Section_L_Attachment_3_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf

For Official Use Only Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

Section L Attachment 3:

Past Performance Questionnaire – DCRIOS

The 38th Contracting Squadron of Air Force Space Command (AFSPC) is in the process of selecting a contractor for the Defensive Cyber Realization, Integration & Operational Support (DCRIOS) Services contract.

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offerors' past performance on contracts or other work efforts which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from organizations such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with the offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts or work efforts.

Our areas of interest regarding the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. In order to meet the acquisition milestones, we request your written response no later than 10 calendar days after your receipt of this letter. This schedule will allow us sufficient time to analyze the data prior to the start of negotiations.

The questionnaire should be completed electronically and be returned via e-mail to Anthony Owens (anthony.owens.7@us.af.mil) and Donna Williams (donna.williams.6@us.af.mil). You may contact Mr.

Owens at 405-734-9637 if you have any questions about this request. Your completed questionnaire will become part of the official Source Selection records.

Your assistance is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.

V/r Anthony P. Owens Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/02.htm#P10_602 http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/03.htm#P41_5836 mailto:anthony.owens.7@us.af.mil mailto:donna.williams.6@us.af.mil

Section 1: Contract Identification

A. Contractor (Company/Division):

B. Contractor Cage Code:

C. Contract Number or Task Order Number:

D. Contract Type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPIF, CPFF, etc.):

E. Program Title:

F. Brief Program Description:

G. Program Phase (e.g., Engineering & Manufacturing Development (EMD)):

H. Period of Performance

1. Original Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

2. Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

3. Reason for difference (if applicable):

I. Contract Dollar Value

1. Original maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

2. Current maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

3. Reasons for difference between original and current contract dollar value (if applicable):

J. Description of work performed:

K. Was this a competitively awarded contract? ☐ Yes ☐ No

L. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor ☐ Key Personnel

Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last three (3) years, please complete separate Past Performance Questionnaire forms for those contracts as well.

Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

C. Geographic description of work performed under this contract (i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands):

Section 3: Respondent Identification

A. Respondent’s name:

B. Respondent’s title:

C. Respondent’s phone/fax number/e-mail address:

D. Length of time (number of years/months) respondent worked on subject contract and description of responsibility/position/role:

E. Other suggested points of contact:

Section 4: Performance Areas (Relevancy):

Please indicate if the contractor provided or performed the following services or tasks by placing an “X” in the appropriate block to the right of each question of the Performance Areas below. Please provide a detailed narrative to support each rating.

MISSION OPERATIONS YES NO

A. Performed the following Cyber Protection Team mission areas:

1. Mission Protection (Risk Analysis/Management) – Identified the mission owner’s cyberspace key terrain/critical assets; developed/executed mission risk plan/mission defense plan.

Supporting Information:

2. Discovery & Counter-Infiltration (Threat Response) – Detected, illuminated, and responded directly to threats to a mission owner’s cyberspace key terrain/critical assets.

3. Cyber Threat Emulation (Red Team)– educated/improved cyber defenders’ understanding of cyber threat tactics, techniques, procedures (TTPs); replicated representative threats to support risk mitigation efforts; and guided cyber defense operations based on Red Cell Perspective.

B. Perform the following Cyber Protection Team mission areas:

1. Cyber Readiness (Compliance) – identified/evaluated elements of cyber operations/defense for compliance with DOD policy/standards; assessed readiness/resiliency of a mission to survive/sustain capability under threat; improved existing imbedded cyber defender’s abilities to conduct self-evaluation/enhancement;

and supported defense of a specified mission within a defined cyberspace area of operations.

2. Cyber Support (Remediation/Training) – worked closely with embedded cyber operators/defenders to identify/correct deficiencies in defensive operations, policies, and procedures with the end-state of an improved and self-sustaining security posture;

and provided training/cyberspace operations support in order to sustain a specified mission within a defined cyberspace area of operation.

C. Performed Computer Network Defense vulnerability assessments and Penetration Testing within a given enclave.

D. Performed full spectrum Defensive Cyberspace Operations to include mission planning, mission execution, and post mission reporting and lessons learned.

E. Performed in defining and understanding adversary Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures; and evolving friendly TTPs.

MISSION SUPPORT

A. Performed system administration duties and network infrastructure support to include installing, documenting and testing hardware and software systems while ensuring their security and compliance levels and DoD IA controls.

B. Performed controlling and tracking documentation and hardware/software and supporting equipment.

C. Performed developing training scenarios/curriculum, and qualifying personnel to conduct cyber operations.

Section 5: Performance Information (Quality)

How well did the contractor perform? Using the following rating system, please assign a performance rating for each of the factors in the table below by placing an “X” in the appropriate block to the right of each. Please provide a detailed narrative to support the ratings above Satisfactory. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:

Code Performance Rating

E EXCEPTIONAL – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

V VERY GOOD – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S SATISFACTORY – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available. Do not know.

Areas Rated:

(1) Quality of Service Rating:

Supporting Narrative:

(2) Schedule Rating:

Supporting Narrative:

(3) Cost Control: N/A Supporting Narrative:

(4) Business Relations Rating:

Supporting Narrative:

(5) Management of Key Personnel Rating:

Supporting Narrative:

Specific Problems or Issues:

Were there any adverse performance issues/problems? If so, please explain and indicate how they were resolved?

Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain.

☐ Yes ☐ No

Explanation:

Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain.

☐ Yes ☐ No

Explanation:

Additional remarks:

Print Name Title

[click and pick the date]

Respondent’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

Via e-mail to Anthony Owens (anthony.owens.7@us.af.mil) and Donna Williams (donna.williams.6@us.af.mil). You may contact Mr. Owens at 405-734-9637 if you have any questions about this request.

mailto:anthony.owens.7@us.af.mil mailto:donna.williams.6@us.af.mil