RFQ A E PPES Form - Attachment 3.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 17 KB Posted

Attached to
Design/Build New United States Courthouse - Los Angeles, California
Solicitation number
GS-09P-12-KT-C-0004
Issued by

About this file

From the source

Amendment 2 - RFQ Attachment 3 A E PPES Form

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
GS-09P-12-KT-C-0004_Amendment_9.zip ZIP file
GS-09P-12-KT-C-0004 Amendment 8.zip ZIP file
GS-09P-12-KT-C-0004 Amendment 7.zip ZIP file
GS-09P-12-KT-C-0004 Amendment 6.zip ZIP file
RFP Amendment 5.zip ZIP file
New U.S. Courthouse Los Angeles CA - Small Business Outreach.pdf PDF
RFP Amendment 4.zip ZIP file
RFP Amendment 3.zip ZIP file
RFP Amedndment 2.zip ZIP file
GS-09P-12-KT-C-0004 RFP Amendment 1.zip ZIP file
GS-09P-12-KT-C-0004 DB Shortlist.pdf PDF
GS-09P-12-KT-C-0004 RFP Amendment 1.zip ZIP file
Final Phase II RFP w-attachments.zip ZIP file
U.S. Courthouse - Los Angeles Pre-Solicitation Notice.pdf PDF
GS-09P-12-KT-C-0004 Amendment 3.pdf PDF
Revised SF 1442.pdf PDF
Amendment 3 - Attachment 1.pdf PDF
U.S. Courthouse Pre-proposal - Audience Questions.pdf PDF
GSA National CMa IDIQ Contractor List.pdf PDF
Attendee List.pdf PDF
SF 30.pdf PDF
Amendment 2.pdf PDF
SF 30.pdf PDF
GS-09P-12-KT-C-0004 Amendment1-Attachment 1.pdf PDF
Attachment 1 Past Performance Evaluation.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 2 Doc Security for SBU Info..docx DOCX document
New U.S. Courthouse-Los Angeles- Phase I SOW.pdf PDF
New U.S. Courthouse RFQ - Los Angeles.pdf PDF
C301-Reps and Certs.pdf PDF
SF 1442.pdf PDF
U.S. Courthouse - Los Angeles Pre-Solicitation Notice Rev 1.pdf PDF
Show all 31

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

Sheet1

RFQ Attachment 3: PAST PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR A-E Firm & Design Team
(EVALUATED BY OWNER OR OWNER REPRESENTATIVE)
Evaluating Organization or Company:
Evaluator (Name and Title):
Evaluator Phone and e-mail:
Name of Contractor Being Evaluated:
Project Title and Brief Description:
QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE
0=Unsatisfactory; 1=Poor; 2=Fair; 3=Good; 4=Excellent; 5=OutstandingN/A012345
Thorough Understanding of Project
Quality of site investigation/analysis
Quality of programming
Incorporation of scope of work
Quality control procedures and execution
Quality of deliverables
Coordination of all documentation and among all disciplines
Quality review of contract documents (shop drawings, reports, minutes, etc)
Quality of Inspections
Constructability of contract documents
Quality of supplemental documents (i.e. ASI, RFIs, etc)
Comments for Quality of Product of Service
COST CONTROL
0=Unsatisfactory; 1=Poor; 2=Fair; 3=Good; 4=Excellent; 5=OutstandingN/A012345
Cost Estimating Services
Costs within budget (DD & CD Phases)
Accuracy of final estimate with actual bid
Comments for Cost Control
COMPLIANCE WITH PERFORMANCE SCHEDULES
0=Unsatisfactory; 1=Poor; 2=Fair; 3=Good; 4=Excellent; 5=OutstandingN/A012345
Timeliness with Performance
Responsiveness to review comments
Resolution of Delays (if applicable)
Comments for Timeliness of Performance
EFFECTIVENESS OF MANAGEMENT/BUSINESS RELATIONS
0=Unsatisfactory; 1=Poor; 2=Fair; 3=Good; 4=Excellent; 5=OutstandingN/A012345
Key personnel effectiveness
Coordination of Consultants
Interaction of Team Members (gov't, customer, tenant, consultants)
Effectiveness of the interaction with 3rd parties (i.e. tenants, city, vendors, utilities):
Coordination with external review agencies//utilities
Professional Conduct:
Comments for Effectiveness of Management/Business Relations
SECURITY
0=Unsatisfactory; 1=Poor; 2=Fair; 3=Good; 4=Excellent; 5=OutstandingN/A012345
Compliance with security classification and handling

Comments for Security

OVERALL RATING
0=Unsatisfactory; 1=Poor; 2=Fair; 3=Good; 4=Excellent; 5=OutstandingN/A012345
Overall Rating:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .