Attachment 1 Past Performance Evaluation.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 19 KB Posted

Attached to
Design/Build New United States Courthouse - Los Angeles, California
Solicitation number
GS-09P-12-KT-C-0004
Issued by

About this file

Attachment 1 Past Performance Evaluation

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
GS-09P-12-KT-C-0004_Amendment_9.zip ZIP file
GS-09P-12-KT-C-0004 Amendment 8.zip ZIP file
GS-09P-12-KT-C-0004 Amendment 7.zip ZIP file
GS-09P-12-KT-C-0004 Amendment 6.zip ZIP file
RFP Amendment 5.zip ZIP file
New U.S. Courthouse Los Angeles CA - Small Business Outreach.pdf PDF
RFP Amendment 4.zip ZIP file
RFP Amendment 3.zip ZIP file
RFP Amedndment 2.zip ZIP file
GS-09P-12-KT-C-0004 RFP Amendment 1.zip ZIP file
GS-09P-12-KT-C-0004 DB Shortlist.pdf PDF
GS-09P-12-KT-C-0004 RFP Amendment 1.zip ZIP file
Final Phase II RFP w-attachments.zip ZIP file
U.S. Courthouse - Los Angeles Pre-Solicitation Notice.pdf PDF
GS-09P-12-KT-C-0004 Amendment 3.pdf PDF
Revised SF 1442.pdf PDF
Amendment 3 - Attachment 1.pdf PDF
U.S. Courthouse Pre-proposal - Audience Questions.pdf PDF
GSA National CMa IDIQ Contractor List.pdf PDF
Attendee List.pdf PDF
RFQ A E PPES Form - Attachment 3.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
SF 30.pdf PDF
Amendment 2.pdf PDF
SF 30.pdf PDF
GS-09P-12-KT-C-0004 Amendment1-Attachment 1.pdf PDF
Attachment 2 Doc Security for SBU Info..docx DOCX document
New U.S. Courthouse-Los Angeles- Phase I SOW.pdf PDF
New U.S. Courthouse RFQ - Los Angeles.pdf PDF
C301-Reps and Certs.pdf PDF
SF 1442.pdf PDF
U.S. Courthouse - Los Angeles Pre-Solicitation Notice Rev 1.pdf PDF
Show all 31

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Sheet1

Attachment 1: PAST PERFORMANCE REPORT
(EVALUATED BY OWNER OR OWNER REPRESENTATIVE)
Evaluating Organization or Company:
Evaluator (Name and Title):
Evaluator Phone and e-mail:
Name of Contractor Being Evaluated:
Project Title and Brief Description:
QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE
0=Unsatisfactory; 1=Poor; 2=Fair; 3=Good; 4=Excellent; 5=OutstandingN/A012345
Quality of Workmanship:
Adequacy of the CQC Plan:
Implementation of CQC Plan:
Quality of QC Documentation:
Storage of Materials:
Adequacy of Materials: RESERVED
Adequacy of Submittals:
Adequacy of QC Testing:
Adequacy of As-Builts:
Use of Specified Materials:
Identification/Correction of Deficient Work:
Comments for Quality of Products or Service
COST CONTROL
0=Unsatisfactory; 1=Poor; 2=Fair; 3=Good; 4=Excellent; 5=OutstandingN/A012345
Representation of owner interests in negotiating changes with subcontractors:
Quality of rationale provided to support costs:
Cost Controls
Comments for Cost Control
TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE
0=Unsatisfactory; 1=Poor; 2=Fair; 3=Good; 4=Excellent; 5=OutstandingN/A012345
Adequacy of Initial Progress Schedule:
Adherence to Approved Schedule:
Resolution of Delays:
Submission of Required Documentation:
Completion of Punch List Items:
Submission of Updated and Revised Progress Schedules:
Warranty Response:
Comments for Timeliness of Performance
EFFECTIVENESS OF MANAGEMENT/BUSINESS RELATIONS
0=Unsatisfactory; 1=Poor; 2=Fair; 3=Good; 4=Excellent; 5=OutstandingN/A012345
Extent of collaboration with owner and A-E to achieve project goals:
Effectiveness of the interaction with 3rd parties (i.e. tenants, city, vendors, utilities):
Cooperation and Responsiveness:
Management of Resources/Personnel:
Adequacy of Site Clean-up:
Effectiveness of Job-Site Regulations:
Compliance With Laws and Regulations or Contract Document:
Professional Conduct:
Change Order Activity (By Contractor): RESERVED
Adequacy of Work Force:
O & M Manuals/Instructions:
Spare Parts Delivery:
Comments for Effectiveness of Management/Business Relations

COMPLIANCE WITH LABOR STANDARDS: RESERVED

COMPLIANCE WITH SAFETY STANDARDS: RESERVED

OVERALL RATING
0=Unsatisfactory; 1=Poor; 2=Fair; 3=Good; 4=Excellent; 5=OutstandingN/A012345
Overall Rating:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .