Amendment_4_-French_Curriculum__5-31-13.docx
DOCX document 28 KB Posted
- Attached to
- French Curriculum Requirement Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- HE125420130260053
- Issued by
- Department of Defense Education Activity
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment_11-French_Curriculum_2-12-14.docx | DOCX document | |
| Amendment_10_-French_Curriculum_1-30-14.doc | DOC document | |
| Amendment_9_-French_Curriculum__12-17-13.docx | DOCX document | |
| Amendment_8_-French_Curriculum__11-25-13.docx | DOCX document | |
| Amendment_7_-French_Curriculum__11-8-13.docx | DOCX document | |
| Amendment_6_-French_Curriculum__10-18-13.docx | DOCX document | |
| Amendment_5_-French_Curriculum__7-2-13.docx | DOCX document | |
| Amendment_3_-French_Curriculum__3-21-13.docx | DOCX document | |
| Amendment_2_-French_Curriculum__3-15-13.docx | DOCX document | |
| Amendment_1_-_French_Curriculum_HE125420130260053.docx | DOCX document | |
| HE125420130260053_French_Curriculum_RFQ.doc | DOC document |
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
AMENDMENT 4
May 31, 2013
DoDEA hereby issues Amendment 4 to the following DoDEA French Curriculum request for quote (RFQ).
a. Updated or revised IT submissions closing date to 11 October 2013 at 11:00 A.M. EST (VENDOR SHALL PROVIDE IT SUBMISSIONS ONLY IF ORIGINAL SUBMISSION HAS BEEN REVISED, CHANGED or NEVER SUBMITTED.)
b. Revise Past Performance Survey closing date to 14 November 2013 at 11:00 A.M. EST.
(Refer to Attachments)
c. Revise the RFQ closing date to 14 November 2013 at 11:00 A.M. EST.
Summary of Important Revised Due Dates:
| Item |
| Revised or Updated IT Submissions** |
| Past Performance Surveys |
| Offers and Materials Submission (RFQ) & Past Performance References |
| Due Dates |
| 11 October 2013 |
11:00 A.M. EST
14 November 2013
11:00 A.M. EST
14 November 2013
11:00 A.M. EST
| To |
| Tracey Wilder |
4800 Mark Center Drive Suite 05F09-05 Attn: Procurement Alexandria, VA 22350-1400 Tracey.wilder@hq.dodea.edu
DDESS Area Service Center ATTN: Procurement Division (Debra Markart) 700 Westpark Drive Peachtree City, GA 30269-1498
** Vendors, if you previously submitted your IT submissions to DoDEA and there have been no changes or updates since the original submission, do NOT re-submit your IT submissions.
Attachment 1:
Past Performance Part 1 - RFQ: HE125420130260053 – French Curriculum Information To Be Completed by Offeror Provide a Minimum of Three References
Name of Agency/Command/Company Contracting Activity:
Contract number:
Contract type:
Total contract value (Include exercised an unexercised options) At time of award: $ Currently (or at completion): $
Period of performance or delivery schedule (Include exercised an unexercised options) At time of award:
Currently (or at completion):
Brief description or title of contract requirements. Use space as needed, but do not exceed one typewritten page per contract.
Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) Use current name as point of contact for on-going contracts or the last individual’s name for completed contracts.
Name:
Telephone number:
Facsimile number:
E-mail address:
Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) Name:
Telephone number:
Facsimile number:
E-mail address:
Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO):
Name:
Telephone number:
Facsimile number:
E-mail address:
Brief description of any problems encountered and corrective actions taken to resolve those problems. Use space as needed, but do not exceed one typewritten page per contract.
Attachment 2:
Past Performance - Part 2 (Respondent Information) - RFQ: HE125420130260053 – French Curriculum.
Submit completed information to DoDEA Contract Specialist – Tracey Wilder at tracey.wilder@hq.dodea.edu NLT November 14, 2013 by 11:00 AM EST.
REFERENCE INQUIRY
Name of Company Reference is for (Vendor):_______________________________________________
1. Reference Provided By (Customer)
2. Most recent or relevant Project Title(s): ______________________________________________
3. Contract Number (if known):
4. Key Point of Contact for Project:
5. Key Point of Contact Phone No.:
6. Did the Key Contact work directly on the contract referenced? Yes [ ] No [ ]
7. Contract period: From to
8. Brief Description of Work Performed:
9. Quality of Work Performed and Products Delivered:
10. Degree of Cooperation by Contractor and Your Organization.
(a) How well overall did the Contractor work with the Contracting Organization?
| (b) | How well did the key personnel and Contractor’s staff work with COTR and |
| Contracting Organization’s staff? |
11. Timeliness of Contract Work.
(a) Was work completed on time?
(b) Were there any unresolved problems during performance or afterwards? _______
| 12. | Effectiveness of Cost Controls (For Cost Reimbursement Contracts Only). | |
| (a) | Was the project completed within budget? | |
| (b) | Were costs properly controlled? ______________________________________ |
13. Would you recommend the Contractor? Yes No If no explain why
Rating_________ (Rate the past performance as Excellent, Satisfactory or Unsatisfactory) Supporting Comments
Common DoD Assessment Rating System
Excellent (E) - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Satisfactory (S) - Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Unsatisfactory (U) - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .