Attachment 6 - Base and Golf Course Pest Control Serviced PPQ.pdf

For Official Use Only This document is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

Past and Present Performance Questionnaire

Edwards Air Force Base (AFTC/PZIOB), is in the process of competitively selecting a source for the Base and Golf Course Pest Control Service Contract, which includes Edwards AFB, AFRL and AF Plant 42. You have been identified as a point of contact for a past and/or present performance evaluation of the firm listed on the attached questionnaire.

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offerors' past performance on contracts or other work efforts which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from organizations such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with the offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts or work efforts.

Our areas of interest regarding the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. In order to meet the acquisition milestones, we request your written response no later than 7 calendar days after your receipt of this letter. This schedule will allow us sufficient time to analyze the data prior to award.

To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be filled out electronically and e-mailed directly to Lisa Davis at lisa.davis.6@us.af.mil and Eric Romero at eric.romero.11@us.af.mil. Please do not return to the Contractor. If you have any questions, please call Ms. Davis at 661-275-2498 or Mr. Romero at 661-277-9618. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official Source Selection records.

Once again your assistance is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.

ERIC ROMERO

Contracting Officer

AFTC/PZIOB

Attachement :

Past Performance Questionnaire

FA9301-24-R-0007, Attachment 6 http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/02.htm#P10_602 http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/03.htm#P41_5836 mailto:lisa.davis.6@us.af.mil mailto:eric.romero.11@us.af.mil

Past and Present Performance Questionnaire

FA9301-24-R-0007, Attachment 6

Attachment One: Questionnaire and General Information

Section 1: Contract Identification (COMPLETED BY CONTRACTOR AND

VERIFIED BY RESPONDENT)

A. Contractor’s Name:

B. Telephone Number Number:

C. Point of Contact:

D. Email address:

E. Mailing Address:

F. Detailed Description of Work Including type of contract and System(s) Maintained/Repaired:

G. Contract Number Provided by Offeror:___________ Dollar Amount: $__________

H. Contract Period of Performance*: ___________

*Note: If Offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

I. Was this a competitively awarded contract? ☐ Yes ☐ No

J. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor ☐ Key Personnel

Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification (COMPLETED BY RESPONDENT)

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

Section 3: Respondent Identification (COMPLETED BY RESPONDENT)

A. Respondent’s name:

B. Respondent’s title:

C. Respondent’s phone number / fax number / e-mail address:

D. Respondent’s position (e.g., Program Manager, PCO/ACO, etc.):

http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/02.htm#P10_602 http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/03.htm#P41_5836

Past and Present Performance Questionnaire

FA9301-24-R-0007, Attachment 6

E. Length of time (number of years/months) respondent worked on subject contract and description of responsibility/position/role:

F. Other suggested points of contact:

Section 4: Performance Information (COMPLETED BY RESPONDENT)

In the tables below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block to the right of each question. Provide supporting information for each response in the space provided. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:

Code Performance Rating

E EXCEPTIONAL – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

V VERY GOOD – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S SATISFACTORY – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available. Do not know.

Technical Performance E V S M U N/A

T1. How well did the contractor meet the technical requirements of the specification?

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

Past and Present Performance Questionnaire

FA9301-24-R-0007, Attachment 6

T2. How was the quality of technical Base and Golf Course Pest Control Service?

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

T3. How was the quality/integrity of preparation efforts?

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

T4. How adequate/effective was the Base and Golf Course Pest Control Process?

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

T5. How well did the contractor implement current quality processes, standard practices for Base and Golf Course Pest Control operation?

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

T6. How well did the contractor implement current standard practices for Base and Golf Course Pest Control operation?

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

T7. How adequate/effective were the contractor’s environmental safety procedures?

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

Program Management E V S M U N/A

P1. How effective was overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage, control and deliver on-time)?

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

Past and Present Performance Questionnaire

FA9301-24-R-0007, Attachment 6

Program Management E V S M U N/A

P2. How reasonable and cooperative was the contractor when dealing with program staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)?

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

P3. How timely and effectively did the contractor resolve contract problems without extensive customer guidance?

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

P4. How well did the contractor understand/comply with customer objectives and technical requirements?

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

P5. How successfully did the contractor respond to emergency and/or surge situations?

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

P6. How well did the contractor manage quality/effectiveness of subcontracted efforts?

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

P7. How effective was the contractor’s acquisition management?

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

P8. Of what benefit to the customer were contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors?

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

P9. To what degree did the contractor implement responsive/flexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support?

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

Past and Present Performance Questionnaire

FA9301-24-R-0007, Attachment 6

Program Management E V S M U N/A

Transition / Phase-in E V S M U N/A

TP1. How smoothly did the contractor transition resources and personnel?

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

TP2. How effective was the contractor in maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts?

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

Government Contracts Only: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience, or are there any pending terminations?

☐ Yes ☐ Default ☐ Convenience ☐ Pending Terminations ☐ No

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules).

SECTION 5: GENERAL COMMENT

Given what I know today about the contractor’s ability to execute what he promised in his proposal, I [ click and select an item ] award to him today given that I had a choice.

REMARKS:

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

[click and pick the date]

Respondent’s Signature Date

Past and Present Performance Questionnaire

FA9301-24-R-0007, Attachment 6

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

E-Mail to: Lisa Davis at lisa.davis.6@us.af.mil and Eric Romero at eric.romero.11@us.af.mil.

http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/02.htm#P10_602 http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/03.htm#P41_5836 mailto:lisa.davis.6@us.af.mil mailto:eric.romero.11@us.af.mil