QA_Set_9_170705.pdf

PDF 47 KB Posted

Attached to
SPEAR Family of Tactical Headborne Systems
Solicitation number
H92222-17-R-0003
Issued by

About this file

Q&A Set 9

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
H92222-17-R-0003-0009.pdf PDF
QA_Set_11_170717.pdf PDF
QA_Set_10_170706.pdf PDF
H92222-17-R-0003-0007.pdf PDF
H92222-17-R-0003-0006.pdf PDF
Attachment_4_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_170628.pdf PDF
H92222-17-R-0003-0005.pdf PDF
QA_Set_8_170606.pdf PDF
Attachment_4_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_170531.pdf PDF
Exhibit_A_CDRLs_170531.pdf PDF
H92222-17-R-0003-0004.pdf PDF
QA_Set_7_170516.pdf PDF
H92222-17-R-0003.pdf PDF
QA_Set_6_170509.pdf PDF
H92222-17-R-0003-0002.pdf PDF
Exhibit_A_CDRLs_170501.pdf PDF
H92222-17-R-0003-0001.pdf PDF
QA_Set_5_170501.pdf PDF
QA_Set_4_170426.pdf PDF
Attachment_04_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_170406.pdf PDF
H92222-17-R-0003.pdf PDF
Exhibit_A_CDRLs_170301.pdf PDF
Attachment_05_Price_Matrix_170426.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
REVISED_QA_Set_2_170418.pdf PDF
QA_Set_3_170406.pdf PDF
QA_Set_2_170405.pdf PDF
Attachment_4_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_170404.pdf PDF
Q&A_Set_1_170327.pdf PDF
Attachment_05_Price_Matrix_170316.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Exhibit_A_CDRLs_170301.pdf PDF
H92222-17-R-0003_DRAFT.pdf PDF
Show all 31

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

SPEAR Family of Tactical Headborne Systems Q&A Set 9 5 July 2017

Q1: When performing Tool Qualification Testing of Appendix B of FTHS Specification dated 8 May 2017, the test lab performing V-50 tests in accordance with MIL-STD-662F begins testing at 100 fps above base threat requirement. In many instances for 4 grain RCC, 16 grain RCC, and 9mm FMJ V-50 tests, 14 shots per threat are being placed without being able to achieve quantitative V-50 results.

Will it be acceptable to submit V-50 tool qualification results that utilize 7 partial rule protocol as long as 14 fair shots are placed within the test items with no complete penetrations below the requirement listed in points 2 and 3 of Appendix B?

A1: Yes.

Q2: We request a 30 day extension for the FTHS RFP H92222-17-R-0003.

A2: Please be aware that the proposal due date has been extended to 26 July 2017 at 12 PM Eastern Standard Time.

Q3: Will the USG modify the PSPEC 1.2 requirement for PPAH comparison between bump and ballistic shells? Industry has found it impossible to meet the existing +/-0.46 sq in requirement. Production level shells were needed to validate this requirement at the test house and therefore this problem was not identified until recently. Recommendation is to remove or relax that requirement, maintaining PPAH for minimum surface area mandate and weight calculations.

A3: Please see Amendment 06 with Performance Specification changes.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .