About this file

Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Bridging Design Build (BDB) Construction Services New Federal Office Building - Broward County, Florida, newest first.
File Type Posted
GS-04P-10-BV-C-0065 Small Business Netowrking Session Rev 1.docx DOCX document
GS-04P-10-BV-C-0065 Small Business Netowrking Session.docx DOCX document
GS-04P-10-BV-C-0065 ShortList Announcement.docx DOCX document
GS-04P-10-BV C-0065 Amendment 2.pdf PDF
GS-04P-10-BV C-0065 Amendment 1.pdf PDF
GSA DB Preproposal Conf 20100812.ppt PPT presentation
GS-04P-10-BV C-0065 Questions Rev 3.docx DOCX document
GS-04P-10-BV-C-0065 Preproposal Conference Questions.docx DOCX document
Preproposal Conference Attendee List.pdf PDF
GS-04P-10-BV C-0065 Questions Rev 2.docx DOCX document
GS-04P-10-BV C-0065 Questions.docx DOCX document
RFQ Phase I.pdf PDF
Show all 12

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT 3

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Instructions for Questionnaire

Dear Respondent, The United States General Services Administration would like to thank you for taking the time to assist us in the selection of a Design/Builder for our Project. Please complete the questionnaire to the best of you ability. We ask that you keep your responses to this questionnaire confidential. The information you provide on this questionnaire will not be shared with the Offeror.

When completed, please send a scanned or electronic copy of the questionnaire to the following electronic mail (e-mail) address: TBD@tbd.tbd. We ask that you include the following information in the subject line of the e-mail: Solicitation No. GS-04P-10-BV-C-0065.

If you are unable to e-mail the questionnaire, please mail the completed questionnaire to:

Lawrence Hales, Contracting Officer U.S. General Services Administration Public Building Service, Acquisition Management Division (4PG) 401 West Peachtree Street, N.W., Suite 2500, Atlanta, Georgia 30308

The questionnaire shall be placed in a sealed envelope with an original signature of the Respondent to the questionnaire across the envelope seal. Also include the following statement on the envelope:

Confidential - Information enclosed is for the sole use of the Government

We ask that the questionnaire be submitted ON or BEFORE September 1, 2010, at 2:00 PM Eastern Standard Time.

We appreciate your time and efforts in assisting us in serving the American public.

Name of Offeror:

Name of Contact:

Company:

Title:

Telephone No./E-mail Address:

Location of Contract Performance:

Approx. contract start/completion dates:

Approx. Price/cost for construction at contract start:

Approx. Price/cost for construction at contract completion:

Type of building and no. of stories:

Contract type (Firm-Fixed Price, Guaranteed Maximum Price, Cost Plus Fee, Identify Other):

Project delivery method (Construction Manager at-risk, Design-Bid-Build, Design-Build, Identify Other):

New construction or renovation:

If renovation, occupied during construction (Y/N):

Is this questionnaire being prepared for work during the Design Phase, Construction Phase, or to offer insight into Key Personnel experience?

If this form is being used to offer insight into Key Personnel, then answer each question by evaluating the individual rather than the company.

To the best of your ability please briefly answer the following:

1. Did the project stay within the original contract schedule and budget? If not, was it due to factors within their control?

2. How would you rate the working relationship with the project team and specifically the Architect/Engineer and Construction Manager as-agent during the project (Excellent, Good, Marginal, Poor)? Please briefly explain.

3. How would you rate the responsiveness in administrative areas (e.g. processing necessary paperwork) (Excellent, Good, Marginal, Poor)? Please briefly explain.

Questions 4, 5 and 6 are associated with work during the Design Phase:

4. How would you rate the cooperation and commitment during the design phase (Excellent, Good, Marginal, Poor)? Please briefly explain.

5. How would you rate how well design errors and omissions, construction conflicts or constructability issues identified during the design phase (Excellent, Good, Marginal, Poor)? Please briefly explain.

6. How would you rate the efforts in avoiding or mitigating scheduling issues during construction (Excellent, Good, Marginal, Poor)? Please briefly explain.

7. How would you rate the number and final price of contractor-initiated change orders reasonable for the size of the project (Excellent, Good, Marginal, Poor)? Please briefly explain.

8. How would you rate the number of excessive or non-essential Requests For Information which resulted in change order requests (Excellent, Good, Marginal, Poor)? Please briefly explain.

9. How would you rate how well the prime contractor coordinated the subcontractors, and resolved any changes or disputes with their subcontractors (Excellent, Good, Marginal, Poor)? Please briefly explain.

10. How would you rate the quality of the final product (Excellent, Good, Marginal, Poor)? Did the finished product meet the needs and expectations (Y/N)?

11. Were there any serious or minor accidents on this project (Y/N)? If so, please briefly explain.

12. How would you rate the consistency of project team and key personnel throughout duration of the project (Excellent, Good, Marginal, Poor)? Please briefly explain.

13. If you had a choice would you want the same key personnel assigned to a future project (Y/N)? Please briefly explain.

14. How would you rate the overall performance (Excellent, Good, Marginal, Poor)?

15. If you had a choice would you contract with this person/company again (Y/N)? Please briefly explain.

Additional Comments:

GSA Southeast Sunbelt RegionPublic Buildings Service
Office of Design and Construction3 - 1July 23, 2010

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .