A23.2 - HR001125R0003 Amend 0002 MANNUS Q&As - 2025-04-17.pdf

HR001125R0003 Questions and Answers

Question # Page # RFP Section Reference Question Government response

001 Not Applicable General Solicitation Information

Could the government provide the name of the incumbent contractors, the current contract number, and the total contract value for the existing contract supporting this requirement? This is a new requirement with no current incumbent.

002 Page 18

File Name: A23 - HR001125R0003 Solicitation 2025-03-28 Section: Volume VII – Factor 5: Past Performance

Can the Government please clarify if past performance performed at a subcontractor capacity is allowed for submission? Would the government evaluate past performance performed at Prime contractor capacity more favorably or equal?

The solicitation does not prohibit the submission of past performance performed at a subcontractor capacity. Please see Section V under "Basis for Award" for past performance evaluation information.

003 Page 14

File Name: A23 - HR001125R0003 Solicitation 2025-03-28 Section: VOLUME I – FACTOR 1:

SAMPLE TASK ORDER

PROPOSALS

Can the Government please clarify what is meant by "DoD-approved vendor solution" in VOLUME I – FACTOR 1:

SAMPLE TASK ORDER PROPOSALS (File Name: A23 - HR001125R0003 Solicitation 2025-03-28)? The requirement states that "the offeror shall provide their DoD-approved vendor solution and why it is selected for use for each sample task order" and must submit proof of DoD authorization (e.g., Authority to Operate letter or a point of contact for the Government Authorizing Official). Since this is a service-based contract where we propose solutions based on our approach, could the Government clarify whether this requirement applies to service offerings, and if so, how it should be interpreted?

The phrase "DoD-approved vendor solution" refers to any COTS, GOTS, or other technologies (hardware, software, or cloud-based services) the offeror proposes to utilize in performing the sample task orders. Offerors are not required to propose a vendor solution if their proposed approach does not involve utilizing any specific technologies. If a proposed approach relies on a specific technology, the offeror should identify the specific product or service and provide justification for its selection. In accordance with solicitation provision 52.212-1 additional information, Section I, "DoD-approved" in this context means the vendor solution is authorized for use on DoD networks and systems, which can be demonstrated by providing an ATO or equivalent documentation demonstrating the security posture of the proposed technology, or by providing a point of contact within the DoD organization responsible for authorizing the technology. If the proposed technology is still undergoing the authorization process, please provide the current authorization status and expected completion date. For Sample Task Order 1, in addition to the DoD-approved vendor solution, Offerors shall address how their proposed solution will ensure the website is compliant with all applicable requirements of the Risk Management Framework (RMF), as well as a proposed RMF implementation schedule. For Sample Task Order 2, in addition to the DoD-approved vendor solution, Offerors shall address how their proposed solution will address the structural load of the systems being installed.

Solicitation provision 52.212-1 additional information Section I has been updated to include this clarification.

004 Not Applicable General Solicitation Information Can the Government share an estimated volume of task orders (or average annual number of TOs) anticipated under this IDIQ?

While the Government anticipates a significant need for the services described in this IDIQ and expects multiple task orders to be awarded, we cannot provide a precise estimate of the number or volume of task orders. The actual number will depend on various factors, including evolving mission requirements, funding availability, and the nature of future research and development efforts. This IDIQ is designed to provide DARPA with a flexible mechanism to acquire IT services as needed, and the Government will issue task orders on a competitive basis as requirements arise.

005 Page 13

File Name: A23 - HR001125R0003 - Attachment 1 - IDIQ PWS 2025-03- Section: 3.2 CLASSIFIED

INFORMATION SUPPORT

The PWS states that the contractor must utilize a TS/SCI/SAP facility per DOD Manual 5220.22-M. Should this facility be in place at time of proposal submission, or is it only required prior to the start of performance on a particular classified task order?

The TS/SCI/SAP facility is not required to be in place at the time of proposal submission. However, offerors must clearly demonstrate in their proposals their capability to obtain and operate such a facility prior to commencing work on any classified task order in accordance with solicitation provision 52.212-1 additional information, Section IV. Award of a base IDIQ contract does not guarantee the award of any classified task orders. Classified task orders will only be awarded to contractors who possess the necessary facilities and clearances at the time the task order is solicited.

HR001125R0003 - Attachment S01 - Questions and Answers

006 Page 15

File Name: A23 - HR001125R0003 - Attachment 1 - IDIQ PWS 2025-03- Section: 4.0 KEY PERSONNEL AND

TRAINING

Could the government please clarify what is the security clearance level for the personnel working on this contract?

All personnel working on this contract must possess, at a minimum, a final DOD Secret clearance. Specific task orders may require personnel with higher-level clearances (e.g., Top Secret, SCI) or access to Special Access Programs (SAPs). These requirements will be clearly stated in the individual task order solicitations.

Solicitation Attachment 1 - Performance Work Statement, has been updated to clarify this requirement.

007 Page 15 Section 4 PWS Are proposed key personnel required to be on-site, or is remote work permitted for certain roles?

In accordance with solicitation provision 52.212-1 additional information, Section IV, because of the complexity and anticipated variability of the task orders envisioned under this IDIQ, offeror’s technical approach shall assume availability to meet on-site and remotely with task order requirements owners to properly vet the execution of technical approach(es) for the ad-hoc needs of the requirements owners, which will include agency technical and support offices. In accordance with solicitation Attachment 1 - Performance Work Statement, Section 6.0, a hybrid approach for key personnel may be acceptable on a case-by-case basis and will depend on the specific roles, responsibilities, and the nature of the work performed under individual task orders.

008 Page 16 Section 6 PWS

If hybrid or off-site work is allowed for any part of the effort, what are the expectations for in-person attendance, meeting frequency, and remote work policies?

In accordance with solicitation provision 52.212-1 additional information, Section IV, because of the complexity and anticipated variability of the task orders envisioned under this IDIQ, offeror’s technical approach shall assume availability to meet on-site and remotely with task order requirements owners to properly vet the execution of technical approach(es) for the ad-hoc needs of the requirements owners, which will include agency technical and support offices. In accordance with solicitation Attachment 1 - Performance Work Statement, Section 6.0, a hybrid approach for key personnel may be acceptable on a case-by-case basis and will depend on the specific roles, responsibilities, and the nature of the work performed under individual task orders.

009 Page 18

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY

FULL TEXT

52.212-1 INSTRUCTIONS TO

OFFERORS--COMMERCIAL

PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL

SERVICES (SEP 2023)

Please confirm the anticipated contract type (Firm Fixed Price, Time & Materials, Cost Reimbursement)?

See Section 4 of Solicitation Attachment 1A for types of task orders which may be issued under the IDIQ.

010 Page 45

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY

FULL TEXT

52.212-1 INSTRUCTIONS TO

OFFERORS--COMMERCIAL

PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL

SERVICES (SEP 2023)

Can a contractor submit a proposal for only one task order, or is it mandatory to submit responses for both?

Additional provision instructions, Section (g) (I), Volume I requires submission of a proposed approach to both sample task orders provided under the solicitation.

011 Page 46

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY

FULL TEXT

52.212-1 INSTRUCTIONS TO

OFFERORS--COMMERCIAL

PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL

SERVICES (SEP 2023)

If a contractor submits a proposal for only one task order, will they still be considered for the overall contract award?

Additional provision instructions, Section (g) (I), Volume I requires submission of a proposed approach to both sample task orders provided under the solicitation.

012 Page 28

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY

FULL TEXT

52.212-1 INSTRUCTIONS TO

OFFERORS--COMMERCIAL

PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL

SERVICES (SEP 2023)

If a contractor is awarded only one task order, will they still be eligible to receive additional task orders under the IDIQ?

The solicitation does not contain initial task orders, just sample task orders for the purpose of conducting the source selection for the base IDIQ contracts.

013 Page 22

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY

FULL TEXT

52.212-1 INSTRUCTIONS TO

OFFERORS--COMMERCIAL

PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL

SERVICES (SEP 2023)

Are there any restrictions on a contractor bidding on future task orders if they do not submit a proposal for both initial task orders?

Additional provision instructions, Section (g) (I), Volume I requires submission of a proposed approach to both sample task orders provided under the solicitation.

014 Page 14

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY

FULL TEXT

52.212-1 INSTRUCTIONS TO

OFFERORS--COMMERCIAL

PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL

SERVICES (SEP 2023)

Are key personnel requirements the same for each task order, or do they vary based on the specific task order requirements?

Per Section 4.0 of the Solicitation Attachment 1 - Performance Work Statement, each task order may identify additional key personnel as required. Key personnel requirements can vary across task orders.

015 Page 20

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY

FULL TEXT

52.212-1 INSTRUCTIONS TO

OFFERORS--COMMERCIAL

PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL

SERVICES (SEP 2023)

The RFP states that the evaluation process is divided into Phase 1 and Phase 2. Can you confirm whether offerors are required to submit responses only for Phase 1 at this stage, or should both phases be submitted together?

Per additional provision instructions, Section (g) (II), Phase I proposals are due in accordance with the date and time listed in Block 8 of the SF1449. If an offeror's Phase I proposal is rated as "Acceptable", the Phase II proposal due dates will be listed in the Phase I evaluation results letter. Phase II proposal will not be accepted nor evaluated before issuance of the Phase I proposal evaluation results.

016 Page 15 Section 4 PWS

The PWS identifies the Program Manager and Requirements Manager as key personnel. Should offerors submit resumes for these two positions in the IDIQ proposal submission, or will key personnel only need to be proposed at the task order level?

Solicitation provision 52.212-1 additional instructions Section V has been updated to include the submission of the two Key Personnel positions listed in solicitation Attachment 1 - Performance Work Statement.

017 Page 15 Section 4 PWS

The PWS states that each task order may identify additional key personnel as required. Should offerors propose additional key personnel for Task Order 1 and Task Order 2 in the initial response, or will these roles be defined after contract award?

Per additional FAR 52.212-1 provision instructions, Section (g) (I)(4), Offerors shall provide resumes for any proposed key personnel for Sample Task Order 1 only. The Sample Task Order 2 does not identify any additional key personnel.

018 Page 15 Section 4 PWS

If an offeror proposes additional key personnel beyond the Program Manager and Requirements Manager, will these personnel be subject to evaluation in the proposal scoring criteria? Please see "Basis for Award" for evaluation information.

019 Page 4

Attachment S03 - Sample Task Order Section 5

Will contractor personnel performing Task Order 1 be required to attend in-person meetings or reviews at the government facility? See Section 5.0 "Place and Period of Performance" in Sample Task Order 1.

020 Page 3

Attachment S04 – Sample Task Order Section 3

Task Order 2 requires performance at the government facility (675 North Randolph Street, Arlington, VA). Is full-time, on-site presence required for all personnel, or will hybrid/remote work arrangements be considered?

In accordance with solicitation provision 52.212-1 additional information, Section IV, because of the complexity and anticipated variability of the task orders envisioned under this IDIQ, offeror’s technical approach shall assume availability to meet on-site and remotely with task order requirements owners to properly vet the execution of technical approach(es) for the ad-hoc needs of the requirements owners, which will include agency technical and support offices. In accordance with solicitation Attachment 1 - Performance Work Statement, Section 6.0, a hybrid approach for key personnel may be acceptable on a case-by-case basis and will depend on the specific roles, responsibilities, and the nature of the work performed under individual task orders.

Attachment S03 - Sample Task Order

For Task Order 1, the PWS states that the work will be performed at the contractor’s facilities, while other documents mention the government facility. Can the government clarify the definitive place of performance for Task Order 1?

Section 5.0 "Place and Period of Performance" in Sample Task Order 1 contains the assumed performance location for Sample Task Order 1.

022 Page 16 PWS Section 6

Will the place of performance be determined at the task order level for future orders, or will there be flexibility for the contractor to propose alternative work locations?

In accordance with solicitation provision 52.212-1 additional information, Section IV, because of the complexity and anticipated variability of the task orders envisioned under this IDIQ, offeror’s technical approach shall assume availability to meet on-site and remotely with task order requirements owners to properly vet the execution of technical approach(es) for the ad-hoc needs of the requirements owners, which will include agency technical and support offices. In accordance with solicitation Attachment 1 - Performance Work Statement, Section 6.0, a hybrid approach for key personnel may be acceptable on a case-by-case basis and will depend on the specific roles, responsibilities, and the nature of the work performed under individual task orders.

PWS Section 6 Section 5-Task Order 1 Section 3-Task Order 2

There are inconsistencies in the place of performance across the documents. Can the government confirm whether work is expected to be performed on-site, off-site, or a combination of both?

Sample Task Order 1 and Sample Task Order 2 are two separate and distinct sample task orders. See Section 5.0 "Place and Period of Performance" in Sample Task Order 1 for the Sample Task Order 1 place of performance. For Sample Task Order 2, see Section 3.0 "Place and Period of Performance" for the Sample Task Order 1 place of performance.

024 Page 15 Section 4 PWS Should key personnel resumes be submitted for both task orders in Phase 1, or will this be required only at the task order level?

Per additional FAR 52.212-1 provision additional instructions, Section (g) (I)(4), Offerors shall provide resumes for any proposed key personnel for Sample Task Order 1 only. The Sample Task Order 2 does not identify any additional key personnel.

025 Page 14

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY

FULL TEXT

52.212-1 INSTRUCTIONS TO

OFFERORS--COMMERCIAL

PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL

SERVICES (SEP 2023)

Should Volume 1 and Volume 2be submitted as separate files, or can they be combined into a single submission file?

Volume I and Volume II should be submitted as separate files with file names in accordance with the additional FAR 52.212-1 provision instructions, section (g).

026 Page 5

Attachment S03 - Sample Task Order Section 8.1

Should the Quality Assurance (QA) Plan be submitted as part of Phase 1, or is it only required at the Task Order level? If yes, does it include the 5-page limit?

Section 8.1 of Sample Task Order 1 requires submission of a quality assurance plan and included as part of the 5 page limit for the proposed Sample Task Order 1 PWS.

Proposals in response to the sample task orders are due as part of Phase I.

027 Page 1 General Can you provide more detail on the current incumbent contractor(s), their roles, and contract performance to date? This is a new requirement with no current incumbent.

028 Pages 4 Scope of Work Are there specific DARPA programs or directorates that will receive priority under this contract?

No, there are no specific DARPA programs or directorates that will receive pre-determined priority under this contract. Task orders will be awarded competitively based on the specific requirements of each task, and all offerors will have a fair opportunity to compete for each task order. The PWS outlines a broad range of IT support services that may be required across the agency, and the government anticipates utilizing this IDIQ to address a variety of needs across different programs and directorates.

029 Pages 4, 18 Task Order Process

How will task orders be competed and evaluated under the IDIQ? Will past performance on initial task orders influence future awards?

Each task order solicitation will contain evaluation factors and basis for award for that specific task order solicitation.

030 Pages 6 Cybersecurity Requirements

Is DARPA open to alternative cybersecurity monitoring tools beyond those mentioned, assuming they meet RMF/NIST requirements?

Solicitation Attachment 1 - Performance Work Statement, Section 2.2.5, does not preclude offerors from proposing alternative cybersecurity monitoring tools, provided they meet all applicable RMF and NIST requirements, as well as any other relevant DoD and agency-specific cybersecurity policies and mandates.

031 Page 5 Program Management Can DARPA clarify expectations around surge support and what types of events would typically trigger surge activity?

DARPA expects offerors to have the capability to provide surge support for IT services under this IDIQ. Surge events are defined as periods of increased demand for IT support beyond normal operational levels, and may be triggered by a variety of factors, including but not limited to:

Cybersecurity incidents: These may include network intrusions, malware outbreaks, or denial-of-service attacks.

New program launches: Rapidly deploying IT infrastructure and services to support new DARPA programs.

Special events: Conferences, workshops, or other events requiring increased IT support.

Emergency situations: Natural disasters, power outages, or other emergencies impacting IT operations.

032 Pages 5, 8 Emerging Technologies Are there specific categories of emerging technology DARPA is most interested in (e.g., quantum, neuromorphic, zero trust)?

While DARPA maintains a broad interest in emerging technologies and their potential applications to national security, there are no specific pre-defined categories of emerging technology that will receive automatic priority under this IDIQ. Task orders will be awarded based on the specific requirements of each task, and all offerors will have a fair opportunity to compete. The government anticipates utilizing this contract to explore a wide range of IT services and solutions, including those related to emerging technologies. Specific areas of interest may be identified in individual task order RFPs.

033 Pages 5 Technical Staffing

Will DARPA consider teaming or subcontracting strategies where specialized capabilities (e.g., cross-domain solutions) are subcontracted?

Per solicitation provision 52.212-1 additional information, Section V(4), Offerors are permitted to propose teaming arrangements or utilize subcontractors to address specific task order requirements, including those related to specialized technologies or skillsets.

Proposals should include an explanation of proposed teaming arrangement structure and how this arrangement will impact offeror’s interactions with the Government.

034 Page 18 Proposal Evaluation Can DARPA provide greater insight into proposal evaluation criteria beyond what is mentioned in Section M? The proposals will be evaluated in accordance with FAR Provision 52.212-2.

035 Page 4 Cloud Hosting

Will DARPA provide access to AWS cloud services under their existing contract, or is the contractor expected to procure cloud services?

While contractors are generally expected to procure and manage their own cloud services to support task order requirements, DARPA may, at its discretion and based on the specific needs of the agency and the individual task order, provide access to its existing cloud service provider (CSP). DARPA CSP includes access to AWS, Azure, Google, and Oracle cloud environments. The decision to utilize DARPA's existing CSP will be made at the task order level. Task orders utilizing DARPA's CSP will clearly state this in the task order RFP, along with any specific instructions regarding access and usage. If no such instructions are provided, offerors should assume they are responsible for procuring their own cloud services.

036 Page 3 Compliance Will the government provide a template or preferred format for the RMF continuous monitoring strategy deliverable?

While the government does not mandate a specific template for the RMF continuous monitoring strategy.

037 Page 9 ITD Hunt Team

Can DARPA expand on how proactive threat intelligence and malware analysis outputs will be integrated with external agency systems?

Proactive threat intelligence and malware analysis generated by the contractor's Hunt Team will be shared with external agencies on a case-by-case basis, following established DARPA and DoD information sharing protocols and procedures. The specific methods and mechanisms for integration with external agency systems will depend on the nature of the threat intelligence, the classification level of the information, and any applicable information sharing agreements in place with the receiving agencies. Methods may include, but are not limited to, secure government networks, established threat intelligence platforms, and direct communication with designated points of contact at external agencies. All information sharing will be conducted in accordance with applicable security regulations and with appropriate government approvals. The contractor will be provided with specific guidance and instructions for information sharing as needed for individual task orders.

038 page 4 Cross-Domain Solutions

What CDS technologies are currently deployed and does the government intend to expand their capabilities during the contract period?

Due to the sensitive nature of cross-domain solutions (CDS) and related security considerations, specific details regarding currently deployed CDS technologies cannot be disclosed in this solicitation. Specific CDS requirements, including any relevant technology details, will be provided in individual task order RFPs as needed.

039 Page 5 Program Management

Will DARPA provide access to any existing tools, dashboards, or systems currently used to track IDIQ performance and task orders?

DARPA will provide access to relevant tools, dashboards, and systems used for tracking IDIQ performance and task order management to the extent practicable and permitted by security and access restrictions. These may include systems for task order tracking, performance reporting, and communication with the government. Specific tools and access details will be provided at the task order level or as needed.

040 Page 16 Proposal Evaluation What is the anticipated timeline for Phase I evaluations and Phase II invitation?

The Government estimates completion of Phase I evaluations and notification letters sent in Q3 of FY25.

041 Page 16 Proposal Evaluation Is there an anticipated date for award notifications and kickoff of first task order(s)?

The Government estimates awards in Q4 of FY25. The Government does not have anticipated dates for initial task orders.

042 Page 66 IDIQ Task Order Requirements Can you elaborate on how task orders will be issued, and if vendors will be rotated or tiered in prioritization?

Each task order solicitation will contain evaluation factors and basis for award for that specific task order solicitation.

043 Page 66 IDIQ Task Order Requirements Will all awarded vendors be expected to respond to each task order (including niche technical domains)?

Per the "Order Request for Proposals" section of the solicitation, awarded contractors shall response to all task order requests for proposals (RFPs) with either 1) a proposal or 2) an explanation for a no-bid decision. If contractor does not submit a proposal or a valid reason why they did not submit a proposal in response to five (5) consecutive task order RFPs, at the Contracting Officer’s discretion, the Contractor may be removed as a MANNUS IDIQ holder and will no longer be eligible to receive any task order awards for the remainder of the ordering period.

044 Page 66 Task Order Instructions What level of detail will be provided in task order RFPs to allow for accurate LOE (level of effort) estimation?

Please see solicitation Attachment 1 - Performance Work Statement, for information that will be included at the task order level.

045 Page 19 Evaluation Criteria Will DARPA provide a rubric or scoring guidance used to determine acceptable vs unacceptable across Factors? The Government will not provide any rubric or scoring guidance.

046 Page 17 Evaluation Criteria Oral Presentation Are there additional expectations for oral presentations, such as format, time allocation, or evaluation panel composition?

Details regarding oral presentations will be included in the Phase I evaluation results notification letter.

2, 16 IDIQ PWS Introduction & Solicitation Section IV

Will DARPA identify any incumbent contractors or provide historical data on current support staffing levels, particularly those supporting PL-2 to PL-4 environments? This is a new requirement with no current incumbent.

3, 8

IDIQ PWS Sections 1.2 & 2.3.5

Can DARPA specify the current or preferred Cross Domain Solutions (CDS) technologies registered with NCDSMO and deployed in its environment?

Due to the sensitive nature of cross-domain solutions (CDS) and related security considerations, specific details regarding currently deployed CDS technologies cannot be disclosed in this solicitation. Information regarding specific CDS technologies, including those registered with NCDSMO, will be provided at the task order level, on a need-to-know basis, and only within the confines of specific task order requirements.

3, 8

IDIQ PWS Sections 1.2 & 2.3.4

Can DARPA estimate the percentage of work expected in classified environments, broken down by PL-2, PL-3, and PL-4, to inform security clearance assumptions and facility planning?

Due to the dynamic nature of DARPA's research and development efforts, the specific percentage of work anticipated in classified environments (PL-2, PL-3, and PL-4) cannot be precisely estimated at this time. The distribution of work across different classification levels will vary depending on the specific requirements of future task orders. Offerors should be prepared to support tasks across all classification levels identified in the PWS. While the government cannot provide precise percentages, it is anticipated that the majority of work will require at least a Secret clearance, with a smaller portion potentially requiring Top Secret, SCI, or SAP access. Specific clearance requirements will be clearly stated in individual task order RFPs.

5-9

IDIQ PWS Sections 2.2 & 2.3

Can DARPA clarify how it intends to allocate work across the scope categories (e.g., technical vs. support office work, cybersecurity vs. app dev)?

The allocation of work across the scope categories defined in solicitation Attachment 1

- PWS (Sections 2.2 and 2.3) will be determined by the specific requirements of individual task orders. DARPA anticipates a need for services across all categories outlined in the PWS, and the relative distribution of work will vary depending on the agency's evolving research and development priorities. Offerors should be prepared to compete for task orders across all scope categories and demonstrate their capabilities in each area. The government cannot provide a pre-determined allocation of work across categories, as this will be driven by the dynamic nature of DARPA's mission.

6, 8

IDIQ PWS Sections 2.2.4 & 2.3.3

Can DARPA elaborate on expectations for emerging tech (AI/ML, DevSecOps, zero trust) within the scope of ad-hoc task orders?

DARPA recognizes the importance of emerging technologies like AI/ML, DevSecOps, and zero trust in modern IT environments. Specific requirements for emerging technologies will be outlined in individual task order RFPs as needed. Ad-hoc task orders, by their nature, may require rapid integration and application of emerging technologies to address specific DARPA research and development challenges.

8-9

IDIQ PWS Sections 2.3.6 & 2.3.8

What tools and metrics are currently in place for cybersecurity readiness evaluations (e.g., SIEM type, CCRI scoring expectations)?

DARPA utilizes various tools and metrics for cybersecurity readiness evaluations, including Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) systems and established scoring criteria for assessments like the Command Cyber Readiness Inspection (CCRI). Specific details about the SIEM platform in use and CCRI scoring expectations cannot be disclosed in this solicitation due to security considerations.

Further information regarding specific tools and metrics will be provided at the task order level, as appropriate, and aligned with the specific requirements of the task order.

Solicitation, File Formatting Instructions

Does the prohibition on hyperlinks in proposals apply to internal document links (e.g., table of contents to section headers), or only to external URLs?

The prohibition on hyperlinks does not apply to internal document links. Solicitation provision 52.212-1 additional information has been updated with this clarification.

FAR Provision 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors

Per the instructions on page 13, it states:

"Offeror shall provide sufficient technical documentation to allow for a thorough evaluation of the contractor’s ability to perform the work outlined in Attachment 1 – PWS."

Could you please clarify whether the offeror is required to incorporate the IDIQ requirements into its technical approach, or if the focus should be solely on the requirements of the task orders?

Solicitation provision 52.212-1 additional information, Section (a) refers to the base IDIQ requirements contained in Attachment 1 - Performance Work Statement.

Solicitation, Phase I Instructions – Key Personnel Resumes

Can the Government please confirm that the Key Personnel resumes required in Phase I, Volume I are for any task order-specific Key Personnel proposed under each sample task order, despite their notional nature? Are Key Personnel required to be proposed at the Sample Task Order level?

Per additional FAR 52.212-1 provision instructions, Section (g) (I)(4), Offerors shall provide resumes for any proposed key personnel for Sample Task Order 1 only. The Sample Task Order 2 does not identify any additional key personnel.

Solicitation, Phase I Instructions – Volume I

Can the Government confirm that the 5-page limit for the Sample Task Order 1 Technical Approach is separate from the 5-page limit for the Sample Task Order 1 Performance Work Statement?

The 5-page limit per task order proposal is separate from the 5-page limit for the Sample Task Order 1 Performance Work Statement.

Solicitation, Volume I – Staffing Plan (Attachment S05)

Can the Government confirm whether there is a required labor category mapping or matrix that offerors should use for Attachment S05 (Staffing Plan Template)?

There is no required labor category mapping or matrix to accompany solicitation Attachment S05 - Sample Task Order Staffing Plan Template.

Solicitation, Volume I – Task Order Approach

If selected for award, when does DARPA anticipate issuing the first live Task Orders? Does DARPA intend on awarding Sample Task Order 1 & 2 with the IDIQ?

The frequency and volume of task orders will be dependent on the needs of the agency and its various programs. Sample Task Orders 1 and 2 (S03 and S04) are for proposal evaluation purposes only and will not be awarded with the IDIQ. They serve solely as examples to assist offerors in developing their proposals and demonstrating their understanding of potential task order requirements. Live task orders will follow the standard task order competition process outlined in the solicitation.

Solicitation

Can the Government please provide the anticipated date or timeframe for notifying offerors of the Phase I downselect results and eligibility to proceed to Phase II?

The Government estimates completion of Phase I evaluations and notification letters sent in Q3 of FY25.

5,16

Solicitation Volume IV & IDIQ PWS Transition Language

Will DARPA provide a prioritized list or timeline of expected initial task orders post-award to help inform the proposed transition and onboarding plan?

While DARPA cannot provide a definitive prioritized list or firm timeline of expected initial task orders due to the dynamic nature of agency requirements, the government will endeavor to provide offerors with as much advance notice as practicable regarding upcoming task order competitions.

15 16

Solicitation, Phase I Instructions – Volume I

Per the instructions for Phase I and II, Offerors are instructed to submit signed SF 30 forms in Phase I as part of Volume II.

However, for Phase II, it is indicated that the signed SF 30 forms should be submitted as part of Volume III. Could the Government please confirm whether Offerors should submit these forms in separate volumes for Phase I and Phase II as outlined?

Per the solicitation, Phase II proposals, Volume III, shall contain "any new signed amendments (SF30s)" which means any new SF30s that were not already submitted as part of Phase I Volume II.

Solicitation, Phase II – Volume V:

Oral Presentations

Can the Government please clarify the expected timeframe that will be provided to offerors selected from Phase I to prepare and submit their Phase II proposals, including the due date?

Additionally, can the Government confirm whether oral presentations under Phase II (Volume V) will be conducted virtually or in person, and when they are expected to take place relative to the Phase II proposal submission deadline?

The Government estimates two (2) weeks to prepare and submit Phase II proposals.

Oral presentations are estimated to occur within one week of Phase II proposal submission and will be virtual.

Solicitation, Volume VII – Past Performance

Can the Government provide clarification on what constitutes “similar in size” to Department of Defense 4th Estate Agencies?

Is this based on funding levels, employee count, scope of work, or another metric?

A specific "similar in size" metric is not included in the solicitation. However, offerors proposals should explain how the selected past performance example is similar in size to Department of Defense 4th Estate Agencies. Solicitation provision 52.212-1 additional information has been updated to include this clarification.

Solicitation, Volume VII – Past Performance

If the full Statement of Work (SOW) or Performance Work Statement (PWS) is not publicly releasable due to agency security requirements, can a redacted version or contractor-prepared summary be submitted in its place?

If the full SOW or PWS for a past performance example is not publicly releasable due to security restrictions, offerors may submit a redacted version or a contractor-prepared summary that provides sufficient context for the government to evaluate the relevance and scope of the work performed. Solicitation provision 52.212-1 Section VII has been updated with this clarification.

18-19

Solicitation, Evaluation Criteria

Can the Government confirm that receiving an “Unacceptable” rating for either Sample Task Order in Phase I disqualifies an offeror from submitting a Phase II proposal, even if only one Task Order is deficient?

Per solicitation provision FAR 52.212-2, Factor 1 will be rated on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis. Factor 1 includes the evaluation of both Sample Task Order 1 and Sample Task Order 2. There will not be separate ratings for Sample Task Order 1 and Sample Task Order 2.

18-19

Solicitation, Evaluation Criteria

Will all offerors who receive an “Acceptable” rating across all evaluation factors in Phase I and Phase II be awarded an IDIQ contract, regardless of ranking or number of awards? How many awards are intended to be made?

Per solicitation provision FAR 52.212-2(a), Government will award multiple Indefinite- Delivery Indefinite-Quantity contracts resulting from this solicitation to each and all qualifying offerors in accordance with FAR 15.304(c)(1)(ii)(A)(3). The Government does not have an intended number of awards.

N/A

N/A What are the reporting and deliverable expectations for awardees?

See Section 8.0 Deliverables, under solicitation Attachment 1 - Performance Work Statement.

N/A

N/A

Can the Government please provide the DARPA onboarding timeframe for resources to obtain CAC and obtain access to required networks/systems to successful perform the support outlined in the sample task orders?

DARPA performs onboarding every 2 weeks for new personnel. Requisite documentation and clearance submissions via updated Visit Authorization Request (VAR) must be completed not less than 1 week prior to the scheduled onboarding.

CACs and all other assets needed to perform the work are available upon completion of onboarding. In cases that the onboarding individual requires assess to classified systems, times vary and are initiated upon successful onboarding, but generally are completed within a few weeks.

069 19 Solicitation, Evaluation Criteria

Can the Government please confirm whether a price proposal is required for the DARPA MANNUS opportunity? If a price proposal is required, could the Government kindly provide the appropriate pricing template?

Per solicitation provision FAR 52.212-2, in accordance with FAR 15.304(c)(1)(ii)(A), cost/price will not be included as an evaluation factor as the price will be considered as one of the evaluation factors in the selection decision of each task order placed under any contract awarded under this solicitation.

070 14 Solicitation, Phase I Instructions – Volume I

On page 14 of the solicitation, it states:

“Additionally, the offeror shall provide their DoD-approved vendor solution and why it is selected for use for each sample task order. The offeror shall submit proof of DoD authorization (e.g., Authority to Operate letter or point of contact for Government Authorizing Official).”

Could the Government please clarify this requirement?

Specifically, is the Government seeking documentation of an existing Authority to Operate (ATO) for each proposed solution, or would a point of contact for the Government Authorizing Official suffice at the time of proposal submission?

In accordance with solicitation provision 52.212-1 additional information, Section I, "DoD-approved" in this context means the vendor solution is authorized for use on DoD networks and systems, which can be demonstrated by providing an ATO or equivalent documentation demonstrating the security posture of the proposed technology, or by providing a point of contact within the DoD organization responsible for authorizing the technology. If the proposed technology is still undergoing the authorization process, please provide the current authorization status and expected completion date. For Sample Task Order 1, in addition to the DoD-approved vendor solution, Offerors shall address how their proposed solution will ensure the website is compliant with all applicable requirements of the Risk Management Framework (RMF), as well as a proposed RMF implementation schedule. For Sample Task Order 2, in addition to the DoD-approved vendor solution, Offerors shall address how their proposed solution will address the structural load of the systems being installed.

Solicitation provision 52.212-1 additional information Section I has been updated to include this clarification.

Solicitation; I. Volume I - Factor 1:

Sample Task Order Proposals; (1) Technical Approach

"(1) Technical Approach" requires that the offeror provides their DoD-approved vendor solution and why it is selected for use for each sample task order. Sample Task Order 1 is for the design, development, testing, and deployment of a solution that does not currently exist.

As it's implied that the solution will be new development, a DoD ATO cannot exist; as the solution itself does not exist. Can the government elaborate on the intention of this requirement?

Is the expectation to provide a plan on how the offeror will achieve an ATO for the solution?"

For Sample Task Order 1, offerors should provide a comprehensive plan outlining how they will achieve an ATO for the newly developed solution. This plan should detail the security engineering processes that will be incorporated into the design and development phases, the planned security controls, the testing and assessment procedures that will be followed, and a realistic timeline for obtaining the ATO. In addition to the DoD-approved vendor solution, Offerors shall address how their proposed solution will ensure the website is compliant with all applicable requirements of the Risk Management Framework (RMF), as well as a proposed RMF implementation schedule. Solicitation provision 52.212-1 additional information Section I has been updated to include this clarification.

Solicitation; I. Volume I - Factor 1:

Sample Task Order Proposals; (1) Technical Approach

"(1) Technical Approach" requires that the offeror provides their DoD-approved vendor solution and why it is selected for use for each sample task order. Sample Task Order 2 is for the installation of a large format print device. Can the government elaborate on the intention of this requirement? Is the expectation that the offeror will provide a plan on how the offeror will achieve a new or modified ATO for the solution as part of device implementation?

For Sample Task Order 2, since the government is furnishing the printer, the contractor is not expected to obtain a new ATO or modify the existing one, unless explicitly required in the sample task order. The contractor should verify the existing ATO, adhere to its stipulations, and document any configuration changes that could impact security. Solicitation Attachment S04 has been updated with this clarification.

2 Attachment S04, 1.2 Task Order Background

Section 1.2 of Attachment S04 indicates that the offeror must ensure the printer meets the required specifications, however, the required specifications are not identified within the document. Is the expectation that the offeror will utilize the vendor-provided specifications for the Ricoh Pro C7210x/sx?

Solicitation Attachment S04 has been updated to clarify the required specifications.

3 Attachment S04, Section 4.0

Can the government please clarify the specific model of the Ricoh Pro C7210 printer that should be assumed for Sample Task Order 2? There are differences between the two models that may affect our approach to maintenance, training, and security requirements. For example, the SX model includes a scanning capability that may require additional security controls versus the X model with only printing capabilities.

While the task order description primarily focuses on printing capabilities, Section 4.0 explicitly states that the government will furnish the Ricoh Pro C7210x/sx. This should be interpreted as the furnished model will have both print and scan capabilities (SX model). Solicitation Attachment S04 has been updated to clarify the printer model.

3 Attachment S03, Section 1.3

The objectives for Sample Task Order 1 include "Development of a fact-checking and referencing system that can verify the accuracy of AI-generated content, including the use of external datasets and knowledge graphs." Can the government please clarify the intention behind this objective. The development of such a system seems beyond the scope of the task order and would likely take longer than the 24-week period of performance.

The objective of developing a fact-checking and referencing system for AI-generated content, as described in Sample Task Order 1, is to deliver a functional system that can be integrated into the challenge website within the 24-week period of performance.

14 RFP, Page 14, Section (g)

Can the government please confirm that the response for Sample Task Order one includes 5 pages for the technical approach plus an additional 5 pages for the PWS for a total of 10 pages?

The 5-page limit per task order proposal is separate from the 5-page limit for the Sample Task Order 1 Performance Work Statement.

3 Section 4.0: Government Furnished Information/Equipment

Section 4.0 identifies the Ricoh Pro C7210x/sx as the large format visual media systems printer. Both devices may include numerous paper handling, finishing, and controller options that increase the physical dimensions of the device and enhance the device's capabilities . Can you government specify if any of these options will be included with the government furnished equipment?

While the task order description primarily focuses on printing capabilities, Section 4.0 explicitly states that the government will furnish the Ricoh Pro C7210x/sx. This should be interpreted as the furnished model will have both print and scan capabilities (SX model). Solicitation Attachment S04 has been updated to clarify the printer model.

078 14 Solicitation, Phase I Instructions – Volume I

Could the Government please clarify if DARPA is seeking vendors to provide only DoD approved solutions for the Sample Task Orders?

In accordance with solicitation provision 52.212-1 additional information, Section I, "DoD-approved" in this context means the vendor solution is authorized for use on DoD networks and systems, which can be demonstrated by providing an ATO or equivalent documentation demonstrating the security posture of the proposed technology, or by providing a point of contact within the DoD organization responsible for authorizing the technology. If the proposed technology is still undergoing the authorization process, please provide the current authorization status and expected completion date. For Sample Task Order 1, in addition to the DoD-approved vendor solution, Offerors shall address how their proposed solution will ensure the website is compliant with all applicable requirements of the Risk Management Framework (RMF), as well as a proposed RMF implementation schedule. For Sample Task Order 2, in addition to the DoD-approved vendor solution, Offerors shall address how their proposed solution will address the structural load of the systems being installed.

Solicitation provision 52.212-1 additional information Section I has been updated to include this clarification.

079 14 Solicitation section I3 Can the government please confirm that the S03 PWS must be submitted, but it will not be evaluated for acceptability?

See solicitation provision FAR 52.212-2 for the evaluation definitions and the Basis for Award section of the solicitation for the basis for award information for Factor 1.

080 16 Solicitation section II Will the government provide a second opportunity for Q&A after the Phase 1 evaluations for those eligible for Phase II.

No, the government does not anticipate a second formal Q&A opportunity after the Phase 1 evaluations.

081 17 Solicitation section V Will the oral presentations be conducted onsite at DARPA? Oral presentations will be conducted virtually.

082 17 Solicitation section V Will the video teleconference oral presentations be allowed? Oral presentations will be conducted virtually.

083 18 Solicitation section VII Do all three (3) past performance reference need to be from the small business prime?

Section VII of solicitation provision 52.212-1 additional information has been updated to clarify past performance examples between proposed prime and subcontractors.

084 18 Solicitation section VII Will the past performance of subcontractor teammates be evaluated the same as the prime's past performance?

Per solicitation provision FAR 52.212-2, Factor 5 will be rated on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis. Factor 5 includes the evaluation of both prime and subcontractor past performance. There will not be separate ratings for prime past performance and subcontractor past performance.

085 18 Solicitation section VII

Can the government better clarify "similar in size to Department of Defense 4th Estate Agencies"? Is the size reference to the number of total supported end users, dollar value spend, or some other criteria?

Offerors proposals shall explain how the past performance examples are similar in size to Department of Defense 4th Estate Agencies. Solicitation provision 52.212-1 additional information has been updated with this clarification.

086 18 Solicitation section VII How will the government evaluate "risk of unsuccessful performance"? See solicitation Basis for Award section for basis for award information for Factor 5.

087 20 Solicitation section bV

In accordance with the final sentence of Factor 5, will the government confirm that offers that do not submit past performance will be rated Acceptable?

Lack of submission of past performance is not the same as an offeror without a record of relevant past performance.