Attachment_5_Past_and_Present_Performance_Questionnaire.doc
DOC document 88 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Integrated Solid Waste Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA9301-14-R-0001
About this file
Attachment 5 Past and Present Performance Questionairre
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| ISWS_A0002.doc | DOC document | |
| ISWS_Final_PWS_11062013.docx | DOCX document | |
| Q A_ISWS_13-61.docx | DOCX document | |
| ISWS_SF_1449_11_6_2013.doc | DOC document | |
| 2009_new_landfill_permit_.pdf | ||
| ISWS_A0001.doc | DOC document | |
| LANDFILL_SiteVisit.pptx | PPTX presentation | |
| Q A_ISWS_1-12.docx | DOCX document | |
| ISWS_Final_PWS_102913.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_3_Wage_Determination_05_2043_Rev_16.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_2_Mission_Essential_Contractor_Services_Plan.docx | DOCX document | |
| SF_1449.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment_4_Site_Visit_Information.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_1_Performanced_Based_Work_Statement.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Source Selection Sensitive Information (See FAR 2.101 & 3.104)
Attachment 5 – Past and Present Performance Questionnaire
SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Evaluation
TO:
You have been identified as a point of contact for a past and/or present performance evaluation of the firm listed on the attached questionnaire. This firm is currently being considered for an Integrated Solid Waste Services contract at Edwards AFB, CA.
Your prompt attention to this questionnaire will be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions concerning this request, I can be contacted at ________________________________.
Please submit completed questionnaire to the Government Contract Specialist identified on the attached questionnaire.
Contractor Signature
1 Attachment:
Past and Present Performance Questionnaire
A. GENERAL INFORMATION:
Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate
Contractor’s Name:
Address:
Telephone Number:
Fax Number:
Point of Contact:
Project Title and Brief Description of Work*: ______________________________________________________________________________
Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ________________ Dollar Amount:$__________
Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror*: _____________________
* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
Contractor performed as the ( Prime Contractor ( Sub-Contractor ( Key Personnel
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Name of Respondent:
Title: ______________________
Address: _____________________
Telephone Number: _________________
Fax Number:
Email Address: _____________________
C. . SEND COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO (E-mail is Preferred Method):
Aimee Buckless
Charles Dodson
AFTC/PZRB
AFTC/PZRB
aimee.buckless@edwards.af.mil charles.dodson@edwards.af.mil
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION:
Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation or N/A if performance in this area is not applicable to the effort addressed.
PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| Exceptional |
| Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Neutral |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeded many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeded some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory. |
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: _______________
CONTRACT #: _______________
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
| Contractor Performance or Situation |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| N/A |
| 1. |
| How well did the contractor implement an orderly transition from the incumbent contractor? |
| 2. |
| How well did the contractor comply with contractual terms and conditions including the preparation and timely/accurate submission of any required documents? |
| 3. |
| How well did the contractor attract and retain qualified and fully trained personnel at all levels within their organization to ensure contract compliance? |
| 4. |
| How well does the contractor’s organization provide the necessary manning, training, equipment, and supplies to meet contractual requirements? |
| 5. |
| How would you rate the contractor’s critical key management and technical staff in terms of expertise, knowledge and qualifications? |
| 6. |
| Rate contractor’s ability to respond to workload fluctuations, e.g. budgetary fluctuations that resulted in increased or decreased activities. |
| 7. |
| Rate contractor’s ability to respond to requests and provide refuse containers (roll-off and dumpsters) IAW contract requirements. |
| 8. |
| How effective was the contractor in identifying and solving technical issues in a timely manner to ensure all government provided equipment (i.e. recycling sorters, refuse of recycling balers, composting equipment etc.) are operational and effective in processing trash and recyclable items and perform composting |
| 9. |
| How effective was the contractor’s Preventive Maintenance Plan and inspection program in preventing and correct deficiencies with GFP equipment, by minimizing equipment breakdowns and service interruptions, extending component service life, and maximizing operating efficiency. |
| 10. |
| How well did the contractor use performance measurements and reporting systems to track performance? |
| 11. |
| How effective were the contractor’s quality assurance processes to ensure landfill operations, refuse collection recycling and composting was performed IAW PWS, Federal, State, EPA, OSHA and local regulatory requirement’s? |
| 12. |
| How willing was the contractor to improve and correct noncompliance issues or concerns? |
| 13. |
| How well did the contractor measure customer satisfaction and provide solutions to achieve improvement? |
| 14. |
| How well did the contractor comply with all Federal, State, EPA, OSHA and local regulatory requirement’s? |
| 15. |
| How well did the contractor handle, remove, document and properly dispose of hazardous /non-hazardous wastes. |
| 16. |
| How effective and efficient did the contractor perform CLASS III landfill operations IAW PWS, Federal, State, EPA, OSHA and local regulatory requirement’s |
| 17. |
| How effective and efficient did the contractor perform green waste grinding and composting operations IAW PWS, Federal, State, EPA, OSHA and local regulatory requirement’s |
| 18. |
| How effective and efficient did the contractor perform residential curbside and commercial refuse collection IAW PWS, Federal, State, EPA, OSHA and local regulatory requirement’s |
| 19. |
| How effective and efficient did the contractor perform residential curbside and commercial recycling collections IAW PWS, Federal, State, EPA, OSHA and local regulatory requirement’s |
| 20. |
| How effective and efficient did the contractor operate a recycling center, sort, process, market and sell recyclable materials and return revenues generated to the government IAW the PWS |
| 21. |
| How would you rate the overall customer satisfaction rating |
| 22. |
| Rate the contractor’s overall management of subcontracts |
| 23. |
| How would you rate the overall management of property or government property? |
| 24. |
| How would you rate the overall performance of the contractor under this contract? |
| 25. |
| Was the contractor ever issued a default, cure or show cause notice, Notice of Violation under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.” |
| YES/NO |
| 26. |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.” |
| YES/NO |
| 27. |
| If a Government Contract, is the contractor rated in CPARS? |
| YES/NO |
Remarks:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
FA9301-14-R-0001
5 Sep 2013
Attachment 5 Source Selection Sensitive Information (See FAR 2.101 & 3.104)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .