SOL_ATCH 4_PP FORM.docx
DOCX document 16 KB Posted
- Attached to
- DoDIG Electronic Work Paper Solution (EWPS) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- HE125421R9001
- Issued by
- Department of Defense Education Activity
About this file
This document contains a past performance inquiry form and information on a related federal contract opportunity for an Electronic Work Paper Solution. The past performance inquiry form requests ratings from references on a company's technical capability, on-site management, integrity, ability to meet schedules, work quality, performance problems if any, recommendation for future awards, and overall customer satisfaction.
The related federal contract opportunity is a pre-solicitation notice from the Department of Defense Education Activity seeking an Electronic Work Paper Solution. The synopsis provides additional details on the required solution. Offerors would need to review the full solicitation for complete information on proposal submission requirements, evaluation factors, and anticipated award timing.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| EWPS Amendment 3 Conformed HE125421R9001.pdf | ||
| EWPS Amendment 3 HE125421R9001.pdf | ||
| SOL_ATCH 2_GPAT0729.pdf | ||
| AMD 2 21R9001 GPAT Form.pdf | ||
| AMD 1 Conformed 21R9001.pdf | ||
| AMD 1 21R9001.pdf | ||
| Amendment 1 Questions and Answers 21R9001.pdf | ||
| SOL_ATCH 2_GPAT.pdf | ||
| SOL_HE125421R9001.pdf | ||
| SOL_ATCH 5_PRICING TEMPLATE.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| SOL_ATCH 3_SVC ADDEND.docx | DOCX document | |
| EWPS Updated Synopsis 6.15.2021.pdf |
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 4
PAST PERFORMANCE INQUIRY
RFP: HE125421R9001 Electronic Work Paper Solution (EWPS)
Name of Company you are providing information on:
Reference’s Name:
Reference’s Organization:
Email Address: Phone:
Position held or function in relation to the Company’s project or contract:
Ratings: Please evaluate the Contractor’s performance using the following rating:
Acceptable (A) The Contractor met this requirement.
Unacceptable (U) The Contractor was poor and/or did not satisfy this requirement.
1. The Contractor’s technical capability to perform the project or contracted work:
RATING:
2. The Contractor’s on-site management and coordination of work requirements:
RATING:
3. The Contractor’s cooperative nature, integrity and reasonableness:
RATING:
4. The Contractor’s ability to meet performance schedules:
RATING:
5. The Contractor’s quality of work:
RATING:
6. What type of performance problems did this Contractor have, if any, during your contract?
RATING:
7. Would you award another contract to this Contractor or recommend them for a contract? If no, please state reason(s).
COMMENT:
8. Were you, as the customer, satisfied with this Contractor’s overall performance?
COMMENT:
9. Please provide any additional favorable or unfavorable comments regarding this Contractor.
COMMENT:
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 and 3.104
SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .