Attachment_J-4_ISS-J_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 41 KB Posted

Attached to
Actionable Intelligence Support Services Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
H92222-13-R-0062A
Issued by
United States Special Operations Command

About this file

Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Actionable Intelligence Support Services, newest first.
File Type Posted
Attachment_J-7_Sect_L_3_Sep.docx DOCX document
Attachment_J-8_Section_M_3_Sep.docx DOCX document
Attachment_J-3_DD254.pdf PDF
Attachment_J-9_Section_M_22_Aug.docx DOCX document
Attachment_J-2_CDRLs_JISS.pdf PDF
Attachment_J-5_Pricing_Sheet_-_15_Aug_2013_FINAL.xls XLS spreadsheet
H92222-13-R-0062B.pdf PDF
Attachment_J-8_Sect_L_final_Aug_22.docx DOCX document
Attachment_J-6_TBC_Local_and_required_Instructions_FINAL.docx DOCX document
Attachment_J-7_C3_Clauses_FINAL.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment 4 H92222-13-R-0062B

Past Performance Questionnaire

Company Responding To RFP: ____________________________________________

Company Completing Questionnaire: _______________________________________

Name of Person Completing questionnaire:

Title of Person Completing questionnaire:

Address of Person Completing questionnaire:

Phone Number of Person Completing questionnaire:

E-mail of Person Completing questionnaire:

Contract Number:

Period of Performance:

Current Contract Value:

Describe type of Intelligence Support:

Please complete this questionnaire. Handwritten responses are sufficient. If you need more space than that provided, please attach additional pages or write on the back. Responses will be treated as acquisition sensitive information.

If you have more than one contract to respond to, please use a different sheet and do not combine answers below.

Please scan your responses and email the completed questionnaire to:

Sordac-KP
Email: sordac-k_intel@socom.mil
Phone: N/A

1. Please assign one of the following adjectival ratings to each question during your assessment:

E – Exceptional/Substantial Confidence: Based on the offeror’s ability to provide Intelligence support in OCONUS locations worldwide, no doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

S – Satisfactory/Confidence: Based on the offeror’s ability to provide Intelligence support in OCONUS locations worldwide, some doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

L - Low/Limited Confidence: Based on the offeror’s ability to provide Intelligence support in OCONUS locations worldwide, substantial doubt exists that the offeror will successfully.

U – Unsatisfactory/No Confidence: Based on the offeror’s ability to provide Intelligence support in OCONUS locations worldwide, extreme doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

N – Neutral/Unknown Confidence: No performance record identifiable where the offeror has provided Intelligence support in OCONUS locations worldwide.

2. For each response, please include a narrative with appropriate and specific examples for each of the assessment elements. Please check the appropriate rating for each applicable past performance service area.

ASSESSMENT ELEMENTS

Adjectival Rating
E
S
L
U
N

a. How would you rate the Contractor’s performance in screening/processing Intel Analysts for deployments to OCONUS locations around the world in a timely manner?

Comments:

Adjectival Rating
E
S
L
U
N

b. How would you rate the Contractor’s performance in recruiting and retaining quality personnel?

Comments:

Adjectival Rating
E
S
L
U
N

c. How would you rate the Contractor’s overall ability in providing OCONUS On-Site Management?

Comments:

Adjectival Rating
E
S
L
U
N

d. How would you rate this Contractor’s overall ability to provide personnel who have the skills to meet contract requirements?

Comments:

Adjectival Rating
E
S
L
U
N

e. Do you feel the Contractor can staff appropriately for a large number personnel OCONUS?

Comments:

Adjectival Rating
E
S
L
U
N

f. How would you rate this Contractor’s ability to manage the overall contract effectively and efficiently?

Comments:

Adjectival Rating
E
S
L
U
N

g. How would you rate the Contractor’s ability to smoothly transition resources and personnel?

Comments:

Adjectival Rating
E
S
L
U
N

h. How would you rate this Contractor’s effectiveness on maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning in/out resources and personnel?

Comments:

Adjectival Rating
E
S
L
U
N

i. To what extent did the Contractor demonstrate reasonable and cooperative management behavior?

Comments:

Adjectival Rating
E
S
L
U
N

j. How would you rate the Contractor’s ability to manage sub-contractors?

Comments:

Adjectival Rating
E
S
L
U
N

k. How would you rate this Contractor’s responsiveness to contract requirements and changes?

Comments:

Adjectival Rating
E
S
L
U
N

l. How would you rate this Contractor’s overall ability to effectively manage project cost/price?

Comments:

Adjectival Rating
E
S
L
U
N

m. How would you rate the Contractor’s ability to submit timely and accurate invoices?

Comments:

Adjectival Rating
E
S
L
U
N

n. How would you rate this Contractor’s ability to forecast accurate costs and meet realistic cost projections?

Comments:

Adjectival Rating
E
S
L
U
N

o. Did the contractor provide adequate safeguards and security to protect sensitive information and processes?

Comments:

YES
NO

p. Given the choice, would you award to this contractor again?

Comments:

YES
NO

q. Are you aware of any other contracted efforts performed by this contractor similar in nature to this contract? Please identify contract/program and point of contact.

Comments:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .