FY26_NSGP_ Prioritization of Investment Justifications_.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 360 KB Posted
- Opportunity number
- DHS-26-GPD-008-00-99
- Issued by
-
Federal Emergency Management Agency
About this file
This file is a prioritization framework for investment justifications related to the Fiscal Year 2026 Nonprofit Security Grant Program administered by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. The document appears to be an Excel-based template or scoring tool designed to evaluate and rank nonprofit security grant applications based on predetermined criteria. The NSGP, funded under CFDA 97.008, allocates grants to strengthen physical and cybersecurity infrastructure for nonprofit organizations at elevated risk of terrorist or extremist attacks, with eligible activities including surveillance systems, access control mechanisms, facility hardening, enhanced lighting, and contracted security services. Individual nonprofits may request up to $200,000 per site, with performance periods extending through August 31, 2028. Awards are distributed through State Administrative Agencies serving as pass-through administrators, with recent awards ranging from $1.05 million to $33.7 million to state and territorial entities. Applications are submitted through the FEMA Grants Outcomes system with evaluation criteria emphasizing risk profile assessment, security improvement proposals, project feasibility, and alignment with national priorities.
FY26_NSGP_ Prioritization of Investment Justifications_.xlsx
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| FY_2026_NSGP_Export Assistance and Data Collection Cleaning Tool.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| FY26_NSGP_ Prioritization of Investment Justifications V2.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| FY_2026_NSGP_Process Overview for SAAs.pptx | PPTX presentation | |
| FY_2026_NSGP Scoring Tool_ONLY.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| FEMA Form FF-207-FY-21-115_NEW.pdf | ||
| FEMA Form FF-207-FY-21-115_NEW.pdf | ||
| FY26 NSGP NOFO_Final.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Instructions - Individual
| Column Header | Instructions |
| State | Select the appropriate State or Territory from the drop down list |
| Urban Area | Select the appropriate Urban Area from the drop down list |
| Organization Name | List the full legal name of the organization applying for funding |
If an organization has the same legal name, please include a signifier (Bldg A, Site B, etc.) or add the numeric address value to the end of the name (Hill Building 1320, Campus 398, etc.)
| Organization Address | |
| (Street Address, City, State, Zip Code) | Provide the complete physical address of the building that houses the applying organization. |
This should include the street address (not a PO Box), City, State, and Zip Code
| Total Federal Funding Requested on Invesment Justification | Provide the total amount of federal funding requested by the nonprofit | |
| Mission Statement Provided | ||
| (Yes/No) | Select Yes or No based on whether or not the nonprofit provided a mission statement | |
| Heightened Threat from the Israel-Hamas War | Select Yes or No based on whether or not the organization has self-identified as facing heightened threat resulting from the Israel-Hamas war | |
| Nonprofit Category/Type | Select the type of nonprofit that the organization has self-identified as on the investment justification | |
| Organization Function | Select the function of organization from the drop down list | |
| If "Other" in Columns H and/or I, describe | Describe "Other" if this option was selected in Columns H and/or I | |
| Religious Affiliation | Select the Religious Affiliation of the applying organization | |
| If "Other" in Column K, describe | Describe "Other" if this option was selected in Column K | |
| State Administrative Agency Certification of Organization's Eligibility | ||
| (Yes/No) | The State Administrative Agency must certify that the nonprofit is eligible for NSGP funding (if recommended) | |
| UEI Number Provided | ||
| (Yes/No) | Select Yes or No based on whether or not the organization provided their UEI Number | |
| Vulnerability Assessment (VA) Provided by Nonprofit | ||
| (Yes/No) | Select Yes or No based on whether or not the nonprofit provided a vulnerability assessment | |
| Does vulnerability assessment align with Investment Justification? | Select the level of alignment between the provided vulnerability assessment and the content provided in the investment justification | |
| Is At Risk Based on Ideology, Beliefs, Mission, or Purpose | ||
| (Yes/No) | Select Yes or No to reflect whether or not the nonprofit has demonstrated risk based on their ideology, beliefs, mission, or purpose | |
| Does this Investment Justification contain disallowed costs? | ||
| (Yes/No/Questionable) | Select Yes, No, or Questionable to reflect if the investment justification contains or may contain disallowed costs | |
| If "Yes" or "Questionable" in Column R, describe | Describe rationale for selecting Yes or Questionable in Column R. Provide relevant details or identify the possible disallowed costs in this investment justification. | |
| Previously Received NSGP Funding (Yes/No) | Select Yes or No based on whether or not the nonprofit has previously received NSGP funding | |
| If previously funded, describe historical federal grant management performance | Provide feedback by selecting an option from the drop down menu that describes the nonprofit's previous performance in managing federal grant funding. | |
| State Administrative Agency Score | ||
| (0 - 40) | Provide a numerical score (must be a whole number) between 0 (low) - 40 (high) | |
| State Administrative Agency Prioritization | ||
| (Rank/Total # of Applications) | Rank each nonprofit in the following format: [rank]/[total number of Investment Justifications] |
*Note: Rankings may not include a tie.*
| Comments for any investment justifications prioritized out of alignment with score | |
| (if applicable) | Provide any details to describe any times when an investment justification's ranking is inconsistent with its score (ex: If an investment justification scores low but is ranked at the top of the list, or if an investment justification receives a perfect score but is ranked as last) |
| State Administrative Agency Additional Comment | |
| (to be included in federal review) | Provide any comments that federal reviewers should take into account when assessing this particular investment justification. |
*Please note any organizations that are located in your state, but fall within another state's designated Urban Area.*
| State Administrative Agency Recommends for Federal Review | ||
| (Yes/No) | Select Yes or No based on whether or not the investment justification is being recommended for federal review and funding | |
| Reason for not recommending, if applicable | Select an option from the drop down list to provide context as to why an investment justification has not been recommended for federal review and funding | |
| If "Other" in Column AA, describe | Describe "Other" if this option was selected in Column AA |
Instructions
| Column Header | Instructions | |
| State | Select the appropriate State or Territory from the drop down list | |
| Urban Area | Select the appropriate Urban Area from the drop down list, leave blank if not applicable. | |
| Organization Name | List the full legal name of the organization applying for funding | |
| Organization Address | ||
| (Street Address, City, State, Zip Code) | Provide the complete physical address of the building that houses the applying organization. |
This should include the street address (not a PO Box), City, State, and Zip Code
| Total Federal Funding Requested on Invesment Justification | Provide the total amount of federal funding requested by the nonprofit | |
| Mission Statement Provided | ||
| (Yes/No) | Select Yes or No based on whether or not the nonprofit provided a mission statement | |
| Nonprofit Category/Type | Select the type of nonprofit that the organization has self-identified as on the investment justification | |
| Organization Function | Select the function of organization from the drop down list | |
| If "Other" in Columns G and/or H, describe | Describe "Other" if this option was selected in Columns G and/or H | |
| Religious Affiliation | Select the Religious Affiliation of the applying organization | |
| If "Other" in Column J, describe | Describe "Other" if this option was selected in Column J | |
| State Administrative Agency Certification of Organization's Eligibility | ||
| (Yes/No) | The State Administrative Agency must certify that the nonprofit is eligible for NSGP funding (if recommended) | |
| UEI Number Provided | ||
| (Yes/No) | Select Yes or No based on whether or not the organization provided their UEI Number | |
| Vulnerability Assessment (VA) Provided by Nonprofit | ||
| (Yes/No) | Select Yes or No based on whether or not the nonprofit provided a vulnerability assessment | |
| Does vulnerability assessment align with Investment Justification? | Select the level of alignment between the provided vulnerability assessment and the content provided in the investment justification | |
| Is At Risk Based on Ideology, Beliefs, Mission, or Purpose | ||
| (Yes/No) | Select Yes or No to reflect whether or not the nonprofit has demonstrated risk based on their ideology, beliefs, mission, or purpose | |
| Does this Investment Justification contain disallowed costs? | ||
| (Yes/No/Questionable) | Select Yes, No, or Questionable to reflect if the investment justification contains or may contain disallowed costs | |
| If "Yes" or "Questionable" in Column Q, describe | Describe rationale for selecting Yes or Questionable in Column Q. Provide relevant details or identify the possible disallowed costs in this investment justification. | |
| Previously Received NSGP Funding (Yes/No) | Select Yes or No based on whether or not the nonprofit has previously received NSGP funding | |
| If previously funded, describe historical federal grant management performance | Provide feedback by selecting an option from the drop down menu that describes the nonprofit's previous performance in managing federal grant funding. | |
| State Administrative Agency Score | ||
| (0 - 40) | Provide a numerical score (must be a whole number) between 0 (low) - 40 (high) | |
| State Administrative Agency Prioritization | ||
| (Rank/Total # of Applications) | Rank each nonprofit in the following format: [rank]/[total number of Investment Justifications] |
*Note: Rankings may not include a tie.*
| Comments for any investment justifications prioritized out of alignment with score | |
| (if applicable) | Provide any details to describe any times when an investment justification's ranking is inconsistent with its score (ex: If an investment justification scores low but is ranked at the top of the list, or if an investment justification receives a perfect score but is ranked as last) |
| State Administrative Agency Additional Comment | |
| (to be included in federal review) | Provide any comments that federal reviewers should take into account when assessing this particular investment justification. |
*Please note any organizations that are located in your state, but fall within another state's designated Urban Area.*
| State Administrative Agency Recommends for Federal Review | ||
| (Yes/No) | Select Yes or No based on whether or not the investment justification is being recommended for federal review and funding | |
| Reason for not recommending, if applicable | Select an option from the drop down list to provide context as to why an investment justification has not been recommended for federal review and funding | |
| If "Other" in Column Z, describe | Describe "Other" if this option was selected in Column AA |
SAA Prioritization Tracker (S)
| State or Territory | Urban Area | Organization Name | Organization Address | |||
| (Street Address, City, State, Zip Code) | Total Federal Funding Requested on Invesment Justification | Mission Statement Provided | ||||
| (Yes/No) | Nonprofit Category/Type | Organization Function | If "Other" in Columns H and/or I, describe | Religious Affiliation | If "Other" in Column K, describe | State Administrative Agency Certification of Organization's Eligibility |
| (Yes/No) | UEI Number Provided | |||||
| (Yes/No) | Vulnerability Assessment (VA) Provided by Nonprofit | |||||
| (Yes/No) | Does vulnerability assessment align with Investment Justification? | Is At Risk Based on Ideology, Beliefs, Mission, or Purpose | ||||
| (Yes/No) | Does this Investment Justification contain disallowed costs? | |||||
| (Yes/No/Questionable) | If "Yes" or "Questionable" in Column R, describe | Previously Received NSGP Funding | ||||
| (Yes/No) | If previously funded, describe historical federal grant management performance | State Administrative Agency Score | ||||
| (0 - 40) | State Administrative Agency Prioritization | |||||
| (Rank/Total # of Applications) | Comments for any investment justifications prioritized out of alignment with score | |||||
| (if applicable) | State Administrative Agency Additional Comment | |||||
| (to be included in federal review) | State Administrative Agency Recommends for Federal Review | |||||
| (Yes/No) | Reason for not recommending, if applicable | If "Other" in Column Z, describe |
SAA Prioritization Tracker (UA)
| State or Territory | Urban Area | Organization Name | Organization Address | |||
| (Street Address, City, State, Zip Code) | Total Federal Funding Requested on Invesment Justification | Mission Statement Provided | ||||
| (Yes/No) | Nonprofit Category/Type | Organization Function | If "Other" in Columns H and/or I, describe | Religious Affiliation | If "Other" in Column K, describe | State Administrative Agency Certification of Organization's Eligibility |
| (Yes/No) | UEI Number Provided | |||||
| (Yes/No) | Vulnerability Assessment (VA) Provided by Nonprofit | |||||
| (Yes/No) | Does vulnerability assessment align with Investment Justification? | Is At Risk Based on Ideology, Beliefs, Mission, or Purpose | ||||
| (Yes/No) | Does this Investment Justification contain disallowed costs? | |||||
| (Yes/No/Questionable) | If "Yes" or "Questionable" in Column R, describe | Previously Received NSGP Funding | ||||
| (Yes/No) | If previously funded, describe historical federal grant management performance | State Administrative Agency Score | ||||
| (0 - 40) | State Administrative Agency Prioritization | |||||
| (Rank/Total # of Applications) | Comments for any investment justifications prioritized out of alignment with score | |||||
| (if applicable) | State Administrative Agency Additional Comment | |||||
| (to be included in federal review) | State Administrative Agency Recommends for Federal Review | |||||
| (Yes/No) | Reason for not recommending, if applicable | If "Other" in Column Z, describe |
Ineligible
| State or Territory | Urban Area | Organization Name | Organization Address | |||
| (Street Address, City, State, Zip Code) | Total Federal Funding Requested on Invesment Justification | Mission Statement Provided | ||||
| (Yes/No) | Nonprofit Category/Type | Organization Function | If "Other" in Columns H and/or I, describe | Religious Affiliation | If "Other" in Column K, describe | State Administrative Agency Certification of Organization's Eligibility |
| (Yes/No) | UEI Number Provided | |||||
| (Yes/No) | Vulnerability Assessment (VA) Provided by Nonprofit | |||||
| (Yes/No) | Does vulnerability assessment align with Investment Justification? | Is At Risk Based on Ideology, Beliefs, Mission, or Purpose | ||||
| (Yes/No) | Does this Investment Justification contain disallowed costs? | |||||
| (Yes/No/Questionable) | If "Yes" or "Questionable" in Column R, describe | Previously Received NSGP Funding | ||||
| (Yes/No) | If previously funded, describe historical federal grant management performance | State Administrative Agency Score | ||||
| (0 - 40) | State Administrative Agency Prioritization | |||||
| (Rank/Total # of Applications) | Comments for any investment justifications prioritized out of alignment with score | |||||
| (if applicable) | State Administrative Agency Additional Comment | |||||
| (to be included in federal review) | State Administrative Agency Recommends for Federal Review | |||||
| (Yes/No) | Reason for not recommending, if applicable | If "Other" in Column Z, describe |
Sheet1
| Anaheim/Santa Ana Area |
| Atlanta Area |
| Austin Area |
| Baltimore Area |
| Bay Area |
| Boston Area |
| Charlotte Area |
| Chicago Area |
| Cincinnati Area |
| Cleveland Area |
| Colorado Springs Area |
| Columbus Area |
| Dallas/Fort Worth/Arlington Area |
| Denver Area |
| Detroit Area |
| Hampton Roads Area |
| Honolulu Area |
| Houston Area |
| Indianapolis Area |
| Jacksonville Area |
| Jersey City/Newark Area |
| Kansas City Area |
| Las Vegas Area |
| Los Angeles/Long Beach Area |
| Miami/Fort Lauderdale Area |
| Milwaukee Area |
| Nashville Area |
| National Capital Region |
| New Orleans Area |
| New York City Area |
| Orlando Area |
| Phoenix Area |
| Philadelphia Area |
| Pittsburgh Area |
| Portland Area |
| Richmond Area |
| Riverside Area |
| Sacramento Area |
| San Antonio Area |
| San Diego Area |
| Seattle Area |
| St. Louis Area |
| Tampa Area |
| Twin Cities Area |
Drop Down Text
| Mission Statement | Category | Organization Function | Religious Affiliation | SAA Certification | UEI Number | Vulnerability Assessment | VA Alignment | At Risk | Disallowed Costs | Previous Funding | Past Performance | State/Territory | Urban Area | Recommendation | Elimination | Application Items |
| Yes, Mission Statement provided | Ideology-based/Spiritual/Religious (Houses of Worship, Religious Schools, etc.) | House of Worship | Christian | Yes, SAA certifies organization's eligibility | Yes, the organization provided a valid UEI number | Individual | Fully Aligns | Yes, at risk based on ideology, belief, mission, or purpose | Yes, the IJ contains disallowed costs | Yes, organization has previously received funding | Not applicable (no previous grant award) | Alabama | Anaheim/Santa Ana Area | Yes, SAA recommends IJ for federal review | Ineligible | Consortium Workbook |
| No, Mission Statement NOT provided | Educational (Secular) | Community Center | Buddhist | No, SAA does not certify organization's eligibility | No, the organization did not provide a valid UEI | Shared | Somewhat Aligns | No, not at risk based on ideology, belief, mission, or purpose | No, the IJ does not contain disallowed costs | No, organization has never received funding | Highly effective (little/no assistance) | Alaska | Atlanta Area | No, SAA does not recommend IJ for federal review | Administratively Noncompliant/Incomplete Submission | Vulnerability Assessment(s) |
| Medical (Secular) | Pre-School | Jewish | Partially Aligns | Questionable, the IJ should be reviewed for disallowed costs | Unable to determine | Mode |
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .