24Q2000_SOL_Attachment_3_Volume II Past Perf.docx

CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (CUI)

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

FACTOR 2: PAST PERFORMANCE VOLUME II

Pacific East, Japan On-Board Surveillance System (OBVSS)

N/CAGE Code:

Unique Entity ID:

Email Address:

Point of Contact Number:

Company Name:

Address:

Phone Number:

Point of Contact:

Attachment 3

HE1254Q2000

Volume II – Past Performance

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION-SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (CUI)

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

Past Performance Volume Instructions

Failure to submit a Past Performance Proposal (Attachment 3) will result in noncompliance. In the event the Offeror does not have any past performance record, the Offeror shall still submit a Past Performance proposal with a statement that past performance is unavailable.

The Offeror shall submit at a minimum of one (1) recent past performance for the prime and one (1) for the subcontractors/teaming contractor (performing as the Prime on that effort) to determine the recency, relevancy, and quality of the Offeror’s performance. To be recent, the effort much be on-going or must have been completed within the last three (3) years by the closing date/time of this solicitation. To be relevant, the Offeror must demonstrate that performance that performance involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires. The relevancy analysis will focus on if the Offeror has provided bus transportation services similar in scope, magnitude of effort and complexities as follows:

Scope: Refers to the type of work performed in the Offeror’s past performance reference when compared to the type of work required in this solicitation. The type of work required is for student transportation services.

Magnitude of Effort: Refers to the size (e.g., currency/dollar amount, personnel, vehicles) of an Offeror’s past performance reference. The Offeror’s past performance reference will be compared to the Government’s estimated amount to perform the work required in the PWS.

Complexity: Refers to the level of complication of an Offeror’s past performance reference. The level of complexity will be compared to the Government’s estimated complexity level. The following factors will be considered for each past performance reference to determine whether each reference is similar in complexity.

1. Maintaining, installing, and removal equipment in accordance with the PWS.

2. Providing timely and accurate reports and other contract deliverables.

3. Effectively communicating with all stakeholders. Communicating issues as necessary to ensure all stakeholders were informed.

The Contractor shall follow the format shown in the next page when submitting Volume II – Past Performance.

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

Volume II – Past Performance Information

The Offeror, shall at a minimum, submit the following for each past performance reference. Do not change the format. Complete and address all areas below:

Reference Information:

Brief Description of Effort Please provide a brief description of the past performance reference to include the services provided.

Past Performance Relevancy Factors In this section, please indicate how the past performance reference is relevant in scope, magnitude of effort and complexity based on the definitions provided to you in this document and under Factor 2: Past Performance in the solicitation. Please feel free to use additional pages (but not exceeding the page limit) if more than one past performance reference is used.

Scope: Please describe how your past performance reference is relevant in scope.

Magnitude of Effort: Please describe how your past performance reference is relevant in magnitude of effort (e.g. include number of buses/vehicles cameras were installed, number of personnel (safety attendants, safety aides, contract managers).

Complexity: Please describe how your past performance reference is relevant in complexity.