Grissom-Widening-PSJ-Fay-30-PER-App1-Env-20240118.pdf

APPENDIX ONE:

PRELIMINARY

ENVIRONMENTAL

ASSESSMENT

1.0 PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT:

1.1 INTRODUCTION:

The subject area for the purpose of this preliminary assessment contains approximately 35 acres total and is generally identified as a portion of Grissom Parkway right of way from approximately 2000 feet south of Port St. John Parkway north to Fay Boulevard. The subject area is located in Section 24, Township 23 South, Range 35 East, within the jurisdiction of Brevard County, Florida. The project area is divided into two distinct overall community types with undeveloped lands surrounding the right of way for the south section and existing residential development on both sides of the right of way in the northern section (See attached maps).

DRMP, Inc. was contracted to perform professional engineering, surveying and consulting services which includes an environmental assessment of this subject area to evaluate the extent and condition of environmental resources and prepare a preliminary findings summary. An office review of pertinent mapping resources was conducted prior to the initial site inspection (See attached maps). This information was utilized to predict the potential for the occurrence of wetlands and endangered species on the site. In March and September of 2022, pedestrian transect surveys were conducted to verify the existing site conditions and onsite wetlands were delineated by DRMP staff. Field located, wetland boundaries have been added to the survey and are shown approximately on the attached maps. The following provides details and results of the preliminary environmental assessment.

1.2 LANDSCAPE FEATURES:

The 35-acre subject area is generally classified the Grissom Parkway right of way corridor, which is an existing road with full right of way areas previously cleared. As mentioned above, there are two distinct sections of road which are discussed as the south section and north section. The south section is surrounded by natural habitats with no development beyond the right of way limits. Beyond the edge of pavement on both sides of the road, the shoulders are grassed, mowed and maintained. The eastern shoulder is over 100 foot wide in some areas while the western side around 40 foot wide on average.

There are areas on both sides where vegetation has grown back in from previous clearing efforts or that was never fully cleared to the limit, extending into the right of way limits. In these areas, there are native trees and shrubs that are found in the surrounding communities. Some of these areas have provided desirable habitat to gopher tortoises and other species. In other areas, wetlands have expanded into the right of way that connect to larger wetland areas offsite. Natural communities beyond the right of way limits consist primarily of palmetto prairie and pine flatwoods, with several forested wetland communities intermixed. There are also two existing stormwater ponds in this section, both of which are fenced and County maintained.

A drainage ditch running east-west separates the north and south sections, with residential development located on the north side of the ditch. There are no remaining natural areas north of the ditch and almost every platted lot has been developed. The road is lined on both sides with grassed swales and sidewalks, extending all the way to the right of way limits. The swales are grassed and dry, not classified as surface water communities. There are no environmental concerns or considerations within the north section of the project area.

The communities found within the project corridor and discussed above are classified as Medium Density Residential, Palmetto Prairie, Pine Flatwoods, Surface Water Ditch, Stormwater Pond, Wetland Forested Mix, Wetland Scrub and County Road Right of Way.

1.3 JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS AND SURFACE WATERS:

Prior to the initial field investigation, the National Wetland Inventory Database was consulted to determine the potential for onsite wetlands (Figure 6). The map identifies six wetland communities within the south project area and no wetland areas in the north section. The inventory is utilized as a starting reference of potential onsite conditions but is not always consistent with actual field conditions observed during the ground truthing investigation. The Florida Land Use Cover and Classification System (FLUCCS) map generated by St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) was also reviewed for potential onsite wetland areas and identified six potential wetland communities within the corridor. During the field investigation, the site was assessed for the extent of on-site wetlands using the methodology outlined in Chapter 62-340 Florida Administrative Code and the US Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) Wetlands Delineation Manual (January 1987). There are three indicators used to determine wetland communities: hydrology, hydric soils, and wetland vegetation. Random pedestrian transects canvassing the majority of the project corridor were performed, finding four jurisdictional wetlands within the project boundary and three surface waters. All four wetlands along the project boundary were partially delineated with flagging adjacent to the road right of way. Wetland boundaries are shown with onsite acreages on Figure 12.

Wetland 1 is located in the northwest corner of the intersection of Grissom Parkway and Port St. John Parkway. This wetland area is isolated and overgrown with Brazilian pepper and other exotic species with marginally hydric soils. Overall quality of this wetland is low, with development immediately adjacent on two sides. Wetlands 2, 3 and 4 are considered to be moderate to high in quality with a high percentage of desirable species. There are nuisance/exotic species present in each wetland system but they do not dominate any one area. Although these wetland areas are also immediately adjacent to the cleared right of way areas, they connect further offsite to larger wetland systems that remain in high quality. Overall acreage of these wetlands is unknown as the boundaries were only delineated in close proximity to the right of way limits. Aerial interpretations of overall size will be utilized for permitting purposes and agency review.

Since the onsite wetlands and surface waters are not connected to named waters of the United States, they become State Assumed waters under the jurisdiction of Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). FDEP has been assigned the State 404 permitting program which was previously reviewed by the US Army Corps of

Engineers. FDEP is expected to claim jurisdiction over the onsite wetland areas and will require mitigation for any proposed impacts. Surface water impacts must also be reviewed by FDEP and mitigation for proposed impacts is expected. SJRWMD will review the site as part of the Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) process. All onsite wetlands and surface waters will be claimed as jurisdictional by SJRWMD and mitigation for impacts will be required. Brevard County Natural Resources Management Department (NRMD) has local jurisdiction over the onsite wetland communities and will also require mitigation for proposed impacts.

1.4 WILDLIFE UTILIZATION:

A preliminary survey for protected wildlife species was conducted as part of the on-site field investigation. Protected wildlife species are animals which are listed as endangered, threatened, or species of special concern by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC). Random pedestrian transects throughout the project area were traversed to obtain evidence, such as presence of burrows, scat, nests or direct observation of protected wildlife species utilization.

Review of Eagle nest mapping information, compiled by the FWC, revealed that the closest active eagle’s nest is beyond the area of development concern established by FWC. Eagles were directly observed flying near the project vicinity during the site inspection and are known to frequent the St. Johns River basin area. Unless a new nest is constructed near the proposed project boundary, construction limitations will not be enforced and agency approval will not be required. Therefore, we do not anticipate any regulatory concerns for this site with regard to the American Bald Eagle.

A review of Florida Scrub Jay mapping information indicates the southern section of the subject site contains suitable habitat and has been known to be utilized by the species (See Figure 8). The field investigation revealed that the natural communities adjacent to the roadway are classified as desirable habitat by the species, with open canopy areas and scattered oaks. Based on these findings, consultation with UWFWS was initiated earlier this year. USFWS staff reviewed the proposed project and determined that if only already cleared areas within the right of way and project area are to be impacted, further coordination and/or formal surveys will not be required. Any impacts to natural habitat would require formal surveys with coordination and possibly permitting with mitigation depending on survey results. Based on the current project design, natural areas beyond the road right of way will not be impacted. Therefore, we do not expect any further agency consultation or permitting requirements with regard to this species.

The upland portions of the project area were inspected for the presence of Gopher Tortoise burrows as part of an informal species survey. Random pedestrian transects revealed fourteen active gopher tortoise burrows and several abandoned burrows that appear to have been collapsed by mowers or other roadside equipment. This was an informal survey and it is anticipated that formal surveys will reveal additional burrows.

Since there are burrows within the project limits, a formal survey of the onsite upland areas and surrounding 25 feet beyond the project limits will be required. Coordination and permitting through FWC will be required along with offsite relocations to a permitted recipient site. Formal surveys will reveal the total number of burrows and the appropriate permit required, along with approximate costs and available recipient site fees. Formal surveys will also determine what burrows can be avoided and if coordination with adjacent property owners will be required for burrows that are within 25 feet of the project limits.

Based on the informal survey results, it is anticipated that greater than 15 burrows will need to be permitted, mitigated and excavated prior to construction commencement.

Formal surveys should occur within 6 months of proposed construction mobilization to allow sufficient time for permitting and relocation efforts.

Wood storks typically forage along shallow, open water ditches or marshes and there is suitable habitat for the species located onsite. Mapping information indicates the site is within core foraging habitat for the species and therefore any impacts to suitable habitat must be appropriately identified and mitigated. The onsite surface water ditches and portions of the slopes of the surface water ponds are all considered suitable habitat for the species. Wood storks were directly observed flying over the site while conducting the site assessment and they are expected to utilize areas onsite at times for foraging. If impacts to these habitats are proposed, permitting and mitigation through USFWS will be required as part of the FDEP and SJRWMD permitting and consultation process.

Mitigation will only be required if greater than 0.50 acres of suitable habitat is proposed which based on current design is not anticipated.

Audubon’s Crested Caracara nests have been mapped to the west of the project vicinity but are not mapped within the subject site. Caracara were not observed onsite at any time during the preliminary assessment and there were no nests observed in the random transects. This species is known to utilize open pasture and prairie areas, making their nests in cabbage palms and returning seasonally. Although there is not open pasture within the project area, there are mowed grassy areas with cabbage palms along the perimeter which could provide nesting for the species which is considered suitable habitat. Since there is suitable habitat onsite, consultation with USFWS could be required during the FDEP permitting process. If USFWS determines that the proposed project could potentially impact the species, formal surveys inspecting the right of way perimeter area palm trees could be required in order to verify the species is not nesting onsite. If there are no nests onsite, permitting and mitigation will not be required.

Florida Sandhill Cranes were not directly observed onsite during the preliminary inspections. There are no areas of suitable habitat for this species remaining within the project boundary. Unless nest removal or impacts are proposed, permitting and mitigation for this species is not required. Agency coordination for this species prior to construction is not expected.

Eastern Indigo Snakes are known to inhabit the same community types as gopher tortoises and often utilize the same burrow or abandoned burrows for their homes. Since there is onsite gopher tortoise habitat, there is a potential for this species to utilize the site. USFWS requires that proposed development sites containing suitable habitat adhere to the Standard Protection Measures for the Eastern Indigo Snake which includes informing equipment operators about procedures if an Indigo Snake is observed as well as required onsite signage and educational material. These measures will be listed as permit conditions from FDEP as they are the agency responsible for consultation with USFWS during the review process. USFWS is not expected to require any formal surveys or mitigation efforts for impacts to Indigo Snake habitat.

Other protected species known to inhabit Brevard County and suspect to site utilization prior to the onsite inspection include the following: Everglades Snail Kite, Florida Panther, Florida Weasel, Florida Mouse, Sherman’s Fox Squirrel, Kirkland’s Warbler, Southeast American Kestrel, Burrowing Owl and Gopher Frog. The subject area was carefully inspected for all of the above species with no evidence found suggesting their presence onsite. Based on the existing conditions and onsite activity, it is unlikely that any of the above species utilize the subject site. Although the following species are not listed and therefore not protected species, evidence suggests these species could inhabit or utilize the subject corridor: Eastern Black Racer, Bullfrog, Mud Snake, Mud Turtle, Blue-Jay, Northern Cardinal, Gray Bat, Northern Mockingbird, Mourning Dove, Migratory duck species, Florida mallards, Ibis, Turkey Vulture, Gray Squirrel, Florida Water Rat, Nine- Banded Armadillo, Raccoon, Opossum, Wild Boar, Coyote, Bobcat and Deer. Please note that threatened/endangered species could inhabit the subject site subsequent to the completion of the preliminary surveys we have performed. In this case, USFWS and FWC must be contacted and the permittee will still be responsible for complying with all Local, State and Federal requirements pertaining to preservation or relocation of threatened/endangered species. It is recommended that the project area be carefully monitored and managed during the design and development process.

1.5 PERMITTING CONSIDERATIONS:

There are approximately 0.068 acres of wetlands present within the project area along with a surface water ditch and two stormwater ponds. Proposed construction activities will require wetland and surface water review and permitting through Brevard County, FDEP and SJRWMD. Based on the locations of the existing wetland and surface water communities, impacts cannot be entirely avoided. As discussed above, FDEP is expected to claim jurisdiction over these wetland and surface water areas and will require mitigation for any direct impacts. Secondary impacts will also be assessed for potential impacts to remaining offsite wetlands where adequate upland buffers are not provided. Impacts to existing stormwater ponds will not require mitigation as they are permitted systems. Demonstration of avoidance and minimization will also be required as part of the permitting process, limiting the amount of impacts that will be permitted. As part of the FDEP consultation, they will notify USFWS and FWC of the proposed activities and invite them to comment on possible impacts to wood storks, caracara, sandhill cranes, scrub jays, indigo snakes and/or other listed species. If over ½ acre of impacts to suitable wood stork habitat is proposed, appropriate mitigation will be required. Proposed mitigation could include onsite littoral shelves within stormwater ponds, wetland creation areas or credit purchase from an approved mitigation bank. Appropriate gopher tortoise permitting and relocations through FWC will be required.

SJRWMD will claim jurisdiction over the proposed project and all wetland and surface water communities. Proposed impacts to the existing surface water ditch will need to be quantified however, mitigation is not expected to be required. Any proposed wetland impacts will require mitigation along with demonstration of avoidance and minimization. Secondary wetland impacts will also be assessed for remaining onsite wetlands and adjacent wetlands offsite within the determined secondary impact zone.

Brevard County NRMD defaults to SJRWMD regarding their permitting/mitigation requirements for wetlands and surface waters except there are limits on the overall percentage of allowable wetland impacts based on overall project size. Based on the project size and minimal acreage of onsite wetlands, this limit will not alter proposed project design. NRMD will agree to the SJRWMD verified wetland delineations and require the same mitigation as agreed to by SJRWMD. NRMD also requires verification that all potential endangered species consultation has been completed and any required permitting through FWC or USFWS occurs prior to development plan approval.

1.6 WETLAND MITIGATION:

In order to offset unavoidable direct and secondary impacts to wetlands, a credit purchase from a permitted mitigation bank is recommended. The agencies generally prefer credit purchases as mitigation and since there is no remaining suitable mitigation habitat within the project corridor, this will be the appropriate option. There are currently two banks with available credits for purchase within the same drainage basin that would satisfy impacts to forested wetlands or freshwater marsh communities. Credits are available from Farmton Mitigation Bank based on UMAM scores for $130,000 each. Colbert Cameron has ratio scored credits available for $50,000 each. These prices satisfy both FDEP and SJRWMD mitigation requirements. Although there is a large price difference in credit price, the cost is around the same as the credits are scored by different methods which requires more credits to be purchased using ratios.

Until project design and wetland impacts are finalized along with preservation areas and upland buffers, exact mitigation values and fees cannot be determined. Using the ratio assessment method and assuming direct impacts of 0.068 acres of onsite wetlands and half acre of secondary impacts to each adjacent wetland area, the approximate mitigation bank fee would be $150,000. Secondary impacts are calculated for potential impacts to remaining wetlands, which typically extend between 50-200 feet beyond the impact area depending on habitat type and construction activities. This could contribute a considerable amount of mitigation but can be minimized by providing upland buffers or planting buffer strips if uplands are not available. By minimizing secondary impacts, the mitigation fee estimated above would be reduced. Mitigation values for proposed direct and secondary impacts will need to be prepared and negotiated with the regulatory agencies. Surface water impacts are assessed separately and will require a minimal credit purchase to satisfy FDEP mitigation requirements.

1.7 SUMMARY:

The project area can be classified as a partially developed, agricultural site with some remaining natural habitats, manmade surface water ditches and a borrow pond. The overall parcel is 118 acres which includes a 40 acre area located to the northwest of the main parcel area. The main parcel includes three surface water areas and nine wetlands. In order to further develop the site, an Environmental Resource Permit must be obtained from St. Johns River Water Management District. Florida Department of

Environmental Protection will review the site as part of the State 404 Program and an

Individual Permit is expected to be required. A Building Permit must be issued by

Brevard County which will require review by Brevard County Natural Resources

Management Department. Any proposed wetland and/or surface water impacts will require a mitigation proposal that fully offsets impacts. Mitigation options include preservation/enhancement of the 40 acre area or a credit purchase from one of the in-basin approved banks. A preliminary survey indicated that gopher tortoises, sandhill cranes and wood storks are the only threatened and/or endangered species expected to utilize the subject area at this time. Coordination efforts with the appropriate reviewing agency will be required and formal surveys and/or permitting could be required prior to site development. Mitigation could be required if impacts to suitable habitat or species is proposed. Based on the preliminary survey, a formal gopher tortoise survey will be required along with permitting through FWC followed by offsite relocations of any onsite tortoises. Other protected species have been observed within the immediate project vicinity and must be carefully monitored for site utilization up to and during site construction. Additional coordination efforts could be required if these species are found nesting in the project area.

100 PARNELL STREET MERRITT ISLAND, FLORIDA 32953

PHONE NO.: (321) 453-0010 FAX NO.: (321) 454-6885

FIGGRISSOM PARKWAY WIDENING 1

LOCATION MAP

BREVARD COUNTY FLORIDA

100 PARNELL STREET MERRITT ISLAND, FLORIDA 32953

PHONE NO.: (321) 453-0010 FAX NO.: (321) 454-6885

FIGGRISSOM PARKWAY WIDENING 2

QUAD MAP

BREVARD COUNTY FLORIDA

11/30/2022

21-0700.019 State of Florida # 00000 Engineer of Record, P.E.

G

RI

SS

O

M P

AR

KW

AY

W

ID

EN

IN

G

D R M P

Ce rt ifi ca te o f A ut ho riz at io n N o.

Pa rn el l S tr ee t S ui te A

, M er rit t I sla nd

, F L

Ph on e:

1.

3.

W

W

.D

RM

P.

CO

M

EN

G

IN

EE

RS

● S

UR

VE

YO

RS

● P

LA

NN

ER

S ● S

CI

EN

TI

ST

S

DRMP, Inc.

BR

EV

AR

D

CO

U

N

TY

, F

LO

RI

DA

SO

IL

S M

AP

FIG-3

1"=300'

State of Florida # 00000 Engineer of Record, P.E.

G

RI

SS

O

M P

AR

KW

AY

W

ID

EN

IN

G

D R M P

Ce rt ifi ca te o f A ut ho riz at io n N o.

Pa rn el l S tr ee t S ui te A

, M er rit t I sla nd

, F L

Ph on e:

1.

3.

W

.D

RM

P.

CO

M

EN

G

IN

EE

RS

● S

UR

VE

YO

RS

● P

LA

NN

ER

S ● S

CI

EN

TI

ST

S

DRMP, Inc.

BR

EV

AR

D

CO

U

N

TY

, F

LO

RI

DA

AE

RI

AL

FIG-4

State of Florida # 00000 Engineer of Record, P.E.

G

RI

SS

O

M P

AR

KW

AY

W

ID

EN

IN

G

D R M P

Ce rt ifi ca te o f A ut ho riz at io n N o.

Pa rn el l S tr ee t S ui te A

, M er rit t I sla nd

, F L

Ph on e:

1.

3.

W

.D

RM

P.

CO

M

EN

G

IN

EE

RS

● S

UR

VE

YO

RS

● P

LA

NN

ER

S ● S

CI

EN

TI

ST

S

DRMP, Inc.

BR

EV

AR

D

CO

U

N

TY

, F

LO

RI

DA

FL

U

CC

S

FIG-5A

1"=150'

State of Florida # 00000 Engineer of Record, P.E.

G

RI

SS

O

M P

AR

KW

AY

W

ID

EN

IN

G

D R M P

Ce rt ifi ca te o f A ut ho riz at io n N o.

Pa rn el l S tr ee t S ui te A

, M er rit t I sla nd

, F L

Ph on e:

1.

3.

W

.D

RM

P.

CO

M

EN

G

IN

EE

RS

● S

UR

VE

YO

RS

● P

LA

NN

ER

S ● S

CI

EN

TI

ST

S

DRMP, Inc.

BR

EV

AR

D

CO

U

N

TY

, F

LO

RI

DA

FL

U

CC

S

FIG-5B

State of Florida # 00000 Engineer of Record, P.E.

G

RI

SS

O

M P

AR

KW

AY

W

ID

EN

IN

G

D R M P

Ce rt ifi ca te o f A ut ho riz at io n N o.

Pa rn el l S tr ee t S ui te A

, M er rit t I sla nd

, F L

Ph on e:

1.

3.

W

.D

RM

P.

CO

M

EN

G

IN

EE

RS

● S

UR

VE

YO

RS

● P

LA

NN

ER

S ● S

CI

EN

TI

ST

S

DRMP, Inc.

BR

EV

AR

D

CO

U

N

TY

, F

LO

RI

DA

FL

U

CC

S

FIG-5C

State of Florida # 00000 Engineer of Record, P.E.

G

RI

SS

O

M P

AR

KW

AY

W

ID

EN

IN

G

D R M P

Ce rt ifi ca te o f A ut ho riz at io n N o.

Pa rn el l S tr ee t S ui te A

, M er rit t I sla nd

, F L

Ph on e:

1.

3.

W

.D

RM

P.

CO

M

EN

G

IN

EE

RS

● S

UR

VE

YO

RS

● P

LA

NN

ER

S ● S

CI

EN

TI

ST

S

DRMP, Inc.

BR

EV

AR

D

CO

U

N

TY

, F

LO

RI

DA

FL

U

CC

S

FIG-5D

State of Florida # 00000 Engineer of Record, P.E.

G

RI

SS

O

M P

AR

KW

AY

W

ID

EN

IN

G

D R M P

Ce rt ifi ca te o f A ut ho riz at io n N o.

Pa rn el l S tr ee t S ui te A

, M er rit t I sla nd

, F L

Ph on e:

1.

3.

W

.D

RM

P.

CO

M

EN

G

IN

EE

RS

● S

UR

VE

YO

RS

● P

LA

NN

ER

S ● S

CI

EN

TI

ST

S

DRMP, Inc.

BR

EV

AR

D

CO

U

N

TY

, F

LO

RI

DA

W

ET

LA

N

D

IN

VE

N

TO

RY

FIG-6

State of Florida # 00000 Engineer of Record, P.E.

G

RI

SS

O

M P

AR

KW

AY

W

ID

EN

IN

G

D R M P

Ce rt ifi ca te o f A ut ho riz at io n N o.

Pa rn el l S tr ee t S ui te A

, M er rit t I sla nd

, F L

Ph on e:

1.

3.

W

.D

RM

P.

CO

M

EN

G

IN

EE

RS

● S

UR

VE

YO

RS

● P

LA

NN

ER

S ● S

CI

EN

TI

ST

S

DRMP, Inc.

BR

EV

AR

D

CO

U

N

TY

, F

LO

RI

DA

EX

IS

TI

N

G W

ET

LA

N D

FIG-7A

State of Florida # 00000 Engineer of Record, P.E.

G

RI

SS

O

M P

AR

KW

AY

W

ID

EN

IN

G

D R M P

Ce rt ifi ca te o f A ut ho riz at io n N o.

Pa rn el l S tr ee t S ui te A

, M er rit t I sla nd

, F L

Ph on e:

1.

3.

W

.D

RM

P.

CO

M

EN

G

IN

EE

RS

● S

UR

VE

YO

RS

● P

LA

NN

ER

S ● S

CI

EN

TI

ST

S

DRMP, Inc.

BR

EV

AR

D

CO

U

N

TY

, F

LO

RI

DA

EX

IS

TI

N

G W

ET

LA

N D

FIG-7B

State of Florida # 00000 Engineer of Record, P.E.

G

RI

SS

O

M P

AR

KW

AY

W

ID

EN

IN

G

D R M P

Ce rt ifi ca te o f A ut ho riz at io n N o.

Pa rn el l S tr ee t S ui te A

, M er rit t I sla nd

, F L

Ph on e:

1.

3.

W

.D

RM

P.

CO

M

EN

G

IN

EE

RS

● S

UR

VE

YO

RS

● P

LA

NN

ER

S ● S

CI

EN

TI

ST

S

DRMP, Inc.

BR

EV

AR

D

CO

U

N

TY

, F

LO

RI

DA

SC

RU

B

JA

Y

HA

BI

TA

T

FIG-8

1"=300'

SCRUB JAY HABITAT

SCRUB JAY HABITAT

State of Florida # 00000 Engineer of Record, P.E.

G

RI

SS

O

M P

AR

KW

AY

W

ID

EN

IN

G

D R M P

Ce rt ifi ca te o f A ut ho riz at io n N o.

Pa rn el l S tr ee t S ui te A

, M er rit t I sla nd

, F L

Ph on e:

1.

3.

W

.D

RM

P.

CO

M

EN

G

IN

EE

RS

● S

UR

VE

YO

RS

● P

LA

NN

ER

S ● S

CI

EN

TI

ST

S

DRMP, Inc.

BR

EV

AR

D

CO

U

N

TY

, F

LO

RI

DA

GO

PH

ER

T

O

RT

O

IS

E

BU

RR

O

W S

FIG-9A

State of Florida # 00000 Engineer of Record, P.E.

G

RI

SS

O

M P

AR

KW

AY

W

ID

EN

IN

G

D R M P

Ce rt ifi ca te o f A ut ho riz at io n N o.

Pa rn el l S tr ee t S ui te A

, M er rit t I sla nd

, F L

Ph on e:

1.

3.

W

.D

RM

P.

CO

M

EN

G

IN

EE

RS

● S

UR

VE

YO

RS

● P

LA

NN

ER

S ● S

CI

EN

TI

ST

S

DRMP, Inc.

BR

EV

AR

D

CO

U

N

TY

, F

LO

RI

DA

GO

PH

ER

T

O

RT

O

IS

E

BU

RR

O

W S

FIG-9B

State of Florida # 00000 Engineer of Record, P.E.

G

RI

SS

O

M P

AR

KW

AY

W

ID

EN

IN

G

D R M P

Ce rt ifi ca te o f A ut ho riz at io n N o.

Pa rn el l S tr ee t S ui te A

, M er rit t I sla nd

, F L

Ph on e:

1.

3.

W

.D

RM

P.

CO

M

EN

G

IN

EE

RS

● S

UR

VE

YO

RS

● P

LA

NN

ER

S ● S

CI

EN

TI

ST

S

DRMP, Inc.

BR

EV

AR

D

CO

U

N

TY

, F

LO

RI

DA

Li

DA

R M

AP

FIG-10

1"=500'

EL

EV

AT

IO

N S

CA

LE

(F T)

State of Florida # 00000 Engineer of Record, P.E.

G

RI

SS

O

M P

AR

KW

AY

W

ID

EN

IN

G

D R M P

Ce rt ifi ca te o f A ut ho riz at io n N o.

Pa rn el l S tr ee t S ui te A

, M er rit t I sla nd

, F L

Ph on e:

1.

3.

W

.D

RM

P.

CO

M

EN

G

IN

EE

RS

● S

UR

VE

YO

RS

● P

LA

NN

ER

S ● S

CI

EN

TI

ST

S

DRMP, Inc.

BR

EV

AR

D

CO

U

N

TY

, F

LO

RI

DA

HI

ST

O

RI

CA

L

AE

RI

AL

FIG-11

1"=500'

11/04/2022

State of Florida # 00000 Engineer of Record, P.E.

G

RI

SS

O

M P

AR

KW

AY

W

ID

EN

IN

G

D R M P

Ce rt ifi ca te o f A ut ho riz at io n N o.

Pa rn el l S tr ee t S ui te A

, M er rit t I sla nd

, F L

Ph on e:

1.

3.

W

.D

RM

P.

CO

M

EN

G

IN

EE

RS

● S

UR

VE

YO

RS

● P

LA

NN

ER

S ● S

CI

EN

TI

ST

S

DRMP, Inc.

BR

EV

AR

D

CO

U

N

TY

, F

LO

RI

DA

W

ET

LA

N

D

S U

RF

AC

E W

AT

ER

IM

PA

CT

SU

M M

AR

Y

FIG-12A

11/04/2022

State of Florida # 00000 Engineer of Record, P.E.

G

RI

SS

O

M P

AR

KW

AY

W

ID

EN

IN

G

D R M P

Ce rt ifi ca te o f A ut ho riz at io n N o.

Pa rn el l S tr ee t S ui te A

, M er rit t I sla nd

, F L

Ph on e:

1.

3.

W

.D

RM

P.

CO

M

EN

G

IN

EE

RS

● S

UR

VE

YO

RS

● P

LA

NN

ER

S ● S

CI

EN

TI

ST

S

DRMP, Inc.

BR

EV

AR

D

CO

U

N

TY

, F

LO

RI

DA

W

ET

LA

N

D

S U

RF

AC

E W

AT

ER

IM

PA

CT

SU

M M

AR

Y

FIG-12B