Amendment 8 -.pdf
PDF 283 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- HDTRA1-20-S-0002
- Issued by
-
Defense Threat Reduction Agency
About this file
This Broad Agency Announcement from the Defense Threat Reduction Agency solicits research proposals to inform strategic analysis of emerging threats through 2030. The agency seeks studies, strategic dialogues, and tabletop exercises under four thrust areas: competition with revisionist powers; assessing and countering weapons of mass destruction threats; Track 1.5 and 2 dialogues with partners; and exercises simulating future conflicts. Proposals are due on a rolling basis with priority deadlines of January 5th, 12th, and 19th, 2021 for the first three thrust areas and exercises respectively. Awards will be contracts of up to three years for recurring dialogues or exercises. Required deliverables include monthly progress and financial reports as well as briefing materials, a final report, and dissemination of findings.
View the file
Other files
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY
BROAD AGENCY ANNOUNCEMENT
AMENDMENT 08
HDTRA1-20-S-0002
As DTRA SI-STT’s focus and priorities have evolved for this Broad Area Announcement (BAA), we have made the following changes to the BAA and Attachments to reflect the current areas of interest. Please see the referenced sections and note the changes for white paper and proposal submissions.
SI-STT will hold a virtual Research Topic Information Session (RTIS) for interested participants on November 17, 2020, from 8:00 AM to 11:15 AM EST. To register for the RTIS, please email:
dtra.belvoir.si.mbx.hdtra1-stri-adm@mail.mil. In the registration email (Subject: STRI RTIS Registration), please include the participant’s full name, title, organization, and email address. On or before November 15, SI-STT will send a link to the virtual session on the Blackboard Collaborate platform. Questions should also be directed to the above email.
I. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION:
1. Statement of Objective/Need: (page 2) has been modified as follows:
The Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) Strategic Integration Directorate, Strategic Trends and Effects Department, Strategic Trends Division (SI-STT) has the responsibility to generate timely, credible, and actionable insights into emerging threats within the counter weapons of mass destruction (CWMD) and counter improvised threats (CIT) network mission spaces to enable and guide warfighter understanding of the range of military operations in Great Power Competition. One of mailto:dtra.belvoir.si.mbx.hdtra1-stri-adm@mail.mil its primary responsibilities is to characterize the 2026 to 2031 battlespace. This requires sponsoring research, through the Strategic Trends Research Initiative (STRI), that aligns with the priorities outlined in the 2018 National Defense Strategy (NDS) and specifically addresses DTRA’s needs – and by extension the needs of the Combatant Commands (CCMDs) and other US Department of Defense (DoD) elements it supports. To that end, SI-STT must partner with a diverse set of experts in the field to deliver a continuous stream of operationally relevant research and analysis to create reservoirs of readily aggregated information, as well as finished analytic products, that provide insight into the future battlespace and threat environment. The analytic products will offer actionable recommendations that can inform future U.S.
operations, activities, and investments, especially those that are most pertinent to the DTRA mission space.
The Five (5) Focus Areas (page 3) have been modified to Three (3) Focus Areas as follows:
• Identify the utility of deeper, more meaningful relationships with existing allies, partners, and establish new relationships with non-traditional partners as a mechanism to compete against key strategic competitors;
• Understand the implications of emerging capabilities, with specific emphasis on those developed or used by key competitors and potential adversaries, on the United States’ ability to maintain operational advantage and project power in order to generate insights and develop recommendations that can inform future U.S. operations, activities, and investments; and/or
• Identify emerging WMD threats of concern for the future battlespace, methodologies to assess and counter them, and consider implications for future U.S. operations, activities, and investments.
The Seven (7) Thrust Areas Outlined for FY 2020 (page 3) have been changed (e.g.
collapsed, eliminated, or further elaborated) to the following Four (4) Thrust Areas for FY2021:
• Thrust Area 1: Studies Focused on Competition with Revisionist Powers
SI-STT is seeking studies that provide insight into key competitors’ strategies, emerging (including novel and non-traditional) capabilities, and consideration of potential implications for the United States’ ability to maintain its operational advantage and project power in the 2026 to 2031 timeframe. Of particular interest are those studies that:
Explore and analyze how these revisionist powers might exploit advances in technology to intensify surprise, increase the lethality and operational relevance of their existing strategic and conventional capabilities; alter warfighting and escalation dynamics; or negate or overmatch current U.S. technological superiority in order to generate insights and develop recommendations that can inform future operations, activities, and investments in the counter WMD realm.
Examine the role alliance structures play in shifting the balance of power in key strategic regions.
Explore the potential role, viability, and utility of specific risk reduction tools
(including, but not limited to, international arms control regimes) in the 2026 to 2031 threat environment.
Consider, provide, or develop statistical, analytic, and structural models that reveal dynamics of the interactions between developments in science, technology, and the ability of potential adversaries to project power.
• Thrust Area 2: Studies Focused on Assessing and Countering Emerging WMD-
Related Threats
SI-STT is seeking studies that provide insight into emerging threats that characterize the future battlespace in order to generate insights and develop recommendations that inform future U.S. operations, activities, and investments to counter NDS priority actors. It is especially interested in studies that:
Provide methodologies for assessing and quantifying emerging threats in WMD and related realms.
Provide insight into the most effective tools, techniques, and procedures to counter emerging WMD-related threats from revisionist powers, rogue regimes, or violent extremist organizations.
Explore novel forecasting and predictive modeling techniques to better understand WMD-related emerging threats.
Incorporate simulation-based analysis to measure risk and identify vulnerabilities associated with emerging WMD-related threats.
Assess how competitors and other current and potential adversaries’ structures and networks can be used to facilitate, develop, and use chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear weapons (whether purpose-built or improvised) in order to identify opportunities to counter the development of these weapons and use (or threats of use) on the battlefield.
• Thrust Area 3: Track 1.5 and Track 2* Strategic Dialogues with Allies, Partners, and Non-Traditional Partners
SI-STT is seeking Track 1.5 and Track 2 Strategic Dialogues that provide a venue and engagement framework for structured, but informal discussions among subject matter experts, held under the “Chatham House Rule,” that can help the United States develop deeper, more meaningful relationships with existing allies and partners and/or establish new relationships with non-traditional partners as a mechanism to compete against revisionist powers especially in key strategic regions, including, but not limited to, the Indo-Pacific. The dialogues should address issues that fall within DTRA’s purview such as countering WMD, deterrence, counter/non-proliferation efforts, risk reduction, strategic security, etc.
While SI-STT is interested in bilateral dialogues, it is also interested in unique trilateral or quadrilateral dialogues that allow for discussion among allies and/or partners with overlapping interests and concerns. It is especially interested in those dialogues that have the potential to build from year to year, advancing the discussion on important strategic issues.
*Track 1.5 and Track 2 dialogues are unofficial, bilateral or multilateral meetings that provide an opportunity for American experts to discuss important, and sometimes sensitive, strategic issues with their foreign counterparts in a private, open environment, outside of official diplomatic channels (Track 1). Track 2 dialogues involve non-governmental expert representatives, to include former government officials. Current government officials do not participate. Track 1.5 dialogues involve a mix of government officials - who participate in an unofficial capacity - and non-governmental experts. Both Track 1.5 and Track 2 strategic dialogues involve dialogue lead(s) identifying research questions ahead of the meetings and conducting preliminary research as required to inform the development of the dialogue meeting’s agenda. The meeting participants will provide answers to those questions with their presentations and comments during the discussion sessions, which serve as the basis for analytic reports that are provided to SI-STT at the end of the period of performance.
• Thrust Area 4: Tabletop Exercises (TTXs) Focused on Competition with
Revisionist Powers
SI-STT is seeking TTXs that provide an experiential learning platform to strengthen the DTRA workforce’s ability to: understand the multi-faceted and complex challenges facing the Joint Force; recognize requirements that may be placed on a Combatant Command in a crisis or conflict situation; and anticipate opportunities for DTRA to support. Challenges to address could include revisionist powers’ strategies, operational concepts, and emerging capabilities;
and the intersection between WMD and other threat domains. Each exercise should draw important insights and implications for the United States’ ability to maintain its operational military advantages and should incorporate a focus on the DTRA mission space.
II AWARD INFORMATION:
2. Anticipated Number of Awards: Has been changed to the following:
There is no set limit to the number of proposals an institution or organization can submit under this BAA; however, the level of effort for each key personnel should not reasonably exceed one (1) annual full time equivalent (FTE). Each Thrust Area proposal must be submitted under the corresponding email address provided in the Agency Contacts section of this BAA. The amount and period of performance (PoP) of each selected proposal may vary depending on the research area and the technical approach pursued by the selected Offeror.
Given the need for timely research, in most but not all cases, the PoP of the awards shall not exceed twelve (12) months from the effective date of award. The preferred PoP for studies is no more than nine (9) months to maximize opportunities for operational relevance. While the PoP for each iteration of a strategic dialogue or a tabletop exercise should not exceed twelve (12) months, in order to ensure year by year advancement of the dialogues and TTXs, as well as to maximize efficiencies, DTRA will consider up to three option periods (for a total of three years) for dialogue and TTX research efforts.
Offerors shall reference potential options in their white papers and proposals.
3. Anticipated Award Type: Has been changed to the following:
a. The Government anticipates awarding contracts under this BAA. Contracts require successful offerors to have an accounting system considered adequate for tracking costs. The contracts shall adhere to the requirements of the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) and Defense Federal Acquisition Regulations Supplement (DFAR).
b. Unless specifically indicated, cost sharing is permitted and encouraged, but not required; however, the Government may not accept volunteer services and all contributions to the Federal award must be recognized as either Government or Non-Federal Entity (NFE) share.
4. Anticipated Award Period: Has been changed to the following:
a. This announcement will remain open until replaced by a successor BAA or until it is cancelled. White papers and proposal are reviewed and evaluated as they are received, in accordance with specified review periods, and may be submitted at any time.
b. The next review period will begin on January 5, 2021. For priority FY 2021 funding consideration, please submit:
Thrusts 1 and 2 submitted by January 5, 2021.
Thrusts 3 submitted by January 12, 2021.
Thrust 4 submitted by January 19, 2021.
Please refer to the evaluation criteria listed in the BAA.
IV. PHASE 1 – WHITE PAPER SUBMISSION INFORMATION: Has been changed to the following:
Offerors will submit the complete White Paper package to the corresponding Thrust Area email address for review/evaluation. No individual file shall exceed 10 MB of storage space.
• Cover Page: The Cover Page shall be titled “WHITE PAPER” and include the following:
BAA number HDTRA1-20-S-0002;
Research opportunity “Strategic Trends Research Initiative (STRI)”;
Title of White paper that is descriptive of the research to be conducted and Thrust
Area;
Estimated cost of proposed effort;
Proposed period of performance (list number of months, not start and end dates);
Technical Point of Contact (name, address, phone/fax, email address);
Administrative/Business Point of Contact (name, address, phone/fax, email address);
Institution’s full address and institution type;
Data Universal Number System (DUNS);
Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN);
North American Industry Classification System (NAICS);
Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) Code;
Signature and name of an authorized officer at the Offeror’s institution; and Marked as “Procurement Sensitive”.
• Technical Concept: Submission is limited to 3-5 pages summarizing the following:
Research gap or challenge that needs to be addressed;
The objective of the research;
The research plan (technical approach);
o White papers for dialogue projects shall include possible agenda topics and participant categories in the discussion of the research plan.
Benefit of the research for SI-STT (describe the alignment of the research topic to the STRI Objective and SI-STT Mission and the potential for an operationally relevant output); and
The Offeror’s knowledge, capabilities, and experience to conduct the research.
This submission must be on 8 ½ x11 inch sized paper, single-spaced, with one-inch margins in type not smaller than Times New Roman, 12 point font.
• Cost Estimate: Cost information shall include a realistic cost summary, not to exceed one (1) page, showing requested funding across all major categories (e.g. labor, travel, other direct costs, and indirect costs).
VIII. AGENCY CONTACTS: Has been modified as follows:
The specific contact point for each Thrust Area is listed below. Please submit the white papers and proposals to the corresponding Thrust Area. Please do not submit the same white paper to multiple Thrust Areas. All questions regarding administrative content shall be submitted in writing by email to Admin. Correspondence & Questions (dtra.belvoir.si.mbx.hdtra1-stri-adm@mail.mil). DTRA will not release employee personal contact information.
Thrust Area 1: Studies Focused on Competition With Revisionist Powers dtra.belvoir.si.mbx.hdtra1-stri-ta1@mail.mil
Thrust Area 2: Studies Focused on Assessing and Countering Emerging WMD-Related Threats dtra.belvoir.si.mbx.hdtra1-stri-ta2@mail.mil
Thrust Area 3: Track 1.5 and Track 2 Strategic Dialogues with Allies, Partners, and Non-Traditional Partners dtra.belvoir.si.mbx.hdtra1-stri-ta3@mail.mil
Thrust Area 4: Tabletop Exercises Focused on Competition with Revisionist Powers dtra.belvoir.si.mbx.hdtra1-stri-ta4@mail.mil mailto:dtra.belvoir.si.mbx.hdtra1-stri-adm@mail.mil
ATTACHMENT 1 – PROPOSAL FORMAT AND PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS:
has been modified as follows:
h. Cover Page: This should include the words “TECHNICAL PROPOSAL” and the following:
BAA number HDTRA1-20-S-0002;
Research opportunity “Strategic Trends Research Initiative (STRI)”;
Title of proposal that is descriptive of the research to be conducted and Thrust Area;
Estimated cost of proposed effort;
Proposed period of performance (list number of months and preferred start and end dates);
Technical Point of Contact (name, address, phone/fax, email address);
Administrative/Business Point of Contact (name, address, phone/fax, email address);
Institution’s full address and institution type;
Data Universal Number System (DUNS);
Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN);
North American Industry Classification System (NAICS);
Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) Code;
Signature and name of an authorized officer at the Offeror’s institution; and Marked as “Procurement Sensitive”.
i. Table of Contents:
Has been modified as follows:
• Deliverable Reports: STRI requires the following deliverables for every award:
Technical and financial progress reports, monthly;
Briefings (slides to be delivered at DTRA at the kickoff meeting, midpoint in-progress review, and final out brief);
Final financial report and closeout report; and Final 12 to 15-page technical report (not including appendices) with accompanying 1 to 3-page standalone executive summary, both suitable for a US Government audience and including actionable recommendations (format/template will be provided; appendices or annexes are welcome).
If awarded, researchers will be required to participate in a project kick-off meeting and a mid-point In-Progress Review. Additional coordination meetings may be required for dialogues. All meetings will be held at DTRA unless otherwise specified. Researchers may provide final briefings to other interested US Government entities (including in coordination with SI-STT), but shall provide an out brief to DTRA at a minimum.
While it is acknowledged that researchers may generate other publications based on the research beyond the required technical report, they shall not be considered acceptable substitutes for the final technical report. While these publications are not considered a deliverable, the researcher will consult SI-STT prior to publishing findings resulting from the research in any academic journals, media outlets, or online forums, including websites. Publication opportunities (to include speaking engagements) will be discussed at the kickoff and mid-point in progress review meetings, and DTRA will notify the research of any required release processes. Upon publication in any journal or other outlet, the researcher shall provide a copy to SI-STT for tracking purposes.
All other instructions remain the same as the BAA.
ATTACHMENT 2 – COST SHEET INSTRUCTIONS: has been modified as follows:
GENERAL INFORMATION:
• This worksheet is for uniformity and clarity of cost estimates proposed to the Government.
• No other tabs can be added to this workbook.
• Ensure all numbers are visible and there are no hidden formulas or figures.
• Input should commensurate with your cost elements.
• Formulas are provided to help calculate estimated annual salary, travel air and rail fares;
car rental; per diem; and other sources as appropriate.
• Formulas in any cell can be overridden. If a formula is changed, know and understand that all formulas are linked to the General Information and Totals tabs. Changes will affect the automatic population of cells on these tabs. Ensure the “total cost” for each tab will automatically input into the proper title under the General Information and Totals tabs.
• Do not remove any tabs that are non-applicable (e.g. travel, sub-contractor/consultant, etc.) from the cost workbook. Simply leave them blank.
• All costs identified in the Cost Proposal spreadsheet must be referenced in the accompanying Cost Narrative.
TOTAL TAB:
• This worksheet (tab) will automatically populate data from the final “totals” of the other tabs within this Workbook.
• If formulas and links are changed, ensure the total tab properly conveys the proposed estimated costs.
• Except for fees (Indirect, G&A, and Fixed Fee), this tab serves to input the totals from the other tabs ONLY. G&A, and Fee can be manually input accordingly. If there are no fees, leave it blank.
• Provide short details as required, however extra details on the totals page should be placed in the accompanying cost narrative.
• All descriptions and explanations of costs should be documented in the cost narrative as applicable. Ensure consistency between the two documents.
DIRECT LABOR:
• Use the BAA Labor Categories (Attachment 5) that most closely aligns with the description of proposed labor.
• The Offeror must put the Government-provided labor category in Column A. In Column B, the Offeror can insert their organization’s labor category as well.
• Proposed personnel should be named in Column C. Any proposed personnel in the technical proposal should be identified (using their legal name) with their labor category.
• If there is a different hourly rate after the period of performance crosses the calendar year or government fiscal year, use the percentage of the annual escalation rate.
• The escalation will auto-calculate throughout the spreadsheet. If there are other reasons for cost change, simply input the costs in respective cells, overwriting the formula.
However, keep in mind the change will be throughout.
• Again, no hidden formulas are permitted.
EXAMPLE of ESCALATION INPUT:
• Change only the amount of percentage escalation – circled in red.
NOTE: Honoraria for invitees or speakers fees are to be annotated under ODCs. Travel for the same will be annotated under Invitee/Speaker section of travel.
What to include in the cost narrative under direct labor:
1. Justify the number of personnel estimated by identifying workload, activities, etc.;
2. Input why you selected this labor category title, including the number years of experience and education level;
3. Justify estimations for fringe expenses;
4. Justify estimations for Indirect Cost Rates and provide a copy of the rates;
5. Justify estimations (if any) for fee; and
6. Justify the number of hours estimated in terms of supported activities.
For example, "Offsite PM monthly meetings--12 hours; report generation--24 hours; oversight--120 hours for 156 hours total."
SUB-CONTRACTOR – CONSULTANTS:
• Input proposed sub-contractor/consultants using their legal name; and
• Input billable hours required for each sub-contractor or consultant.
Direct Labor BASE BASE Total Cost
YR 2021 Total YR 2022 Total Government Labor Category Offeror's Labor Category Name (Last, First) Base/Hours Rate Cost Base/Hours Rate W- 3.5% Cost Senior Advisor Fellow Advisor Walter, Derek 25 125.16$ 3,129.00$ 32 129.54$ 4,145.28$
0 -$ -$ 0 -$ -$ 0 -$ -$ 0 -$ -$ 0 -$ -$ 0 -$ -$ 0 -$ -$ 0 -$ -$ 0 -$ -$ 0 -$ -$
3,129.00$ 4,145.28$ 7,274.28$
Direct Labor
Total YR 2021 Total YR 2022Total Direct Labor
NOTE: Honoraria for invitees or speakers fees are to be annotated under ODCs. Travel for the same will be annotated under Invitee/Speaker section of travel.
What to include in the cost narrative under sub-contractor - consultants:
1. Justify the number of personnel estimated by identifying workload, activities, etc.;
2. Input why you selected this sub-contractor/consultant, including the number years of experience and education level/certifications;
3. Justify estimations (if any) for fringe expenses; and
4. Justify number of hours estimated.
OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODCs): (NOTE: Travel has a separate tab)
ODC entries require every column be filled for that entry.
• List the item name (what is it?) and ensure that descriptions and vendors listed on the ODC worksheet match information provided in the cost narrative;
• List the types of costs that are acceptable ODCs include honoraria, room rentals and other event fees (including AV support), costs for printing or telecommunications, services from another vendor – such as foreign translation, etc.; Add additional lines, if needed.
• As applicable, list the product number or identifier (manufacturer and item number is best) if known;
• Describe the required item in as much detail as possible;
• Input the cost estimate for one unit; and
• Input the number of units required.
What to include in the cost narrative under ODCs:
1. State how the ODC supports the effort and why it’s needed and best for the requirement;
2. State how you arrived at the unit price; and
3. State why you need the number of items.
TRAVEL:
• Input the purpose of the trip;
• Input the number of contracted personnel required on the trip;
• Input airport of departure and arrival;
• Input number of days (duration of travel) (and if known, estimated dates);
• Input estimated airfare per person;
• Input estimated per diem rate; (Keep in mind, the first and last day per diems are reduced.) [If the conference/event is providing meals (e.g. breakfast, lunch, or a welcome dinner) then reduce corresponding per diem for travelers that will be provided those meals. The Government does not allow double payment on meals.]
The following are links for information and estimates used by the government.
o CONUS: https://www.travelocity.com/ o OCONUS: https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/international-travel/International-Travel-Country-Information-Pages.html o https://www.gsa.gov/travel/plan-book/per-diem-rates o https://www.defensetravel.dod.mil/site/perdiemCalc.cfm
• Input estimated auto rental and gasoline expenses; and (Ensure if more than one traveler on the same trip need a rental car, travelers share the rental vehicle.)
• Repeat for additional trips as required.
What to include in the cost narrative under Travel:
1. Tie the purpose of the trip to the requirements; (How does the trip support the effort?)
2. Justify the number and type of personnel; (Who will travel and why are they needed?)
3. Provide the most convenient/advantageous airport; (Why?)
4. Justify date and duration of trip;
5. Describe how you arrived at this cost; (What class, type of flight (i.e. non-stop), checked bags?)
6. Describe how you arrived at this cost; (What class of car and provider as well as why this one?)
7. If meals are provided (and paid through the contract), ensure the per diem rate is not charged for that meal; and
8. Justify any other related costs (e.g. hotel, taxi, and car rental) in the same manner.
INDIRECT COST RATE:
• In your cost proposal submission, include a copy of the organization’s approved Indirect Cost Rate from the US Government.
NOTE: Failure to adequately provide detailed cost data will require the DTRA Contracts Officer to contact the proposing organization for the requisite information. This will result in a delay of the award. All Offerors are required to submit a thoroughly detailed cost breakdown and budget narrative to facilitate the cost analysis in order to determine whether the proposed costs are allocable, allowable and reasonable.
ATTACHMENT 4 – STATEMENT OF RESEARCH WORK (SoRW)
Statement of Research Work
Title
Date:
1. Background: Describe, in one to three paragraphs, what the research gap is, why it needs to be addressed (both from a research and policy/strategic/operational standpoint), and highlight any alignment to current US strategic guidance, policy, and/or activities.
2. Thrust Area X: [Insert Thrust Area Name]
3. Scope and Objective: To address the [gap/challenge] highlighted in Section 1.0, the contractor will [insert a succinct statement that outlines the primary research question that will be addressed and/or the project goal. [If a dialogue, denote what the dialogue will be and where it will take place]. Identify any sub-objectives in sub-bullets (each bullet should start with a verb). Include any caveats about what the research effort does not entail to reflect the scope.
3.1. Begin with Verb
3.2. Begin with Verb
4. Task Requirements: The contractor will perform the following tasks to fulfill the [dialogue, study, or TTX] objectives outlined in Section 3.0:
4.1. Conduct kickoff meeting with DTRA SI-STT.
4.1.1 The contractor and the Strategic Trends Research Coordinator (hereafter DTRA Project Manager, PM) will determine the time and place of the kickoff meeting with SI-STT, which may need to be conducted remotely due to COVID-19-related restrictions.
4.1.2 The contractor will submit any read ahead materials to the DTRA PM no later than 24 hours prior to the meeting.
4.2 Conduct a midpoint in-progress review (IPR) meeting with DTRA SI-STT.
4.2.1 The contractor and the DTRA PM will coordinate the appropriate time and place for the IPR at the kickoff meeting and subsequent email communication. It may be conducted remotely due to COVID-19-related restrictions.
4.2.2 The contractor will submit any read ahead materials to the DTRA PM no later than 24 hours prior to the meeting.
4.3 Insert tasks to accomplish the research project in sequential order (continue with numbering, 4.3, 4.4, etc. – each must begin with a verb)
4.4 Based on the [dialogue meeting outputs, study results, etc.], prepare and provide final deliverables in accordance with the Contract Deliverables Requirements List (CDRLs).
[For reference, please describe anything unique about the deliverables you will provide, which will ultimately be removed from this section and incorporated into the CDRLs.
Consult the BAA for required deliverables.]
4.5 Dissemination of Research Outputs. This task will involve disseminating the research output (to include reports and briefings) to key stakeholders, including in coordination with DTRA SI-STT as appropriate.
5. Period of Performance: X months from date of award. [Example: 12 months]
6. Deliverables: The contractor shall provide deliverables to the DTRA PM according to the Contract Data Requirements List (CDRLs).
7. Additional Information:
7.1. Travel: Describe any required travel. Outline any contingency plans as relevant for
COVID-19.
7.2. Security: The research effort will be conducted entirely at the unclassified level and all reports, including the final report, will also be unclassified. [Modify as required.]
7.3. Publication/Release of Information: The contractor will consult the DTRA sponsor prior to publishing findings resulting from the research in any academic journals, media outlets, or online forums, including websites. Publication opportunities (to include speaking engagements) will be discussed at the kickoff meeting. Publication opportunities (to include speaking engagements) will be discussed at the kickoff and mid-point in progress review meetings, and DTRA will notify the contractor of any required release processes. Upon publication in any journal or other outlet, the researcher shall provide a copy to SI-STT for tracking purposes.
7.3.1. Outline any publication plans as currently known.
7.4. The technical proposal and final negotiated terms are incorporated as part of this SoRW.
ATTACHMENT 5 – LABOR CATEGORIES
Principal Investigator and Co-Principal Investigator: Conceives, designs, and directs major research projects or programs. Conducts and oversees the development of credible research efforts that generates independent, high quality deliverables. Supervises all aspects of the research effort and is responsible for the management, direction, and oversight of the project team, including all related activities. Writes credible and technically sound papers and reports on complex issues and topics. Displays expert and innovative use of theories and principles and contributes to the development of advanced analyses, methods and/or techniques. Possesses an advanced degree in a relevant discipline. Has over fifteen years of related professional research experience, including extensive project leadership and publications.
Project/Program Director or Manager: Manages and organizes the completion of the research effort and coordinates all technical, financial, and administrative elements. Responsible for implementing and/or reviewing major project components and prioritizing all tasks and activities to meet the research goals and provide the required deliverables. Experienced in managing research design, analysis, and evaluation tasks that produce high-quality deliverables on time and within budget. Has over ten years of related experience.
Senior Advisor: Provides subject matter area expertise and review of concepts, ideas, and deliverables in the conduct of moderately complex to complex research projects. Has over ten years of experience providing expert knowledge in the performance of research and analysis that leads to high quality, credible deliverables. Has an advanced degree in a relevant discipline.
Senior Analyst/Senior Research Analyst: Executes research and analysis necessary for the completion of the project on the basis of advanced knowledge and experience. Serves as a team leader for subordinate analysts. Develops and drafts findings, conclusions, and recommendations for review by project leads. Displays expert and innovative use of concepts, principles, and techniques to complete required research tasks, including preparation and review of deliverables. Has over ten years of related experience and, at a minimum, a bachelor’s degree in a relevant discipline.
Analyst/Research Analyst: Collects, sorts, and analyzes data in assigned areas using appropriate procedures, techniques, and approaches. Contributes to the development and review of deliverables. Performs other assignments in accordance with project performance specifications and requirements. Has five or more years of related experience and, at a minimum, a bachelor’s degree in a relevant discipline.
Project Coordinator: Coordinates travel, meetings, project activities, and deliverables.
Provides administrative and logistical support necessary to complete the research project.
Demonstrates experience in planning, organizing and managing conferences, seminars and workshops in a range of sizes and formats and under a variety of situations and conditions. Has two or more years of related experience.
Research Assistant: Under supervision, carries out information gathering, data collection, and basic analytic duties in support of the research project. Assists in interpreting basic to intermediate concepts and preparing and reviewing documents. Has one year of relevant experience and, at a minimum, a bachelor’s degree in a relevant discipline.
This concludes the changes for this BAA Amendment.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .