Amend02CC.doc

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

GS11P10MKC0063

PAGE OF

PAGES

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

Amendment 02

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

06/17/2010

REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

GSA, NCR, PBS,

Campus Development Team (WP) 301 7th Street, SW Room 4606 Washington, DC 20407

GSA, NCR, PBS,

Campus Development Team (WP)

301 7th Street, SW Room 4606

Washington, DC 20407

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code)

9.A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

To All Prospective Offerors

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

06/01/2010

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers FORMCHECKBOX is extended, FORMCHECKBOX is not extended

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning. copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegraph which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

c.

THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D.

OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor FORMCHECKBOX is not FORMCHECKBOX is required to sign this document and return ________ copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible).

The solicitation is hereby amended as follows:

The following changes, clarifications, additions and supplements are hereby incorporated into this SOLICITATION in their entirety as submitted. Continued on Page 2 of this Amendment

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document reference in item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print) Bonnie Echoles, Contracting Officer

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

BY

Bonnie Echoles .

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

06/01/2010

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

PREVIOUS EDITION UNUSABLE

30-105

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

GS11P10MKC0063, RECOVERY: Campus Coordinator, Consolidation of DHS at the St. Elizabeths Campus, SE, Wash., DC

ITEM A:

THE PROPOSAL RECEIPT DATE remains as follows:

July 1, 2010 by 2:00 PM, EST. Place of receipt as follows:

GSA, NCR, ROB – Bid Room 301 7th Street, SW, Room 1065 Washington, DC 20407 Phone: (202)708-5961

ITEM B:

Offerors must acknowledge receipt of this amendment on offer form, giving number and date.

Attachments:

Attendees List

END OF AMENDMENT NO. TWO (2)

CAMPUS COORDINATOR RFI LOG #1 06/07/10

RESPONSE

FAR Subpart 9.5 specifically addresses Organizational and Consultant Conflicts of Interest. This subpart prescribes responsibilities, general rules, and procedures for identifying, evaluating, and resolving organizational conflicts of interest. The scope for the Campus Coordinator will include the administration of global issues pertaining to all three (3) phases for the project. The global issues will be relative to the oversight and management of interdependent projects. At a minimum, it is expected that there will be three (3) Architects of Record (one for each phase); three (3) Construction Management Firms (one for each phase), and over one hundred Construction Contractors (large and small). Each Construction Management (CM) professional services contract is intended to perform design phase (excluding actual design), procurement phase, construction phase, reimbursable, supplemental, claims, testing, and miscellaneous services under each phase.

Due date is July 1, will be updated.

75 pages are just for the Technical portion.

No, just the Pricing.

Contracting Officer will supply forms.

Yes

Yes

3 pages for each person.

See attached Sheet – SDB Participation Plan and SB Subcontracting Plan.

#10 Response to CC RFI Log #1: SDB Participation Plan and SB Subcontracting Plan Please define the difference between FACTOR 5: Small Disadvantaged Business Participation Plan, p. 100, with targets expressed as dollars and percentages of total contract value, and Price Proposal Tab 5, Subcontracting Plan?

FACTOR 5: Small Disadvantaged Business Participation Plan, (p. 100), is an evaluation factor for the participation of SDB concerns in performance of the contract.

The Small Disadvantaged Business Participation Plan addresses specifically SDBs which the US Small Business Administration defines as a small business concern that is at least 51 percent owned by one or more individuals who are both socially and economically disadvantaged. This can include a publicly owned business that has at least 51 percent of its stock unconditionally owned by one or more socially and economically disadvantaged individuals and whose management and daily business is controlled by one or more such individuals.

SBA further defines socially disadvantaged groups as those who have been, historically, subjected to "racial or ethnic prejudice or cultural bias" within the larger American culture. Identified groups include: African Americans, Asian Pacific Americans, Hispanic Americans, Native Americans and Subcontinent Asian Americans.

The Small Business Subcontracting Plan encompasses ALL small business concerns: small business (including ANCs and Indian tribes), veteran-owned small business, service-disabled veteran-owned small business, HUBZone small business, small disadvantaged business (including ANCs and Indian tribes) and women-owned small business concerns as subcontractors.

FAR 52.219-24Small Disadvantaged Business Participation Program—Targets (Oct 2000)

(a) This solicitation contains a source selection factor or subfactor related to the participation of small disadvantaged business (SDB) concerns in the contract. Credit under that evaluation factor or subfactor is not available to an SDB concern that qualifies for a price evaluation adjustment under the clause at FAR 52.219-23, Notice of Price Evaluation Adjustment for Small Disadvantaged Business Concerns, unless the SDB concern specifically waives the price evaluation adjustment.

(b) In order to receive credit under the source selection factor or subfactor, the offeror must provide, with its offer, targets, expressed as dollars and percentages of total contract value, for SDB participation in any of the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Industry Subsectors as determined by the Department of Commerce. The targets may provide for participation by a prime contractor, joint venture partner, teaming arrangement member, or subcontractor; however, the targets for subcontractors must be listed separately.

(End of provision)

FAR 52.219-25 Small Disadvantaged Business Participation Program—Disadvantaged Status and Reporting (Apr 2008)

(a) Disadvantaged status for joint venture partners, team members, and subcontractors. This clause addresses disadvantaged status for joint venture partners, teaming arrangement members, and subcontractors and is applicable if this contract contains small disadvantaged business (SDB) participation targets. The Contractor shall obtain representations of small disadvantaged status from joint venture partners, teaming arrangement members, and subcontractors through use of a provision substantially the same as paragraph (b)(1)(i) of the provision at FAR 52.219-22, Small Disadvantaged Business Status. The Contractor shall confirm that a joint venture partner, team member, or subcontractor representing itself as a small disadvantaged business concern is a small disadvantaged business concern certified by the Small Business Administration by using the Central Contractor Registration database or by contacting the SBA’s Office of Small Disadvantaged Business Certification and Eligibility.

(b) Reporting requirement. If this contract contains SDB participation targets, the Contractor shall report on the participation of SDB concerns at contract completion, or as otherwise pro-vided in this contract. Reporting may be on Optional Form 312, Small Disadvantaged Business Participation Report, in the Contractor’s own format providing the same information, or accomplished through using the Electronic Subcontracting Reporting System’s Small Disadvantaged Business Participation Report. This report is required for each contract containing SDB participation targets. If this contract contains an individual Small Business Subcontracting Plan, reports shall be submitted with the final Individual Subcontract Report at the completion of the contract.

(End of clause)

Part III Section J - List of Documents, Exhibits, and Other Attachments

ATTACHMENT 1

Name of Procurement Official

PRIVACY ACT NOTICE TO EMPLOYEES AND OFFICIALS (rev.)

In accordance with Privacy Act of 1974, as amended (5 U.S.C.552a), the following notice is provided:

AUTHORITY FOR COLLECTION OF INFORMATION; 41 U.S.C. 423 and Executive Order 9397.

Your signature on the original Form 333, Procurement Integrity Certification for Procurement Officials, and disclosure of Social Security Number on this page, are voluntary. However, you should realize that if the certification is not signed and the Social Security Number is not provided, you may be disqualified from particular work or duty assignments, or from the position for which you have applied or which you currently hold. Further, other appropriate action, or administrative delay in processing your certification may be taken.

Principle purpose for collection of this information;

To obtain and maintain a completed certification from any person designated as a “Procurement Official,” as defined by 41 U.S.C. 423 and applicable procurement regulations.

Routine uses which may be made of the collected information:

Transfers to Federal, state, local, or foreign agencies when relevant civil, criminal, administrative, or regulatory investigations or proceedings, including transfer to the Office of GOVERNMENT Ethics in connection with its program oversight responsibilities, or pursuant to a request by any appropriate Federal agency in connection with hiring, retention, or grievance of an employee or applicant, the issuance of a license, grant, or other benefit, to committees of the Congress, or any other use specified by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) in the system of records entitled “OPM/GOVT-1, General Personnel Records,” as published in the Federal Register periodically by OPM.

A. ATTACHMENT 11: FIRM’S PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Your assistance is requested in support of a source selection.

Please complete this Questionnaire and send by facsimile [(202) 373-0164] or electronic mail [ tiphenie.wise-traynham@gsa.gov]o:

GSA, St Elizabeths Campus Development Team

301 7th Street, SW; Room 4606 (WP)

Washington, DC 20407 Bonnie E. Echoles, Contracting Officer

Desired Response Date:

June 28, 2010

When complete, the information on this form is SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION (41 U.S.C. 423) and shall be protected accordingly.

2.1 TO BE COMPLETED BY FIRM OFFEROR for THE ST ELIZABETHS CAMPUS COORDINATOR PROJECT

5. CONTRACT START DATE / COMPLETION DATE:

6. CONTRACT VALUE (AT AWARD / FINAL VALUE):

2. OWNER’S NAME AND ADDRESS

7. CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT VALUE (AT AWARD / FINAL VALUE):

8. TYPE OF CONTRACT:

3. PROJECT NAME:

9. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT’S KEY CHARACTERISTICS:

Please add a continuation page if additional space is necessary.

TO BE COMPLETED BY EVALUATING ORGANIZATION REPRESENTATIVE (REFERENCE)

10. EVALUATION: a. EVALUATOR'S NAME, POSITION DURING PROJECT EXECUTION ( Project Manager/ COR/ Other) AND ORGANIZATION:

b. EVALUATOR'S PHONE NUMBER: c. EVALUATOR’S FAX NUMBER:

d. EVALUATOR'S E-MAIL ADDRESS: e. MONTHS PERFORMANCE MONITORED BY EVALUATOR:

Did the construction project contain any of the following characteristics?

The project involved the development of a campus (federally owned), at least 400,000 GSF.

The project was a construction program with multiple phases and multiple interdependent projects managed in a coordinated way to obtain benefits and controls not available from managing them individually.

The project was in a highly secured area.

The project was set in a restricted/congested urban site requiring extensive coordination with adjacent landowners/occupants and the community.

The project involved historic preservation.

The project involved working with Central Utility Plant (CUP) Utilities (with cogeneration).

Questions: (Some questions may not apply to roles)

Experience:

1. What was the actual work performed by the firm? Who was the Senior Project Manager (Coordination Executive) on the project?

2. Did the key personnel ensure that the finished product met your requirements as set forth in the documents? Did the management cooperate with the administration of routine matters and unexpected difficulties?

3. Did the firm demonstrate adequate technical knowledge for the referenced project?

Performance:

[Using the following scale, please rate the following areas of performance. The scale is defined with each factor.]

EX- Excellent; VG- Very Good; S- Satisfactory; MG- Marginal; US- Unsatisfactory; NO- Not Observed

4.

How effective was the firm in identifying and resolving potential problems?

US – Firm failed to identify and resolve problems resulting in extensive modifications, claims or cost/schedule overruns.

EX - Firm was proactive in identifying potential problems and recommending solutions to minimize cost/schedule impacts.

Rating: ________ Comments:____________________________________________________________________

5.

How effective was the firm in managing the project’s budget and controlling costs?

US – Firm failed to manage the budget and control costs.

EX - Firm maintained tight control of budget and costs and was proactive in identifying potential costs and recommending solutions to minimize cost/schedule impacts

Rating: ________ Comments:____________________________________________________________________

6.

How effective was the firm in maintaining project quality, enforcing the contract documents, and identifying and resolving defects and omissions to the owner’s satisfaction and in a timely fashion?

US – Firm did not adequately enforce the contract documents and left resolution of defects and omissions until the punch list.

EX - Firm actively enforced the contract documents, maintained high standards for quality and workmanship, and quickly resolved defects and omissions, leaving a minimal punch list at project completion.

Rating: ________ Comments:____________________________________________________________________

7.

Rate the firm’s overall management of the project.

US – Firm was often not available and work seemed to suffer significantly due to lack of management capabilities.

EX - Firm’s work flowed smoothly, management was always available and responsive and the project was efficiently and effectively completed.

Rating: ________ Comments:____________________________________________________________________

8. If you had a choice, would you contract with the firm again? Why or Why not?

9. What are the company’s strong points, or what did you like about them?

10. What are the company’s weak points and what do you like least about them?

11. If you were GSA, would you contract with this firm? Why or Why not?

12. Do you know of any other projects performed by this firm?

13. In summary would you choose to describe the quality of their services and overall performance as:

____ a. significantly better than acceptable (EX);

____ b. slightly better than acceptable (VG);

____ c. acceptable (S);

____ d. slightly less than acceptable (MG); or

____ e. entirely unacceptable (US).