G. SOLICITATION ATTACHMENT 05 - Past Performance Questionnaire for Architect Engineer.pdf
PDF 266 KB Posted
- Attached to
- GSA Design Excellence Project - D-B - Dunseith, ND Land Port of Entry - Phase 1 Solicitation
- Solicitation number
- 47PJ0023R0041
View the file
Other files
Show all 22
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SOLICITATION ATTACHMENT 3
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE FOR ARCHITECT-ENGINEER
INSTRUCTIONS: The Offeror is responsible for the completion of Section 1 of the Past Performance Questionnaires for each
Similar Project. After completing Section 1 of the Past Performance Questionnaire for each Similar Project, the Offeror shall distribute the Past Performance Questionnaires to the References who will complete Section 2. Each Reference, after completion of
Section 2, shall submit the completed Past Performance Questionnaire directly to the GSA Contracting Officer and Contracting
Specialist not later than 10:00 AM Mountain Time, July 11, 2023.
Past Performance Questionnaires shall be submitted directly to:
Rhonda Widick, Contracting Officer at rhonda.widick@gsa.gov
Christie VandenDries, Contract Specialist at christie.vandendries@gsa.gov
Email subject lines should reference “Solicitation No. 47PJ0023R0041, Dunseith ND LPOE.”
A SIMILAR PROJECT means a project that meets all of the following:
• Construction was substantially completed within ten years prior to the submission deadline for Phase 1 proposals;
• Construction was delivered using the design-build (D-B) or Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) methods. For purposes of this evaluation factor, IPD is defined as the execution of a multiparty agreement in which the owner or developer contracted with a single Offeror to provide all, or substantially all, of the design and construction services for that project;
• Construction of a commercial building that as at least 15,000 gross square feet;
• Construction included the construction of site utilities, storm drainage, grading, roads, and security; and
• Construction contract cost at award was greater than or equal to $50 million.
SECTION 1 – TO BE COMPLETED BY THE OFFEROR
Name of Offeror/Firm:
Contract Number:
Was the Offeror the Prime Contractor:
Place of Performance (City and State):
Period of Performance (include start date and substantial completion date):
Was the delivery method DB or IPD:
Gross Square Footage of Commercial Building Construction:
Contract Value at initial award: $
Total Contract Value (including modifications): $
Briefly describe all construction work performed under this contract (address construction of site utilities, storm drainage, grading, roads, and security):
Continued on next page mailto:rhonda.widick@gsa.gov mailto:christie.vandendries@gsa.gov
Section 2 – TO BE COMPLETED BY THE REFERENCE NOTE: If the offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last ten (10) years, that meet the Similar Project definition, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
Name of Respondent/Title:
Firm Name:
Address:
Phone:
Fax:
Email:
Performance Information: Please check the level of the Offeror’s overall performance in each of the past performance categories listed below.
Check “N/A” if the factor does not apply to the contract being rated. If any portion of the contract performance was performed by subcontractors, please include the subcontractor’s performance on the same chart.
KEY: Poor – A Poor rating indicates the Offeror/Firm completely failed to meet the requirements.
Marginal – A Marginal rating indicates the Offeror/Firm failed to meet some of the contract requirements.
Average – An average rating indicates the Offeror/Firm met the contract requirements.
Very Good – A Very Good rating indicates the Offeror/Firm exceeded some of the contract requirements.
Excellent – An Excellent rating indicates the Offeror/Firm significantly exceeded the contract requirements.
PAST PERFORMANCE CATEGORY Poor Marginal Average Very
Good
Excellent N/A
Quality of design and construction documents
Achieving project design goals within the allowable budget
Creativity of solutions to design ideas
Timeliness of required documentation
Communication and interfacing with government/company personnel
Overall Rating of the Contractor’s Performance
Continued on next page
1. Would you award to this contractor again? YES NO
2. Could you provide another contact for further information? YES NO
Remarks: (Please provide detailed facts concerning specific events/actions to justify your rating. Attach additional pages if necessary):
| Text1: |
| Check Box3: Off |
| Check Box4: Off |
| Check Box5: Off |
| Check Box6: Off |
| Check Box7: Off |
| Check Box8: Off |
| Check Box9: Off |
| Check Box10: Off |
| Check Box11: Off |
| Check Box12: Off |
| Check Box13: Off |
| Check Box14: Off |
| Check Box15: Off |
| Check Box16: Off |
| Check Box17: Off |
| Check Box18: Off |
| Check Box19: Off |
| Check Box20: Off |
| Check Box21: Off |
| Check Box22: Off |
| Check Box23: Off |
| Check Box24: Off |
| Check Box25: Off |
| Check Box2: Off |
| Check Box27: Off |
| Check Box28: Off |
| Check Box30: Off |
| Check Box31: Off |
| Check Box32: Off |
| Check Box33: Off |
| Check Box34: Off |
| Check Box35: Off |
| Check Box37: Off |
| Check Box38: Off |
| Check Box40: Off |
| Check Box41: Off |
| Check Box42: Off |
| Check Box43: Off |
| Check Box47: Off |
| Check Box48: Off |
| Text49: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .