Attachment 1 Past Performance Evaluation.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 19 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- GS-09P-12-KT-C-0004
About this file
Attachment 1 Past Performance Evaluation
View the file
Other files
Show all 31
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| Attachment 1: PAST PERFORMANCE REPORT |
| (EVALUATED BY OWNER OR OWNER REPRESENTATIVE) |
| Evaluating Organization or Company: |
| Evaluator (Name and Title): |
| Evaluator Phone and e-mail: |
| Name of Contractor Being Evaluated: |
| Project Title and Brief Description: |
| QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE | |||||||
| 0=Unsatisfactory; 1=Poor; 2=Fair; 3=Good; 4=Excellent; 5=Outstanding | N/A | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Quality of Workmanship: | |||||||
| Adequacy of the CQC Plan: | |||||||
| Implementation of CQC Plan: | |||||||
| Quality of QC Documentation: | |||||||
| Storage of Materials: | |||||||
| Adequacy of Materials: RESERVED | |||||||
| Adequacy of Submittals: | |||||||
| Adequacy of QC Testing: | |||||||
| Adequacy of As-Builts: | |||||||
| Use of Specified Materials: | |||||||
| Identification/Correction of Deficient Work: | |||||||
| Comments for Quality of Products or Service |
| COST CONTROL | |||||||
| 0=Unsatisfactory; 1=Poor; 2=Fair; 3=Good; 4=Excellent; 5=Outstanding | N/A | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Representation of owner interests in negotiating changes with subcontractors: | |||||||
| Quality of rationale provided to support costs: | |||||||
| Cost Controls | |||||||
| Comments for Cost Control |
| TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE | |||||||
| 0=Unsatisfactory; 1=Poor; 2=Fair; 3=Good; 4=Excellent; 5=Outstanding | N/A | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Adequacy of Initial Progress Schedule: | |||||||
| Adherence to Approved Schedule: | |||||||
| Resolution of Delays: | |||||||
| Submission of Required Documentation: | |||||||
| Completion of Punch List Items: | |||||||
| Submission of Updated and Revised Progress Schedules: | |||||||
| Warranty Response: | |||||||
| Comments for Timeliness of Performance |
| EFFECTIVENESS OF MANAGEMENT/BUSINESS RELATIONS | |||||||
| 0=Unsatisfactory; 1=Poor; 2=Fair; 3=Good; 4=Excellent; 5=Outstanding | N/A | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Extent of collaboration with owner and A-E to achieve project goals: | |||||||
| Effectiveness of the interaction with 3rd parties (i.e. tenants, city, vendors, utilities): | |||||||
| Cooperation and Responsiveness: | |||||||
| Management of Resources/Personnel: | |||||||
| Adequacy of Site Clean-up: | |||||||
| Effectiveness of Job-Site Regulations: | |||||||
| Compliance With Laws and Regulations or Contract Document: | |||||||
| Professional Conduct: | |||||||
| Change Order Activity (By Contractor): RESERVED | |||||||
| Adequacy of Work Force: | |||||||
| O & M Manuals/Instructions: | |||||||
| Spare Parts Delivery: | |||||||
| Comments for Effectiveness of Management/Business Relations |
COMPLIANCE WITH LABOR STANDARDS: RESERVED
COMPLIANCE WITH SAFETY STANDARDS: RESERVED
| OVERALL RATING | |||||||
| 0=Unsatisfactory; 1=Poor; 2=Fair; 3=Good; 4=Excellent; 5=Outstanding | N/A | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Overall Rating: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .