FBO_Q-As__2_FA8903-17-R-0062_29Nov2017.docx
DOCX document 26 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Fence to Fence Environmental Services at Joint Base Charleston and Shaw Air Force Base, South Carolina
- Solicitation number
- FA8903-17-R-0062
About this file
Q&A Number 2
View the file
Other files
Show all 25
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFP QUESTIONS / RESPONSES #2
Attachment 6
FA8903-17-R-0062
28 Nov 2017
Fence to Fence Environmental Services at Joint Base Charleston and Shaw Air Force Base, SC
| QUESTIONS |
| ANSWERS |
291. Our research indicates the incumbent has been performing under the Multiple Award Environmental Services (MAES) contract (W912DR-12-D-0002). This was awarded by the USACE Baltimore District under the $49.7M Socioeconomic Pool (8a) that has a total of five prime awards. In an effort to move forward on this requirement, please confirm that the current solicitation (No. FA8903-17-R-0062) is a stand-alone requirement and classified as a Small Business Set Aside.
Solicitation FA8903-17-R-0062 is a stand-alone requirement and 100% Small Business Set Aside.
| 292. Our research indicates the total dollars obligated under the previous contract (MAES Contract No. W912DR-12-D-0002) between 4/4/14 and 4/6/17 was $3,604,582. Is this correct? If not, what amount has been obligated to date? |
| The Air Force is not administering the current contract, and does not have the information available. |
| 293. What is the estimated dollar limits (min/max) for the current solicitation (FA8903-17-R-0062)? |
| The resulting contract will be a Firm-Fixed Price stand-alone contract with no minimum and maximum values assigned. |
| 294. Is the current contractor (H&S/Zapata JV, LLC) performing in a satisfactory manner? |
| See Response #211. |
295. Upon review of the RFP documents, we noticed “past performance” is not included as an evaluation factor. Please confirm that this is correct and there is no requirement for “past performance.”
In accordance with FAR Part 9, when making a responsibility determination, the contracting officer shall consider all the information available through FAPIIS with regard to the offeror and any immediate owner, predecessor, or subsidiary identified for that offeror in FAPIIS, as well as other past performance information on the offeror.
296. With regard to the technical proposal, would resumes for key personnel be included as part of the page-count parameters?
If provided, resumes are not included in the page-count.
297. Besides the telephone and staging areas detailed in the contract support memos, will there be any other facilities provided to the contractor (e.g. permanent onsite workspace) at Shaw and/or JB Charleston?
Yes, office area will be provided for the IHMP Support CLIN.
298. Could you provide any insight with regard to the distribution/ratio of work between the two bases?
No information provided other than what is stated in the PWS.
299. With regard to the PWS, please clarify whether or not “Storage Tank Environmental Compliance” (sections 4.7 & 5.7) is a requirement. It is listed in the PWS index for both installations, but there are no corresponding sections within the document.
Storage Tank Environmental Compliance is not a requirement at JB Charleston and Shaw AFB. References made in the PWS Table of Contents is deleted.
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
File details come from the government source that posted it.