Amendment 1_SF33_H9240521R0001_Undersea Systems TE Support.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this solicitation amendment is to address questions from industry. As a result, updates have taken place in the RFP, please see the below Summary of Changes.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 10

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 06-Oct-2021

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X H9240521R0001

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

23-Sep-2021

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

06-Oct-2021

CODE

HQ USSOCOM

SOF AT&L-KW

7701 TAMPA POINT BLVD

TAMPA FL 33621-5323

H92405 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

H9240521R0001

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

The Table of Contents has changed from:

DOCUMENT

TYPE

DESCRIPTION PAGES DATE

Attachment 1 Statement of Work

04 16-SEP-2021

Attachment 2 DD Form 254

08 N/A

Attachment 3 Government Furnished Property Listing

04 30-JUL-2021

Attachment 4 Price Matrix.

06 N/A

Attachment 5 Past Performance Interview Questionnaire

06 N/A

Exhibit A DD Form 1423-1 (Contract Data Requirements List

(CDRL))

TBD TBD

to:

DOCUMENT

TYPE

DESCRIPTION PAGES DATE

06 N/A 06-OCT-2021

Interview Questionnaire

06 N/A

Exhibit A DD Form 1423-1 (Contract Data Requirements List

The following have been modified:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

The following have been modified:

SECTION L

L.0 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

L.0.1 Each offeror intending to submit a proposal in response to this solicitation should notify the Contracting Officer via e-mail corletta.n.campbell.civ@socom.mil within 10 calendar days of RFP issuance. This is an all-electronic solicitation release. No hard copies of the solicitation will be mailed. Amendments to the solicitation will be posted to https://sam.gov/. The offeror is responsible for reviewing the webpage for notice of amendments, updates, or changes to current information. Proprietary information submitted in response to this solicitation will be protected from unauthorized disclosure as required by Subsection 27 of the Office of Procurement Policy Act as amended (41 U.S.C. Sections 2101 - 2107) and as implemented in the FAR. Proposals shall be unclassified and will be treated as Source Selection Information (see FAR 2.101 and 3.104). Classified information will not be accepted and will be returned to the offeror. The Government will perform a virus scan using McAfee Endpoint Security on all electronic files provided by the offeror. Any submittal failing the virus scan shall be rejected and returned to the offeror.

L.0.2 Proposals must be complete, self-sufficient, and respond directly to the requirements of the solicitation.

Any commitments made in the proposal shall become part of the resultant contract. Any significant inconsistency, if unexplained, raises a fundamental issue of the offeror’s understanding and/or ability to perform the contract. This may be a basis for rejection of the proposal. Failure to comply with these instructions may result in an offeror’s proposal being excluded from further consideration for award. The offeror shall submit a cover letter with the proposal that includes a list of names, telephone numbers, and email addresses of persons authorized to conduct negotiations.

L.0.3 Volume 1, Factor 1, Technical - shall be prepared in accordance with these instructions and will be evaluated in accordance with (IAW) the evaluation criteria in Section M, Evaluation Factors for Award. Proposals shall include necessary information to enable the evaluators to form a definitive conclusion concerning the offeror’s ability to perform the required support. The Technical volume shall be organized in tab format in the order listed in this Addendum (Section L) and submitted IAW L.0.8 and L.0.9.

L.0.4 Volume 2, Factor 2, Past Performance - shall be prepared IAW these instructions and will be evaluated in accordance with the evaluation criteria in Section M, Evaluation Factors for Award. The Past Performance volume shall be submitted IAW L.0.8 and L.0.9.

L.0.5 Volume 3, Factor 3, Cost/Price - shall be prepared IAW these instructions and will be evaluated IAW the evaluation criteria in Section M, Evaluation Factors for Award. The Price volume shall be submitted IAW L.0.8 and L.0.9.

L.0.6 Volume 4 - Administrative Information - shall be prepared in accordance with these instructions and will be provided to the Contracting Officer and utilized as part of the separate determination of Contractor responsibility IAW FAR 9.104-1. The Administrative Criteria volume shall be submitted IAW L.0.8 and L.0.9.

mailto:corletta.n.campbell.civ@socom.mil https://sam.gov/

L.0.7 Submit proposals via email to:

Ms. Corletta Campbell, Contracting Officer @ corletta.n.campbell.civ@socom.mil Ms. Terry Ann Lewis, Contract Specialist @ terryann.j.lewis.ctr@socom.mil Subject Line: H92405-21-R-0001 Undersea T&E Support

L.0.8 Format of the proposal volumes shall be as follows:

• Text size shall be no smaller than what is equivalent to Microsoft Word, Times New Roman, 11-point, uncompressed font.

• Pages (to include Cover Pages) shall be single sided, 8.5 by 11 inches in size, one and one half spaced, with a minimum of one-inch margins on all sides.

• Text size and spacing requirements do not apply to header and footer text.

• Pages shall be dated and numbered sequentially by volume. All documents identified in L.0.9 as excluded from the identified Volume page count shall be provided at the end of the applicable Volume and distinguished by adding “unlimited” after the page number.

• Proposal table of contents, cover pages, cover letter, acronym lists, and tab dividers are not included in the page count. Test data, certification documents and the below referenced video are not included in the page count for the Technical Volume.

• Legible tables, charts, graphs and figures shall be used when necessary to depict organizations, systems and layout, implementation schedules, plans, etc. These displays shall be uncomplicated, legible, may be single spaced, and shall not exceed 11 by 17 inches in size. 11 by 17 inches pages may only be used for large tables, charts, graphs, diagrams and schematics, not for pages of text. For tables, charts, graphs and figures, the text shall be no smaller than 8-point Arial font.

• Microsoft Office presentation and spreadsheet products are preferred. PDF files where Microsoft Office formats are not available are acceptable.

L.0.9, Section L, Table 1, Proposal Submission and Preparation:

Proposal Submissions Factor

Electronic Copies

Per Volume

Print Copies Per

Volume Number of Pages

Volume 1, Technical Factor 1 2 1 1 Original 40 max + Certification Documentation

DCS Program Test Support Subfactor 1 DCS Next Development of Acquisition Program and Test Documentation

Subfactor 2

Related SOF AT&L Maritime Portfolio Test Support Subfactor 3

Technical Engineering Support Subfactor 4 Program Management Subfactor 5

Volume 2, Past Performance Factor 2 2 1 1 Original 24 max + consent letters + explanation if required

Volume 3, Cost/Price Factor 3 2 1 1 Original RFP Attachment 4 Volume 4, Administrative Information N/A 2 1 1 Original No Limit mailto:corletta.n.campbell.civ@socom.mil mailto:terryann.j.lewis.ctr@socom.mil

L.0.10 Offerors may submit questions to the Contracting Officer at any time; however, questions received after the date(s) specified in the https://sam.gov/ posting may not be answered prior to the RFP closing date.

L.1 VOLUME 1 – Factor 1 – Technical.

The offeror shall not deviate from any of the stated Undersea Systems Program Management Office (USPMO) requirements when proposing their services and/or capabilities. Proposed services and/or capabilities that outperform the Government’s stated requirements shall not be evaluated.

The offeror’s technical proposal shall include detailed and factual data validating that the proposed services and/or capabilities meet all claimed performance standards.

The technical proposal shall identify any risks associated with the proposed T&E service support strategy that may cause disruption of schedule, increased costs, degradation of performance, the need for increased Government oversight, and/or the increased likelihood of unsuccessful contract performance as well as the associated planned risk mitigation techniques.

L.1.1 Subfactor 1: DCS Program Test Support. The offeror shall provide their strategy to perform Naval Special Warfare (NSW), Test and Evaluation (T&E), and Engineering Subject Matter Expert (SME) support for the DCS Program Initial Operational Test and Evaluation (IOT&E), Verification of Correction of Deficiencies (VCD), and Follow-on Test and Evaluation (FOT&E). The offeror shall provide their strategy to assist USPMO with SME and engineering analysis in support of troubleshooting IOT&E and FOT&E deficiencies. The offeror shall provide their proposed plan of execution to assist the US Navy Commander Operational Test and Evaluation Force (COTF) in a Test Measures (TM) matrix that cross references the Government’s requirements, and the applicable page/paragraph number clearly indicating whether their proposed strategy meets the identified Statement of Work (SOW) requirements (As per section M.1.1)

L.1.2 Subfactor 2: DCS Next-Development Acquisition and Test Documentation. The offeror shall provide their strategy to perform subject matter expert input to the DCS Next program’s adaptive acquisition framework pathway (i.e. Middle Tier Acquisition and Major Capability Acquisition Milestone C decision) acquisition documentation and activities. These include but are not limited to: the Concept of Operations (CONOPS), Capability Development Document (CDD), Design Reference Mission Profile (DRMP), Technology Readiness Assessment (TRA), Preliminary Design Review (PDR), Critical Design Review (CDR), System Verification Review (SVR), Functional Configuration Audit (FCA), Production Readiness Review (PRR), Test and Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP), DT Requirements Traceability Verification Matrix (RTVM), and Developmental Evaluation Framework (DEF) (As per section M.1.2).

The offeror shall provide their proposed plan of execution to assist the DCS Next Program Manager in a Cross Reference Matrix (CRM) that cross references the Government’s requirement, and the applicable page/paragraph number clearly indicating whether their proposed strategy meets the identified Statement of Work (SOW) requirements.

The offeror shall also provide their expertise to assist the Program Office and COTF with the development of plans and strategies to execute the DCS Next Program Developmental Testing (DT), Operational Testing (OT), Test Measures (TMs), Integrated Evaluation Framework (IEF), and Initial Operational Test and Evaluation (IOT&E) Plan.

L.1.3 Subfactor 3: Related SOF AT&L Maritime Portfolio Test Support. The offeror shall provide their strategy to perform Test & Evaluation subject matter expert input during the development of plans, designs, reports and products intended to enhance current and the future capability of NSW dry submersibles and ancillary equipment.

The offeror shall provide their proposed plan of execution to assist the Government Program Office or third-party organizations with review of vendor-developed verification test plans and procedures to determine quality, applicability, and utility of the collected data (As per section M.1.3).

https://sam.gov/

L.1.4 Subfactor 4: Technical Engineering Support. The offeror’s proposal shall include a detailed plan to support technical engineering working groups/teams’ efforts as the Test and Evaluation SMEs. This detail plan shall include their strategy to participate in technical working groups/teams and meetings as directed by USPMO (Examples includes but not limited to, Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs) evaluations, configuration management reviews, emergent test and evaluation working groups, and Integrated Product Teams) (As per Section M.1.4).

L.1.5 Subfactor 5: Program Management. The offeror shall provide a concise summary of the approach to meeting the program management requirements (facilities and personnel) of this solicitation. This entails the necessary facilities and personnel expertise to have the ability to meet the requirements outlined in the SOW. This includes adequate level of management structure, personnel training & certifications, quality assurance, financial management and security requirements delineated in the DD 254. (As per Section M.1.5).

At a minimum the offeror shall address the following elements and, when viewed collectively, demonstrate its ability to successfully execute the requirements in the solicitation:

L.1.5.1 The offeror shall also include the following within this subfactor to address small business participation IAW DFARS 215.304. This is separate from the Individual Subcontracting Plan required by FAR 19.702(a)(1) and Volume 4, Administrative Information. (*NOTE* the NAICS code of 541330 pertains to the prime offeror. The offeror will then be able to determine their subcontractors and the NAICS code for the work that the subcontractor will be performing):

• Describe your corporate commitment in providing subcontracting opportunities for small business, small-disadvantaged business, women-owned small business, HUBZone small business, veteran-owned small business, and service-disabled veteran-owned small business concerns

• Describe the strength and specificity of each corporate commitment (i.e. what type of commitment, how binding is the commitment, how specific is the commitment to this proposed effort, and what type of work will be included in these subcontracting opportunities from the overall corporate level)

L.2 VOLUME 2 – Factor 2 - Past Performance

L.2.1 Contents. The offeror shall submit a Past Performance Proposal (Volume 2) containing the following:

1. Table of Contents

2. Summary Page describing the role of the offeror and each subcontractor, teaming partner, and/or joint venture partner (herein referred to as subcontractor) for which the offeror is required to provide Past Performance Information Sheets in accordance with paragraph L.2.1.1 below.

3. Past Performance Information Sheets (paragraph L.2.1.1 below).

4. Past Performance Information regarding Subcontracting (paragraph L.2.1.2 below).

5. Consent Letters executed by each major subcontractor, teaming partner, and/or joint venture partner, authorizing release of adverse past performance information so the offeror can respond to such information. **Excluded from page limit for Volume 2**

6. Past Performance Questionnaires (Attachment 5) **Excluded from page limit for Volume 2**

L.2.1.1 Past Performance Information Sheets. The offeror shall submit information on contracts it considers most recent and relevant in demonstrating its ability to perform the proposed effort. The offeror shall submit a maximum of five and a minimum of three Past Performance Information Sheets identifying active or completed contracts, for the prime and a maximum of two and a minimum of one Past Performance Information Sheet for each major subcontractor. For purposes of this solicitation “major” is defined as those subcontractors, teaming partners, or joint venture partners who the offeror feels are key to demonstrating its ability to perform the entire scope of the proposed effort. Offerors are not required to submit subcontractor past performance if they do not find them key to their ability, however, if proposed, no more than two separate major subcontractors may be submitted.

Past Performance Information Sheets for each prime contractor are limited to three pages and for each major subcontractor to two pages. Offerors are advised that the Government will use the information provided in this volume as well as information obtained from other sources for the overall evaluation of past performance. The

Government requests the offeror provide references including current Points of Contact (POCs) for each contract identified. Contact information for each POC and reference shall include both a telephone number and email address.

L.2.1.1.1 Past Performance Information Sheets shall include specific information for each effort regarding experience in accordance with the following areas outlined below. NOTE: If the experience in the following areas was not required under the referenced contract, the offeror shall indicate that it was not applicable on the Past Performance Information Sheet.

L.2.1.1.1.1 For each submitted prime offeror effort, offerors should:

• Describe if the prime offeror was the prime contractor or subcontractor for that effort. If not the prime contractor for the effort, all information should be reflective of what was actually performed as a subcontractor rather than what was required of the overall team.

• Include a brief narrative of the overall effort, addressing each relevancy criterion within the three areas outlined in section L.2.1.3.1 (scope and magnitude).

L.2.1.1.1.2 For each submitted major subcontractor effort, offerors should:

• Describe what effort(s) that major subcontractor will be performing in support of the prime offeror under this contract.

• Describe if they were the prime contractor or subcontractor for that effort. If not the prime contractor for the effort, all information should be reflective of what was actually performed as a subcontractor rather than what was required of the overall team.

• Identify current contract value (awarded tasks/exercised options), Government or commercial organization(s) supported, and the POP.

• Describe overall scope of the effort and how it relates to the specific area(s) in the SOW/PDS the major subcontractor is proposed to actually perform under this contract.

• Any additional information the offeror finds necessary in order to demonstrate the overall team capability.

L.2.1.2 Recent Contracts. The Government defines “recent” as contracts that have been performed during the past five years from the date of issuance of this solicitation.

L.2.1.3 Relevant Contracts. Relevancy will be determined based on contract references reflecting recent (within the past five years) past performance.

L.2.1.3.1 For the prime offerors, relevancy is defined as contracts that are most similar to this overall effort and require similar scope and magnitude of effort this solicitation requires. In order to be considered relevant (prime offeror efforts only) the effort must include the following:

Similar Scope: Test and Evaluation of Special Operations Forces Undersea Mobility Systems or Similar efforts and was in support of DOD or other U.S. Government agency;

Magnitude: contract value of $1M annually or greater.

L.2.1.3.2 For proposed major subcontractors, relevancy is defined by that which reflects experience in the area of expertise the major subcontractor is proposed to actually perform under this contract (i.e. specific areas in the SOW or PDS).

L.2.1.3.3 When making the relevancy determination the following definitions outlined within Table 2 will be used for both prime offeror and major subcontractor efforts:

SECTION L - Table 2. Past Performance Relevancy Rating Method Adjectival Ratings Description

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort this solicitation requires.

L.3 VOLUME 3 – Factor 3 – Cost/Price

L.3.1 The offeror shall submit pricing for all CLINS utilizing RFP Attachment 4 entitled “Price Matrix”. Upon contract award, the evaluated and accepted tab of RFP Attachment 4 will become an attachment to the contract.

Submission of the pricing data shall be complete and accurate. The offeror shall not lock, re-format, remove, change, or alter the cells in RFP Attachment 4 unless otherwise instructed.

L.3.2 The Contracting Officer has determined there is a high probability of adequate price competition on this acquisition. Upon examination of the initial proposals, the Contracting Officer will review this determination and if in the Contracting Officer’s opinion adequate price competition exists, certification under FAR 15.406-2 will not be required. However, if at any time during this acquisition the Contracting Officer determines that adequate price competition no longer exists, the offeror may be required to submit certified pricing data. Additionally, all information related to price shall be included in the section of the proposal defined as “Volume 3 – Cost/Price”.

UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES should price data be included elsewhere in the proposal.

L.3.3 The awardee is expected to have an adequate cost accounting system as determined by the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA). IAW DFARS 252.242-7006(c) Accounting System Administration – System Criteria.

(c) System criteria. The Contractor’s accounting system shall provide for—

(1) A sound internal control environment, accounting framework, and organizational structure;

(2) Proper segregation of direct costs from indirect costs;

(3) Identification and accumulation of direct costs by contract;

(4) A logical and consistent method for the accumulation and allocation of indirect costs to intermediate and final cost objectives;

(5) Accumulation of costs under general ledger control;

(6) Reconciliation of subsidiary cost ledgers and cost objectives to general ledger;

(7) Approval and documentation of adjusting entries;

(8) Management reviews or internal audits of the system to ensure compliance with the Contractor’s established policies, procedures, and accounting practices;

(9) A timekeeping system that identifies employees’ labor by intermediate or final cost objectives;

(10) A labor distribution system that charges direct and indirect labor to the appropriate cost objectives;

(11) Interim (at least monthly) determination of costs charged to a contract through routine posting of books of account;

(12) Exclusion from costs charged to Government contracts of amounts which are not allowable in terms of Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) part 31, Contract Cost Principles and Procedures, and other contract provisions;

(13) Identification of costs by contract line item and by units (as if each unit or line item were a separate contract), if required by the contract;

(14) Segregation of preproduction costs from production costs, as applicable;

(15) Cost accounting information, as required—

(i) By contract clauses concerning limitation of cost (FAR 52.232-20), limitation of funds (FAR 52.232-22), or allowable cost and payment (FAR 52.216-7); and

(ii) To readily calculate indirect cost rates from the books of accounts;

(16) Billings that can be reconciled to the cost accounts for both current and cumulative amounts claimed and comply with contract terms;

(17) Adequate, reliable data for use in pricing follow-on acquisitions; and

(18) Accounting practices in accordance with standards promulgated by the Cost Accounting Standards Board, if applicable, otherwise, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.

L.4 VOLUME 4 – Administrative Information. The offeror shall provide documentation as required below in order for the Contracting Officer to determine the offeror responsible IAW FAR 9.104-1 and eligible for contract award.

L.4.1 Secret Facility Clearance and Secret Safeguarding Capability. The offeror must have a U.S. SECRET or higher facility security clearance and personnel working on the contract should have access to SIPRNet. Offerors shall provide proof of a Secret Facility Clearance and Authorized Secret Safeguarding as accredited by the Defense Security Service (DSS) at the time of proposal submission.

L.4.2 Contract Forms and Certifications.

1. Section 1 – Proposal cover letter or proposal cover page. Include names, office phone numbers, cell phone numbers, and e-mail addresses for proposal POCs. Include validity of proposals and *NOTE* offers must be valid through at least December 2021 for purposes of Government evaluation of proposals.

2. Section 2 – A completed SF33 with blocks 12 thru 18 filled out.

L.4.3 Small Business Subcontracting Plan. FAR 52.219-8, FAR 52.219-9 (g) (DEV), FAR 52.219-9 Alt II (DEV), and DFARS 252.219-7003 (DoD Contracts) clauses are included in this solicitation and will be incorporated into any resultant contract. A subcontracting plan is required from all offerors other than small business concerns.

A commercial or master small business subcontracting plan may be submitted in lieu of an individual plan IAW FAR 19.704(d). The offeror's submission must provide sufficient information, as required, and must meet the minimum requirements in FAR Part 19.704.

DOCUMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION PAGES DATE

06 N/A 06-OCT-2021

Interview Questionnaire

06 N/A

Exhibit A DD Form 1423-1 (Contract Data Requirements List

(End of Summary of Changes)