Attachment_3_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.doc

ATTACHMENT 3 - PAST PERFORMANCE COVER LETTER & QUESTIONNAIRE

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

The Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) is in the process of selecting a contractor for the Program Executive Office for Command and Control Capabilities (PEO C2C), Joint Command and Control (C2) Architecture Support Services.

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the Offeror’s past and present performance on contracts, which reflects the Offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from Agencies such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with an Offeror, for the evaluation of the Offeror's performance on those contracts.

Our areas of interest in the Offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. The acquisition schedule for Joint C2 Architecture Support Services is streamlined, and as such, your written response to the questionnaire is requested no later than the proposal due date. The questionnaire should be completed electronically and emailed to the Contracting Officer, charlotte.k.hunter.civ@mail.mil and Contract Specialist, christina.y.murray.civ@mail.mil.

Your completed questionnaire will be considered SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION I.A.W. FAR 2.101 & 3.104 and will become a part of the official contract file.

Your help is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.

Respectfully, CHARLOTTE K. HUNTER

Contracting Officer 1 Attachment

Past Performance Questionnaire

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

When filled in this document is source selection sensitive information iaw FAR 2.101 & 3.104

SECTION 1 - CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor: ______________________________________________________________________________

B. Cage Code of Contractor Contract Was Awarded to: _________________________________

C. Contract Number: _______________________________________ D. Task Order Number (if applicable): ___________________________ D. Contract Type: ______________________________ (FFP, FPI, Cost, CPFF, CPIF, LH, T&M) E. Was this a Competitive Contract? Yes _____ No _____ F. Was this Contract Performance-Based? Yes _____ No _____ G. Was the Contractor a Prime or Subcontractor on this Effort? __________________________________

H. Additional Past Performance Information for this Contract Available in PPIRS? Yes _____ No _____

I. Period of Performance (including option periods): _____________________________________________________ J. Number of Users Supported by this Contract: __________

K. Number of Locations/Sites Supported by this Contract: ____________

L. Initial Contract Cost: $____________________________

M. Current/Final Contract Cost: $_______________________________

N. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract cost: _____________________________________ O. Description of service provided:__________________________________________________________________________

SECTION 2 - CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or Agency Name: _________________________________________________________________

B. Customer or Agency Description (if applicable): ____________________________________________________________

C. Geographic Description of Services under this Contract, i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:

SECTION 3 - EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Evaluator's Name: ____________________________________________________________________________________ B. Evaluator's Title: _____________________________________________________________________________________ C. Evaluator's Phone/Fax Number: _________________________________________________________________________ D. Evaluator’s E-Mail Address: ____________________________________________________________________________ E. Number of Years Evaluator Worked on Subject Contract: _____________________

SECTION 4 - EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the Contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

PERFORMANCE LEVEL

EXCEPTIONAL (E) - Performance meets or met contractual requirements and exceeds or exceeded many to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD (VG) - Performance meets or met contractual requirements and exceeds or exceeded some to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

SATISFACTORY(S) – Performance meets or met contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear to be or were satisfactory.

MARGINAL (M) – Performance does not or did not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

UNSATISFACTORY (U) – Performance does not or did not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

NOT APPLICABLE (NA) - Unable to provide a score.

T1. Ability to contribute to technical modernization of a portfolio of complex systems that do not have a single directive authority

T2. Ability to use collaborative tools and Systems Modeling Language (SysML) compliant tools

T3. Ability to analyze and identify critical and emerging information technology standards to facilitate interoperability across a portfolio of complex systems

T4. Ability to analyze and identify complex systems compliance with approved DoD Architectures

T5. Quality of Deliverables

T6. Timeliness of Deliverables

T7. Ability to adhere to established technical processes and procedures

M1. Effectiveness of Contract Management (i.e. ability to lead, manage and control the program)

M2. Interaction with Government Personnel and Other Contractor Staff

M3. Ability to Recruit and Retain Key Staff

M4. Effectiveness at devising and adhering to a plan or agreement, such as a Contract Management Plan, which consists of the planning activities associated with the project to include approach, project schedule, milestones, required reviews and list of deliverables

M5. Timeliness / Effectiveness of Problem Resolution

M6. Overall effectiveness in establishing and meeting customer satisfaction objectives

C1. Ability to effectively manage fixed price tasks

C2. Ability to Alert the Government of Constructive Changes before They Occur

C3. Number of Cost-related Equitable Adjustments

C4. Number of Projects / Tasks that Incurred Additional Costs

C5. Ability to Meet Forecasted / Projected Costs

C6. Sufficiency, Accuracy and Timeliness of Cost Reporting

C7. Timely Submission of Correct Invoices

2. Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes___ Default___ Convenience___ Pending Terminations___

No ___

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).

SECTION 5 - NARRATIVE SUMMARY

What were the contractor’s most positive aspects in the performance of the contract (what strengths did the contractor bring to the effort)?

What were the contractor’s most negative aspects in the performance of the contract (what were the contractor’s weaknesses)? ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Would you have any reservations about using this contractor again?

Evaluator’s Signature

Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire via e-mail to to the Contracting Officer, charlotte.k.hunter.civ@mail.mil and Contract Specialist, christina.y.murray.civ@mail.mil.