The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.
ATTACHMENT 4 - Questions & Answers Template
| Question # |
| Technical / Management |
Questions / Comments
| RFP Reference |
| Government Response |
| RFP Change Required (Y/N) |
| Location of Change |
| T-001 |
| In order to avoid a competitive disadvantage, increase competition, and provide best value solution, will the Government sponsor the contractor FCL upon award of this contract? |
| N/A |
| The prime or sub contractor is required to have a facility clearance (per the DD254) in order to submit a proposal. |
| N |
| N/A |
| T-002 |
| Is this a new requirement for this work? |
| N/A |
| No |
| N |
| N/A |
| T-003 |
| If not, are the incubments going to be allowed to re-compete? |
| N/A |
| The current incumbent is a large business. This requirement is set aside for small businesses. However, it is possible that a small business (as the prime) could team with a large business as a subcontractor. |
| N |
| N/A |
| T-004 |
| When will this officially come out? |
| N/A |
| 4 April 2014 |
| N |
| N/A |
| T-005 |
| For estimation, how much time will be alloted for proposal preparation? |
| N/A |
| The vendor will have 30 days to respond once the final RFP is issued. |
| N |
| N/A |
| T-006 |
| Will the current contractors, supporting the systems engineering activities associated with the Joint C2 Architecture, be allowed to go after this work? |
| N/A |
| The current incumbent is a large business. This requirement is set aside for small business. However, it is possible that a small business (as the prime) could team with a large business as a subcontractor. |
| N |
| N/A |
| T-007 |
| Is there a possibility of this work growing from the 2 personnel requested? |
| N/A |
| This RFP does not request a specific number of personnel. The PWS indicates key personnel only. |
| N |
| N/A |
| T-008 |
| Who is the incumbent? |
| N/A |
| Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) |
| N |
| N/A |
| T-009 |
| Is this a new procurement, or a follow-on to the work performed by Leidos, a large business? |
| N/A |
| No |
| Question # |
| Past Performance |
Questions / Comments
| RFP Reference |
| Government Response |
| RFP Change Required (Y/N) |
| Location of Change |
| PP-001 |
| Please confirm Past Performance evaluation quantity requirements. There is ambiguity in quantity in the draft documentation, 3 vs 6. |
| Section M |
| Offerors shall submit no more than three (3) total recent past performance efforts for evaluation, and each cited past performance effort shall not exceed 3 pages. Recent efforts are those, which have been performed during any portion of the last three (3) years, including ongoing efforts which must have been in place at least six (6) months before the proposal due date. The maximum number of past performance efforts submitted by the Prime Offeror and its teaming partners may not exceed three (3) total. |
| N |
| N/A |
Questions / Comments
| RFP Reference |
| Government Response |
| RFP Change Required (Y/N) |
| Location of Change |
| K-001 |
| 13 March 2014 notice indicated a CLOSING RESPONSE DATE of 28 March 2014. Pre-solicitation notice on 13 March 2014, was a DRAFT RFP, and NOT a SOLICITATION. What does this CLOSING RESPONSE DATE refer to? |
| N/A |
| The closing response date refers to the closing publicizing date. The pre-solicitation notice shall be published at least 15 days before issuance of the solicitation. |
| N |
| N/A |
| K-002 |
| What is the acquisition strategy? Single Award, CPFF, FFP, etc.? |
| N/A |
| The contract will be awarded on a FFP basis. |
| N |
| N/A |