FBI RHINO Past Perf.pdf
PDF 167 KB Posted
- Attached to
- DJF-RHINO Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- Not on record
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a solicitation from the Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation Headquarters Division. The solicitation, numbered DJF-RHINO, seeks information technology products and services, as referenced in an attached request for proposal, statement of requirements, product matrix, and past performance questionnaire. Offerors are required to provide three completed past performance questionnaires from previous clients by January 29, 2021 to be considered for award. The questionnaires require clients to rate offerors' performance on metrics such as meeting requirements, timeliness, quality of shipments, and overall performance. Ratings include exceptional, very good, satisfactory, marginal, and unsatisfactory.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| RHINO Q-A 01-28-2021.pdf | ||
| RHINO Q-A 01-22-2021.pdf | ||
| RHINO-SF33-14c.pdf | ||
| RHINO Q and A 01-19-2021.pdf | ||
| FBI RHINO PRODUCT MATRIX v2.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| FBI RHINO SOR.pdf | ||
| FBI RHINO CONSOLIDATION J-A.pdf | ||
| FBI RHINO RFP.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Solicitation# DJF-RHINO
Please complete this Questionnaire and e-mail to Contracting Officer Ryan Dolan
We are currently in the process of preparing our proposal for the Federal Bureau of Investigation Request for Proposal # DJF-RHINO. As part of our proposal, we have listed you as a reference on our performance for this type of service with your company or agency under the previous/current contract or service order listed below. Your input on our performance is therefore requested.
Please complete this Questionnaire and e-mail to Contracting Officer Ryan Dolan at RDolan@fbi.gov.
Questionnaire is due to Ryan Dolan no later than 12:00 PM EST on January 29, 2021. Questionnaire must be submitted directly to the Contracting Officer from a corporate email account.
Please inform the company who sent you this past performance questionnaire if you will not be able to complete it and submit it before 12:00 PM EST on January 29, 2021. The offeror (vendor) has to submit three past performance questionnaires to be considered for award.
If you will not be available on January 29, 2021 for verification of this past performance evaluation, please indicate another POC for the contacting officer to contact if additional information is need.
Alternate POC name: ________________________________________
Alternate POC phone number: _________________________________
Alternate POC e-mail address: _________________________________
Thank you.
NAME OF THE QUOTER/COMPANY THAT SENT YOU THE PAST PERFORMANCE
QUESTIONNAIRE: .
Phone:
E-Mail:
I. Current or Historical Contract Information
CONTRACT REFERENCED:
1. Contract or Identifying Number: ________________________________________________
2. Contract Value: _____________________________________________________________
3. Period of Performance: _______________________________________________________
4. Brief description of services provided:
5. Name of Person Completing Questionnaire: _______________________________________
Agency/Company:____________________________________________________________
Title: __________________________________ Phone: _____________________________
E-mail: _____________________________________________________________________
II. EVALUATION. Please rate the Contractor utilizing the guide below. Explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible would be appreciated. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. Attach additional pages if more space is needed.
Evaluation Definitions –
The following definitions should be used in the assessment of Contractor performance.
EXCEPTIONAL
Performance EXCEEDS MOST contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns.
VERY GOOD
Performance EXCEEDS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance MEETS contractual requirements.
The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
MARGINAL
Performance MEETS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance DOES NOT MEET contractual requirement. The performance of the areas being assessed includes serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.
NOT APPLICABLE (N/A) Performance information not recent or relevant as defined in the Solicitation. Unable to provide assessment.
Past Performance Evaluation
Question 1. Performance
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet your requirements?
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A
Performance
Comments, if any.
Questions 2 and 3. Timeliness
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to provide products in a timely manner?
Timeliness (Delivery/Re sponse to Emails & Calls/)
Ability to Resolve Timeliness Problems
Question 4. Quality of Shipments
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet requirements of shipping (including packing, marking, etc) and the overall quality of the delivery?
Quality of Shipments
Question 5. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance
What is your overall rating of Contractor’s performance (requirements, schedule, and price) on contract being assessed?
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory
General Comments:
| Evaluation Definitions – |
| The following definitions should be used in the assessment of Contractor performance. |
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| VERY GOOD |
| SATISFACTORY |
| MARGINAL |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| NOT APPLICABLE (N/A) |
| N/A |
| N/A |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .