J-6

BLK13-DATE OF SUBS SUBM: SEE J-6

BLK16-REMARKS:

1st submission shall include:

1. The initial submission shall be labled Rev. 0.

2. The MEL shall be in Microsoft Office Excel spreadsheet format. The MEL shall include:

- ESWBS: The appropriate 3-digit SWBS code selected from the ESWBS based Hierarchical Structure Codes (HSC) list.

- Equipment Nomenclature

- Equipment Location: The compartments that the equipment is located in.

- Quantity: The quantity of equipment to be installed in the compartment.

- Equipment Performance Characteristics

- Equipment Configuration Data o Dimensions in inches, dimensions with maintenance and operational envelopes in inches o Dry Weight: The weight of the equipment without operating fluids in pounds.

o Wet Weight: The total weight of the equipment including operating fluids in pounds.

o Electrical Power: The connected power required by the equipment in kW.

o Electric Phase: The electric phase of the equipment.

o Electrical Frequency: The electrical frequency of the equipment in Hz.

o Voltage: The voltage required by the equipment in volts.

- Potential Vendor(s) / Location of Manufacture

- Model Number: Each potentialmanufacturer’s part number, if available.

- Long Lead Time Material: Identifies if the equipment has long lead time.

- Notes: Details describing the basis for the equipment characteristics.

- Date: The date the record was established/updated in the MEL.

2. This submission shall reflect changes and modifications made since the previous submission and be based on Industry Heavy Polar Icebreaker Baseline Design Report (Rev. 1).

3. Final update (if required to address Government comments) should be provided IN ACCORDANCE WITH

1. The follow on submission shall be labled as Rev. 2.

2. This submission shall reflect changes and modifications made since the previous submission and be based on Industry Heavy Polar Icebreaker Baseline Design Report (Rev. 2).

3. Final update (if required to address Government comments) should be provided NLT IN ACCORDANCE

BLK01-SEQUENCE NO.: A014

BLK02-TITLE OF DATA ITEM: Electric Plant Load Analysis (EPLA)

BLK04-AUTHORITY: DID Number: DI-SESS-81002 DID Title: Developmental Design Drawings/Models and

Associated Lists

BLK12-DATE OF 1ST SUBM: SEE J-6

BLK13-DATE OF SUBS SUBM: SEE J-6

BLK16-REMARKS:

1st submission shall include:

1. The initial submission shall be labled Rev. 0.

2. Initially the primary purpose of the EPLA is to size distribution system equipment, cables and generator set capacity.

a. The EPLA (Electric Plant Load Analysis) shall be prepared in accordance with the Draft Systems

Specification . Operating condition load requirements shall heating (winter) winter and cooling (summer) profiles separately. The ship service loads shall be the basic operating loads included under each ship operating condition as a minimum.

b. The EPLA shall include ship service, emergency and special frequency systems which shows operating loads under typical ship operating conditions, tabulated and summarized in such a way as to demonstrate adequacy of the power sources. This is a preliminary step in the development of a power distribution system with adequate power source capacity. This analysis shall be revised whenever noun nomenclature and individual operating loads change.

c. In addition to the requirements and recommendation above, the EPLA system load and power analysis shall be prepared in accordance with the guidance provided in DDS 310-1, “Electric System Load and Power Analysis for Surface Ships” and MIL-STD-2189-310, Electric System Load and Power Analysis For Surface Ships. This analysis shall be prepared to a detailed level for the all components of the electric plant and distribution system. In preparing the initial load analyses, typical load factors provided in DDS 310-1 and MIL-STD-2189-310 may be used. However, as the design progresses, these typical load factors shall be replaced with realistic load factors which reflect actual anticipated load under design conditions.

If the operating load (kW) is determined by applying an operating load factor, the operating load factor shall be indicated; if determined by other means, the method used shall be indicated by a note. Realistic values of operating load (kW) shall be indicated for each load. For the purpose of this drawing, the operating load is defined as the maximum sustained power (kW) required to operate the ship under each probable operating condition.

d. The operating load shall not include instantaneous power surges which are caused by starting large motors, or peak loads of short duration. Each electric load shall be identified as sheddable or non-sheddable. Each sheddable load shall be assigned a load shedding sequence number.

e. The EPLA may use recommendations of ANSI/IEEE Std 141 “Load Surveys” as guidance.

f. In addition to the requirements and recommendation above, the following shall be included in the EPLA:

i. The EPLA shall reference all related drawings. The EPLA sources and loads shall correspond to items on other system drawings such as the Electrical One Line Diagram and Master Equipment list.

ii. The EPLA shall be supported by engineering analysis.

iii. The EPLA shall show each generating source and load in the electric plant/electrical distribution system.

iv. The EPLA may be created using ESA’s Easypower software and exported to an AutoCAD file and shall meet the format as shown in the figure below. This may be accomplished with ESA’s SendCAD feature included with every EasyPower configuration. The Easypower source code file(s) for the EPLA shall also be delivered.

g. If the EPLA is created in a program such as Microsoft Excel or Microsoft Access, the .xls or .mdb file shall be submitted with the AutoCAD and paper version of the EPLA.

h. The System Load and Power Analysis shall be divided into groups arranged by SWBS.

i. EPLA sample below, or similar format, shall be used to tabulate the operating load on the system for each item of equipment in each SWBS group. Requirements for this tabulation are defined in more detail as follows:

i. Rated horsepower or kilowatt of the motor shall be indicated.

ii. Full load kW (full load input to the motor) of each connected auxiliary shall be indicated.

iii. The operating loads (kW) on the electric plant, obtained by the summation of individual operating loads, shall be indicated for each operating condition of the ship, which are Anchor, Hove To, Transit, Half-Power Icebreaking, Full-Power Icebreaking.

iv. Design margins and service life allowance shall be clearly identified in the EPLA. The margins shall be in accordance with the Heavy Polar Icbreaker System Specification

v. Service life allowance shall be applied for sizing ship service power generation plant capacity based on the functional kW load for the worst case ship operating condition.