HQ0013-18-R-0001_-_Att_D__-_PPQ_-_RFP_(1).docx

DOCX document 35 KB Posted

Attached to
New Amendment for Financial Improvement and Audit Readiness (FIAR) and Managers' Internal Control Program (MICP) - HQ001318R0001
Solicitation number
HQ001318R0001
Issued by

About this file

PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE FORM ATTACHMENT D

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
0008.pdf PDF
QA_1210.docx DOCX document
PWS_FIAR_Amendment_0007_(003).docx DOCX document
Appendix_2_Final.docx DOCX document
qa_part_2.docx DOCX document
PWS_FIAR_Amendment_0007.docx DOCX document
Appendix_6_MICP_AUs.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
RFP0007.pdf PDF
Amendment_0006.pdf PDF
HQ0013-18-R-0001_-_Att_1a_-_Task_Area_Chart-Experience_v2.DOCX DOCX document
JUSTIFICATION_AND_APPROVAL_FIAR_CONTRACT_EXTENSION.pdf PDF
HQ0013-18-R-0001_-_Att_c_-_Past_Performance_Description_V1.docx DOCX document
dd0254-Inst.pdf PDF
HQ0013-18-R-0001_-_Att_1a_-_Task_Area_Chart-Experience_v1.DOCX DOCX document
HQ001318R0001_00005v2.pdf PDF
HQ0013-18-R-0001_-_Att_B_-_SB_PP_Format_-_RFP_V1.docx DOCX document
HQ001318R0001_0004.pdf PDF
dd0254.pdf PDF
Att_A__-_Sample_Consent_Letter_-_RFP_V1.docx DOCX document
HQ0013-18-R-0001_-_Att_D__-_PPQ_-_RFP_(V1).docx DOCX document
FIAR_Amendment_0005.pdf PDF
FIAR_Amen_03v1.pdf PDF
FIARA00002(tnt).pdf PDF
dd0254.pdf PDF
dd0254-Inst.pdf PDF
FBO_FIAR_A0002.pdf PDF
HQ0013-18-R-0001_-_Att_1a_-_Task_Area_Chart-Experience_-_RFPv2.DOCX DOCX document
Amend_1.pdf PDF
Att_A__-_Sample_Consent_Letter_-_RFP.docx DOCX document
Appendix_2.pdf PDF
Appendix_3_Expanded_Acronym.pdf PDF
HQ0013-18-R-0001_-_Att_1a_-_Task_Area_Chart-Experience_-_RFP.DOCX DOCX document
HQ0013-18-R-0001_-_Att_c_-_Past_Performance_Description.docx DOCX document
HQ0013-18-R-0001_-_Att_B_-_SB_PP_Format_-_RFP.docx DOCX document
FIAR_Pricing_Summary_(RevTNT).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
PWS_FIAR_Contract_as_of_11_Oct_2018_(v4t).docx DOCX document
Appendix_4.pdf PDF
HQ001318R0001_FIAR.pdf PDF
Appendix_5.pdf PDF
Show all 39

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

SAMPLE QUESTIONNAIRE COVER LETTER

LETTERHEAD

(Date)

PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE FORM

The Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) is soliciting proposals for “Financial Improvement and Audit Readiness (FIAR), Audit Remediation, Financial Data Reconciliation, and Managers’ Internal Control Program (MICP)” services.

One of the considerations in proposal evaluations is the verification of the offerors' past and present performance on contracts, which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. The Government depends on information received from Agencies such as yours, which have had firsthand experience with an offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contract(s).

The areas of interest for the Government are summarized in the questionnaire below. Questionnaires should be completed and returned to the offeror for submission with their proposal. Proposals are due _________ so we kindly ask for your response by ________ so it can be included in the proposal submission.

Please complete Sections II and III of the attached questionnaire of the attached questionnaire. Include your name and title, organizational address, e-mail address, telephone number. Use the rating scale and definitions found in the questionnaire to rate each performance element. Please sign the questionnaire.

The Government encourages comments. The last page may be used if additional space is needed for comments. Clear handwritten responses are sufficient.

Thank you for your time and participation.

Sincerely,

NAME
Title

HQ0013-18-R-0001

ATTACHMENT D

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SECTION I: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION (To be filled out by Offeror)

1. CONTRACTOR’S NAME & ADDRESS:

2. CAGE CODE OF PRIME CONTRACTOR:

3. CONTRACT NUMBER (include task number if applicable):

4. AWARD ENVIRONMENT:

|_| COMPETITIVE |_| NON-COMPETITIVE

5. CONTRACT TYPE:

|_| FIRM FIXED PRICE |_| COST + FEE

|_| FIXED PRICE + FEE |_| LABOR HOUR

|_| COST or COST SHARING |_| TIME & MATERIALS

|_| OTHER ___________________

6. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE (including options):

7. INTIAL CONTRACT VALUE (including options):

8. CURRENT/FINAL CONTRACT VALUE (including options):

9. REASONS FOR DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INITIAL CONTRACT VALUE AND FINAL CONTRACT VALUE:

10. DESCRIPTION OF PRODUCTS/SERVICE PROVIDED:

11. LOCATION SERVICES PROVIDED (local, nationwide, worldwide, etc.):

SECTION II. EVALUATOR AND AGENCY IDENTIFICATION (To be filled out by the Evaluator)

1. AGENCY (CUSTOMER) NAME:

2. EVALUATOR NAME & TITLE:

3. EVALUATOR CONTACT INFORMATION:

TEL NO.:

E-MAIL:

4. NUMBER OF YEARS EVALUATOR WORKED ON SUBJECT CONTRACT:

SECTION III. PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONS/EVALUATION

Adjectival ratings definitions to be used in your response:

EXCEPTIONAL (E) (Blue): During the contract period, contractor performance meets or met contractual requirements and exceeds or exceeded many to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD (VG) (Purple): During the contract period, contractor performance meets or met contractual requirements and exceeds or exceeded some to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective

SATISFACTORY(S) (Green): During the contract period, contractor performance meets or met contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

MARGINAL (M) (Yellow): During the contract period, contractor performance does not or did not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

UNSATISFACTORY (U) (Red): During the contract period, contractor performance does not or did not meet most contractual requirements and recovery in a timely manner is not likely. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

No Knowledge of This Element (NA): No knowledge of this element or does not apply to meeting contractual requirements

SECTION III. PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONS/EVALUATION

PAST PERFORMANCE ELEMENT
RATING
E
VG
S
M
U
NA
1.Contractor demonstrated a thorough understanding of the requirements of the contract/task.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|

Comments:

2.Contractor managed and directed resources (i.e. personnel, subcontractors, equipment, etc.) effectively. Contractor accurately forecasted and met or exceeded program cost, schedule, and performance goals. Contractor invoiced appropriately and in a timely manner.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|

Comments:

3. Contractor recruited, hired, and trained a qualified workforce with the appropriate skill levels to perform the required work.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|

Comments:

4.Contractor retained a qualified workforce with the appropriate skill levels and maintained an appropriate turnover rate. Contractor replaced departing personnel with employees of the same quality and skills with minimal disruption to performance.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|

Comments:

5.Contractor developed and implemented innovative processes and methodologies. Contractor improved efficiencies through innovative processes and approaches.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|

Comments:

6. Contractor anticipated, identified, and resolved problems effectively and in a timely manner. Contractor suggested alternative approaches to unresolved problems. Contractor identified and reduced unanticipated risks.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|

Comments:

7. Contractor provided accurate, complete and high quality performance and deliverables.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|

Comments:

8. Contractor developed realistic schedules and met established schedules and delivery dates.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|

Comments:

9. Contractor was responsive to contract changes. Contractor complied with the terms of the contract.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|

Comments:

10. Contractor cooperated with Government personnel after award.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|

Comments:

11. If the contract required a subcontracting plan, IAW FAR 15.304(c)(3)(ii), Contractor met or exceeded its subcontracting goals.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|

Comments:

12. Contractor provided an innovative solution.
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|

Comments:

RATING

YES
NO
12. Contractor was issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract. If yes, please explain the outcome.
|_|
|_|

Comments:

13. The contractor is rated in Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS).
|_|
|_|
14. I would recommend award to this contractor again.
|_|
|_|

Comments:

OVERALL RATING

|_| EXCEPTIONAL

(E) (Blue)

|_| VERY GOOD

(VG) (Purple)

|_| SATISFACTORY

(S) (Green)

|_| MARGINAL

(M) (Yellow)

|_| UNSATISFACTORY

(U) (Red)

Comments:

EVALUATOR’S SIGNATURE Date

File details come from the government source that posted it.