Annex A1 FINAL Kaz movement along dev continuum _rev4 12 08_.pdf

PDF 23 KB Posted

Attached to
RFP HE176-09-005, QUALITY HEALTH CARE PROJECT FOR CENTRAL ASIA
Solicitation number
HE176-09-005
Issued by

About this file

Attachment 11 Annex A1 KZ

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Amendment 4 to RFP_HE176-09-005.doc DOC document
Amendment RFP_HE176-09-005-03.doc DOC document
ATTACHMENT 16 A Health Systems Approach to Tb Control in Central Asia.doc DOC document
Amendment RFP_HE176-09-005-02.doc DOC document
Amendment RFP_HE176-09-005-01.doc DOC document
Annex V Turkmenistan Indicator Graph.pdf PDF
Annex B FINAL Kyrgyzstan Country Findings _rev 4 16 08_.pdf PDF
Annex D FINAL 2 Turkmenistan Country Findings.pdf PDF
Annex T Country Tables Zdrav to ZdravPlusII KZ.pdf PDF
Annex TCountry Tables Zdrav to ZdravPlusII TK.pdf PDF
Annex V Uzbekistan Indicator Graph.pdf PDF
Annex V Tajikistan Indicator Graph.pdf PDF
Annex B 1 FINAL Kyr Movement along the continuum _rev4 17 08_.pdf PDF
Annex V Kazakhstan E E Indicator Graph.pdf PDF
Final RFP_HE176-09-005.DOC DOC document
Annex P Z II Turkmenistan PMP Report 2007.pdf PDF
Annex P Z II Kazakhstan PMP Report 2007.pdf PDF
Annex P Z II Tajikistan PMP Report 2007.pdf PDF
Annex V Kyrgyz Republic Indicator Graph.pdf PDF
Annex P Z II Uzbekistan PMP Report 2007.pdf PDF
Annex C FINAL 4 Tajikistan Country Findings.pdf PDF
Annex T Country Tables Zdrav to ZdravPlusII UZ.pdf PDF
Annex T Country Tables Zdrav to ZdravPlusII KR.pdf PDF
Annex E FINAL 3 Uzbekistan Country Findings.pdf PDF
Annex T Country Tables Zdrav to ZdravPlusII TJ.pdf PDF
Annex P Z II Kyrgyzstan PMP Report 2007.pdf PDF
Annex A FINAL 2 Kazakhstan Country Findings.pdf PDF
Annex E1 FINAL UZ movement along dev continuum _rev4 12 08_.pdf PDF
Annex D1 FINAL Turk movement along dev continuum _rev 4 12 08_.pdf PDF
Annex C1 FINAL Taj movement along dev continuum _rev4 12 08_.pdf PDF
Draft RFP_HE176-09-005_v2.DOC DOC document
ATTACHMENT 14d_TJ Povetry Reduction strategy.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT 8 - USAIDCAR Results Framework for Health.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT 13 Table of Global Fund grants.doc DOC document
ATTACHMENT 14f_UZ evidence based strategy.doc DOC document
ATTACHMENT 14a_KZ strategy.doc DOC document
ATTACHMENT 17 List of Continuous Quality Improvement sites suport by USAID CAR.doc DOC document
ATTACHMENT 15 IEE Health.doc DOC document
ATTACHMENT 14b_ MCH strategy.doc DOC document
ATTACHMENT 11 ZdravPlusII Mid-Term Evaluation Report.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT 12 USAID supported activities and contact info.xls XLS spreadsheet
ATTACHMENT 9 Analysis of status of Infection Prevention and Control —
ATTACHMENT 14g_UZ strategy.doc DOC document
ATTACHMENT 14e_UZ CME startegy.doc DOC document
Draft RFP_HE176-09-005.DOC DOC document
ATTACHMENT 14c_TJ NDS strategy.pdf PDF
Show all 46

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Annex A1: Kazakhstan: Expectations of Movement Along the Development Continuum over the Next Two Years

Kazakhstan’s status as an upper-middle income country places it in the Sustaining Partnership Countries category of the U.S. Foreign Assistance Strategic Framework.

However, it falls into the Developing Countries category judging by the assistance profile for the Investing in People (IIP) program area; namely, “Encourage social policies that deepen the ability of institutions to establish appropriate roles for the public and private sector in service delivery.” The changes expected in the health sector over the next two years will not have an impact on the country’s movement along the continuum from the “Developing” to “Transforming Country” category. Kazakhstan may achieve Transforming Country status over the next seven years in terms of the IIP assistance profile but is unlikely to reach Sustaining Partnership status.

Kazakhstan ranks 25 of 28 countries (higher number rankings are worse cases) in the 2007 Europe and Eurasia Health Vulnerability Analysis. See the report at:

http://www.usaid.gov/locations/europe_eurasia/dem_gov/docs/2007_ee_health_vulnerabi lity_analysis_report_final.pdf

The analysis identifies those countries in the region where health status is the poorest and where the transition to democracy and free-market economies may be most vulnerable because of health factors. The graph below draws on this data to compare Kazakhstan’s health status to European Union and E&E regional averages. For each indicator, a score of 10 corresponds with the EU average, suggesting ideal performance. A score of 1 indicates the poorest performance in that indicator in the E&E region. The country’s performance is then plotted against this scale. A score of 10 is ideal performance for all indicators and all countries.

Kazakhstan

Life Expectancy

Adult Mortality

Under-5 Mortality

Public Health Expenditure

TB incidence

HIV incidence

Kazakhstan Northern Tier EU25 Mean

Northern Tier refers to the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia, and Slovenia.

Kazakhstan is far from approaching the levels of health sector development achieved by counties in northern Europe and the EU25. It appears that Kazakhstan scores better than the EU average on HIV incidence. Since the number of confirmed HIV cases is highly dependant on the surveillance program in the country, HIV scores may be deceptively optimistic.

The graphic below shows Kazakhstan’s performance on several key health systems development indicators relative to: (1) averages for Europe and Eurasia and other geographic regions, and ( 2) averages for country categories of the USG Foreign Assistance Framework. Indicators reflecting the extent of corruption and public expenditures for health put Kazakhstan into the Developing Country category. However, given Kazakhstan’s increasing public expenditures in recent years, by this measure now it likely falls into the Transforming Country category. Out of pocket expenditures are very high relative to countries elsewhere in the region, and more characteristic of the Rebuilding Country category. It is not clear the extent to which these reflect formal payments by those with the ability to pay as opposed to informal payments by those for which these payments impose a heavy financial burden. Nurses per 100,000 are high, putting Kazakhstan in the Sustaining Country category. However, this is misleading as nurses receive low salaries and most require training to upgrade their skills. Access to essential drugs is high, reaching levels of the Transforming Country category.

Source: U.S. Agency for International Development, Bureau for Global Health; most data is 2006.

1—Corruption Index

2—Public Expenditures on Health as % of GDP

4—Nurses per 100,000

5—% of Population with Access to Essential Drugs

3—Out of Pocket Expenditures

0 2 4 6 8

95% Conf. Intervals Rebuilding Developing Transforming Sustaining

200 400 600 800

0 25 50 75 100

.4.20

.8

2 3 4 5

.6

LAC

ANE

E&E

E&E

AFR LAC

AFR

ANE

E&E

AFR

LAC ANE

E&E LAC

AFR

ANE

E&E

LAC

AFR

worst worst worst worst best best best best

ANE

Country=

Regional Mean=

Developing: Kazakhstan Health Systems Indicators

The GOK is increasing budgetary allocations to health annually and just contributed $178.4 million to a $296.1 million loan agreement with the World Bank. Nonetheless, Kazakhstan’s ongoing health sector development requires technical assistance, in addition to money, so it can use these increases in resources efficiently and equitably.

The GOK is also demonstrating its commitment to health reform by implementing the State Health Care Development Program designed with ZdravPlus II technical assistance.

As evidenced by interviews with GOK officials and health workers, much remains to be done to continue the reform momentum, including passage of additional key legislation and wider implementation of the reforms nationwide.

Given Kazakhstan’s oil revenues and increasing per capita income, it is unlikely USAID can justify continuing its health assistance program beyond FY 2009 using traditional funding accounts. However, ongoing TA remains critical to sustaining and expanding the reforms to achieve a “critical mass” when USAID assistance is no longer required.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .