HSCG23-17-Q-APB004_20161222.pdf

PREAMBLE

NOTICE FOR FILING AGENCY PROTESTS: It is the policy of the United States Coast Guard (USCG) to issue solicitations and make contract awards in a fair and timely manner. The Ombudsman Program for Agency Protests (OPAP) was established to investigate agency protest issues and resolve them without expensive and time- consuming litigation. OPAP is an independent reviewing authority that is empowered to grant a prevailing protester essentially the same relief as the Government Accountability Office (GAO). Interested parties are encouraged to seek resolution of their concerns within the USCG as an Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) forum, rather than filing a protest with the GAO or some external forum. Interested parties may seek resolution of their concerns informally or opt to file a formal agency protest with the contracting officer or Ombudsman.

Informal forum with the Ombudsman: Interested parties who believe a specific USCG procurement is unfair or otherwise defective should first direct their concerns to the cognizant contracting officer. If the contracting officer is unable to satisfy the concerns, the interested party is encouraged to contact the USCG Ombudsman for Agency Protests. Under this informal process, the agency is not required to suspend contract award performance. Use of an informal forum does not suspend any time requirement for filing a protest with the agency or other forum. In order to ensure a timely response, interested parties should provide the following information to the Ombudsman:

solicitation/contract number, contracting office, contracting officer, and solicitation closing date (if applicable).

Formal Agency Protest with the Ombudsman: Prior to submitting a formal agency protest, protesters must first use their best efforts to resolve their concerns with the contracting officer through open and frank discussions. If the protester’s concerns are unresolved, an independent review is available by the Ombudsman. The protester may file a formal agency protest to either the Contracting Officer or as an alternative to that, the Ombudsman under the OPAP program. Contract award or performance will be suspended during the protest period unless contract award or performance is justified, in writing, for urgent and compelling reasons or is determined in writing to be in the best interest of the Government. The agency’s goal is to resolve protests in less than 35 calendar days from the date of filing. Protests shall include the information set forth in FAR 33.103. If the protester fails to submit the required information, resolution of the protest may be delayed or the protest may be dismissed. This will not preclude re-filing of the protest to meet the requirement. To be timely, protests must be filed within the period specified in FAR 33.103(e). Formal protests filed under the OPAP program should be submitted electronically to OPAP@uscg.mil and the Contracting Officer. The Ombudsman Hotline telephone number is 202-372-3695 mailto:OPAP@uscg.mil mailto:OPAP@uscg.mil

PREAMBLE

The attached Request for Quote is issued pursuant to the commercial procedures of FAR Part 12. All Line Items are Firm Fixed Priced (FFP). Award determination will be made utilizing best value approach.

The Government intends to make multiple awards (up to five (5)) as a result of this solicitation. The contract ceiling for each award will be not greater than $4,000,000.00, inclusive of all options.

The Government anticipates award of the resulting contract(s) on or about 7 March 2017, with the base period of the contract(s) to be four (4) months, with optional CLINs. The optional CLINs will be exercised as funding is made available and the same optional CLINs will be exercised on each resultant contract. Should all CLINs be exercised, the overall Period of Performance of the contract(s) will be 12 months.

Written questions in regard to this RFP shall be submitted to the Contracting Officer, Mr. Trellis Martin at trellis.t.martin@uscg.mil no later than 15:00 Eastern Standard Time on 6 January 2017.

mailto:trellis.t.martin@uscg.mil mailto:trellis.t.martin@uscg.mil mailto:trellis.t.martin@uscg.mil mailto:trellis.t.martin@uscg.mil mailto:trellis.t.martin@uscg.mil mailto:trellis.t.martin@uscg.mil

SEE ADDENDUMIS CHECKED

CODE 18a. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY

CODE

FACILITYCODE

17b. CHECK IF REMITTANCE IS DIFFERENT AND PUT SUCH ADDRESS IN OFFER

OFFEROR

Washington DC 205930001

2703 MARTIN LUTHER KING JR AVE SE

USCG HEADQUARTERS (CG-912)

CODE 16. ADMINISTERED BYCODE

X

X

336611

SIZE STANDARD:

% FOR:SET ASIDE:UNRESTRICTED OR232

RFPIFB

10. THIS ACQUISITION ISCODE

RFQ

14. METHOD OF SOLICITATION

13b. RATING

NAICS:

SMALL BUSINESS

01/20/2017 1600 ET

11/29/2016

2024753893Trellis Martin (No collect calls)

INFORMATION CALL:

FOR SOLICITATION 8. OFFER DUE DATE/LOCAL TIMEb. TELEPHONE NUMBERa. NAME

4. ORDER NUMBER3. AWARD/ 6. SOLICITATION

HSCG23-17-Q-APB004

5. SOLICITATION NUMBER

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS 1. REQUISITION NUMBER PAGE OF

1 8 OFFEROR TO COMPLETE BLOCKS 12, 17, 23, 24, & 30

TELEPHONE NO.

17a. CONTRACTOR/

Multiple Destinations

15. DELIVER TO

Washington DC 205930001

2703 MARTIN LUTHER KING JR AVE SE

9. ISSUED BY

7.

2. CONTRACT NO.

EFFECTIVE DATE

1,000

18b. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN BLOCK 18a UNLESS BLOCK BELOW

ISSUE DATE

DELIVERY FOR FOB DESTINA-

TION UNLESS BLOCK IS

MARKED

11.

SEE SCHEDULE

12. DISCOUNT TERMS

THIS CONTRACT IS A

RATED ORDER UNDER

DPAS (15 CFR 700)

13a.

SERVICE-DISABLED

VETERAN-OWNED

SMALL BUSINESS

HUBZONE SMALL

BUSINESS

8(A)

USCG HEADQUARTERS (CG-912)

WOMEN-OWNED SMALL BUSINESS

(WOSB) ELIGIBLE UNDER THE WOMEN-OWNED

SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAM

EDWOSB

24.

AMOUNT

23.

UNIT PRICE

22.

UNIT

21.

QUANTITY

20.

SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/SERVICES

19.

ITEM NO.

Period of Performance: 03/07/2017 to 01/05/2018

00001 CAIV and Initial Baseline Design

00001AA Initial Cost As an Independent Variable Study 1 JB The Contractor shall perform a cost assessment for the Heavy Polar Icebreaker in accordance with Contract Data Requirements Lists (CDRLs)A001, A002 and paragraphs 3.2.1.1 and 3.3 of the Statement of Work (SOW), incorporated within this

(Use Reverse and/or Attach Additional Sheets as Necessary)

HEREIN, IS ACCEPTED AS TO ITEMS:

X

DATED

Trellis T. Martin

. YOUR OFFER ON SOLICITATION (BLOCK 5),

INCLUDING ANY ADDITIONS OR CHANGES WHICH ARE SET FORTH

COPIES TO ISSUING OFFICE. CONTRACTOR AGREES TO FURNISH AND DELIVER

ARE

ARE

31c. DATE SIGNED

27b. CONTRACT/PURCHASE ORDER INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-5 IS ATTACHED. ADDENDA

31a. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER)

30c. DATE SIGNED 31b. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

ALL ITEMS SET FORTH OR OTHERWISE IDENTIFIED ABOVE AND ON ANY ADDITIONAL

SHEETS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SPECIFIED.

27a. SOLICITATION INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-1, 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-3 AND 52.212-5 ARE ATTACHED. ADDENDA

26. TOTAL AWARD AMOUNT (For Govt. Use Only)

OFFER

STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV. 2/2012)

Prescribed by GSA - FAR (48 CFR) 53.212

ARE NOT ATTACHED.

ARE NOT ATTACHED.

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION

PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE

30b. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30a. SIGNATURE OF OFFEROR/CONTRACTOR

28. CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO SIGN THIS DOCUMENT AND RETURN

25. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

29. AWARD OF CONTRACT:

REF.

32e. MAILING ADDRESS OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE

32c. DATE 32b. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE

ACCEPTED, AND CONFORMS TO THE CONTRACT, EXCEPT AS NOTED:

32a. QUANTITY IN COLUMN 21 HAS BEEN

RECEIVED INSPECTED

40. PAID BY39. S/R VOUCHER NUMBER38. S/R ACCOUNT NUMBER

37. CHECK NUMBER

FINALPARTIAL

36. PAYMENT

FINALPARTIAL

35. AMOUNT VERIFIED

CORRECT FOR

34. VOUCHER NUMBER33. SHIP NUMBER

COMPLETE

32g. E-MAIL OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE

42d. TOTAL CONTAINERS42c. DATE REC'D (YY/MM/DD)

42b. RECEIVED AT (Location)

42a. RECEIVED BY (Print)

41c. DATE41b. SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF CERTIFYING OFFICER

41a. I CERTIFY THIS ACCOUNT IS CORRECT AND PROPER FOR PAYMENT

STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV. 2/2012) BACK

24.

AMOUNT

23.

UNIT PRICE

22.

UNIT

21.

QUANTITY

20.

SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/SERVICES

19.

ITEM NO.

document.

See Attachment J-6 for data delivery requirements.

00001AB Industry Baseline for Heavy Polar Icebreaker 1 JB

Design

The Contractor shall establish a baseline design that represents a ship meeting the requirements of the draft Heavy Polar Icebreaker System

Specification in accordance with CDRLS A003, A0005, A008, A010, A011, A013, A016, A017, and paragraphs 3.2.1.2.1 and 3.3 of the SOW, incorporated within this document.

See Attachment J-6 for data delivery requirements.

01001 Additional Industry Heavy Polar Icebreaker 1 JB

Baseline Design Study Support Information

Study Support Information

The contractor shall provide Study Support

Information in accordance with CDRLs A001, A006, A007, A009, A012, A014, A015, A018 and paragraphs

3.2.1.2.2 and 3.3 of the SOW, incorporated in this document.

See Attachment J-6 for data delivery requirements.

Continued ...

32f. TELEPHONE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE

32d. PRINTED NAME AND TITLE OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE

8 2 of

ITEM NO. SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

NAME OF OFFEROR OR CONTRACTOR

3 8

CONTINUATION SHEET

REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED PAGE OF

(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F)

HSCG23-17-Q-APB004

(Option Line Item)

120 Days After Award

01002 Cost and Schedule Estimate for Initial Baseline 1 JB

Design (REV.0)

The Contractor shall identify the expected cost and schedule to construct the Heavy Polar

Icebreaker baseline in accordance with CDRLS

A001, A019 and paragraphs 3.2.1.3, of the SOW incorporated within this document.

See Attachment J-6 for data delivery requirements.

(Option Line Item)

120 Days After Award

01003 Hull Form Study

(Option Line Item)

120 Days After Award

01003AA Hull Form and Structures Study Plan 1 JB

The contractor shall provide a Hull Form and

Structures Study plan in accordance with CDRL

A022 and paragraphs 3.2.1.4.3 of the SOW, incorporated into this document.

See Attachment J-6 for data delivery requirements.

(Option Line Item)

120 Days After Award

01003AB Hull Form and Structures Study 1 JB

The Contractor shall perform a hull form and structures trade study to evaluate potential alternatives that balance ice breaking power, open water speed, endurance, maneuverability in open water and ice, stability, seakeeping, strength, and producibility in accordance with

CDRLs A001, A039, A040, A041, A042, A043, A044 and paragraphs 3.2.1.4.3 and 3.3 of the SOW, incorporated within this document.

See Attachment J-6 for data delivery requirements.

(Option Line Item)

Continued ...

NSN 7540-01-152-8067 OPTIONAL FORM 336 (4-86)

Sponsored by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.110

4 8

CONTINUATION SHEET

REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED PAGE OF

(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F)

HSCG23-17-Q-APB004

120 Days After Award

01004 Propulsion Study

(Option Line Item)

120 Days After Award

01004AA Propulsion Plant/ Power Train Study Plan 1 JB

The Contractor shall provide a Proupulsion Plant/

Power Train Study Plan in accordance with CDRL

A020 and paragraph 3.2.1.4.1 of the SOW, incorporated into this document.

See Attachment J-6 for data delivery requirements.

(Option Line Item)

120 Days After Award

01004AB Propulsion Plant / Power Train Study 1 JB

The Contractor shall perform a propulsion plant/ power train study to evaluate potential options for providing vessel propulsion for the operating profile which meets the requirements for the

Draft Heavy Polar Icebreaker System Specification in accordance with CDRL A023 and paragraphs

3.2.1.4 and 3.2.1.4.1 of the SOW, incorporated within this document.

See Attachment J-6 for data delivery requirements.

Anticipated Award Type: Firm-fixed-price

(Option Line Item)

120 Days After Award

01005 Electric Plant Configuration / Topology Study

(Option Line Item)

120 Days After Award

01005AA Electric Plant Configuration/ Topology Study 1 JB

Plan

The Contractor shall provide an Electric Plant

Configuration/ Topology Study Plan in accordance with CDRL A021 and paragraph 3.2.1.4.2 of the

SOW, incorporated into this document.

Continued ...

NSN 7540-01-152-8067 OPTIONAL FORM 336 (4-86)

5 8

CONTINUATION SHEET

REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED PAGE OF

(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F)

HSCG23-17-Q-APB004

See Attachment J-6 for data delivery requirements.

(Option Line Item)

120 Days After Award

01005AB Electric Plant Configuration / Topology Study 1 JB

The Contractor shall perform an electric plant configuration/ topology study to evaluate the potential options for providing ship service power and potential propulsion using the Draft

Heavy Polar Icebreaker System Specification in accordance with CDRLs A001, A029, A030, A031, A032, A033, A034, A035, A036, A037, A038 and paragraphs 3.2.1.4.2 and 3.3of the SOW, incorporated within this document.

See Attachment J-6 for data delivery requirements.

Anticipated Award Type: Firm-fixed-price

(Option Line Item)

120 Days After Award

01006 Proposed Areas of Further Study 1 JB

The contractor shall identify a list of additional studies recommended to further meet the program objectives stated in paragraph 3.1 in accordance with CDRL A045 and paragraph 3.2.1.4.4 of the SOW, incorporated within this document.

See Attachment J-6 for data delivery requirements.

(Option Line Item)

120 Days After Award

01007 Updated Baseline Design with Cost and Schedule

(Option Line Item)

120 Days After Award

01007AA Define Industry Baseline Heavy Polar Icebreaker 1 JB

Design (Rev. 1)

The Contractor shall update the Heavy Polar

Icebreaker Baseline Design, Description Report, Study Support Informant, Cost and Schedule

Estimates in accordance with CDRLs A001, A003, A005, A006, A007, A008, A009, A010, A011, A012, Continued ...

NSN 7540-01-152-8067 OPTIONAL FORM 336 (4-86)

6 8

CONTINUATION SHEET

REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED PAGE OF

(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F)

HSCG23-17-Q-APB004

A013, A014, A015, A016, A017, A018, A019 and paragraphs 3.2.1.5, 3.2.1.6 adn 3.3 of the SOW, incorporated within this document.

See Attachment J-6 for data delivery requirements.

(Option Line Item)

120 Days After Award

01007AB The Contractor shall provide a Regulatory Design 1 JB

Impact Study in accordance with CDRL A004 and paragraph 3.2.1.5 of the SOW, incorporated into this document.

See Attachment J-6 for data delivery requirements.

(Option Line Item)

120 Days After Award

01008 Follow On Studies

(Option Line Item)

240 Days After Award

01008AA Follow On Study Plan 1 JB

The Contractor shall provide a Follow On Study

Plan in accordance with CDRL A046 and paragraph

3.2.1.7 of the SOW, incorporated into this document.

See Attachment J-6 for data delivery requirements.

(Option Line Item)

240 Days After Award

01008AB Cold Weather and Remote Operations 1 JB

The Contractor shall identify the impact of Cold

Weather and Remote Operations on the Polar

Icebreaker in accordance with CDRLs A001, A047 and paragraphs 3.2.1.7.1 and 3.3 of the SOW, incorporated within this document.

See Attachment J-6 for data delivery requirements.

(Option Line Item)

240 Days After Award

Continued ...

NSN 7540-01-152-8067 OPTIONAL FORM 336 (4-86)

7 8

CONTINUATION SHEET

REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED PAGE OF

(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F)

HSCG23-17-Q-APB004

01008AC Selected Space Arrangements 1 JB

The Contractor shall identify space arrangements to demonstrate compliance with the Heavy Polar

Icebreaker System Specification in accordance with CDRLs A001, A048, A049, A050, A051, A052, A053, paragraphs 3.2.1.7.2 and 3.3 of the SOW incorporated within this document.

See Attachment J-6 for data delivery requirements.

(Option Line Item)

240 Days After Award

01008AD Icebreaking Enhancements 1 JB

The Contractor shall identify potential icebreaking enhancements in accordance with CDRL

A054 paragraphs 3.2.1.7.3 and 3.3 of the SOW, incorporated within this document.

See Attachment J-6 for data delivery requirements.

(Option Line Item)

240 Days After Award

01009 Integration Studies and CAIV Update

(Option Line Item)

240 Days After Award

01009AA Integration Study 1 JB

The Contractor shall perform an integration study to assess the combined impacts and effects of the initial and follow on Studies in accordance with

CDRLs A001, A055 paragraphs 3.2.1.8 and 3.3 of the SOW, incorporated within this document.

See Attachment J-6 for data delivery requirements.

(Option Line Item)

240 Days After Award

01009AB Updated CAIV Assessment 1 JB

The Contractor shall update the CAIV Assessment in accordance with CDRL A002 and paragraph

3.2.1.9 of the SOW, incorporated within this document.

Continued ...

NSN 7540-01-152-8067 OPTIONAL FORM 336 (4-86)

8 8

CONTINUATION SHEET

REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED PAGE OF

(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F)

HSCG23-17-Q-APB004

See Attachment J-6 for data delivery requirements.

(Option Line Item)

240 Days After Award

01010 Industry Baseline Heavy Polar Icebreaker Design 1 JB

(Rev.2)

The Contractor shall update the Heavy Polar

Icebreaker Baseline Design in accordance with

CDRLs A001, A003, A005, A006, A007, A008, A009, A010, A011, A012, A013, A014, A015, A016, A017, A018, A019, and paragraphs 3.2.1.10, 3.2.1.11 and

3.3 of the SOW, incorporated within this document.

See Attachment J-6 for data delivery requirements.

(Option Line Item)

240 Days After Award

01011 Advanced Study 1 JB

The Contractor shall identify and additional areas that the Government should consider studying to support the design and construction of a Heavy Polar Icebreaker in accordance with

CDRL A056 and paragraph 3.2.1.12 of the SOW incorporated within this document. Specifically the Contractor shall identify lessons learned from this and other projects that should be considered by the Government moving forward.

These lessons learned should be focused on assisting the Government with further progress toward meeting the program objectives stated in paragraph 3.1.

See Attachment J-6 for data delivery requirements.

(Option Line Item)

300 Days After Award

NSN 7540-01-152-8067 OPTIONAL FORM 336 (4-86)

Descriptions and Specifications

Statement of Work (SOW) USCG Heavy Polar Icebreaker Industry Studies

CONTENTS

1. Introduction

2. References

3. Work Statement

4. Reserved

5. Reserved

6. Data Deliverables Acceptance Criteria

7. Government Furnished Property

8. Quality Assurance

9. Security Clearance / Distribution Statements

10. Performance Requirement Summary

GENERAL

1.0 Introduction.

The Government requires Heavy Polar Icebreaker Design Studies and analysis. The Government will use the Design Studies and analysis to refine the Heavy Polar Icebreaker system specification. Industry Study contracts will be awarded to Contractors able to build and design, or who have a plan for achieving production capability to build, Heavy Polar Icebreakers (i.e., U.S. shipyards with in-house design capability, or a designer as a team member).

2.1 References.

1. Draft Heavy Polar Icebreaker System Specification (select sections)

2. Heavy Polar Icebreaker Operational Requirements Document

3. Navy Cost Estimating Classifications http://www.navsea.navy.mil/Portals/103/Documents/SUPSHIP/SOM/Ch6- CostEstimating_18Aug15.pdf

3.1 Work Statement.

3.1. Objective:

Design Studies and analyses must identify solutions for the Heavy Polar Icebreaker that minimize cost, schedule, production and technology risk. The overall objective of this procurement is to enable the Government to analyze input from Industry that will be used to refine the Draft Heavy Polar Icebreaker System Specifications. This information will assist the Government in achieving an affordable solution that can be produced on an accelerated schedule. Industry input will be used to support the following Heavy Polar Icebreaker Industry Study objectives:

Affordability – Identify possible affordability initiatives for reducing acquisition costs as well as overall life cycle cost;

Producibility Risk – Consider producibility attributes early in the design and acquisition cycle, considering icebreaker unique design attributes;

Technology Risk – Make use of existing state of the market technology/ components with proven performance considering icebreaking and harsh environment operations;

Sustainability – Maximize reliability, maintainability and supportability over the service life of the vessel.

The Government seeks proposed systems approaches and alternatives that offer advantages in meeting the Heavy Polar Icebreaker Industry Study objectives of reduced production and technical risks, along with reduced acquisition and sustainment costs. The Contractor shall perform Design Studies and analyses addressing the topics outlined in Section 3.2 of this SOW focused on affordability. Using the Draft Heavy Polar Icebreaker System Specification and the other listed references, the Contractor shall establish a Heavy Polar Icebreaker Baseline Design that represents a ship meeting the requirements of the Draft Heavy Polar Icebreaker System Specification. The Contractor shall make every effort to identify areas and efficiencies within design, production, documentation and testing to reduce the acquisition cost,design a n d construction schedule for the vessel.

Through these industry studies, the Contractor shall conduct specific cost, schedule, production and technical studies to support validation and refinement of the Draft Heavy Polar Icebreaker Specification.

The Industry Studies are divided into twelve parts. This approach is to ensure that the Heavy Polar Icebreaker Program receives study output as early as possible to provide the Government additional information to assist the Government in obtaining an affordable vessel with the required size and powering within the schedule and budget established for the program.

The Contractor shall use commercially available, state of the market and proven technologies. Component commonality with other U.S. Coast Guard Cutters is required. The Government intends to use the deliverables to refine the Draft Heavy Polar Icebreaker System Specification, which may include recommended innovative methods and alternative standards.

3.2. Tasks:

The Contractor shall perform studies to evaluate proposed approaches against the objectives the Heavy Polar Icebreaker Program has specified herein. The Government is interested in proposed systems and approaches that meet the mission requirements as described in reference (3) and offer advantages in meeting the Heavy Polar Icebreaker Industry Study objectives. The Contractor shall address the relevant Draft Heavy Polar Icebreaker System Specification requirements, and identify opportunities for alternate requirements for meeting the mission requirements, while being affordable and producible.

3.2.1 Task Description

3.2.1.1 Initial Cost As an Independent Variable (CAIV) Assessment

3.2.1.2 Industry Baseline Heavy Polar Icebreaker Design (Rev. 0)

3.2.1.2.1 Establish Industry Baseline Heavy Polar Icebreaker Design (Rev. 0)

3.2.1.2.2 Additional Industry Baseline Heavy Polar Icebreaker Design (Rev. 0) Information

3.2.1.3 Cost and Schedule Estimate for Baseline Design (Rev. 0)

3.2.1.4 Initial Studies

3.2.1.4.1 Propulsion Plant / Power Train Study

3.2.1.4.2 Electric Plant Configuration / Topology Study

3.2.1.4.3 Hull Form and Structures Study

3.2.1.4.4 Proposed Areas of Further Study

3.2.1.5 Define Industry Baseline Heavy Polar Icebreaker Design (Rev. 1)

3.2.1.6 Cost and Schedule Estimates for Baseline Design (Rev. 1)

3.2.1.7 Follow On Studies

3.2.1.7.1 Cold Weather and Remote Operations

3.2.1.7.2 Selected Space Arrangements

3.2.1.7.3 Icebreaking Enhancements

3.2.1.8 Integration Study

3.2.1.9 Updated CAIV Assessment

3.2.1.10 Define Industry Baseline Heavy Polar Icebreaker Design (Rev.2)

3.2.1.11 Cost and Schedule Estimates for Baseline Design (Rev. 2)

3.2.1.12 Advanced Study

3.2.1.1 Initial Cost As an Independent Variable (CAIV) Assessment

The Contractor shall perform a cost assessment for the Heavy Polar Icebreaker Program requirements as described in the Heavy Polar Icebreaker Operational Requirements Document (Reference 2) and the Draft Heavy Polar Icebreaker System Specification (Reference 1). The goal of this assessment is to define the costs associated with each of the Heavy Polar Icebreaker expanded capabilities as defined in CDRL A002. As part of the CAIV analysis, the Contractor shall identify which capabilities and requirements are the major cost drivers. Further, the Contractor shall identify the cost differential, if any, between delivery of the first ship on the Contractor’s schedule and delivery in 2023. The Contractor shall examine the potential benefit of utilizing other contracting mechanisms to include Block Buy, incremental funding, etc. The Contractor shall perform cost, schedule, and performance trade-offs, and discuss the impacts to the design and construction of the Heavy Polar Icebreaker. This Initial CAIV Assessment will be used as the basis for the Updated CAIV Assessment as described in Section 3.2.1.9 of this SOW.

3.2.1.2 Industry Baseline Heavy Polar Icebreaker Design (Rev. 0)

3.2.1.2.1 Establish Industry Baseline Heavy Polar Icebreaker Design (Rev. 0)

The Contractor shall establish a baseline design that represents a ship meeting the requirements of the Draft Heavy Polar Icebreaker System Specification. The Contractor shall prepare a Baseline Design Description Report, (CDRL A003) that includes the Contractor’s assessment of the degree of design maturity (i.e., Concept, Preliminary, Contract, or Detail Design).

If an existing design is used as the baseline, the Contractor shall discuss design refinements and system modifications to meet the Heavy Polar Icebreaker requirements. The Contractor shall provide information on the design tools to be used and the method or approach used to modify the existing design and validate the naval architectural and marine engineering design features. The Contractor’s baseline design shall be used as the basis of the Design Studies conducted under this effort.

The Contractor shall also prepare an initial set of Study Support items to include :

General Arrangements Drawings (Inboard and Outboard Profile) (CDRL A005) Hull Lines (Hull Form Table and Offsets) (CDRL A008) Structural Design (CDRL A010) (including the design’s structural configuration in the Bow, Mid- body, Stern and

Icebelt including material selection, initial spacing, type and orientation of framing) Weight and Center of Gravity Estimate Report (CDRL A011) (including approach addressing design margins and level of maturity) Major Machinery Equipment List (MEL) (CDRL A013) (identifying candidate equipment and/or key characteristics) Open Water Speed-Power Estimates (CDRL A016) Continuous Level Icebreaking Shaft Horsepower Estimates (CDRL A017) (describing approach to the estimate and level of validation)

3.2.1.2.2 Optional Task- Additional Industry Baseline Heavy Polar Icebreaker Design (Rev. 0) Information

The Contractor shall prepare additional Study Support items to include:

Watertight Subdivision and Initial Intact Stability (CDRL A006) Area/Volume Report (CDRL A007) Open Water Seakeeping and Maneuvering Analysis (CDRL A009) Machinery Space Arrangements (CDRL A012) (Propulsion and Ship Service Plants Including Uptake Space demonstrating adequate separation and survivability) Electric Plant Load Analysis (EPLA) (CDRL A014) Electrical One-Line Block Diagram (CDRL A015) Range, Endurance and Fuel Burn Curve (CDRL A018)

3.2.1.3 Optional Task- Cost and Schedule Estimate for Baseline Design (Rev. 0)

The Contractor shall identify the expected cost and schedule to construct the Heavy Polar Icebreaker Baseline identified in Section 3.2.1.2 of this SOW. These estimates shall be based on the Draft Heavy Polar Icebreaker System Specification and the identified Heavy Polar Icebreaker Baseline Design (Rev. 0). To ensure producibility and affordability, the Heavy Polar Icebreaker cost estimates shall be based on and compared to cost data for vessels of similar size (i.e. vessels of similar full load displacement, length overall, extreme breadth and draft). The Contractor shall provide the Cost and Schedule Estimate for Baseline Design and Construction Report (Rev. 0) (CDRL A019) summarizing the cost and schedule estimates.

3.2.1.3.1 Cost Estimate

The Contractor shall provide a Cost Estimate Baseline Design (Rev. 0) as a part of CDRL A019 cost estimate (in Fiscal Year 2017 dollars) broken down as follows:

1. Design Development through detailed design to include non-recurring engineering costs

2. Cutter construction (through cutter delivery)

The Contractor shall develop the cost estimate to at least a Navy cost estimate classification Class F level as described in reference three (3). In CDRL A019, the Contractor shall identify all cost assumptions made in the development of the estimates as well as the basis for those cost assumptions. Assumptions based on recent relevant construction experience of comparably sized ocean going vessels shall be noted. The Contractor shall arrange the costs by Ship Work Breakdown System (SWBS) number.

3.2.1.3.2 Schedule Estimate

The Contractor shall develop a Schedule Estimate Baseline Design (Rev. 0) (in months) as a part of CDRL A019 broken down as follows:

1. Design Development through detailed design to include non-recurring engineering

The Contractor shall identify all assumptions made in the development of the schedule. Assumptions based on recent relevant construction experience of comparably sized ocean going vessels must be explained as a part of CDRL A019.

3.2.1.4 Optional Task- Studies

The Contractor shall perform individual studies to address the items listed in Sections 3.2.1.4.1 through 3.2.1.4.3. Within each study, the Contractor shall identify alternative approaches to meeting the requirements of the Draft Heavy Polar Icebreaker System Specification. T h e C o n t r a c t o r shall evaluate how these alternative approaches are addressed in the identified Heavy Polar Icebreaker Baseline Design to achieve the Heavy Polar Icebreaker Industry Studies objectives. Specifically, the cost and schedule impacts shall be clearly discussed. Further, for each identified solution, the Contractor shall identify the associated technical and production risks.

The Contractor shall develop a Study Report for each item listed in Section 3.2.1.4.1 through 3.2.1.4.3 that describes the baseline and each alternative analyzed. The Contractor shall describe the study methodology and assumptions included.

T h e C o n t r a c t o r shall describe and justify the assessment of how each alternative ranks against the identified Heavy Polar Icebreaker Baseline Design, while addressing the Heavy Polar Icebreaker Industry Study objectives as identified in Section

3.1 of this SOW.

3.2.1.4.1 Propulsion Plant / Power Train Study

The propulsion plant of a ship is responsible for generating the power required to propel the ship through the water, conduct ice breaking, support general operations in Arctic and Antarctic Polar Regions and in between, and support the Heavy Polar Icebreaker endurance requirements. In this respect the propulsion plant / power train has a significant impact on meeting the vessel’s mission. The Contractor shall prepare a Propulsion Plant / Power Train Study Plan (CDRL A020). The Contractor shall perform a propulsion plant / power train study to evaluate the potential options for providing vessel propulsion for the operating profile, as defined in reference three (3), which meets the requirements of the Draft Heavy Polar Icebreaker System Specifications. The Contractor shall prepare a Propulsion Plant / Power Train

Study Report (CDRL A023). The Contractor shall identify a range of alternatives to be investigated. For each alternative investigated, the Contractor shall develop the design sufficiently to assess any hull form impacts for optimization to the alternative and determine the resultant speed-power estimate, icebreaking, and range and endurance impacts. For each of the solutions, the Contractor shall identify the cost, schedule and production impacts. The main machinery space arrangements shall identify any impacts to the general arrangements, shall ensure a survivable plant configuration and demonstrate that adequate space has been allocated for maintenance access and equipment removals.

The Contractor shall use this data to support the preparation of the various calculations below. The Contractor shall prepare the following for the baseline design and each alternative:

Machinery Space Arrangements (CDRL A024) (Including Uptake Space) Major Machinery Equipment List (MEL) (CDRL A025) Open Water Speed-Power Estimates( CDRL A026) Continuous Level Icebreaking Shaft Horsepower Estimates (CDRL A027) Range, Endurance and Fuel Burn Curve (CDRL A028)

3.2.1.4.2 Electric Plant Configuration / Topology Study

The electric plant of a ship is responsible for generating the power required to support the full range of mission operations, conduct ice breaking and general operations in Arctic and Antarctic Polar Regions and in between. In this respect the electric plant has a significant impact on meeting the vessel’s missions. The Contractor shall prepare an Electric Plant Configuration / Topology Study Plan (CDRL A021). The Contractor shall perform an electric plant configuration / topology study to evaluate the potential options for providing ship service power and potential propulsion using the operating profile as defined in the Draft Heavy Polar Icebreaker System Specifications. The Contractor shall identify a range of alternatives to be investigated. The electric plant space arrangements shall identify any impacts to the general arrangements and ensure that adequate space has been allocated for maintenance access and equipment removals.

The Contractor shall prepare an Electric Plant Load Analysis for each alternative to assess the ship’s electrical power requirements across the operating profile. The Contractor shall prepare an Electric Plant Configuration / Topology Study Report (CDRL A029). The Contractor shall also conduct a Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) Impact Assessment to identify the technical, operational, and cost impacts of various HVAC approaches. The Contractor shall prepare a HVAC Impact Assessment Report (CDRL A030). The Contractor shall include an assessment of electric and thermal fluids, and discuss the efficiencies and related sustainment of the various systems. For each of the solutions the Contractor shall identify the cost, schedule and production impacts. The Contractor shall use this data to support the preparation of the various calculations below. The Contractor shall prepare the following data for the Contractor’s Baseline Design and each alternative:

Electric Plant Arrangements (CDRL A031) Master Electrical Plant Equipment List (CDRL A032)

Electric Plant Load Analysis (EPLA) (CDRL A033) Electrical One-Line Block Diagram (CDRL A034) Main Machinery Arrangements (CDRL A035) Open Water Speed-Power Estimates (CDRL A036) Continuous Level Icebreaking Shaft Horsepower Estimates (CDRL A037) Endurance and Annual Fuel Consumption Calculations (CDRL A038)

3.2.1.4.3 Hull Form and Structures Study

The primary missions of the Heavy Polar Icebreaker are to break ice in the Arctic, to provide year- round assured access to Polar Regions for national security purposes, to resupply McMurdo outpost and the Antarctic and support U.S. Coast Guard missions. The Heavy Polar Icebreaker hull form must be capable of supporting both open water transit and ice breaking operations as defined in the Draft Heavy Polar Icebreaker System Specification considering producibility of the hull form and structure. The Contractor shall prepare Hull Form and Structures Study Plan (CDRL A022).The Contractor shall perform a hull form and structures trade-off study to evaluate potential alternatives that balance ice breaking power, open water speed, endurance, maneuverability in open water and ice, stability, seakeeping, strength and producibility. The Contractor shall prepare a Hull Form and Structures Study Report (CDRL A039). The Contractor shall conduct comparison and alternative studies to include trade-offs on hull form and structural performance while providing a producible design. The Contractor shall investigate the impact of material selection on the Heavy Polar Icebreaker design. Specifically, the material selections for the ice belt and primary hull structure shall examine the use of high tensile strength steel, high strength steel, mild steel, etc. For each of the solutions, the Contractor shall identify the cost, schedule and production impacts.

For each alternative hull form investigated, the Contractor shall prepare the following items:

Hull Lines Plan (Hull Form Table and Offsets) (CDRL A040) Open Water Seakeeping and Maneuvering Analysis (CDRL A041) Stability Calculations (CDRL A042) Structural Assessment - Weight and Strength (CDRL A043) Material Specifications (CDRL A044)

3.2.1.4.4 Proposed Areas of Further Study

The Contractor shall identify additional studies recommended to further meet the program objectives stated in paragraph 3.1. The Contractor shall provide a description for each additional proposed area of study within the Proposed Areas of Further Study Report (CDRL A045). The Contractor shall provide the detail for each proposed area of further study and identify the expected level of effort required to complete each area.

3.2.1.5 Optional Task- Define Industry Baseline Heavy Polar Icebreaker Design (Rev. 1)

The Contractor shall update the Heavy Polar Icebreaker Baseline design utilizing the information obtained from 3.2.1.4 of this SOW. The Updated Heavy Polar Icebreaker Baseline design (Rev. 1) shall be used as the basis of the Follow On Design Studies conducted under 3.2.1.7 of this SOW. The Contractor shall prepare an Updated Industry Heavy Polar Icebreaker Baseline Design Report (CDRL A003) that shall describe how the Rev. 1 Design improves on the Heavy Polar Icebreaker Baseline design (Rev. 0), identifies a more mature design level, while at the same time decreases technical and production risk while remaining affordable and sustainable. The Contractor shall prepare the following items for the selected baseline design:

General Arrangements Drawings (Inboard and Outboard Profile) (CDRL A005) Watertight Subdivision and Initial Intact Stability (CDRL A006) Area/Volume Report (CDRL A007)

Hull Lines (Hull Form Table and Offsets) (CDRL A008) Open Water Seakeeping and Maneuvering Analysis (CDRL A009) Structural Design (CDRL A010) (including the design’s structural configuration in the Bow, Mid- body, Stern and

Icebelt including material selection, initial spacing, type and orientation of framing) Weight and Center of Gravity Estimate Report (CDRL A011) (including approach addressing design margins and level of maturity) Machinery Space Arrangements (CDRL A012) (Propulsion and Ship Service Plants Including Uptake Space demonstrating adequate separation and survivability) Major Machinery Equipment List (MEL) (CDRL A013) (identifying candidate equipment and/or key characteristics) Electric Plant Load Analysis (EPLA) (CDRL A014) Electrical One-Line Block Diagram (CDRL A015) Open Water Speed-Power Estimates (CDRL A016) Continuous Level Icebreaking Shaft Horsepower Estimates (CDRL A017) (describing approach to the estimate and

In addition to the information provided as part of the Industry Heavy Polar Icebreaker Baseline Design Description Report, the Contractor shall prepare a Regulatory Design Impacts Report (CDRL A004). The severe and environmentally sensitive areas of operation for the Heavy Polar Icebreaker bring some unique regulations into consideration. The Contractor shall conduct a gap analysis as a part of CDRL A004 on the Draft Heavy Polar Icebreaker Specification, identifying areas where there is a difference between the Draft Heavy Polar Icebreaker System Specification and existing or emerging regulations, such as IMO Polar Code, SOLAS, MARPOL, ASPPR, POLARIS, etc.

3.2.1.6 Optional Task- Cost and Schedule Estimates for Baseline Design (Rev. 1)

The Contractor shall identify the expected cost and schedule to construct the Heavy Polar Icebreaker Baseline Design (Rev.1) identified in sections 3.2.1.5 of this SOW. In order to analyze the producibility and affordability of the Polar Icebreaker, the Government expects the Contractor to be able to design and build a vessel capable of meeting the technical requirements of the Draft Heavy Polar Icebreaker Systems Specification. To ensure producibility and affordability, the Heavy Polar Icebreaker cost estimates shall be based on and compared to cost data for vessels of similar size (i.e. vessels of similar full load displacement, length overall, extreme breadth and draft). The Cost and Schedule Estimate for Baseline Design and Construction for Baseline Design Report (Rev. 1) (CDRL A019) will provide a summary of the cost and schedule estimates.

3.2.1.6.1 Cost Estimate

The Contractor shall provide a Cost Estimate Baseline Design (Rev. 1) as part of the CDRL A019 cost estimate in Fiscal Year 2017 dollars broken down as follows:

1. Design Development through detailed design to include non-recurring engineering costs

The Contractor shall develop a cost estimate that shall be developed to at least a Navy cost estimate classification Class F level. The Contractor shall identify all cost assumptions made in the development of the estimates as well as the basis for those cost assumptions. Assumptions based on recent relevant construction experience of comparably sized ocean going vessels shall be noted as a part of CDRL A019. To the extent possible, the Contractor shall arrange the costs by SWBS number.

3.2.1.6.2 Schedule Estimate

The Contractor shall develop a Schedule Estimate Baseline Design (Rev. 1) (in months) as a part of CDRL A019 broken down as follows:

1. Design Development through detailed design to include non-recurring engineering efforts

The Contractor shall identify all assumptions made in the development of the schedule. Assumptions based on recent relevant construction experience of comparably sized ocean going vessels shall be noted as a part of CDRL A019.

3.2.1.7 Optional Tasks- Follow On Studies

The Contractor shall perform additional individual studies to address the items listed in Sections 3.2.1.7.1 through 3.2.1.7.3.

Within each study, the Contractor shall identify alternative approaches to meeting the requirements of the Draft Heavy Polar Icebreaker System Specification. Each study shall evaluate how these alternative approaches are addressed in the identified Heavy Polar Icebreaker Baseline Design so as to achieve the Heavy Polar Icebreaker Industry Studies objectives.

The Contractor shall prepare Study Plans for each of the items listed in Section 3.2.1.7.1 through 3.2.1.7.4. The Contractor shall combine the three study plans into a single Follow On Studies Plan (CDRL A046).

The Contractor shall develop a Study Report for each item listed in Section 3.2.1.7.1 through 3.2.1.7.4 that describes the baseline and each alternative analyzed. The Contractor shall describe the study methodology and assumptions. The Study Reports shall describe and justify the assessment of how each alternative ranks against the identified Heavy Polar Icebreaker Baseline Design while addressing the Heavy Polar Icebreaker Industry Study objectives as identified in Section 3.1 of this SOW. For each of the solutions, the Contractor shall identify the cost, schedule and production impacts.

3.2.1.7.1 Optional Task- Cold Weather and Remote Operations

The Contractor shall identify the impact of Cold Weather and Remote Operations on the Polar Icebreaker. The Contractor shall analyze the impact of operating in the Polar Regions on the vessel’s functional areas. Specifically, the Cold Weather and Remote Operations Report (CDRL A047) shall include, but not be limited to, indentifying the technical, operational, and cost impacts of cold weather and remote operations. The analysis shall address the impact of the applicable criteria of recognized standards. The equipment and sensors exposed to or interfacing with the environment shall be evaluated for the operational requirements of -40F and survival requirements of -50F, using -20F as the basis of comparison. For each of the solutions, the Contractor shall identify the cost, schedule and production impacts.

3.2.1.7.2 Optional Tasks- Selected Space Arrangements

The Contractor shall further define the following space arrangements to demonstrate compliance with the Heavy Polar

Icebreaker System Specification:

Multi-mission Spaces (CDRL A049) Aviation Facilities Report (CDRL A050) Topside Arrangements Report (CDRL A051) Bridge Operation and Visibility Report (CDRL A052) Galley and Messing Facilities Report (CDRL A053)

The Contractor shall perform space trade-off studies analyzing the operational and technical impacts of each alternative arrangement. For each of the solutions, the Contractor shall identify the cost, schedule and production impacts. The overall impact on cost and producibility shall also be examined in the Selected Space Arrangements Report (CDRL A048).

3.2.1.7.3 Optional Tasks- Icebreaking Enhancements

The Contractor shall identify a list of potential icebreaking enhancements. For each of the solutions, the Contractor shall identify the cost, schedule and production impacts. The Contractor shall assess the design impact of various methods of improving icebreaking performance including, but not limited to:

Hull coatings Bow wash system Bubbler system Heeling system Reamers

The Contractor shall assess the impact of the icebreaking enhancements on producibility, affordability, and sustainment.

The Icebreaking Enhancement Report (CDRL A054) shall identify any technical or operational impacts of the enhancements on the Heavy Polar Icebreaker. Where commercial products are identified the product specification sheets shall be provided.

3.2.1.8 Optional Tasks- Integration Study

The Contractor shall perform an integration study to assess the combined impacts and effects of the Initial and Follow On Studies prepared under sections 3.2.1.4 and 3.2.1.7. In order to perform the integration study, the following steps shall be followed:

Select systems equipment and approaches from the Initial and Follow On Studies performed under this SOW Analyze how these selections integrate into a single concept. Separate integration concepts may be prepared to evaluate different combinations of selections.

Evaluate the selections for any compatibility issues or compounding impacts Identify one or more cutter concepts based on the integration studies

The Contractor shall prepare an Integration Study Report (CDRL A055) that documents all of the above mentioned steps and the results of the various evaluations. The report shall include an assessment of how each integrated solution performs when compared to the Heavy Polar Icebreaker Baseline Design (Rev. 1) and the Heavy Polar Icebreaker Industry Study objectives outlined herein. The methodology and assumptions used to make the assessment shall be included in the report.

The report shall clearly identify how the following Heavy Polar Icebreaker Industry Study objectives are impacted:

Affordability – Identify possible affordability initiatives for reducing acquisition costs as well as overall life cycle cost Producibility Risk – Consider producibility attributes early in the design and acquisition cycle, considering icebreaker unique design attributes Technology Risk – Make use of existing state of the market technology/ components with proven performance considering icebreaking and harsh environment operations Sustainability - Maximize reliability, maintainability and supportability over the service life of the vessel

3.2.1.9 Optional Tasks- Updated CAIV Assessment

Using the information gleaned from Sections 3.2.1.4 through 3.2.1.8 and reference (2), the Contractor shall update the CAIV Assessment (CDRL A002) to identify candidate capability reductions as outlined in Attachment J-3: Heavy Polar Icebreaker CDRL for Industry Studies that may provide cost savings. The Contractor shall also identify potential cost drivers associated with an accelerated schedule. The Contractor shall examine the potential benefit of utilizing other contracting mechanisms to include Block Buy, incremental funding, etc. The Contractor shall perform cost, schedule, and performance trade-offs, and discuss the impacts to the design and construction of the Heavy Polar Icebreaker.

3.2.1.10 Optional Tasks- Define Industry Baseline Heavy Polar Icebreaker Design (Rev. 2)

The Contractor shall update the Heavy Polar Icebreaker Baseline Design utilizing the information gleaned from Sections

3.2.1.4 through 3.2.1.8 of this SOW. The Updated Polar Icebreaker Baseline Design (Rev. 2) shall be used as the basis for the Contractor’s final cost and schedule estimates. An updated Industry Heavy Polar Icebreaker Baseline Design Description Report (CDRL A003) shall describe how the Rev. 2 design improves on the Heavy Polar Icebreaker Baseline Design (Rev. 1), while at the same time decreases technical and production risk while remaining affordable and sustainable.

The Contractor shall prepare the following items for the selected baseline design:

General Arrangement Drawings (CDRL A005) (Inboard and Outboard Profile) Watertight Subdivision, Intact and Damage Stability (CDRL A006) Area/ Volume (CDRL A007) Hull Lines (Hull Form Table and Offsets) (CDRL A008) Open Water Seakeeping and Maneuvering Analysis (CDRL A009) Structural Design (CDRL A010) (including the design’s structural configuration in the Bow, Mid-body, Stern and

Icebelt including material selection, initial spacing, type and orientation of framing) Weight and Center of Gravity Estimate Report (CDRL A011) (including approach addressing design margins and level of maturity) Machinery Space Arrangements (CDRL A012) (Propulsion and Ship Service Plants including Uptake Space demonstrating adequate separation and survivability) Major Machinery Equipment List (MEL) (CDRL A013) (identifying candidate equipment and/or key characteristics) Electric Plant Load Analysis (EPLA) (CDRL A014) Electrical One-Line Block Diagram (CDRL A015) Open Water Speed-Power Estimates (CDRL A016) Continuous Level…