25QE034_0001_040825.pdf

R

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBE

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

Description/Specifications/Statement of Work

The Requirements text has been modified to:

DoDEA requires digital resources for each grade 9-12 that is aligned to the Common Core State Standards, which DoDEA refers to as its College and Career Ready Standards. DoDEA also requires related product training, virtual professional learning, and industry-standard technical support in accordance with the PWS.

Contract Clauses

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

IDIQ MIN AND MAX

MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM QUANTITIES

(a) As referred to in paragraph (b) of FAR Clause 52.216-22, "Indefinite Quantity" of this contract, the contract minimum guaranteed to the Offeror is a total of $10,000. The maximum quantity is the total quantity for all items combined as set forth in the schedule.

(End of Min & Max)

Clauses Incorporated by Reference

252.215-7008 Only One Offer (DEC 2022)

Additional Information/Notes

The following clauses were modified:

52.216-19Order Limitations.Oct 1995 hereby reads as follows:

As prescribed in , insert a clause substantially the same as follows:16.506(b)

Order Limitations (Oct 1995)

. When the Government requires supplies or services covered by this contract in an amount of less than , the Government is (a) Minimum order 1 unit not obligated to purchase, nor is the Contractor obligated to furnish, those supplies or services under the contract.

. The Contractor is not obligated to honor-(b) Maximum order

Any order for a single item in excess of ;(1) TBD

Any order for a combination of items in excess of ; or(2) TBD

A series of orders from the same ordering office within days that together call for quantities exceeding the limitation in paragraph (b)(1) or (2) of (3) 5 this section.

HE125425QE0340001

If this is a requirements contract ( includes the Requirements clause at subsection 52.216-21 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)), the (c) i.e., Government is not required to order a part of any one requirement from the Contractor if that requirement exceeds the maximum-order limitations in paragraph (b) of this section.

Notwithstanding paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, the Contractor shall honor any order exceeding the maximum order limitations in (d) paragraph (b), unless that order (or orders) is returned to the ordering office within days after issuance, with written notice stating the Contractor's 10 intent not to ship the item (or items) called for and the reasons. Upon receiving this notice, the Government may acquire the supplies or services from another source.

(End of clause)

Evaluation Factors for Award

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

52.212-2 ADDENDUM - EVALUATION - COMMERCIAL ITEMS (DEC 2006)

1. QUOTE EVALUATION:

The Government anticipates issuing one Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP), Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract resulting from this solicitation to the vendor whose quote provides the best value to the Government in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 12 (Acquisition of Commercial Products and Commercial Services) and FAR Part 13 (Simplified Acquisition Procedures). To make the award decision, the government will consider three evaluation factors: (1) Technical Approach, (2) Past Performance, and (3) Price.

Note: Section 508 Acceptance:

1. Prior to acceptance, the government reserves the right to perform testing on required ICT items to validate the vendor's Section 508 conformance claims. If the government determines that Section 508 conformance claims provided by the vendor represent a higher level of conformance than what is actually provided to the agency, the government shall, at its option, require the vendor to remediate the item to align with the vendor's original Section 508 conformance claims prior to acceptance.

2. Vendors may be ineligible for contract award if proposed ICT products or services are not compliant with Section 508 standards.

2. EVALUATION CRITERIA

Basis for Award: A FFP, Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) award will be made on a competitive best value basis. Evaluations will be conducted in accordance with the evaluation criteria below:

I. Factor 1 - Technical Approach

a. Subfactors 1 & 2, Pass/Fail

The subfactors below will be evaluated on a pass/fail basis to determine if the vendor's quote meets the requirements stated below.

Subfactor 1: Alignment to Standards, PWS 2.1

Pass: Offeror self-certifies that its instructional resources are aligned to the required standards.

Offeror does not self-certify to the statement above.Fail:

Subfactor 2: Copyright Dates, PWS 3.6

Pass: Offeror self-certifies that its instructional resources meet the copyright date requirements.

Offeror does not self-certify to the statement above.Fail:

Note: The Government will validate that the instructional resources are aligned to the required standards and meet the copyright date requirements. If it is found not to be so, we reserve the right to reject the quote in its entirety or enter discussions.

b. Subfactors 3-6, Adjectival Rating

The subfactors below will be evaluated to the degree in which the vendors quote meet or exceeds the requirements stated below.

Subfactor 3: Student Bundles, PWS 2.1: To what extent do the Offeror's proposal and proposed resources provide evidence that it can meet this requirement?

: To what extent do the Offeror's proposal and proposed resources Subfactor 4: Teacher Bundles, PWS 2.2 provide evidence that it can meet this requirement?

: To what extent do the Offeror's proposal and samples of product Subfactor 5: Assessment Suites, PWS 2.3 training and professional learning provide evidence that it can meet the face-to-face and virtual professional learning requirements?

: To what extent do the Offeror's proposal Subfactor 6: Product Training and Professional Learning, PWS 2.4 and proposed resources provide evidence that it can operate and maintain the required website and effectively handle the social media requirements?

Table 1: Factor 1 Technical Approach (Subfactors 3 through 6)

Rating Rating Standard

Exceeding

The vendor's quote exceeds the solicitation requirements.

Acceptable

The vendor's quote clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable The vendor's quote does not meet the minimum requirement of the solicitation. Quote is un-awardable.

II. Evaluation Factor 2 - Past Performance

A vendor's Past Performance will be evaluated as "Good" "Acceptable"," Unacceptable" or "Unknown/Neutral" (see table 3 below). The past performance evaluation will assess the vendor's probability of meeting the minimum solicitation requirements. Vendors quote shall include at least 3 and no more than 5 references of relevant past performance references and will be assigned one of the previously mentioned ratings. The assessment will be based on the vendor's record of relevant and recent past performance information. In addition to past performance, the Government may also consider information obtained through other sources such as the Contractor Performance Assessment System (CPARS) https://cpars.gov, System Award Management (SAM) https://SAM.gov, Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), other databases, and interviews with Program Managers, Contracting Officer Representatives, Contract Specialists, and Contracting officers.

Relevant performance includes efforts of the same or similar in size and scope that this solicitation requires; vendors should include specific examples, of relevance, if appropriate. These include efforts where the Vendor provided material similar to those outlined in the PWS. Recent efforts are defined as those efforts, which have been performed during any portion of the last five years, including those efforts currently being performed.

The Government will consider the collective record of all recent and relevant past performance in assessing a rating. In the case of a vendor without a record of past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance can be reasonably assigned, the vendor may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance therefore, the vendor shall be determined to have unknown (or "neutral") past performance.

Table 2: Factor 2-Past Performance Rating Table

Rating

Description

Good

Based on the vendor's recent and relevant present and past performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the vendor will successfully perform the required effort.

Acceptab le

Based on the vendor's recent and relevant present and past performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the vendor will successfully perform the required effort.

Unaccept able

Based on the vendor's recent and relevant present and past performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the vendor will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Unknown /Neutral

No recent and relevant present and past performance record is available or is so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned.

III. Evaluation Factor 3 - Price

Price will be evaluated separately from technical and past performance factors. Vendor's total quoted price will be evaluated for fair and reasonable pricing in accordance with FAR 13.106-3. This effort will be awarded as an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity contract and includes estimated quantities (reference PWS and Pricing Sheet). The quantities identified in the Pricing Sheet are estimated and represents the Government's best estimate for each line item.

Payment will be for actual quantities procured and delivered at the prices outlined in each Delivery Order. If the Government's requirements do not result in the quantities estimated; such event shall not constitute the basis for an equitable price adjustment under the contract.

4800 MARK CENTER DRIVE, ATTN: SUITE 05E08

ALEXANDRIA, VA 22350-1400

UNITED STATES

ANDREW JOHNSTON, Email: andrew.johnston@dodea.edu Telephone: 571-372-1474 AdminBy:

SCD: PAS: