Final RFP.pdf

ACQR5764267

SOLICITATION N40085-20-R-0069, DESIGN-BID-BUILD (DBB), DRY DOCK 2, PORTAL CRANE RAIL AND TUNNEL REPAIRS, PORTSMOUTH

NAVAL SHIPYARD (PNSY), KITTERY, MAINE

SEE PARAGRAPH 4.1 in "INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS" FOR SITE VISIT INFORMATION. SITE VISIT REQUESTS ARE DUE NO LATER THAN 10 March 2020 and SITE VISIT is 18 March 2020.

PROPOSALS ARE DUE ON APRIL 7, 2020 at 2:)) EDT. REFER TO RFP FOR PROPOSAL SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS.

PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRIES (PPI) CUT-OFF DATE AND TIME IS TWO WEEKS PRIOR TO PROPOSAL DUE DATE BY 3:00 P.M. ALL PPIs SHALL

BE SUBMITTED TO ELIZABETH CARMACK EMAIL - ELIZABETH.CARMACK@NAVY.MIL

MAGNITUDE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THIS PROJECT IS BETWEEN $10 MILLION AND $25 MILLION.

THIS ACQUISITION IS BEING SOLICITED ON AN UNRESTRICTED BASIS WITH FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION.

WAGE DETERMINATION GENERAL DECISION NUMBER: ME20200033 01/03/2020

BETSY CARMACK (757) 341-1654

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS

NEGOTIATED

03-Mar-2020

(RFP)

(IFB)

X

CALL:

B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

See Item 7

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID

3. DATE ISSUED

9. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME

SOLICITATION

X

NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)

11. The Contractor shall begin performance w ithin _______15 calendar days and complete it w ithin ________745 calendar days after receiving aw ard, notice to proceed. This performance period is X mandatory, negotiable. (See _________________________52.211-10

12 A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

X YES NO

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and __________4 copies to perform the w ork required are due at the place specif ied in Item 8 by ___________ local time ______________07 Apr 2020 (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time.

shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.

B. An offer guarantee X is, is not required.

C. All offers are subject to the (1) w ork requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than _______180 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due w ill not be considered and w ill be rejected.

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NO.

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

4. CONTRACT NO.

7. ISSUED BY CODE

NAVFAC MID ATLANTIC

MARINE CORPS IPT

9324 VIRGINIA AVE

NORFOLK VA 23511

N40085

PAGE OF PAGES

1 OF

CODE

(Title, identifying no., date):

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

02:00 PM (hour)

Sealed envelopes containing offers

5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.

8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7)

FAX:TEL: (757)341-0695 TEL: FAX:

N4008520R0069 41

20B. SIGNATURE

(REV. 4-85)STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK

TO SIGN

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Continued) (Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the w ork required at the prices specif ied below in strict accordance w ith the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in w riting w ithin ________ calendar days after the date offers are due.

the minimum requirements stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

OFFER (Type or print)

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

CODE

(Insert any number equal to or greater than

20C. OFFER DATE

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)

CODE27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY:26. ADMINISTERED BY

(Include ZIP Code)14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)

See Item 14

(Include only if different than Item 14)16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS

30B. SIGNATURE

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.)

document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees Your of f er on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award con-to f urnish and deliv er all items or perf orm all work, requisitions identif ied summates the contract, which consists of (a) the Gov ernment solicitation and on this f orm and any continuation sheets f or the consideration stated in this y our of f er, and (b) this contract award. No f urther contractual document is contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be necessary .

gov erned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certif ications, and specif ications or incorporated by ref er-ence in or attached to this contract.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

30C. DATE

(Type or print)

TEL: EMAIL:

31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE

BY

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

(Contractor is required to sign this28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT

(M ust be fully completed by offeror)OFFER

N4008520R0069

Section 00 10 00 - Solicitation

DELIVERY INFORMATION

CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

Section 00 21 16 - Instructions to Proposers

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. GENERAL

1.1 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF PROCUREMENT PROCESS

1.2 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF CONTRACT

2. BASIS FOR AWARD

3. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

4. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS

4.1 PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE AND SITE VISIT

4.2 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS

4.3 PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRIES (PPIs)

5. INCORPORATION OF TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

6. ATTACHMENTS: Will be located on FBO WEBSITE

5.1 ATTACHMENT A - PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRY LOG

5.2 ATTACHMENT B - SECNAV 5512 – BASE ACCESS FORM (Naval Station Norfolk)

5.3 ATTACHMENT C - CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE AND PROJECT DATA SHEET

5.4 ATTACHMENT D - PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE

5.5 ATTACHMENT E – PRICE PROPOSAL FORM

5.6 ATTACHMENT F – ONE DAY PASS REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL DELIVERY

5.7 ATTACHMENT G – SUBCONTRACTING PLAN TEMPLATE

1. GENERAL OVERVIEW OF PROCUREMENT PROCESS

1.1.1 This solicitation is being issued as an Unrestricted procurement

1.1.2 The NAICS code for this procurement is 237990 and the size standard is $39.5 Million

1.1.3 This acquisition will be advertised utilizing FAR Part 15 – Contracting by Negotiations Resulting in a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract for construction services

1.1.4 Magnitude of Construction: Between $10,000,000-$25,000,000

1.2 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF CONTRACT

Description of Work:

These projects provide various infrastructure upgrades to the dry dock #2 area at Portsmouth Naval Shipyard (PNS) to increase the function and reliability of the ground level portal crane rails and adjacent facilities. The proposed upgrades are divided into two separate projects that will be awarded together: Dry Dock 2 Portal Crane Rail Repairs, and Dry Dock 2 Tunnel Repairs.

The Dry Dock #2 Portal Crane Rail Repair upgrades will increase the capacity of the ground level portal crane rails at the North and East sides of Dry Dock #2. Major work elements include: demolition of existing crane rails, baseplates, hardware, footings, beams, and pile caps; installation of micro piles; installation of reinforced concrete pile caps, beams, and footings; installation of crane rail, baseplates, and hardware; site grading, drainage improvements, and pavement restoration within the project limits.

The Dry Dock #2 Tunnel Repair upgrades will demolish and reconstruct the personnel access tunnel at the east side of Dry Dock 2, including integral and adjacent ground level portal crane rails and footings. Major work elements include; temporary re-routing of electrical, communication, and mechanical utilities; selective demolition of reinforced concrete personnel access tunnel, and crane rail footings; rock excavation; installation of new cast-in-place reinforced concrete personnel access tunnel with integral crane rails and adjacent crane rail footings;

reconstruction of drainage, electrical, and mechanical utilities; site grading and paving.

2. BASIS FOR AWARD

2.1 The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all offers at any time prior to award of the contract; to negotiate with offerors in the competitive range; and to award the contract to the offeror submitting the lowest priced, technically acceptable offer.

2.2 The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. In addition, if the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

2.3 The LPTA process is selected as appropriate for this acquisition because the best value is expected to result from selection of the technically acceptable proposal with the lowest evaluated price.

2.4 In order to permit efficient competition, the Navy will utilize the following methodology. Proposals will initially be screened for price and placed in order (lowest price to highest price). The Navy will then evaluate the technical factors of the three lowest priced proposals. The Navy will make award to the lowest priced technically acceptable proposal from among the three lowest priced proposals. However, the Navy, at its sole discretion, reserves the right to increase the number of proposals it will review under this methodology. Accordingly, under this methodology, the technical factors of some proposals may not be evaluated by the Navy. If discussions are deemed necessary by the Contracting Officer, all proposals will be evaluated (both technical and price) for the purpose of establishing a competitive range.

2.5 An overall non-price factors rating must be at least “ACCEPTABLE” in order to be eligible for award. An “UNACCEPTABLE” rating in any factor results in the overall non-price factors proposal being rated “UNACCEPTABLE” unless corrected through discussions. An overall non-price factors rating of “UNACCEPTABLE” makes a proposal ineligible for award.

3. EVALUATIONS FOR AWARD

3.1 The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-price factors:

Factor 1 – Corporate Experience Factor 2 – Safety Factor 3 – Past Performance

The distinction between corporate experience and past performance is corporate experience pertains to the types of work and volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work covered by this requirement, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

3.2 Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor.

(a) Price:

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The offeror shall submit one (1) original, marked “Original”, and one (1) copy, marked “Copy”, in a separate three ring binder (1/2 inch minimum) with the following:

• Include a cover page with Solicitation Number, Solicitation Title, Prime Contractor Name, Address, Phone Number, Fax Number, DUNS Number, Cage Code, Point of Contact, and E-mail Address;

• Completed SF 1442 signed with all amendments acknowledged;

• Price Proposal Form;

• Copy of Representation and Certifications and proof of registration in System for Award

Management (SAM);

• Confirmation of filing of Veterans’ Employment and Training (VETS) VETS-4212 for the

2018 filing cycle;

• Bid Guarantee in accordance with FAR Clause 52.228-1 – Bid Guarantee (amount shall be at least 20 percent of the proposed price, but shall not exceed $3 million); and

• Responsibility Determination Information (see below).

• Small Business Subcontracting Plan

The offeror is required to submit a complete Price Proposal Form that includes completion of all contract line item numbers (CLINs).

In the event of a discrepancy between the original and copies, the original version of the proposal will govern.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO BE SUBMITTED WITH PRICE PROPOSAL PACKAGE:

RESPONSIBILITY DETERMINATION INFORMATION – In order to be eligible for award, the offeror must be determined responsible in accordance with FAR Part 9, specifically 9.104-1, General Standards. In a separate tab, the offeror shall provide the following information in the price proposal package:

1. One (1) signed bank reference demonstrating adequate financial resources. If offeror’s firm has a line of credit – provide information on how many figures offeror can borrow against the line of credit (i.e. medium 6 figures – exact line of credit is not required).

2. The offeror shall provide the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for the prime contractor, certified by an independent accounting firm, if practicable, or signed by an authorized officer of the organization.

Submit evidence of availability of working/operating capital, which will be used for the performance of the resultant contract. For Joint Venture arrangements, submit the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for each company in the Joint Venture and discuss the financial responsibilities among the companies. The Government may also utilize Dun & Bradstreet reports to evaluate the financial capacity of the offeror.

3. Description of offeror’s facilities and equipment.

4. Other offeror’s work presently under contract.

Although required to be submitted with offeror’s price proposal, this information will not be evaluated as part of the price proposal. This information forms the basis of your firm’s responsibility determination should your firm be considered for award. Proposal packages from unsuccessful offerors will not be returned to the offeror, but shall be destroyed by the Contracting Officer. No certificate of destruction will be issued.

SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING PLAN INFORMATION – reference FAR 52.219-9 Alt II and

DFARS 252.219-7003).

NAVFAC’s command-wide small business subcontracting targets are shown below. These may be higher or lower than percentages that would represent realistic, challenging small business subcontracting goals for this acquisition.

Offerors representing as other than small businesses shall establish small business subcontracting plan goals and shall document in their subcontracting plans the basis for all proposed goals. Plans shall be submitted with initial offers.

SB 40%

SDB 5%

HUBZone SB 3%

WOSB 9%

SBVOSB 3%

Small businesses identified by name shall be listed in small business subcontracting plans submitted pursuant to FAR 52.219-9 in order to facilitate compliance with 252.219-7003(e).

See the Small Business Subcontracting Plan Template (Attachment) for format.

(2) Basis of Evaluation:

The Government will evaluate price based on the total price. Total price consists of the basic requirements and all option items (see Section 00010 – Solicitation Contract Form of the solicitation). The Government intends to evaluate all options and has included the provision FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options (JUL 1990) in Section 00700 – Contract Clauses of the solicitation. In accordance with FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s). Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

(i) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.

(ii) Comparison of proposed prices with the IGCE.

(iii) Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

(iv) Comparison of market survey results.

(b) Technical Factors:

The offeror shall submit one (1) original, marked “Original”, and four (4) copies, marked “Copy”, each in a separate three ring binder with the following:

• Cover page with Solicitation Number, Solicitation Title, Prime Contractor Name, Address, Phone Number, Fax Number, DUNS, Cage Code, Point of Contact, Phone Number, and Email Address;

• 8 ½ x 11 paper, 12-point font;

• Refer to individual factors for page limitations. Pages that exceed indicated page limitations shall not be evaluated; and

• Submit price and non-price binders on one CD-ROM. In case of variation, the original hard copy proposal takes precedence over electronic or copies.

In the event of a discrepancy between the original and copies, the original version of the proposal will govern.

Furthermore, any price information within the technical proposal (non-price proposal) will not be considered.

Likewise, any technical/non-price information within the price proposal will not be considered.

(1) Factor 1, Corporate Experience

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The offeror shall submit the following information:

Submit a minimum of two (2) to a maximum of five (5) relevant construction projects completed in the past ten (10) years that best demonstrates your experience on projects that are similar in size, scope and complexity as detailed below. The Government will not consider more than five (5) projects and will review only the first five (5) projects if more are submitted.

For the purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as:

Size: A final construction cost of $10 million dollars or greater.

Scope: New construction, renovation, or repair of ground level rail systems or waterfront facilities including piers, wharves, dry docks, bridges, or tunnels.

Complexity: Each project submitted does not require demonstrated experience with all of the following components, but collectively, they must demonstrate experience with all elements:

a) Experience with installation of ground level crane rail or other fixated rail system.

b) Experience with installation of deep foundation systems such as micro piles, H-piles, or rock socketed structural supports.

c) Experience with cast-in-place reinforced concrete foundation elements such as grade beams, pile caps, or footings.

d) Experience with complex, tightly controlled scheduling, sequencing and/or phasing requirements,

e) Experience with projects completed in highly congested, urban, or industrial areas with limited construction laydown space.

Ensure that the project description clearly identifies whether the project is new construction or repair/renovation, addresses how the project meets the scope and complexity requirements as delineated above, and provides the final construction cost.

A project is defined as a construction project performed under a single task order or contract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project;

rather offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

The attached Construction Experience Project Data Sheet is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages).

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP as described above.

If the offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture entity. If the Joint Venture does not have shared experience, projects may be submitted for the Joint Venture partner. Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined. For a JV, the offeror shall submit the signed JV agreement. For 8(a) Mentor-Protégé Joint Ventures, the offeror shall submit the signed and U.S.

Small Business Administration (SBA) approved Mentor-Protégé agreement. For offerors who are a Joint Venture, an offeror’s proposal may be considered ineligible for award if this information is not provided.

If an offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract in order for the past performance information of the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies to be considered. The proposal shall state specific commitments of technical resources (e.g. personnel, equipment) that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies commit to the performance of this contract. In particular, the proposal will clearly state the specific commitments of resources of the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member that will be located at the worksites and company offices in the city/area of the project. The proposal shall also describe specific roles of the affiliate/subsidiary/ parent/LLC/LTD member companies in terms of the work it will either self-perform or manage on behalf of the offeror in performance of the contract. Any projects submitted in excess of the five (5) will not be considered.

The offeror may utilize experience of a subcontractor that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement to demonstrate construction experience under this evaluation factor. The Offer must provide a letter of commitment signed by both parties and an explanation of the meaningful involvement that the subcontractor will have in performance of this contract. Post-award substitution of subcontractor(s) shall be avoided to the maximum extent possible, and any proposed substitutions shall have verifiable, equivalent experience to the subcontractor being replaced and are subject to the approval of the Contracting Officer.

Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

The basis of evaluation will include the offeror’s demonstrated experience in performing relevant construction as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements. The assessment of the offeror’s relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. The requirement for Acceptability will be based upon the projects submitted by the offeror in its proposal; the offeror must have at least three (3) relevant projects that meet the size, scope, and complexity stated in the Solicitation Submittal Requirements above or will be considered Unacceptable.

(2) Factor 2, Safety:

The offeror shall submit the following information: (For a partnership or joint venture, the following submittal requirements are required for each contractor who is part of the partnership or joint venture; however, only one safety narrative is required. EMR, DART and TRC Rates shall not be submitted for subcontractors.)

(1) Experience Modification Rate (EMR): Include three previous complete calendar years’ worth of data (2017, 2018, and 2019). This rate compares company’s annual losses in insurance claims against its policy premiums. The offeror may submit an insurance company-provided equivalent rate if no EMR exists. If the offeror has no EMR or premium, for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why. Any extenuating circumstances that affect the EMR and negative trends should be addressed as part of the factor submission.

(2) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate:

Submit three previous complete calendar years’ worth of data (2017, 2018, and 2019). If an offeror cannot submit an OSHA DART rate, for any year, affirmatively state so and an explanation must be provided. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA DART rate data negatively must be addressed as part of this factor submission.

(3) OSHA Total Recordable Case (TRC) Rate: Submit three previous complete calendar years’ worth of data (2017, 2018, and 2019). If an offeror cannot submit OSHA TRC rates, for any year, affirmatively state so and an explanation must be provided. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA TRC rate data negatively must be addressed as part of this factor submission.

(4) Technical Approach for Safety: The technical approach to safety narrative shall be limited to one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages), and must address all items below.

1. The offeror shall describe the plan for safety that will be implemented to evaluate safety performance of potential subcontractors as part of the selection process for all levels of subcontractors.

2. The offeror shall submit a narrative that fully describes the safety management system that they will use to oversee the safety compliance and performance of self-performed and subcontractor performed work.

3. The offeror shall describe any innovative methods that will be employed to ensure and monitor safe work practices at self-performed and/or all subcontractor levels.

4. The offeror shall describe their methodology to execute an effective program that facilitates sound mishap prevention techniques and processes, employee reporting of unsafe conditions, unsafe activities, and near-miss mishaps.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation: The evaluation will collectively consider the following:

- Experience Modification Rate (EMR)

- OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART)

- Total Recordable Case (TRC) Rates

- Offeror Technical Approach to Safety

- Other sources of information available to the Government

(1) Experience Modification Rate (EMR): For the three previous complete calendar years the offeror will submit EMR. If no EMR exists, the offeror may submit an insurance company-provided equivalent rate explaining why not. If an insurance company-provided equivalent rate is provided, it will be treated the same as an EMR. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the EMR and negative trends should be addressed as part of this selection factor. The board will evaluate the EMR to determine if the offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any negative trends and extenuating circumstances that impact the rating.

(2) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rates: For the three previous complete calendar years, the offeror will submit their OSHA DART, as defined by the U.S.

Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. If unable to submit OSHA DART rates, affirmatively state so, and an explanation must be provided. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA DART rate data and negative trends should be addressed as part of this element. The board will evaluate the OSHA DART rates to determine if the offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any upward trends and extenuating circumstances that impact rates.

(3) OSHA Total Recordable Case (TRC) Rates: For the three previous complete calendar years, the offeror will submit their OSHA TRC rates, as defined by the U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational

Safety and Health Administration. If unable to submit OSHA TRC rates, affirmatively state so, and an explanation must be provided. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA TRC rate data and negative trends should be addressed as part of this element. The board will evaluate the OSHA TRC rates to determine if the offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any upward trends and extenuating circumstances that impact rates.

(4) Technical Approach to Safety: The offeror will describe their plan to evaluate their safety performance and that of potential subcontractors. Also, describe any innovative methods that the offeror will employ to ensure and monitor safe work practices at all subcontractor levels. The Safety Narrative shall be limited to two pages. The board will evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which subcontractor safety performance will be considered in the selection of all levels of subcontractors on the upcoming project. The board will evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which innovations are being proposed that may enhance safety on this procurement and validate the contractor has addressed methodology to be used in the execution of an effective program that facilitates sound mishap prevention techniques/processes, employee reporting of unsafe conditions, unsafe activities, and near-miss mishaps.

(5) Other Sources of Information Available to the Government: Other sources for safety may include but are not limited to OSHA data, NAVFAC’s Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS) in Enterprise Safety Applications Management System (ESAMS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) and other related databases.

Factor 3, Past Performance:

IF A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION IS AVAILABLE, IT SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE

PROPOSAL. IF THERE IS NOT A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION, the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) included in the solicitation is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project the offeror includes in its proposal for Factor 1 – Corporate Experience. AN OFFEROR SHALL NOT

SUBMIT A PPQ WHEN A COMPLETED CPARS IS AVAILABLE.

IF A CPARS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, the offeror must ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed PPQs should be submitted with your proposal. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the offeror must complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ with contract and client information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contact, Ms. Elizabeth Carmack, via email at Elizabeth.carmack@navy.mil prior to proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs or CPARS previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), and any other known sources not provided by the offeror.

While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the offeror. It is the responsibility of the offeror to provide accurate points of contact for each identified contract and current telephone numbers and/or email addresses.

The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information. The Government’s inability to contact any of the offeror’s references or the references’ unwillingness to provide the information requested may affect the Government’s evaluation of this factor.

Offerors are highly encouraged to provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Factor 1 – Corporate Experience. Offerors are also highly encouraged to address any adverse past performance issues. Such explanations shall not exceed two (2) double-sided pages (or four (4) single-sided pages) in total.

Performance award or additional information submitted will not be considered.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

The evaluation focuses on how well the offeror performed on the relevant projects submitted under Factor 1 – Corporate Experience and past performance on other projects currently documented in known sources. Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown.

The degree to which past performance evaluations and all other past performance information reviewed by the Government (e.g., PPIRS, Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), performance recognition documents, and information obtained from any other source) reflect a trend of satisfactory performance may include, but is not limited to:

- A pattern of successful completion of tasks;

- A pattern of deliverables that are timely and of good quality;

- A pattern of cooperativeness and teamwork with the Government at all levels (task managers, contracting officers, auditors, etc.); and

- Recency of tasks performed that are identical to, similar to, or related to the task at Hand

The Government will consider the currency and relevance of the information, the source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in the Contractor’s performance. This evaluation is separate and distinct from the Contracting Officer’s responsibility determination.

In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable”.

4. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS

4.1 PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE/SITE VISIT INFORMATION

1. A pre-proposal conference/site visit will be held on: Wednesday, 18 March 2020 at 1:00 PM EDT.

POC: Nathan Libby, 207-438-1074, nathan.libby@navy.mil Location: Portsmouth Naval Shipyard, Gate 1, Pass and ID Office, One Walker Street, Building 384, Kittery, Maine Base Access:

1. Submit access requests no later than 2:00 PM EDT on Tuesday, 10 March 2020. Submit requests to Contract Specialist Elizabeth Carmack Elizabeth.carmack@navy.mil AND A copy to Philip Cole philip.j.cole@navy.mil

DO NOT submit requests directly to the shipyard.

2. All site visitors are required to be listed on a visitor request written on company letterhead with the following information:

a. First Name, Last Name, Middle Initial

b. U.S. Citizen (Yes or NO)

c. State of Residence

d. Current DBIDS access badge for PNSY (Yes or No)

e. Current Green Badge for Controlled Industrial Area (CIA) access for PNSY (Yes or No)

f. Letter should state: Site visit for solicitation N40085-20-R-0027 Dry Dock 2 Crane Rail and Tunnel Repairs, Portsmouth Naval Shipyard, Kittery, ME

3. Each individual that does not have DBIDS shall complete the provided SECNAV 5512/1 Form. Both social security number and drivers license number as well as state license is issued in are required.

4. A maximum of three attendees per contractor may be submitted.

5. All visitors must be U.S. Citizens.

6. All visitors shall be prepared to show a valid Government-issued photo ID to enter the facility. All visitors will be required to provide two (2) of the following for proof of citizenship and access to the facility.

a. Valid United States Passport

b. Valid driver’s license

c. CERTIFIED copy of your birth certificate with raised seal Please see the “REAL ID ACT” at https://www.dhs.gov/real-id/maine for more information on acceptable forms of ID while visiting the facility. If you do not have a valid license per the REAL ID Act, a passport or birth certificate and another form of ID listed from the website are required for access.

7. Electronics Restriction: Cameras, Cell phones with cameras, laptops, and other electronics are not permitted on the facility. Anyone found possessing these during the visit will be removed.

8. Contractors failing to provide complete information or submit information in a timely manner may be denied access.

CIA (Controlled Industrial Area) Access:

The site visit for this project will take place either completely or partially inside the CIA. The following information is required for each individual requesting access to this space as part of this visit:

1. Last name, First name, Middle Initial

2. State of Residence

3. U.S. Citizenship Status (Yes or No)

4.2 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS

In response to this request for proposal, the complete proposal shall include the Price Proposal and the Non- Cost/Price Factors Proposal, submitted in accordance with the above Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor and as follows:

The Price Proposal and the Non-Cost/Price Proposal shall be submitted in separate 3-ring binders. All pages shall be numbered and binders shall be appropriately tabbed, conforming to the proposal submittal requirements’ structure for each evaluation factor. Price and Non-Cost/Price Proposals must be submitted in sealed envelopes/boxes. Any pricing information included in the Non-Cost/Price Proposal will not be considered. Similarly, any Non-Cost/Price information included in the Price Proposal will not be considered. Proposals shall be labeled “PRICE PROPOSAL OR NON-COST/PRICE PROPOSAL FOR RFP N40085-20-R-0027, ATTN: Elizabeth Carmack; DO NOT OPEN

IN MAIL ROOM”.

The offeror’s proposal must include all data and information required and must be submitted in accordance with these instructions. The offeror shall be compliant with the requirements as stated herein, for non-conformance may result in an unfavorable proposal evaluation.

All proposals shall be mailed or hand carried to the following address:

Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Mid-Atlantic

ACQ21 -

9324 Virginia Avenue Building Z-140, Room 225, Norfolk, VA 23511-3624 Attn: Elizabeth Carmack, ACQ21

Hand Carried Proposals: Offerors who would like to hand deliver their proposal and who do not currently have a valid badge issued by the Department of Defense (DoD) to enter Naval Station Norfolk must do the following:

**********NEW BASE PASS SECURITY REQUIREMENTS****

Security Information: Offerors who would like to hand deliver their proposal and who do not currently have a valid badge issued by the Department of Defense (DoD) to enter Naval Station Norfolk must do the following:

1. Submit the completed base access pass document titled “Department of the Navy Local Population ID Card/Base Access Pass Registration” SECNAV 5512 NO LESS THAN 10 BUSINESS DAYS prior to the proposal due date by 2:00 PM EST. The PDF document is uploaded under Additional Documents in NECO. The request form shall be completed in its ENTIRETY and sent directly to Elizabeth Carmack Elizabeth.carmack@navy.mil

Note that Item 25. BASE SPONSOR’S NAME and TELEPHONE NUMBER should include the following: Elizabeth Carmack (757.341.1654). Submission of a base pass request form is no guarantee you will be able to get on the base. If for any reason you get to the gate and are not allowed onto the base (even if you have submitted a request form), you will need to find another way to get your proposal delivered. Offerors shall also submit the One Day Pass Request (on website).

Government personnel may not be able to sponsor you on base to deliver your proposal.

Ultimately, it is the contractor's responsibility to ensure timely proposal submission to the specified location. Due to heightened security, it is recommended that you allow sufficient time to get into the building and turn in your proposal. The submitted pass request only allows access on the proposal due date. If the proposal due date is extended, the Government will revise the date on the pass request. Submission of a new pass request form is not necessary. If any other information listed on a submitted pass request form changes, a new pass request form with the updated information must be submitted on the PDF document described above. Note: The One Day Pass Excel Spreadsheet is NO LONGER ACCEPTED for access to Naval Station Norfolk.

Be prepared to present the following information at the pass office: Valid Driver’s License, Current Vehicle Registration and/or Rental Car Contract, Current State Safety Inspection, Current Proof of Insurance.

Naval Station Norfolk Pass & ID Office is located on Hampton Boulevard across from Gate 5.

All potential offerors must adhere to this notice in order to avoid delay in submitting your proposal. The level of security at the Naval Station Norfolk may change at any time. As the level of security heightens, the amount of time required to gain access to the Naval Station also increases. Early arrival is advised. Submission of a pass request form is no guarantee you will be able to get on the base. If for any reason you get to the gate and are not allowed onto the base (even if you have submitted a request form), you will need to find another way to get your proposal delivered. Government personnel may not be able to sponsor you on base to deliver your proposal. Ultimately, it is the contractor's responsibility to ensure timely proposal submission to the specified location. Due to heightened security, it is recommended that you allow sufficient time to get into the building and turn in your proposal. The submitted pass request only allows access on the proposal due date. If the proposal due date is extended, the Government will revise the date on the pass request. Submission of a new pass request form is not necessary. If any other information listed on a submitted pass request form changes, a new pass request form with the updated information must be submitted.

PROPOSALS SUBMITTED IN RESPONSE TO THIS REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL MUST BE RECEIVED NO

LATER THAN THE DATE AND TIME SPECIFIED HEREIN.

Proposals not received by the time and date specified shall be treated in accordance with FAR 52.215-1 “Instruction to Offerors - Competitive Acquisitions” and may be rejected.

4.3 PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRIES

All inquiries must be submitted in writing and received by the Contract Specialist by the date specified herein in order to permit adequate time to reply to the inquiry. There is no guarantee that PPI’s submitted after the cut-off date will be answered before the solicitation closes. Submit all questions to Elizabeth.carmack@navy.mil. Use of the PPI Log template is required. The Pre-Proposal Inquiries Log can be found on the Federal Business Opportunities Website (Beta Sam.gov).

4.4 FEDERAL BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES WEBSITE (FBO)

Amendments will be posted directly to FedBizOpps (FBO) (BETASAM.GOV). The drawings and specifications will also be posted on this website. Additionally, other postings will be made to FBO, such as the pre-proposal inquires (PPI) log, revised drawings, etc. It is recommended contractors check the the website periodically to see if additional postings have been made. It is the contractor’s responsibility to check FBO for all postings.

5.INCORPORATION OF TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

The Contractor’s technical proposal, including revisions and amendments, made prior to contract award and a copy of which is in the possession of both parties, will be incorporated into this contract upon award by reference with the same force and effect as if set forth in full text. All contractor personnel shall meet or exceed the qualification standards, experience levels and trade background set forth in the technical proposal. In the event of an inconsistency between the provisions of this contract and the technical proposal, the inconsistency shall be resolved by giving precedence in the following order: (i) the contract (excluding the technical proposal), and then (ii) the technical proposal.

Section 00 22 16 - Supplementary Instructions to Proposers

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.211-13 Time Extensions SEP 2000 52.211-18 Variation in Estimated Quantity APR 1984 52.215-8 Order of Precedence--Uniform Contract Format OCT 1997 52.217-5 Evaluation Of Options JUL 1990 52.219-4 Notice of Price Evaluation Preference for HUBZone Small

Business Concerns

OCT 2014

52.219-8 Utilization of Small Business Concerns OCT 2018 52.219-9 Alt II Small Business Subcontracting Plan (AUG 2018) Alternate II NOV 2016 52.222-1 Notice To The Government Of Labor Disputes FEB 1997 52.222-3 Convict Labor JUN 2003 52.222-4 Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards - Overtime

Compensation

MAY 2018

52.222-5 Construction Wage Rate Requirements--Secondary Site of the Work

MAY 2014

52.222-6 Construction Wage Rate Requirements AUG 2018 52.222-8 Payrolls and Basic Records AUG 2018 52.222-9 Apprentices and Trainees JUL 2005 52.222-26 Equal Opportunity SEP 2016 52.222-50 Combating Trafficking in Persons JAN 2019 52.222-55 Minimum Wages Under Executive Order 13658 DEC 2015 52.222-62 Paid Sick Leave Under Executive Order 13706 JAN 2017 52.225-12 Notice of Buy American Requirement - Construction

Materials Under Trade Agreements

MAY 2014

52.228-5 Insurance - Work On A Government Installation JAN 1997 52.228-11 Pledges Of Assets AUG 2018 52.232-5 Payments under Fixed-Price Construction Contracts MAY 2014 52.232-27 Prompt Payment for Construction Contracts JAN 2017 52.233-1 Disputes MAY 2014 52.233-3 Protest After Award AUG 1996 52.236-2 Differing Site Conditions APR 1984 52.236-3 Site Investigation and Conditions Affecting the Work APR 1984 52.236-4 Physical Data APR 1984 52.236-5 Material and Workmanship APR 1984 52.236-6 Superintendence by the Contractor APR 1984 52.236-7 Permits and Responsibilities NOV 1991 52.236-8 Other Contracts APR 1984 52.236-9 Protection of Existing Vegetation, Structures, Equipment, Utilities, and Improvements

APR 1984

52.236-10 Operations and Storage Areas APR 1984 52.236-11 Use and Possession Prior to Completion APR 1984 52.236-12 Cleaning Up APR 1984 52.236-13 Accident Prevention NOV 1991 52.236-14 Availability and Use of Utility Services APR 1984 52.236-15 Schedules for Construction Contracts APR 1984 52.236-26 Preconstruction Conference FEB 1995 52.236-27 Alt I Site Visit (Construction) (Feb 1995) - Alternate I FEB 1995 52.236-28 Preparation of Proposals--Construction OCT 1997 52.243-1 Alt III Changes--Fixed Price (Aug 1987) - Alternate III APR 1984 52.246-12 Inspection of Construction AUG 1996

252.215-7008 Only One Offer JUL 2019 252.232-7006 Wide Area WorkFlow Payment Instructions DEC 2018 252.236-7000 Modification Proposals-Price Breakdown DEC 1991 252.243-7001 Pricing Of Contract Modifications DEC 1991 252.243-7002 Requests for Equitable Adjustment DEC 2012

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

52.211-10 COMMENCEMENT, PROSECUTION, AND COMPLETION OF WORK (APR 1984)

The Contractor shall be required to (a) commence work under this contract within 15 calendar days after the date the Contractor receives the award, (b) prosecute the work diligently, and (c) complete the entire work ready for use not later than .SEE SCHEDULE BELOW The time stated for completion shall include final cleanup of the premises.

(End of clause)

PHASED CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE

Within the overall project schedule, commence and complete the work in phases. Complete each phase of the work within the number of days stated in the following schedule:

a. Schedule start day: The day designated as the beginning of a particular phase; the number listed is the number of days from the award of contract.

b. Completion day: The day designated as the end of a given phase and the day the work in that phase must be completed; the number listed is the number of days from the award of the contract.

c. Schedule:

Phase Description Schedule Start Day

Total Duration of Phase

Completion Day

Access tunnel utility relocation

DAY 76

Calendar Days

173 calendar days after award

2A

Access tunnel replacement, exterior utilities, rail/pavement reconstruction and tie-in to existing conditions from approximate

DAY 204

Calendar Days

463 calendar days after award

Sta. 11+97.7 to Sta. 12+54

2B

Crane rail repairs, drainage, and pavement restoration from Sta. 5+34.5 to Sta.

11+97.7

DAY 204

Calendar Days

463 calendar days after award

Crane rail repairs, drainage, and pavement restoration from Sta. 12+54 to Sta.

16+25

DAY 477

Calendar Days

685 calendar days after award

Notes: Phase 2A is dependent on completion of Phase 1. Phase 2A and 2B run concurrently.

Phase 3 is dependent on completion of Phase 2A and 2B.

d. Work for each phase cannot begin prior to the scheduled start day.

(End of NAVFAC language)

52.211-12 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES--CONSTRUCTION (SEP 2000)

(a) If the Contractor fails to complete the work within the time specified in the contract, the Contractor shall pay liquidated damages to the Government in the amounts listed in the table below for each calendar day of delay until the work is completed or accepted. Liquidated Damages Breakdown by Phase per calendar day:

Phase 1: $637 Phase 2A: $1591 Phase 2B: $3,967 Phase 3: $3,330

(b) If the Government terminates the Contractor's right to proceed, liquidated damages will continue to accrue until the work is completed. These liquidated damages are in addition to excess costs of repurchase under the Termination clause..

52.215-1 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS--COMPETITIVE ACQUISITION (JAN 2017)

(a) Definitions. As used in this provision--

“Discussions” are…