Attachment_3_PPQ_Litigation_Sppt.pdf

Past Performance Questionnaire 2015

Instructions:

The company that has provided this form to you is proposing to submit an offer to a Washington Headquarters Services Acquisition Directorate (WHS AD) solicitation to provide analytical and administrative litigation support services. Past Performance is an extremely important part of the evaluation criteria for this acquisition; therefore, your input is extremely important. The questionnaire should be filled out and emailed to Stephenie Charlot before 31 AUGUST 2015 at:

STEPHENIE.W.CHARLOT.CIV@MAIL.MIL

This information will not be disclosed to the offeror.

If you have any questions, please contact Stephenie Charlot at 703-545-8994.

Company Name & Address:

Contract Number: Period of Performance:

Contract Value: Complexity: Routine Moderate Difficult

Contract Role: Prime Subcontractor Team Member

Description of the Work Performed Under the Contract (Please be specific about tasks performed.)

mailto:STEPHENIE.W.CHARLOT.CIV@MAIL.MIL

Performance Survey:

No Performance Questions E=Excellent G=Good

S=Satisfactory M=Marginal U=Unacceptable N/A= Not Applicable

Ratings (Mark an “X” in the appropriate Selection)

E G S M U N/A

1. If applicable, how did the contractor perform during a transition of task from another firm?

2. General quality of services and support provided during their period of performance?

3. Content, accuracy, and timeliness of technical reports and deliverables?

4.a. Contractor’s ability to identify and correct performance deficiencies in a timely manner?

4.b. Contractor’s ownership of problems and actively working to resolve them?

5. Ability to recruit and retain highly skilled personnel, including ability to fill key vacancies in a timely manner?

6. Ability to handle fluctuating workloads?

7. Communicating schedules, delays, and expectations and interfacing with Government employees?

8. Overall Responsiveness to Government requests?

9. If performance based, how successful was the Contractor in meeting the contract metrics?

10. Overall Contract Performance Rating?

Additional Rater Comments About Contract Performance

Definitions:

Excellent: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Customer's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the customer's benefit.

The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory: Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified or taken satisfactory corrective action.

Unsatisfactory: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery did not occur or is not likely to occur in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective action appear or were ineffective.

Not applicable: Does not apply to the acquisition.

Rater Information Name Title Agency/Company

Phone: Email:

Signature (Digital or Wet)