FY26_NSGP_ Prioritization of Investment Justifications V2.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 344 KB Posted

Attached to
Fiscal Year 2026 Nonprofit Security Grant Program
Opportunity number
DHS-26-GPD-008-00-99
Issued by

About this file

This file is a prioritization of investment justifications template for the Fiscal Year 2026 Nonprofit Security Grant Program (NSGP). The template is designed to support applications submitted to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) under CFDA 97.008, which funds physical security enhancements and cybersecurity improvements for nonprofit organizations at elevated risk of terrorist or extremist attacks. The NSGP aims to harden nonprofit facilities and integrate their preparedness activities with broader state and local security efforts. Recent award amounts have ranged from $1.05 million to $33.7 million, with the FY 2026 solicitation posted on June 24, 2026, and an application deadline of July 24, 2026.

The template serves as a structured tool for applicants to justify and prioritize security investments within their proposals. Applicants must use this document to articulate the rationale behind their proposed facility hardening projects, physical security infrastructure improvements, and cybersecurity upgrades. The investment justification framework helps applicants demonstrate how their proposed enhancements address identified vulnerabilities and threats, align with organizational security assessments, and contribute to the overall mission of protecting nonprofit facilities and the communities they serve. This template is essential for applicants seeking FEMA funding under the NSGP to ensure their proposals meet agency evaluation criteria and compete effectively for available grant awards.

FY26_NSGP_ Prioritization of Investment Justifications_V2.xlsx

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Instructions

Column HeaderInstructions
StateSelect the appropriate State or Territory from the drop down list
Urban AreaSelect the appropriate Urban Area from the drop down list, leave blank if not applicable.
Organization NameList the full legal name of the organization applying for funding
Organization Address
(Street Address, City, State, Zip Code)Provide the complete physical address of the building that houses the applying organization.

This should include the street address (not a PO Box), City, State, and Zip Code

Total Federal Funding Requested on Invesment JustificationProvide the total amount of federal funding requested by the nonprofit
Mission Statement Provided
(Yes/No)Select Yes or No based on whether or not the nonprofit provided a mission statement
Nonprofit Category/TypeSelect the type of nonprofit that the organization has self-identified as on the investment justification
Organization FunctionSelect the function of organization from the drop down list
If "Other" in Columns G and/or H, describeDescribe "Other" if this option was selected in Columns G and/or H
Religious AffiliationSelect the Religious Affiliation of the applying organization
If "Other" in Column J, describeDescribe "Other" if this option was selected in Column J
State Administrative Agency Certification of Organization's Eligibility
(Yes/No)The State Administrative Agency must certify that the nonprofit is eligible for NSGP funding (if recommended)
UEI Number Provided
(Yes/No)Select Yes or No based on whether or not the organization provided their UEI Number
Vulnerability Assessment (VA) Provided by Nonprofit
(Yes/No)Select Yes or No based on whether or not the nonprofit provided a vulnerability assessment
Does vulnerability assessment align with Investment Justification?Select the level of alignment between the provided vulnerability assessment and the content provided in the investment justification
Is At Risk Based on Ideology, Beliefs, Mission, or Purpose
(Yes/No)Select Yes or No to reflect whether or not the nonprofit has demonstrated risk based on their ideology, beliefs, mission, or purpose
Does this Investment Justification contain disallowed costs?
(Yes/No/Questionable)Select Yes, No, or Questionable to reflect if the investment justification contains or may contain disallowed costs
If "Yes" or "Questionable" in Column Q, describeDescribe rationale for selecting Yes or Questionable in Column Q. Provide relevant details or identify the possible disallowed costs in this investment justification.
Previously Received NSGP Funding (Yes/No)Select Yes or No based on whether or not the nonprofit has previously received NSGP funding
If previously funded, describe historical federal grant management performanceProvide feedback by selecting an option from the drop down menu that describes the nonprofit's previous performance in managing federal grant funding.
State Administrative Agency Score
(0 - 40)Provide a numerical score (must be a whole number) between 0 (low) - 40 (high)
State Administrative Agency Prioritization
(Rank/Total # of Applications)Rank each nonprofit in the following format: [rank]/[total number of Investment Justifications]

*Note: Rankings may not include a tie.*

Comments for any investment justifications prioritized out of alignment with score
(if applicable)Provide any details to describe any times when an investment justification's ranking is inconsistent with its score (ex: If an investment justification scores low but is ranked at the top of the list, or if an investment justification receives a perfect score but is ranked as last)
State Administrative Agency Additional Comment
(to be included in federal review)Provide any comments that federal reviewers should take into account when assessing this particular investment justification.

*Please note any organizations that are located in your state, but fall within another state's designated Urban Area.*

State Administrative Agency Recommends for Federal Review
(Yes/No)Select Yes or No based on whether or not the investment justification is being recommended for federal review and funding
Reason for not recommending, if applicableSelect an option from the drop down list to provide context as to why an investment justification has not been recommended for federal review and funding
If "Other" in Column Z, describeDescribe "Other" if this option was selected in Column AA

SAA Prioritization Tracker (S)

State or TerritoryUrban AreaOrganization NameOrganization Address
(Street Address, City, State, Zip Code)Total Federal Funding Requested on Invesment JustificationMission Statement Provided
(Yes/No)Nonprofit Category/TypeOrganization FunctionIf "Other" in Columns H and/or I, describeReligious AffiliationIf "Other" in Column K, describeState Administrative Agency Certification of Organization's Eligibility
(Yes/No)UEI Number Provided
(Yes/No)Vulnerability Assessment (VA) Provided by Nonprofit
(Yes/No)Does vulnerability assessment align with Investment Justification?Is At Risk Based on Ideology, Beliefs, Mission, or Purpose
(Yes/No)Does this Investment Justification contain disallowed costs?
(Yes/No/Questionable)If "Yes" or "Questionable" in Column R, describePreviously Received NSGP Funding
(Yes/No)If previously funded, describe historical federal grant management performanceState Administrative Agency Score
(0 - 40)State Administrative Agency Prioritization
(Rank/Total # of Applications)Comments for any investment justifications prioritized out of alignment with score
(if applicable)State Administrative Agency Additional Comment
(to be included in federal review)State Administrative Agency Recommends for Federal Review
(Yes/No)Reason for not recommending, if applicableIf "Other" in Column Z, describe

SAA Prioritization Tracker (UA)

State or TerritoryUrban AreaOrganization NameOrganization Address
(Street Address, City, State, Zip Code)Total Federal Funding Requested on Invesment JustificationMission Statement Provided
(Yes/No)Nonprofit Category/TypeOrganization FunctionIf "Other" in Columns H and/or I, describeReligious AffiliationIf "Other" in Column K, describeState Administrative Agency Certification of Organization's Eligibility
(Yes/No)UEI Number Provided
(Yes/No)Vulnerability Assessment (VA) Provided by Nonprofit
(Yes/No)Does vulnerability assessment align with Investment Justification?Is At Risk Based on Ideology, Beliefs, Mission, or Purpose
(Yes/No)Does this Investment Justification contain disallowed costs?
(Yes/No/Questionable)If "Yes" or "Questionable" in Column R, describePreviously Received NSGP Funding
(Yes/No)If previously funded, describe historical federal grant management performanceState Administrative Agency Score
(0 - 40)State Administrative Agency Prioritization
(Rank/Total # of Applications)Comments for any investment justifications prioritized out of alignment with score
(if applicable)State Administrative Agency Additional Comment
(to be included in federal review)State Administrative Agency Recommends for Federal Review
(Yes/No)Reason for not recommending, if applicableIf "Other" in Column Z, describe

Ineligible

State or TerritoryUrban AreaOrganization NameOrganization Address
(Street Address, City, State, Zip Code)Total Federal Funding Requested on Invesment JustificationMission Statement Provided
(Yes/No)Nonprofit Category/TypeOrganization FunctionIf "Other" in Columns H and/or I, describeReligious AffiliationIf "Other" in Column K, describeState Administrative Agency Certification of Organization's Eligibility
(Yes/No)UEI Number Provided
(Yes/No)Vulnerability Assessment (VA) Provided by Nonprofit
(Yes/No)Does vulnerability assessment align with Investment Justification?Is At Risk Based on Ideology, Beliefs, Mission, or Purpose
(Yes/No)Does this Investment Justification contain disallowed costs?
(Yes/No/Questionable)If "Yes" or "Questionable" in Column R, describePreviously Received NSGP Funding
(Yes/No)If previously funded, describe historical federal grant management performanceState Administrative Agency Score
(0 - 40)State Administrative Agency Prioritization
(Rank/Total # of Applications)Comments for any investment justifications prioritized out of alignment with score
(if applicable)State Administrative Agency Additional Comment
(to be included in federal review)State Administrative Agency Recommends for Federal Review
(Yes/No)Reason for not recommending, if applicableIf "Other" in Column Z, describe

Drop Down Text

Mission StatementCategoryOrganization FunctionReligious AffiliationSAA CertificationUEI NumberVulnerability AssessmentVA AlignmentAt RiskDisallowed CostsPrevious FundingPast PerformanceState/TerritoryUrban AreaRecommendationEliminationApplication Items
Yes, Mission Statement providedIdeology-based/Spiritual/Religious (Houses of Worship, Religious Schools, etc.)House of WorshipChristianYes, SAA certifies organization's eligibilityYes, the organization provided a valid UEI numberYesFully AlignsYes, at risk based on ideology, belief, mission, or purposeYes, the IJ contains disallowed costsYes, organization has previously received fundingNot applicable (no previous grant award)AlabamaAnaheim/Santa Ana AreaYes, SAA recommends IJ for federal reviewIneligibleConsortium Workbook
No, Mission Statement NOT providedEducational (Secular)Community CenterBuddhistNo, SAA does not certify organization's eligibilityNo, the organization did not provide a valid UEINoSomewhat AlignsNo, not at risk based on ideology, belief, mission, or purposeNo, the IJ does not contain disallowed costsNo, organization has never received fundingHighly effective (little/no assistance)AlaskaAtlanta AreaNo, SAA does not recommend IJ for federal reviewAdministratively Noncompliant/Incomplete SubmissionVulnerability Assessment(s)
Medical (Secular)Pre-SchoolJewishPartially AlignsQuestionable, the IJ should be reviewed for disallowed costsUnable to determineModerately effective (minimal/intermittent assistance)American SamoaAustin AreaNo Viable Threat Risk/Terrorism/Extremism NexusMission Statement(s)
OtherElementary SchoolHinduDoes Not AlignSomewhat effective (routine/periodic assistance)ArizonaBaltimore AreaPast Performance Issues (Programmatic and/or Financial)Multiple Items
Middle SchoolIslamicNot effective (monitored/full lifecycle assistance)ArkansasBay AreaOther
High SchoolSikhCaliforniaBoston Area
Post-Secondary EducationUnaffiliated/NoneColoradoCharlotte Area
Other Type of Educational OrganizationOtherConnecticutChicago Area
Social ServicesPrefer not to answerDelawareCincinnati Area
Day CareDistrict of ColumbiaCleveland Area
CampFloridaColumbus Area
ShelterGeorgiaDallas/Fort Worth/Arlington Area
Senior ServicesGuamDenver Area
OtherHawaiiDetroit Area
IdahoHampton Roads Area
IllinoisHonolulu Area
IndianaHouston Area
IowaIndianapolis Area
KansasJacksonville Area
KentuckyJersey City/Newark Area
LouisianaKansas City Area
MaineLas Vegas Area
MarylandLos Angeles/Long Beach Area
MassachusettsMiami/Fort Lauderdale Area
MichiganNashville Area
MinnesotaNational Capital Region
MississippiNew Orleans Area
MissouriNew York City Area
MontanaOrlando Area
NebraskaPhiladelphia Area
NevadaPhoenix Area
New HampshirePittsburgh Area
New JerseyPortland Area
New MexicoRiverside Area
New YorkSacramento Area
North CarolinaSan Antonio Area
North DakotaSan Diego Area
Northern Mariana IslandsSeattle Area
OhioSt. Louis Area
OklahomaTampa Area
OregonTwin Cities Area
PennsylvaniaRichmond Area
Puerto RicoMilwaukee Area
Rhode IslandColorado Springs
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
US Virgin Islands
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .