July_15_Industry_Qs_and_As.docx

Army Installation Kits

HC1028-16-R-0010

Industry Questions and Answers July 15, 2016

Question 1: Incomplete drawing package/missing part numbers. During our initial review of the technical data package, numerous missing or unrecognizable part numbers were discovered. Examples are provided in the attachments. It is our expectation that more will be discovered during thorough review and we will provide as discovered. Recommend that the Government provide all part numbers that are needed to locate and price components.

Some examples:

a. Drawing 0000-47528-0001: No BOM. Need component part numbers.

b. Drawing 07006B0052: Part numbers for items 1 & 8 are not recognizable. Cage code listed, 01365, is a Marine Corps cage code.

c. Drawing 8900-48261-0000: Drawing states “See Agile for complete BOM list.” Do not have access to "Agile." The BOM is necessary in order to quote.

d. Drawing 8900-52085-0000: Entire BOM has internal part numbers for cage code 1RWE7. These part numbers are not recognizable to component manufacturers.

Response 1:

a. Drawing added to TDP.

b. 07006B0052 is a drawing that was included as part of the TDP for reference, but we are not actually adding it to the contract. It has been removed from the TDP and should not be quoted.

c. Parts List added to TDP.

d. Parts List added to TDP with equivalent commercial/military specs.

Question 2: Referencing part number 9800F54034-0000A, PCB drawings refer to "Agile" for complete bill of materials (BOM). Please provide the BOMs for these parts. Also, we are requesting the Gerber files for all PCB drawings.

Response 2: The BOM and GERBER Files have been added to the TDP.

Question 3: In paragraph 6.2.5 in Section L, is the only price template the attachment J-3?

Response 3: Yes.

Question 4: Do all employees from the contracting agency and all employees from material suppliers have to sign an NDA? Or does just one employee representing the company have to sign one? Or not any at all?

Response 4: NDA should be signed on behalf of the company, meaning the company and all of its employees that have access to the data are responsible for adhering to the terms of the NDA.

Question 5: In paragraph 6.2.5 in Section L, the subcontracting plan, what are the requirements, do we need specific requirements, and if so, what does it entail?

Response 5: Subcontracting plans are not required to be submitted by small businesses. The reference will be removed.

Question 6: What is the intention of the Government by including the labor categories Program Management, Manufacturing, Quality Assurance, and Logistics in the T&M portion of the pricing spreadsheet? Typically these services would be embedded in the pricing for the individual IK CLINs and not separately proposed on a T&M basis. We anticipated proposing only labor rates for the Engineering services for the development of new IKs and modification of existing IKs, and not a part of the IK CLINs.

Response 6: IK CLIN pricing should include only material and material related charges (procurement and corporate indirect rates, etc.) for the items identified. Labor for this effort shall be priced on a T&M contract basis.

Question 7: Is the overall Program Manager position billable under the T&M portion of the pricing spreadsheet?

Response 7: The only PM hours billable under T&M would be if additional engineering services are required. Otherwise, PM hours are embedded within the fixed price of each CLIN.

Question 8: Can the Government clarify what constitutes “proof” of installation kit engineering design steps and/or processes? If specific documents, can these be excluded from section II page count?

Response 8: Show previous experience of designing and building kits similar to those required as part of the PM MC Installation Kits. This can include a combination of mechanical and electrical components combined as a kit used for installation and integration of military communication equipment or similar.

Question 9: Can the Government clarify what constitutes “proof” of available facilities, equipment, and human resources…”? If specific documents, are these excluded from section II page count?

Response 9: Detail the layout of facilities and equipment that are used to manufacture, fabricate, and assemble mechanical and electrical components of kits. This should include facility layout, available manufacturing equipment, kitting processes and the personnel involved.

Question 10: Can the Government clarify if all proposed subcontractors must complete Government-supplied NDA, and if so, submitted with proposal?

Response 10: All interested parties should, to the maximum extent possible, not disclose information related to this procurement unless there is a need to know. The NDA supplied to interested vendors was for the purpose of receiving the drawings and other sensitive information.

Question 11: Please provide guidance regarding un-sanitized subcontractor rates being sent directly to Government.

Response 11: Subcontractor proposal information, provided in support of the prime proposal, may be provided directly to the Government along with the rest of the proposal, at the time the proposal is uploaded to the DITCO Contracting Opportunities website, https://www.ditco.disa.mil/dcop . Refer to RFP Section L, paragraph 2.3.

Question 12: Are Cost Accounting Standards (CAS) disclosure statements required for subcontractor-submitted T&M pricing?

Response 12: CAS disclosure statements for the prime contractor or subcontractors are not required to be provided to the Government as a part of the initial proposal submission. Section L, 5.2 references summary descriptions of CAS disclosure statements and any changes which impact the Offeror’s proposal. Note that the Government may require disclosure statement support, from prime and subcontractors, during the course of review.

Question 13: Is information required from subcontractors within the proposal Section 1, Estimating & Purchasing system subsections?

Response 13: Yes. Estimating and purchasing system summaries and discussion, where applicable, shall be provided as a part of all subcontract proposal submissions.

Question 14: If the subcontractor is providing T&M engineering services portion, should the T&M Pricing tab on Pricing spreadsheet be labeled accordingly on column A block 1?

Response 14: The Prime contractor name shall be provided in Cell A1. The subcontractor name shall be provided in the Cost/Price Volume.

Question 15: Please verify that the prime contractor is responsible to report manpower through eCMRA, even if subcontractor is performing labor.

Response 15: Per DARS 37.102-90, Contracting Officers shall require the contractor manpower reporting requirement for all contracts and orders for services and supplies that include defined requirements for services, provided that the DoD is receiving or benefiting from the contracted services.

Question 16: Regarding attachment J, pg.7, 1.1.1 – It states that environmental requirements specified in section 3 of this document are not applicable to I-kits produced strictly for administrative and or classroom.

Response 16: That is correct.

Question 17: Can the Government address if cost of living will be applicable beyond one?

Response 17: Cost of living should not be applicable to this requirement as the effort is at contractor site. CONUS-based travel does not necessitate cost of living.

Question 18: On Page 63 in RFP Section 6.1 it mentions Sections A-K. Sections C, D, E, & J are missing?

Response 18: The sections referenced are from the Uniform Contract Format (UCF). If the sections are not in the RFP, they are not applicable for this RFP. Page 1, Item 11 lists as the missing sections: C - Description/specifications/statement of work; D - Packaging and marking; E - Inspection and acceptance and H – Special Contract Requirements. However, the Statement of Work is included as attachment J-1.

Question 19: 6.2.5 Section L a subcontractor is submit a sub-contracting plan. What are the requirements?

Response 19: Subcontracting plans are not required to be submitted by small businesses. The reference will be removed from the RFP.

Question 20: For drawing 13038579, item 28 &29 calls out “as required” quantities. How many do you want of each type for the kit?

Response 20: 50 each for Items 28 and 29. Drawing 13038579 REV A Added to TDP.

Question 21: Several drawings are missing. Could you provide or clarify what is supposed to be used?

Response 21: See Missing Drawings Spreadsheet, provided as a separate attachment.

Question 22: We respectfully request an additional 30 days extension to prepare our proposal due to the size and complexity of the technical data package (TDP). After receiving the TDP, we are anticipating needing more time to analyze the drawings, get them out to the suppliers and vendors for quoting the individual components and subassemblies, and then pulling all of that information together into a coherent and complete proposal package to you.

Response 22: The proposal due date is being extended to 5:00 PM ET on Monday, July 25, 2016. The new IK TDP CD has been uploaded to the AMRDEC site and access will be granted to vendors who have provided/will provide NDAs to the contracting activity.

Question 23: Please advise who is currently performing this work (the incumbent), as applicable.

Response 23: DRS Network & Imaging Systems, LLC is the incumbent.

Question 24: Can the Government provide an estimated Level of Effort (Hours)?

Response 24: No, the Government does not have an estimated Level of Effort.

Question 25: Section L, Sub-Section B - 6.1.2: You are asking for complete pricing information in Section B; however, in 5.1.2, instructions say under NO circumstance should pricing be elsewhere in the proposal (other than in the cost/price volume). Would you like the pricing in 5.1.2 to follow the format of section B? If not, please clarify.

Response 25: The Section 6.1.2 reference to Section B concerns completed pricing in the J-3 format. See the Section B description of the Installation Kits CLIN(s) and the discussion of Attachment J-3 pricing therein.

Question 26: Section L, Sub-Section G - 6.1.4: Are the only TBD sections in reference to the COR and Contractor Point of Contact?

Response 26: The awarded contract will identify the Government-appointed COR. If you are submitting a proposal, you will provide your Contactor POC in your proposal.

Question 27: Section L; Sub-Section H - 6.1.5: This is listed as TBD. Are there any special contract requirements that should be accounted for in the proposal?

Response 27: No, there are no special contract requirements to be accounted for in the proposal.

Question 28: Could you please clarify drawing number 9850-32307-0002? We are not sure exactly what you want supplied on this drawing. For example: item 102 calls out part 9850-54865-0000 with a reference quantity. When you go to note 9 (COMPONENTS INCLUDED AS PART OF ITEM 102) it could be interpreted that you are supplying only the note 9 parts which are as follows:

(1) 0410-54972-0000 (item 103),

(4) 10705AL315C (item 328),

(4) MS51553-420 (item 327),

(4) MS35751-16 (item 326).

Response 28: This should be interpreted as noted. Item 102 should only include the following:

(1) 0410-54972-0000 (item 103)

(4) 10705AL315C (item 328)

(4) MS51553-420 (item 327)

(4) MS35751-16 (item 326) It is on the top level drawing as a reference so one does not have to dig deeper for subassemblies during an installation as this Install drawing is the only included in kits. In future REVs, there should not be a NOTE 9 next to item 102.

Question 29: Are the parts listed above what should be in the kit or should we supply item 102 without the parts listed above? If you want 102 without the parts listed above, than a follow up question would be how to handle the Mounting Plate part? There are two drawings for the same exact part (0410-32258-0000 is the same exact part as 0410-54972-0000) therefore technically there is no 0410-54972-0000 to exclude from the kit.

Response 29: See Response for Question 28.

Question 30: In some kits there is a mix of colors for the parts (i.e., green and tan). Should the parts all be a consistent color?

Response 30: There is a mixture of colors due to the fact that when a majority of these designs were created, the standard color was Olive Drab. Since we have moved to a more desert climate, a majority of the Items are Tan. We still have both options for color usually differentiated by the -1 or the -2 conditions of the part. If there is a mixture, it is acceptable, but we would look to standardize a common color in the future.

Question 31: Will there be an extension granted to the solicitation due date until the missing drawings are provided?

Response 31: Refer to response to Question 22.

Question 32: We have attached a list of platforms associated in the drawings. Please provide us with the number of kits by platform.

Response 32: Unknown number of platforms. List of variants included in Power Point File “Installation Kit Reference Guide.”

Question 33: The solicitation paragraph 6.1.3 Section F - Deliveries or Performance states “Deliveries shall commence 155 - days after receipt of order at a steady rate of 250 kits/cables per week.” Please let us know if that is for specific kits or vehicles or for all kits.

Response 33: Any combination of hardware on that specific order would satisfy our requirement of 250 per week

Question 34: The provided drawing 3772027, MTS Display Mounting Bracket – Does not specify what type of material should be used for fabrication.

Response 34: ASTM B209 5052 H32. Shown in drawing block under MATERIAL.

Question 35: Notes within drawing 3772027 state that additional technical requirements are located in Oshkosh Drawing 1301040. However, drawing 1301040 is not included in the provided TDP. We request that you provide drawing 1301040 or specify the material requirements for part #3772027, MTS Display Mounting Bracket.

Response 35: ASTM B209 5052 H32. Shown in drawing block under MATERIAL.

Question 36: Please explain to us if there are any benefits if our company has HubZone Classification.

Response 36: This requirement is a total small business set-aside. If your organization is represented in any of the categories in FAR 19.5 it should be properly documented in your RFP response and your representation and certifications.

Question 37: Reference Statement of Work paragraph 6.2 Program Management Reviews and Integrated Product Team (IPTs) and 6.4 Integrated Data Environment (IDE). Both paragraphs reference Program Management Reviews (PMRs) and Integrated Product Teams (IPTs). Per paragraph 6.2, we understand you want four (4) Program Management Reviews (PMRs) under each ordering period of this contract one during each quarter and weekly Government Systems Engineering Integrated Product Teams (IPTs) meetings. Per paragraph 6.4, “Additionally, tracking of action items resulting from various program reviews, PMRs, and IPT meetings shall be included in the database.” Please define what the number, frequency and requirements are for "various program reviews."

Response 37: Various program reviews would occur on a case-by-case basis. These periodic reviews would occur during various events such as new Delivery Orders, Service Requests, Engineering Changes, and addressing any issues.

Question 38: What percentage of Kits/Components is expected to require FAQT?

Response 38: All kits/components are expected to require FAQT unless previously validated and witness by a Government agency.

Question 39 Will Quarterly PMRs be required?

Response 39: Yes, Quarterly PMRS will be required.

Question 40: Will a Kick-Off be required?

Response 40: Yes, a Kick-off will be required.

Question 41: Please confirm that the parts requiring ‘Ballistic Welds in accordance with Ground Combat Vehicle Code’ cannot be welded per ANSI/AWSD1.1.

Response 41: Specification 12479550 states “BALLISTIC WELDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH GROUND COMBAT VEHICLE CODE.” The specification has been added to TDP and within this document MIL-STD-1941 (MIL-HDBK-1941) is used as a reference. This Spec has also been added to TDP. These parts should be welded per those specifications and not ANSI/AWS D 1.1.

Question 42: Drawing 889567, M1114 Foot Rest Bracket - does not have material identified. Will require additional details and/or material specification. Please provide additional drawings and/or specify material used for fabrication.

Response 42: Parts list added to TDP, includes material.

Question 43: Regarding Kit # A1-36090D Item # 8, PN 170375, there is dash 1, dash 11, & dash 12 on the drawing. Which is required for this drawing?

Response 43: Each –dash is required for this part. 170375 is an assembly and combines the -1, -12, and -11.

Question 44: The following drawings are missing from the TDP and are needed in order to provide pricing: D1-38806D, D1-38808D, A1-38912D, A1-38913D, A1-43357D, and A1-43345D.

Response 44: D1-38808D, A1-38912D, A1-38913D, A1-43357D, D1-38806D, and A1-43345D have been added to the TDP.

Question 45: Multiple kits require M4614611BTY, adhesive sealant. The quantity required states “AR.” How much would be required per kit?

Response 45: Per Drawing No. 872840 parts list has 1 ounce as being used. 872840 Note 15 specifies the adhesive is supplied locally by HAZMAT. Cage code 81349 for this adhesive belongs to “Military Specification.”

Question 46: Please detail the case dimensions and foam inserts for MTS MRT Control Station Case in DWG No. A3339259.

Response 46: This item is not a CLIN or part of any CLIN. It was included in the TDP as a reference.

Question 47: Please detail the case dimensions and foam inserts for MRT Mobile Unit Case in DWG No. A3339265.

Response 47: This item is not a CLIN or part of any CLIN. It was included in the TDP as a reference.

Question 48: Please detail the case dimensions and foam inserts for MTS Control Station Case in DWG No. A3339250.

Response 48: This item is not a CLIN or part of any CLIN. It was included in the TDP as a reference.

Question 49: Can the Government provide additional labor category qualifications on the “Personnel Qualifications” tab in the pricing file? If not, can the Government provide a full list of professional and non-professional labor category qualifications?

Response 49: Contractor should include the appropriate labor categories within their proposal submission that contractor believes can do the work.

Question 50: In regard to part number 0410-32260-0000, the material thickness is missing from print. Please provide this information.

Response 50: The Thickness is .09. The drawing will be updated to reflect this.

Question 51: In regard to part number 0410-54028-0002, no hole to hang part for powder coating. Please clarify.

Response 52: Latest Rev A of Drawing includes a hole for hanging.

Question 53: In regard to part number 0410-55389-0000, material note 1 calls for .125" thick and drawing has .250" thick (Zone B-5). Please confirm which is correct.

Response 53: .250’’ is the correct thickness. Drawing will be updated to correct this.

Question 54: Please provide drawing # 9850-32500-2116.

Response 54: 9850-32500-2116 added to TDP.

Question 55: Drawing 93F7608, which is listed on drawing 881308 Parts List, is missing from TDP, please advise.

Response 55: Drawing added to TDP, Equivalent part 901-9217-SF is the same as 93F7608.

Question 56: Drawings 170306-1, 170325, 170327 have “proposed” drawings included in TDP. Please clarify which drawings to use.

Response 56: Do not use “Proposed”; use Revs H, F, and H respectively. Proposed drawings removed from TDP.

Question 57: Regarding drawing PCB 5800FS54034-0000, please provide schematic and parts list.

Response 57: Drawing and GERBER Files added to TDP.

Question 58: Regarding drawing PCB 5800FS54059-0000, please provide schematic and parts list.

Response 58: Drawing and GERBER Files added to TDP.

Question 59: On the Fabrication drawing for PCB P/N 5800F54034-0000 Rev A, we have found some anomalies listed below. Please clarify.

a. On sheet 2 of 3, Table 1 mentions layers 1, 6 and 3, 4. There is no layer number 6. This is a 4 layer board. Also we could not find trace and width of .0058” and .0048”.

b. We did find width and space of 0.0044” and 0.0066”. Do you want us to control impedance at these locations?

c. On Sheet 1 of 3, Note 17 mentions Fill Via with non-conductive material and then plate them over with metal. That process sequence does not look like normal PCB manufacturing process sequence. Please explain what you are trying achieve by this process sequence (filling via hole first with non-conductive material and then plating metal over it.)

Response 59:

a. The Rev A drawing shows an incorrect Table 1.

b. There is no sheet 6 or controlled impedance nets on layers 3, 4. The .BRD file shows the correct table and has controlled impedance nets on layer 1 referenced to layer 2. The .dwg and .pdf file will need to be updated.

c. Filling the via with non-conductive epoxy is a normal process. The via hole is drilled, the via barrel is then plated, the barrel is then filled with NCE, the top/bottom layers of the pcb are then plated over. The holes are filled to prevent them from filling with contamination from other processes.

Question 60: Please provide either source control drawings or the manufacturer's part numbers for the following list (Contracting Office Note: The list is not provided within this document.). These are DRS part numbers and they are not the manufacturer’s.

Response 60: See Spreadsheet “RFP MISSING DRAWINGS SPREADSHEET.”

Question 61: On drawing 8728672_C, what material is being used?

Response 61: We believe this drawing is a typo as a copy of the file was made and an additional 2 was added to the end. It is the same as drawing 872867, but it would be “PLATE, .500, 6061-T651 AL ALLY, QQ-A-250/11.”

Question 62: Will the successful awardee receive CAD models for the metal items/parts?

Response 62: The awardee will not receive CAD models.

Question 63: For part number 0410-30571-0042C, please provide the Pro E file as well as dimensions.

Response 63: Pro E file has been added to TDP.

Question 64: For part number 0410-32260-0000, please provide the thickness as well as dimensions.

Response 64: Same as Question #53. The Thickness is .09. The drawing will be updated to reflect this.

Question 65: Part Number 0410-32281-0000 is duplicated. Please clarify.

Response 65: Simply a duplicate of the drawing; both are the same.

Question 66: On Detail -2.pptx, what is the material, finish and marking?

Response 66: The PPT slide is simply an expanded view of the drawing to better see the scaling.

Question 67: For part number 0410-53465-0001B, please provide the acme thread size as well as the dimensions.

Response 67: The thread dimensions and tolerances are for a .750-.1P-.3L-2A as shown in MIL-DTL-38999 (Part of TDP).

Question 68: In regard to part number 881304-1, the spares list calls for “-1.” Drawing only contains specs for “-11.” Please clarify.

Response 68: The -11 would be considered the sheet metal part, while the overall part number is 881304-1. You will see this is called out on DWG 889565. There is also not an NSN for PN 881304-11, however there is one for 881304-1 (NSN: 016169286). The drawing is confusing and will be clarified in the future.

Question 69: In regard to part number 889509-1, the spares list calls out "-1." Drawing does not show a "-1" version. Please clarify.

Response 69: The “-1” is called out on the drawing in the third column from the left in the parts list.

Question 70: For part number 0410-54028-0003, is the release liner on both sides? Please clarify.

Response 70: The release liner is only on 1 side. It does not matter which side.

Question 71: Please provide drawing 179220-1. It is missing from the drawing package.

Response 71: Drawing part of TDP. -1 is shown in 3rd column from left in Parts List.

Question 72: Please clarify the revision levels for the following drawings:

Response 72: See attached MISSING DRAWINGS Spreadsheet. Column B shows the part number revision to use for quoting purposes.

Question 73: In regard to part number 9800-52532-0000B, there is insufficient detail. Need detailed drawings. Need drawing for 0400-06900-0000.

Response 73: DWG 0400-06900-0000 added to TDP.

Question 74: In regard to part number 9800-52533-0000C, there is insufficient detail. Need detailed drawings. Need drawing for 0400-06900-0001.

Response 74: 0400-06900-0001 does not exist. Use 0400-06900-0000, added to TDP.

Question 75: In regard to part number 9800-53465-0001, there are two revisions provided in TDP. Please clarify. Insufficient detail. Need detailed drawings. Need details for drawing for 0410-53465-0001B.

Response 75: Use 9800-53465-0001 REV A. Drawing 0410-53465-0001 REV B added to TDP. The thread dimensions and tolerances are for a .750-.1P-.3L-2A as shown in MIL-DTL-38999 (Part of TDP).

Question 76: In regard to part number 9800-53649-0000, there is insufficient detail. Need detailed drawings. Need details for drawing 0410-53469-0000A.

Response 76: 0410-53469-0000 added to TDP.

Question 77: In regard to part number 9800-53813-0000, there is insufficient detail. Two revisions provided for part number 0410-53664-0000, a sub component; please clarify. Require manufacturer part numbers for 35000-12134-0050, 3500-0350-0010, 3500-10177-0018, and 3500-35338-0001.

Response 77: Use REV D for PN 0410-53664-0000. Drawings 3500-12134-0050, 3500-03530-0010, 3500-35338-0001 added to TDP. 3500-10177-0018 added to TDP

Question 78: In regard to part number 9800-53925-1000, which Rev level for subcomponent 0410-53925-1000? Please clarify. Require manufacturer part numbers for subcomponents 3500-12134-0050 and 3500-03530-0008.

Response 78: Use REV D for 0410-53925-1000. 3500-12134-0050 and 3500-03530-0008 both added to TDP.

Question 79: In regard to part number 9800-54028-0000A, we need further clarification. Two of the subcomponents have two revision levels: 0410-54028-0001 and 0410-54028-0002.

Response 79: Use REV A for 0410-54028-0001 and Rev A for 0410-54028-0002

Question 80: Please provide further information on the following drawings. No dimensions are referenced.

Response 80: Some drawings were included in the TDP that are not part of any CLINS. They have been removed from TDP.

· 07006B0620_RevA (DO NOT QUOTE)

· 07006B1500_RevV5 (DO NOT QUOTE)

· 07006B1510_RevV5 (DO NOT QUOTE)

· 08002B1102_RevA (DO NOT QUOTE)

· 08002B1150_RevA (DO NOT QUOTE)

· 08002B1250_RevA (DO NOT QUOTE)

· 8728381_A (8728381 is a typo, should be 872838. 872838-11 and -12 added to TDP)

· LS1098942_B (Details in Drawings LS1097752 and LS1098218) Question 81: In regard to part numbers 10678587 PED Brkt_MB, 12282157_DP_1_J, 12337003_DP_1_C, 12545533_A, and 12545575_A, is there a suggested source?

Response 81: No suggested source.

Question 82: Please provide the bill of materials on the following part numbers:

861846_E 861865_D 861867_D 8728381_A

Response 82: PARTS LISTS for 861846, 861865, and 861867 added to TDP. 8728381 is a typo, should be 872838. 872838-11 and -12 added to TDP

Question 83: Please provide A1-38730D-001 and 002, A1-388392D-001 and 002, which is referenced on A1-38904D_B, A1-38920D_A, A1-43450D_NC and A1-43451D_NC.

Response 83: Drawings A1-38730D, A1-38892D, A1-38904D, A1-38920D, A1-43451D added to TDP.

Question 84: In regard to part number A3265986, please provide further detail on A3265892.

Response 84: A3265892 added to TDP.

Question 85: In regard to part number 9850-53925-2007A, please provide complete dimensions for 0410-54588-0000.

Response 85: 0410-54588-0000 added to TDP.

Question 86: In regard to part number 9800-55037-0000A: Insufficient detail. Need manufacturer part numbers for all subcomponents.

Response 86: Subcomponent drawings added to TDP. Hardware details in MISSING DRAWINGS SPREADSHEET.

Question 87: In regard to part number 9800-55037-0000C: Insufficient detail. Need manufacturer part numbers for all subcomponents, not DRS part numbers.

Response 87: Subcomponent drawings added to TDP. Hardware details in MISSING DRAWINGS SPREADSHEET.

Question 88: In regard to part number 9800-55377-0000: Insufficient detail. Need drawings for subcomponents 0410-32253-0000, 0410-32252-0000, 32251-0000, and 0410-32250-0000 or manufacturer part numbers.

Response 88: Subcomponent drawings added to TDP. Hardware details in MISSING DRAWINGS SPREADSHEET.

Question 89: In regard to part number 9800-55404-0000: Insufficient detail. Need drawings for subcomponent 3500-48422-0009 or manufacturer part numbers.

Response 89: Subcomponent drawings added to TDP. Hardware details in MISSING DRAWINGS SPREADSHEET.

Question 90: In regard to part number 9800-96539-0000B: Insufficient detail. Need drawings for subcomponent 3520-00431-0000 and 3501-03737-8007 or manufacturer part numbers. Need drawing for 0400-06900-0000.

Response 90: Subcomponent drawings added to TDP. Hardware details in MISSING DRAWINGS SPREADSHEET.

Question 91: In regard to part number 9800-96814-0000_D: Insufficient detail. Need drawings for subcomponents 3400-34172-0000, 3499-01670-0000, 3500-14425-0000, 3500-03530-0010, 3500F51553-0000, 3500-12123-0055, and 3500-54419-8024 or manufacturer part numbers. Need drawing for 0410-21517-0000.

Response 91: Subcomponent drawings added to TDP. Hardware details in MISSING DRAWINGS SPREADSHEET.

Question 92: In regard to part number 9850-30571-0032_D: Insufficient detail. Need drawing for 9850-30571-9032. Need drawings for 3500-53493-000, 3500-47024-0019, 3500-47979-0016 or manufacturer part numbers

Response 92: Subcomponent drawings added to TDP. Hardware details in MISSING DRAWINGS SPREADSHEET.

Question 93: Please provide drawings for A1-38918D & A1-38917D. They are missing from the TDP.

Response 93: A1-38918D and A1-38917D added to TDP.

Question 94: Can a large business partner with a small business in a small business set-aside such as this one, provided the small business is the official contractor to the Government?

Response 94: For a small business set-aside, a large business may only act as a subcontractor to the prime, which shall be a small business. Please refer to FAR 52.219-14, Limitations on Subcontracting.