Phase_I_Q_ _A_-_Amend_3.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 18 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Building 67 Consolidation Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- GS-08-P-16-JE-C-7003
About this file
Question Answers - Updated Answer for Question 19.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| FBO_Notice_Phase_2.docx | DOCX document | |
| GS-08-P-16-JE-C-7003_Amendment_2.pdf | ||
| Bldg_67-_SOW_Appendix_A-POR_2016.10.19.pdf | ||
| Phase_I_Q_ _A_Final.pdf | ||
| PPQ_-_AE.pdf | ||
| BLDG_67_DB_SOW_-_2016.10.04.pdf | ||
| GS-08-P-16-JE-C-7003_Amendment_0001_10.06.16.pdf | ||
| PPQ_-_GC.pdf | ||
| REQUEST_FOR_SENSITIVE_BUT_UNCLASSIFIED_BUILDING.pdf | ||
| Appendix_B_-_Division_1_2016.09.26.pdf | ||
| PAST_PERFORMANCE_QUESTIONNAIRE_FOR_SERVICES.docx | DOCX document | |
| Past_Performance_Questionnaire_for_Construction.docx | DOCX document | |
| GS-08-P-16-JE-C-7003_-_DB201-1_Small_Business_Set_Aside_DB_Sol_2_Phase_Part_1_Final.pdf | ||
| Appendix_A_-_POR_2016.09.26.pdf | ||
| BLDG_67_DB_SOW_-_2016.09.26.pdf |
Show all 15
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| Solicitation GS-08-P-16-JE-C-7003 Building 67 Consolidation | ||
| 25-Oct-16 | ||
| # | Question | Government Answer |
| 1 | Does the Combined Synopsis/Solicitation under solicitation number GS08P16JEC7003 contain requirements similar to a current contract? | There is not a current requirement |
| 2 | Is this a new requirement for the government? | Yes |
| 3 | Will there be a preproposal meeting held for this project? | Not in Phase 1 |
| 4 | Request the addition of the far clause 52.208-9 | This clause is not applicable to construction and the Design Build contract is defined as construction so we will not add this clause to the solicitation. |
| 5 | Will there be a preproposal meeting held for this project? | Not in Phase 1 |
| 6 | Can you confirm this is Unrestricted solicitation for Large Business or is this a Small Business Set Aside? | This is a Small Business Set Aside |
| 7 | Looking for clarification on submittal requirements of Phase 1. | See II. Proposals II Proposals |
| 8 | Are the similar project (SP) criterion (pg. 7) all inclusive? In other words, must each SP be (a) Substantially completed within 8 years of submission deadline (b) delivered by Design-Build or Integrated Project Delivery methods, (c) building 60% occupied, (d) not less than 100,000 sq. ft. or more than $5 million OR will the GSA consider SPs that include at least one or more of these criterion? | The definition of a Similar Project was changed within Amendment 1 to remove the requirement for the project to haveen been Design-Build or Integrated Project Delivery, however the criteria is all inclusive. |
| 9 | GSA intends to shortlist a maximum of (5) firms to participate in the Phase 2 process. Given the heated market and the level of resources required during the Phase 2 process, would GSA consider a shortlist of no more than (3) firms? | Yes, GSA will consider a shortlist of a maxium of three (3) offerors. |
| 14 | Would the GSA consider hosting a job walk for all interested parties? | GSA plans to host a job walk during phase 2 of the solicitation |
| 15 | Will this project be a LEED_CI project or sustainable design practices only? | Sustainable design practices only. |
| 16 | Who will select furniture? Architect or GSA? | GSA |
| 17 | Can you please confirm the budget? $9-11M or $10-15M? | Section I.F. States between $10 - $15 M |
| 18 | Will there be a site visit? | Not in Phase 1, we intend to have a site visit during Phase 2 |
| 19 | Clarify if this proposal is supposed to be submitted in SF330 format | It is preferred but not required. |
| 20 | Will the Commissioning Agent be a separate contract with GSA? | Yes |
| 21 | Will hazardous materials abatement be a separate contract with GSA and not a part of the budget for the renovation projected? | No. It will under the Design Build Contractor. |
| # | Question | Government Answer |
| 22 | It seems the instructions have changed from stating “references from four (4) projects to “a minimum of one (1) for each similar project.” I believe it is confirming the reduction in reference letters (2 per similar project to 1 per similar project) letting us know we need to make sure our questionnaires go to the appropriate parties and NOT include them within the proposal. Correct? | Correct |
| 23 | Please confirm the requirements for Technical Proposal Section 3, “Past Performance of the Team,” is this referencing the past performance questionnaire for each similar project in Section 1, or is a new set of questionnaires required? | Yes, this is referencing the past performance questionnaire for each similar project that was included in Amendment 1. |
| 24 | The instructions require all questionnaires be submitted directly to GSA from client references. What materials are required in this section of our submission? | The Past Performance Questionnaire for both A/E and GC were included in Amendment 1. |
| 25 | Similarly, are Evaluation Factors 1C and 1D referring solely to the completed questionnaires to be sent separately? If so, may we utilize their 10-page limit as additional pages for our similar projects? | The Evaluation Factos for 1C and 1D do not rely solely on the completed questioinnaires. Both subfactor 1C and 1D have a ten page limit for each subfactor. |
| 26 | Please confirm if the 10-page limit for GC similar projects and AE similar projects, as detailed in Evaluation Factors 1A and 1B, are the total limit or for each project. | Evaluation Factor 1A and 1b have a ten page limit for each subfactor. |
| 27 | Please confirm if this project be a LEED-CI project or sustainable design practices only? If it will be a LEED-CI project what will the goal be? | Sustainable design practices only. |
| 28 | As part of the phasing plan, will there be enough swing space provided to vacate all of the floors affected by the renovation project? | Available swing space square footage is provided under phasing. |
| 29 | The Construction Manager as Agent (CMA) is a separate contract with GSA, is that correct? | Yes |
| 30 | Please confirm if Contractor Performance Assessment Reports (CPARS) are acceptable to include within our proposal? A similar project no longer has reference contacts who can speak to our performance or is qualified to complete the questionnaire. We would like to know if we may submit a CPARS for this particular similar project. | The Government is required to review CPARS however, a CPARS report does not take the place of the required number of references. |
| 31 | Per 2C of the technical requirements on page 8 of the revised solicitation, please confirm if team resumes are required relating to team qualifications and professional qualifications. | Resumes are not required but recommended. Please submit what you feel meets the requirements. |
Sheet2
Sheet3
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .