JMM BRU Production Lot 2 CDRLs.pdf

PDF 2 MB Posted

Attached to
Joint Miniature Munitions Bomb Rack Unit (JMM BRU)
Solicitation number
FA8672-12-R-0168
Issued by

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
FA8672-12-R-0168_Amend_0004.pdf PDF
FA8672-12-R-0168_Amend_0003.pdf PDF
FA8672-12-R-0168_Amend_0002.pdf PDF
JMM_BRU_Request_for_Clarifications__2.pdf PDF
JMM_BRU_FA8672-12-R-0168_RFP_Clarification.pdf PDF
JMM_BRU_FA8672-12-R-0168_Amend_0001.pdf PDF
JMM BRU Statement of Work.pdf PDF
EMD JMM BRU F-35 Flight Test CDRLs.pdf PDF
Sect J - Exhibit G - BRU61_A CAD File Placeholder.docx DOCX document
JMM BRU RFP Executive Summary.pdf PDF
JMM BRU TD CDRLs.pdf PDF
JMM BRU Production Lot 1 CDRLs.pdf PDF
Sect J - Attachment 2 - JMM BRU SBSP Placeholder.docx DOCX document
Sect J - Attachment 10 - JMM BRU SCG Placeholder.docx DOCX document
Attach 7 - JMM BRU GFP Placeholder.docx DOCX document
Attach 9 - JMM BRU IMP Placeholder.docx DOCX document
Sect J - Attachment 3 - JMM BRU PEC Placeholder.docx DOCX document
Section J - Attachment 4 -JMM BRU DD Form 254.pdf PDF
SECTION J Attachment 6.docx DOCX document
EMD JMM BRU Development CDRLs.pdf PDF
SECTION J Attachment 5.docx DOCX document
JMM BRU RFP FA8672-12-R-0168.pdf PDF
Attach 8 - JMM BRU SPVP Placeholder.docx DOCX document
JMM BRU Technical Data Package with GPR CDRL.pdf PDF
Sect J - Attachment 2 - JMM BRU SPS Placeholder.docx DOCX document
JMM BRU DRFP Questions and Answers 080912.docx DOCX document
JMM BRU Industry Day III Public Affairs Final.pptx PPTX presentation
Government Responses to JMM BRU DRFP Industry Questions.pdf PDF
Sect J - Attachment 6 - Production Pricing Table Lot 2 Placeholder.docx DOCX document
Sect J - Exhibit G - BRU61_A CAD File Placeholder.docx DOCX document
Section J - Exhibit F - JMM BRU TDP with GPR CDRL.pdf PDF
2. JMM BRU DRFP 12-R-0168 - Executive Memorandum to Offerors 27 Apr 12.pdf PDF
Section J - Attachment 4 -JMM BRU DD Form 254.pdf PDF
Section J - Exhibit C - EMD JMM BRU F-35 Flt Test CDRLs.pdf PDF
Sect J - Attachment 3 - JMM BRU PEC Placeholder.docx DOCX document
Sect J - Attachment 2 - JMM BRU SPS Placeholder.docx DOCX document
Section J - Exhibit D - JMM BRU Production Lot 1 CDRLs.pdf PDF
Sect J - Attachment 5 - Production Pricing Table Lot 1 Placeholder.docx DOCX document
1. JMM BRU DRFP FA8672-12-R-0168.pdf PDF
Section J - Exhibit B - EMD JMM BRU Development CDRLs.pdf PDF
Section J - Attachment 1 - JMM BRU SOW.pdf PDF
Section J - Exhibit A - JMM BRU TD CDRLs.pdf PDF
Sect J - Attach 7 - JMM BRU GFP Placeholder.docx DOCX document
Section J - Exhibit E - JMM BRU Production Lot 2 CDRLs.pdf PDF
Show all 44

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

JOINT MINIATURE MUNITIONS BOMB RACK UNIT (JMM BRU)

EXHIBIT E – TABLE OF CONTENTS

PRODUCTION LOT II

SEQUENCE

NUMBER TITLE

E001 Integrated Program Management Report (IPMR)

E002 RESERVED

E003 Contract Funds Status Report (CFSR)

E004 RESERVED

E005 Contract Work Breakdown Structure (CWBS) E006 Data Accession List E007 Engineering Change Proposal E008 Request for Deviation - "Variance" E009 Notice of Revision E010 System Engineering Management Plan (SEMP) E011 System Safety Program Plan E012 Safety Assessment Report (SAR)

E013 RESERVED

E014 RESERVED

E015 Failure Summary and Analysis Report - Failure Reporting and Corrective Action Summary (FRACAS) Report

E016 RESERVED

E017 RESERVED

E018 RESERVED

E019 Scientific and Technical Reports - Materials and Processes E020 Management Plan – Nondestructive Testing & Inspection Plan E021 Hazardous Materials Management Program (HMMP) Report E022 Interface Control Document - JMM BRU UAI PSICD Supplement Vol I & II (Parts 1 and 2) E023 Interface Control Document - JMM BRU UAI PSCP Supplement (Parts 1 and 2) E024 System/Subsystem Specification (SSS) - System Design Specification E025 Environmental Design Criteria and Test Plan - Environmental Design Criteria

E026 RESERVED

E027 RESERVED

E028 RESERVED

E029 RESERVED

E030 RESERVED

E031 RESERVED

E032 RESERVED

E033 RESERVED

E034 RESERVED

E035 RESERVED

E036 RESERVED

E037 RESERVED

E038 RESERVED

E039 RESERVED

E040 RESERVED

E041 Product Drawings/Model and Associated Lists – Technical Data Package E042 Source Control Drawings Approval Request E043 Acceptance Test Plan – Acceptance Plan E044 Test Procedure – Acceptance Test Procedure

E045 RESERVED

E046 Logistics Product Data – Maintenance Plan E047 Supplemental Data For Provisioning (SDFP) E048 Logistics Product Data – Interim Support Items List (ISIL) E049 Logistics Product Data – Provisioning Parts List (PPL) E050 Logistics Product Data – Packaging Requirements

E051 RESERVED

E052 RESERVED

E053 RESERVED

E054 RESERVED

E055 RESERVED

E056 Test Procedure – Lot Acceptance Test Procedure E057 Test /Inspection Report – Lot Acceptance Test Report

Exhibit E JMM BRU Production Lot 2 CDRLs

Solicitation No: FA8672-12-R-0168

CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST

(1 Data Item)

Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 110 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302 and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of these addresses. Send completed form to the Government Issuing Contracting Officer for the Contract/PR No. Listed in Block E.

A. CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO B. EXHIBIT C. CATEGORY:

Item 0005 E TDP TM OTHER MGMT

D. SYSTEM/ITEM E. CONTRACT/PR NO. F. CONTRACTOR

JMM BRU

1. DATA ITEM NO. 2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM 3. SUBTITLE 17. PRICE GROUP

E001 Integrated Program Management Report (IPMR)

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.) 5. CONTRACT REFERENCE 6. REQUIRING OFFICE 18. ESTIMATED

DI-MGMT-81861 (See Block 16) SOW Para. 5.3.3, 5.4.2 AAC/EBMS TOTAL PRICE

7. DD 250 REQ 9. DIST STATEMENT

REQUIRED

10. FREQUENCY 12. DATE OF FIRST

SUBMISSION

14. DISTRIBUTION

LT D MTHLY See Block 16 b. COPIES

See Block 16

8. APP CODE 11. AS OF DATE 13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT

a. ADDRESSEE Final

A (See 16) See Block 16 See Block 16 Draft Reg. Repro

16. REMARKS

Block 4:

The Contractor shall provide monthly IPMR per DI-MGMT-81861 except as modified per the following:

Modify paragraph 2.1.1.1 to add “Electronic copies shall be provided using the DoD approved Cost XML guideline and schema and shall include all levels of data to the control account level.”

Modify paragraph 2.4 to add “IPMRs required from subcontractors will be provided electronically using the DoD approved XML guidelines and schemas.”

Format 1 (Work Breakdown Structure) Instructions:

(1) Reporting levels will be reviewed periodically, and may be adjusted by contract modification with no change to the contract price.

(2) Modify paragraph 3.2.1.6 to add “Estimated Cost at Completion (EAC) will be updated once each fiscal year. EACs will be updated periodically when significant risk events or major schedule shifts occur.”

(3) Contract Work Breakdown Structure (CWBS) elements shall be reported in accordance with the CWBS CDRL, except for the following:

(a) When the budgeted value of a Level three CWBS element budget exceeds 20% of the Contract Budget Baseline (CBB) then such element will be reported at a lower level where none of the lower reporting elements exceed 20% of the CBB.

(b) When the budgeted value of a Level three CWBS element is less than 1% of the CBB then the element shall be reported at Level two, not subdivided into its Level three components.

Format 2 (Organizational Categories) Instructions:

(1) Reporting levels will be reviewed periodically, and may be adjusted by contract modification with no change to the contract price.

AAC/EBMS 0 1 0

DCMA 0 1 0

15. TOTAL 0 2 0

G. PREPARED BY H. DATE I. APPROVED BY J. DATE

Michelle Ferreira, AAC/EBMS

Dwight Jantzen, AAC/EBMS

DD Form 1423-1 JUN 90 Previous editions are obsolete. Page 1 of 5 1077/183

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 110 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302 and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of these addresses. Send completed form to the Government Issuing Contracting Officer for

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.) 5. CONTRACT REFERENCE 6. REQUIRING OFFICE 18. ESTIMATED

7. DD 250 REQ 9. DIST STATEMENT

REQUIRED

10. FREQUENCY 12. DATE OF FIRST

Block 4 cont:

Format 2 (Organizational Categories) Instructions cont:

(2) Use organizational categories, e.g., Integrated Product Team (IPT) or functional including each major subcontractor that satisfied EVMS flowdown requirements. Format 2 shall follow reporting conventions of Format 1 instructions above, paragraph (3)(a) through (3)(b), substituting applicable organizational levels for CWBS levels.

Format 3 (Baseline) Instructions:

Significant differences (absolute values exceeding +/-5%) between the Performance Measurement Baseline (PMB) at the beginning and end of each specified period shall be explained in Format 5.

Format 4 (Staffing) Instructions:

(1) Clarification to paragraph 3.5.1.1, “The Contractor’s estimate-to-complete projections shall be used for time phasing equivalent staff months for each organizational category specified in Format 2 and include staffing or effort performed by each Intercompany Work Organizations.”

(2) Clarification to paragraph 3.5.1.5, “Significant changes that require explanations in Format 5 are those that change the absolute value of the projected total staff-months at completion of any organizational or functional category by more than +/-5%.”

Format 5 (Explanations and Problem Analyses) Instructions:

(1) If the program has implemented an Over Target Baseline (OTB), calculate variances since the last OTB vice program inception.

DD Form 1423-1 JUN 90 Previous editions are obsolete. Page 2 of 5

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 110 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302 and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of these addresses. Send completed form to the Government Issuing Contracting Officer for the Contract/PR No. Listed in Block E.

A. CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO. B. EXHIBIT C. CATEGORY:

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.) 5. CONTRACT REFERENCE 6. REQUIRING OFFICE 18. ESTIMATED

7. DD 250 REQ 9. DIST STATEMENT

REQUIRED

10. FREQUENCY 12. DATE OF FIRST

Block 4 cont:

Format 5 (Explanations and Problem Analyses) Instructions cont:

(2) The first narrative submission is to provide the Basis and Assumptions

(B&A) of the IMS. The B&A will outline all major program milestones and/or IMP events and document all associated programmatic schedule assumptions that were utilized in the development of the baseline plan.

(3) Modify paragraph 3.6.7.1 with “all monthly submissions will include a written schedule analysis to identify, document, and communicate changes of five working days or greater to Program Critical Path and Near Critical Path task/activity actual start and/or actual finish date variances from submission to submission as well as IMP and/or major program milestone impacts or other major schedule risk areas. Work around and/or recovery schedules/plans, and associated impacts due to program changes shall also be provided. The schedule narrative shall address progress to date and discuss any significant schedule changes (i.e. added/deleted tasks and significant logic revisions, and any/all programmatic schedule assumption change, etc.).”

(4) Explanations and problem analyses shall be required for Format 1 elements and cost/schedule variances that fall within the following categories:

• 5 largest current cost variances exceeding +/-$50K or +/-5% where

CV%=CV(Cur)/BCWP(Cur)

• 5 largest current schedule variances exceed +/-$50K or +/-5% where SV%=SV(Cur)/BCWS(Cur)

• 5 largest cumulative cost variances exceed +/-$150K and +/-5% where CV%=CV(Cum)/BCWP(Cum)

• 5 largest cumulative schedule variances exceed +/-$150K and +/-

5% where SV%=SV(Cum)/BCWS(Cum)

• 5 largest variances at completion exceeding +/-$150K and +/-5%

DD Form 1423-1 JUN 90 Previous editions are obsolete. Page 3 of 5

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 110 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302 and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of these addresses. Send completed form to the Government Issuing Contracting Officer for

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.) 5. CONTRACT REFERENCE 6. REQUIRING OFFICE 18. ESTIMATED

7. DD 250 REQ 9. DIST STATEMENT

REQUIRED

10. FREQUENCY 12. DATE OF FIRST

Block 4 cont:

Format 5 (Explanations and Problem Analyses) Instructions cont:

(5) Other cost and schedule variances or technical performance issues that are causing or are likely to cause significant schedule delays or cost overruns:

• Narrative explanations required and variance thresholds will be reviewed periodically, and may be adjusted by contract modifications with no change in contract price.

• Schedule variance narratives shall identify significant missed milestones, impact to major milestones, and expected recovery dates.

• If there are no changes to the reportable element problem analysis, expected impacts, or corrective action status then specify “no change since last reported analysis” and reference the IPMR date when the narrative was reported.

Format 6 (Integrated Master Schedule) Instructions:

(1) Modify paragraph 3.7.1.1.2 to read, “IMS required from subcontractors will be integrated with the prime Contractor’s scheduling system.”

(2) Modify paragraph 3.7.1.3.6 to read, “The Contractor shall submit quarterly results of all Schedule Risk Assessments (SRA) to identify and quantify milestone/event and task/activity level schedule risk. The Contractor shall report optimistic, pessimistic, and most likely remaining duration for each Critical Path and Near Critical Path activity/task. The SRA will be performed on the Program Critical Path and the Critical Path and Near Critical Paths to select critical milestones. The rationale used to establish the remaining durations should be documented.

• Test Program Critical Path – longest path through the entire program

• Test Critical Path to next major milestone(s)

• Test Near Critical Path to next major milestone(s)"

DD Form 1423-1 JUN 90 Previous editions are obsolete. Page 4 of 5

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 110 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302 and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of these addresses. Send completed form to the Government Issuing Contracting Officer for

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.) 5. CONTRACT REFERENCE 6. REQUIRING OFFICE 18. ESTIMATED

7. DD 250 REQ 9. DIST STATEMENT

REQUIRED

10. FREQUENCY 12. DATE OF FIRST

Block 8: Government comments will be provided 30 calendar days after receipt of initial draft submission. The Contractor will have 15 calendar days to incorporate Government comments and resubmit for approval. No approval required on subsequent submittals.

Block 11 and 12: The first submission is due within 30 calendar days after the end of the first full accounting period following contract award. First submission shall include reporting to the Intermediate level schedule, at a minimum.

Block 11 and 13: Subsequent submittals are due within 30 calendar days after the close of the Contractor’s accounting period, all schedule levels.

Block 14: Distribution to addressee is the responsibility of the JMM BRU CDRL Manager. In addition to the monthly submittal to the DoD program manager and other designated addressees, a quarterly submission must be made to the central repository.

DD Form 1423-1 JUN 90 Previous editions are obsolete. Page 5 of 5

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 110 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302 and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of these addresses. Send completed form to the

D. SYSTEM/ITEM E. CONTRACT/PR NO. F. CONTRACTOR

JMM BRU

E003 Contract Funds Status Report (CFSR)

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.) 5. CONTRACT REFERENCE 6. REQUIRING OFFICE 18. ESTIMATED

DI-MGMT-81468 (See Block 16) SOW Para. 5.4.2 AAC/EBMS TOTAL PRICE

7. DD 250 REQ 9. DIST STATEMENT

REQUIRED

10. FREQUENCY 12. DATE OF FIRST

LT D QTRLY 90 DAC

(See Block 16)

b. COPIES

N/A See Block 16 See Block 16 Draft Reg. Repro

Block 4: SUPPLEMENTAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETION OF

DD FORM 1586

1. Item 11, column a. Reporting levels shall be by each Contract Line Item Number (CLIN)

2. Item 11, column b. Enter the appropriations, subhead, and project unit for each line item as specified on the contract appropriation data sheet, e.g. 1791506/41AP/01050.

3. Item 12 rows a, b, and c. Columns 2 through 9 shall include monthly projected amounts, projected amounts for the next 3 months, quarterly until the end of the next quarter’s fiscal year, and by Government fiscal year until the end of the contract.

4. In the Remarks, enter separately (if applicable) the amount of profit/fee, over-/under-run, and the cost sharing ratio.

Blocks 11, 12, and 13: The initial submission is required electronically within 90 calendar days following contract award. Subsequent submissions shall be required electronically 25 calendar days after the end of each subsequent quarter Government fiscal year period.

Block 14: Distribution to addressee is the responsibility of the JMM BRU CDRL manager. Submittal shall be in digital format using Microsoft Office applications unless otherwise dictated by the nature of the data. All unclassified deliverables shall be submitted via the Program’s IDE. For classifies deliverables, submit 2 hard copies and a CD to the JMM BRU Program Office.

15. TOTAL 0 1 0

DD Form 1423-1 JUN 90 Previous editions are obsolete.

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 110 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302 and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of these addresses. Send completed form to the

D. SYSTEM/ITEM E. CONTRACT/PR NO. F. CONTRACTOR

JMM BRU

E005 Contract Work Breakdown Structure (CWBS)

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.) 5. CONTRACT REFERENCE 6. REQUIRING OFFICE 18. ESTIMATED

DI-MGMT-81334D SOW Para. 5.4.4 AAC/EBMS TOTAL PRICE

7. DD 250 REQ 9. DIST STATEMENT

REQUIRED

10. FREQUENCY 12. DATE OF FIRST

LT D R/ASR

ASREQ b. COPIES

N/A N/A See Block 16 Draft Reg. Repro

Blocks 10 and 13: Submit revisions as required NLT 30 calendar days after significant changes occur, these are changes that would have either a favorable or unfavorable impact to the contract equal to 1% of contract value or 1 month of contract schedule.

Block 14: Distribution to addressee is the responsibility of the JMM BRU CDRL Manager. Submittal shall be in digital format using Microsoft Office applications unless otherwise dictated by the nature of the data. All unclassified deliveries shall be submitted via the Program’s IDE. For classified deliverables, submit a CD ROM to the JMM BRU Program Office.

15. TOTAL 0 1 0

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 110 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302 and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of these addresses. Send completed form to the

D. SYSTEM/ITEM E. CONTRACT/PR NO. F. CONTRACTOR

JMM BRU

1. DATA ITEM NO. 2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM 3. SUBTITLE 17. PRICE GROUP

E006 Data Accession List

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.)

5. CONTRACT REFERENCE 6. REQUIRING OFFICE 18. ESTIMATED

DI-MGMT-81453A (See Block 16)

SOW Para. 5.3.2, 5.3.4, 5.5.1, 5.5.3.4, , 5.6.5.2.2, 5.6.5.3, 5.6.9, 5.6.11.3, 5.6.12, 5.6.13.1.3, 5.6.13.1.4, 5.6.17.1, 5.6.17.3, 5.6.17.4, 5.6.20.1.4, 5.8.1, 5.9.1, 5.15

AAC/EBMS TOTAL PRICE

7. DD 250 REQ 9. DIST STATEMENT

REQUIRED

10. FREQUENCY 12. DATE OF FIRST

SUBMISSION

14. DISTRIBUTION

N/A N/A See Block 16 Draft Reg. Repro

Block 4: Contractor format is acceptable. Includes but is not limited to:

Review agenda and meeting minutes to include, PMRs, TIMs, and Logistics support meetings, IMP, Configuration Status Accounting, TPM Status, Decision-analysis, System Safety assessments, Human Factors Engineering Progress Report, Reliability data and documents, Software Test Plans, Software Test Reports, software updates, Software Version Descriptions, Software Metrics, Acceptance Test Reports, MRA results, Bar Code Identification Report and all documents produced during contract shall be available for Government access

Blocks 12 and 13: Submit Data Accession List no later than 7 calendar days after the end of each calendar month.

Block 14: Distribution to addressee is the responsibility of the JMM BRU CDRL Manager. Submittal shall be in digital format using Microsoft Office applications unless otherwise dictated by the nature of the data. For Software Deliverables on CD or DVD-ROM submit to the JMM BRU Program Office. All un-classified deliveries shall be submitted via the Program’s IDE. For classified deliverables, submit a CD ROM to the JMM BRU Program Office.

AAC/ EBMS 0 1 0

AAE TPO-Indy 0 1 0

15. TOTAL 0 3 0

Dale Julio, AAC/EBMS

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 110 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302 and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of these addresses. Send completed form to the

Item 0005 E TDP TM OTHER CMAN

1. DATA ITEM NO. 2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM 3. SUBTITLE 17. PRICE GROUP

E007 Engineering Change Proposal

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.) 5. CONTRACT REFERENCE 6. REQUIRING OFFICE 18. ESTIMATED

DI-CMAN-80639C (See Block 16) SOW Para. 5.5.3.1 AAC/EBMS TOTAL PRICE

7. DD 250 REQ 9. DIST STATEMENT 10. FREQUENCY 12. DATE OF FIRST SUBMISSION 14. DISTRIBUTION

REQUIRED

LT D R/ASR

(See Block 16)

See Block 16 b. COPIES

A (See 16) N/A See Block 16 Draft Reg. Repro

16. REMARKS AAC/EBMS 1 1 0

Block 4: Contractor format is acceptable.

Block 8: Class I ECPs may only be approved by the Government’s Configuration Control Board and authorized with a contract modification.

Class II ECPs require Government concurrence in classification prior to implementation.

Blocks 10, 12, and 13: The Contractor shall submit preliminary copies of proposed changes for Government review. Government will provide classification determination NLT 5 working days after receipt of preliminary copy. Proposed changes classified as Class I must be submitted to the Government via ECP.

Block 14: Distribution to addressee is the responsibility of the JMM BRU CDRL Manager. Submittal shall be in digital format using Microsoft Office applications unless otherwise dictated by the nature of the data. All unclassified deliveries shall be submitted via the Program’s IDE. For classified deliverables, submit a CD ROM to the JMM BRU Program Office.

AAE TPO-Indy 1 1 0

15. TOTAL 2 3 0

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 110 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302 and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of these addresses. Send completed form to the

Item 0005 E TDP TM OTHER CMAN

1. DATA ITEM NO. 2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM 3. SUBTITLE 17. PRICE GROUP

E008 Request for Deviation “Variance”

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.) 5. CONTRACT REFERENCE 6. REQUIRING OFFICE 18. ESTIMATED

DI-CMAN-80640C (See Block 16) SOW Para. 5.5.3.2 AAC/EBMS TOTAL PRICE

7. DD 250 REQ 9. DIST

STATEMENT

10. FREQUENCY 12. DATE OF FIRST SUBMISSION 14. DISTRIBUTION

REQUIRED

LT D R/ASR

(See Block 16)

8. APP CODE 11. AS OF DATE 13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT SUBMISSION a. ADDRESSEE

A (See16) N/A See Block 16 Draft Reg. Repro

16. REMARKS AAC/EBMS 0 1 0

Block 4: Contractor format is acceptable.

Block 8: All RFDs require Government approval prior to implementation.

Blocks 10, 12, and 13: The Contractor shall submit a Request for Deviation “Variance” when there is a proposed departure from (nonconformance with) the contractually specified configuration documentation for a specific number of units or for a specified period of time.

Block 14: Distribution to addressee is the responsibility of the JMM BRU CDRL Manager. Submittal shall be in digital format using Microsoft Office applications unless otherwise dictated by the nature of the data. All

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 110 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302 and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of these addresses. Send completed form to the

Item 0005 E TDP TM OTHER CMAN

1. DATA ITEM NO. 2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM 3. SUBTITLE 17. PRICE GROUP

E009 Notice of Revision

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.) 5. CONTRACT REFERENCE 6. REQUIRING OFFICE 18. ESTIMATED

DI-CMAN-80642C (See Block 16) SOW Para. 5.5.3.3 AAC/EBMS TOTAL PRICE

7. DD 250 REQ 9. DIST

STATEMENT

10. FREQUENCY 12. DATE OF FIRST SUBMISSION 14. DISTRIBUTION

REQUIRED

LT D R/ASR

(See Block 16)

Block 4: Contractor format is acceptable.

Block 8: Notice of Revision (NOR)’s associated with Class I ECPs will be authorized with a contract modification after approval by the Government’s Configuration Control Board.

Blocks 10, 12, and 13: The Contractor shall submit a NOR when there are proposed changes to a technical document being requested by an Engineering Change Proposal (ECP).

Block 14: Distribution to addressee is the responsibility of the JMM BRU CDRL Manager. Submittal shall be in digital format using Microsoft Office applications unless otherwise dictated by the nature of the data. All

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 110 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302 and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of these addresses. Send completed form to the

Item 0005 E TDP TM OTHER SESS

1. DATA ITEM NO. 2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM 3. SUBTITLE 17. PRICE GROUP

E010 System Engineering Management Plan (SEMP)

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.) 5. CONTRACT REFERENCE 6. REQUIRING OFFICE 18. ESTIMATED

DI-SESS-81785 (See Block 16) SOW Para. 5.5.1, 5.5.3, 5.6.2, 5.6.7, 5.6.8, 5.6.12, 5.6.13.1, 5.6.14, 5.6.16, 5.6.16.1, 5.6.17.2, 5.6.18, 5.9.4, 5.10.2, 5.11, 5.13.1, 5.14.1

AAC/EBMS TOTAL PRICE

7. DD 250 REQ 9. DIST STATEMENT 10. FREQUENCY 12. DATE OF FIRST SUBMISSION 14. DISTRIBUTION

REQUIRED

LT D R/ASR

(See Block 16)

ASREQ b. COPIES

Block 4: Contractor shall disregard Requirements 2 & 4. SEMP format shall follow the outline in the Government approved SEMP.

Block 8: Government will have 30 calendar days for review and comment.

The Contractor shall have 15 calendar days to incorporate Government comment and resubmit for approval.

Blocks 10 and 13: Significant changes to the processes and procedures in the Contractor’s systems engineering program shall be documented in revisions to the SEMP and submitted to the Government for review and approval.

Block 14: Distribution to addressee is the responsibility of the JMM BRU CDRL Manager. Submittal shall be in digital format using Microsoft Office applications. All unclassified deliveries shall be submitted via the Program’s IDE. For classified deliverables, submit a CD ROM to the JMM BRU Program

Dale Julio, AAC/EBMS Dwight Jantzen, AAC/EBMS

DD Form 1423-1 JUN 90 Previous editions are obsolete. Page 1 of 3

A. CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO.

Item 0005

B. EXHIBIT

E

C. CATEGORY

SESS

D. SYSTEM/ITEM

E. CONTRACT/PR NO.

F. CONTRACTOR

16. Remarks (Continued)

Block 4 (Continued):

System Engineering Management Plan (SEMP) Outline

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1. Program Description and Applicable Documents

1.2. Program Schedule

1.3. Approach for SEMP Updates

2. PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS

2.1. Capabilities and Key Performance Parameters

2.2. Statutory and Regulatory Requirements

2.3. Specified and Derived Requirements

2.4. Certification Requirements

2.5. Design Considerations

2.6. Functional Analysis

2.7. Synthesis and Design

2.8. System Analysis and Trade Studies

2.9. Interface Management

2.10. Data Management

3. TECHNICAL STAFFING AND ORGANIZATIONAL PLANNING

3.1. Lead/Chief Systems Engineer and Functional Leads

3.2. IPT Organization/Structure

3.3. IPT Staffing / Functional Skills

3.3.1. IPTs

3.4. IPT Coordination

3.5. Integration with Contractor(s) and External Organizations

3.5.1. Working Groups

Universal Armament Interface Super Joint Interface Control Working Group (UAI SJICWG) JMM BRU Miniature Munitions UAI Working Group (JMMUWG) Electromagnetic Environment Effects (E3) Working Group Integrated Test Team Working Group (ITTWG) System Safety Working Group (SSWG) Human Systems Integration Working Group (HSIWG) Requirements Control Working Group (RCWG) Modeling and Simulation Working Group (M&SWG)

4. TECHNICAL BASELINE MANAGEMENT

4.1. Technical Baseline Management Responsibility

4.2. Defining, Approving, and Maintaining the Technical Baseline

4.2.1. Engineering Change Proposals

4.2.2. Request for Variance

4.2.3. Configuration Control Board (CCB)

4.2.3.1. CCB Chair

4.2.3.2. CCB Membership

4.2.3.3. CCB Process

4.2.4. Requirements Change Management

4.2.5. Requirement Control Working Group

4.2.6. Requirement Change Process

4.2.7. Technical Data Management

4.3. Requirements Traceability and Verification and Validation (V&V)

4.4. Specification Tree

4.5. Technical Maturity

4.5.1. Technical Performance Measures (TPMs)

4.5.2. Technology Readiness Assessments (TRAs)

4.6. Manufacturing Maturity

DD Form 1423-1 JUN 90 Previous editions are obsolete. Page 2 of 3

A. CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO.

Item 0005

B. EXHIBIT

E

C. CATEGORY

SESS

D. SYSTEM/ITEM

System Engineering Management Plan (SEMP) Outline

5. TECHNICAL REVIEW PLANNING

5.1. Event-Driven Technical Reviews

5.1.1. Technology Development Phase Criteria and SETR Events

5.1.1.1. Integrated Baseline Review (IBR)

5.1.1.2. Systems Requirements Review II (SRR-II)

5.1.1.3. System Functional Review (SFR)

5.1.1.4. Software Specification Review (SSR)

5.1.1.5. Preliminary Design Review (PDR)

5.1.2. Engineering and Manufacturing Development (EMD) Phase Criteria and SETR Events

5.1.2.1. Integrated Baseline Review (IBR)

5.1.2.2. Critical Design Review (CDR) (Includes IRR requirements)

5.1.2.3. Test Readiness Review (TRR)

5.1.2.4. Flight Readiness Review (FRR)

5.1.2.5. Functional Configuration Audit (FCA)

5.1.2.6. System Verification Review (SVR)

5.1.2.7. Production Readiness Review (PRR)

5.1.2.8. Operational Test Readiness Review (OTRR)

5.1.3. Production and Deployment Phase Criteria and SETR Events

5.1.3.1. Integrated Baseline Review (IBR)

5.1.3.2. Physical Configuration Audit (PCA)

5.2. Technical Review Management

5.3. Chairing of Technical Reviews

5.4. Stakeholder Participation in Technical Reviews

5.5. Peer Participation at Technical Reviews

6. INTEGRATION WITH OVERALL PROGRAM MANAGEMENT

6.1. Linkage to Other Program Management Plans

6.2. Program Manager’s Approach to Using Technical Reviews

6.3. Risk Management Integration

6.3.1 Risk Management System

6.4. Test and Evaluation

6.4.1. Test Parameters

6.4.1.1 Measures of Effectiveness and Suitability (MES)

6.4.1.2 Critical Technical Parameters (CTP)

6.4.2. Verification and Validation

6.4.2.1 Test and Evaluation Strategy (TES)

6.5. Sustainment Integration

6.6. Contracting Considerations

6.6.1. Associate Contractor Agreements

DD Form 1423-1 JUN 90 Previous editions are obsolete. Page 3 of 3

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 110 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302 and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of these addresses. Send completed form to the

Item 0005 E TDP TM OTHER SAFT

D. SYSTEM/ITEM E. CONTRACT/PR NO. F. CONTRACTOR

JMM BRU

E011 System Safety Program Plan

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.) 5. CONTRACT REFERENCE 6. REQUIRING OFFICE 18. ESTIMATED

DI-SAFT-81626 (See Block 16) SOW Para. 5.6.11.1 AAC/EBMS TOTAL PRICE

7. DD 250 REQ 9. DIST STATEMENT

REQUIRED

10. FREQUENCY 12. DATE OF FIRST

Block 4: Contractor format is acceptable.

Block 8: Government will have 30 calendar days for review and comment.

The Contractor shall have 15 calendar days to incorporate Government comment and resubmit for approval.

Blocks 10, 12, and 13: Revisions are required when significant changes to the processes and procedures in the Contractor’s System Safety Program Plan occur.

Block 14: Distribution to addressee is the responsibility of the JMM BRU CDRL Manager. Submittal shall be in digital format using Microsoft Office applications unless otherwise dictated by the nature of the data. All unclassified deliveries shall be submitted via the Program’s IDE. For classified deliverables, submit a CD ROM to the JMM BRU Program

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 110 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302 and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of these addresses. Send completed form to the

Item 0005 E TDP TM OTHER SAFT

D. SYSTEM/ITEM E. CONTRACT/PR NO. F. CONTRACTOR

JMM BRU

1. DATA ITEM NO. 2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM 3. SUBTITLE 17. PRICE GROUP

E012 Safety Assessment Report (SAR)

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.) 5. CONTRACT REFERENCE 6. REQUIRING OFFICE 18. ESTIMATED

DI-SAFT-80102B (See Block 16) SOW Para. 5.6.11.3 AAC/EBMS TOTAL PRICE

7. DD 250 REQ 9. DIST STATEMENT

REQUIRED

10. FREQUENCY 12. DATE OF FIRST

Block 4: Contractor format is acceptable.

Block 8: Government will have 30 calendar days for review and comment.

The Contractor shall have 15 calendar days to incorporate Government comment and resubmit for approval.

Blocks 10, 12, and 13: Revisions required no later than 30 calendar days after significant changes occur.

Block 14: Distribution to addressee is the responsibility of the JMM BRU CDRL Manager. Submittal shall be in digital format using Microsoft Office applications unless otherwise dictated by the nature of the data. All unclassified deliveries shall be submitted via the Program’s IDE.

For classified deliverables, submit a CD ROM to the JMM BRU Program Office.

AAC/EBMS 0 1 0

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 110 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302 and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of these addresses. Send completed form to the

Item 0005 E TDP TM OTHER RELI

1. DATA ITEM NO. 2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM 3. SUBTITLE 17. PRICE GROUP

E015 Failure Summary and Analysis Report Failure Reporting and Corrective Action Summary (FRACAS) Report

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.) 5. CONTRACT REFERENCE 6. REQUIRING OFFICE 18. ESTIMATED

DI-RELI-80255 (See Block 16) SOW Para. 5.6.13.1.2 AAC/EBMS TOTAL PRICE

7. DD 250 REQ 9. DIST STATEMENT 10. FREQUENCY 12. DATE OF FIRST SUBMISSION 14. DISTRIBUTION

REQUIRED

LT D ASREQ ASREQ b. COPIES

A (See 16) N/A ASREQ Draft Reg. Repro

Block 4: Contractor format is acceptable.

Block 8: Government comments will be provided 30 calendar days after receipt of draft submission. The Contractor will have 15 calendar days to incorporate Government comments and resubmit for approval.

Block 14: Distribution to addressee is the responsibility of the JMM BRU CDRL Manager. Submittal shall be in digital format using Microsoft Office applications unless otherwise dictated by the nature of the data. All

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 110 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302 and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of these addresses. Send completed form to the

Item 0005 E TDP TM OTHER MISC

1. DATA ITEM NO. 2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM 3. SUBTITLE 17. PRICE GROUP

E019 Scientific and Technical Reports Materials and Processes

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.) 5. CONTRACT REFERENCE 6. REQUIRING OFFICE 18. ESTIMATED

DI-MISC-80711A (See Block 16) SOW Para. 5.6.15 AAC/EBMS TOTAL PRICE

7. DD 250 REQ 9. DIST STATEMENT 10. FREQUENCY 12. DATE OF FIRST SUBMISSION 14. DISTRIBUTION

REQUIRED

LT D R/ASR See Block 16 b. COPIES

Block 4: Contractor format is acceptable. All changes made since the previous revision should be marked (e.g., revision bars). This report shall contain a description of the materials and finished systems used in the manufacture of the JMM BRU. The description shall identify part nomenclature, categorized by material type or product form (e.g., casting, forging, plate, sheet, extrusion, etc.). The description shall include isometric views either the entire JMM BRU, or of major components, showing usage location of each material. Each material shall also be identified with the corresponding material and process specification.

The method of assembly and finishing of major components shall be described. Of particular interest are parts which are unconventionally fastened or welded and parts coated for tribological and corrosion resistance. Corrosion protection requirements shall be identified including protective finish system requirements (pretreatments, sealant, organic, and inorganic coatings) for specific parts, surfaces of similar and dissimilar metals, and attaching parts and fasteners.

Describe the material and process specification development and approval process.

Describe the process by which the Contractor ensures that only materials and processes in accordance with approved material and process specifications, and their constraints and limitations, are used in design.

This document shall describe the material allowables philosophy used in the generation of data to support the JMM BRU. Describe the analytical procedures used to calculate static and dynamic material allowables and how these procedures may differ from those found in DOT/FAA/AR-MMPDS-05 (Metallic Materials Properties Development and Standardization) and MIL-HDBK-17F. Static material allowables methodology shall be described in the statistical terms of confidence levels and exceedance values. The methodology used to account for the effect of inorganic finish systems on material allowables shall be described. The methodology used to account for thermal exposure time histories, where applicable, shall be described.

The source(s) and statistical basis of material property allowables used in the design of the JMM BRU shall be identified. If the contractor is planning on using existing or new data to generate allowables, or if existing allowables from another design are going to be used for design, describe how the Contractor plans to evaluate these material allowables for adequacy and whether there is any risk associated with using them.

DD Form 1423-1 JUN 90 Previous editions are obsolete. Page 1 of 2

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 110 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302 and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of these addresses. Send completed form to the

Item 0005 E TDP TM OTHER MISC

1. DATA ITEM NO. 2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM 3. SUBTITLE 17. PRICE GROUP

E019 Scientific and Technical Reports Materials and Processes

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.) 5. CONTRACT REFERENCE 6. REQUIRING OFFICE 18. ESTIMATED

DI-MISC-80711A (See Block 16) SOW Para. 5.6.15 AAC/EBMS TOTAL PRICE

7. DD 250 REQ 9. DIST STATEMENT 10. FREQUENCY 12. DATE OF FIRST SUBMISSION 14. DISTRIBUTION

REQUIRED

LT D R/ASR

(See Block 16)

A (See16) N/A See Block 16 Draft Reg. Repro

Block 4 (Continued): The document shall describe methods to identify, monitor, and control variation in critical processes. The document shall describe process capability measures to be used as evidence of process control.

The document shall describe the approach for establishing critical process upper and lower control limits and correlating those control limits with demonstrated process capability. The correlation between process capability and specification compliance shall be described.

Block 8: Government will have 30 calendar days for review and comment. The Contractor shall have 15 calendar days to incorporate Government comment and resubmit for approval.

Blocks 10, 12, and 13: Revisions are required when significant changes to the processes and materials occur.

Block 14: Distribution to addressee is the responsibility of the JMM BRU CDRL Manager. Submittal shall be in digital format using Microsoft Office applications unless otherwise dictated by the nature of the data. All

DD Form 1423-1 JUN 90 Previous editions are obsolete. Page 2 of 2

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 110 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302 and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of these addresses. Send completed form to the

Item 0005 E TDP TM OTHER MGMT

1. DATA ITEM NO. 2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM 3. SUBTITLE 17. PRICE GROUP

E020 Management Plan Nondestructive Testing & Inspection Plan

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.) 5. CONTRACT REFERENCE 6. REQUIRING OFFICE 18. ESTIMATED

DI-MGMT-80004A (See Block 16) SOW Para. 5.6.15.1 AAC/EBMS TOTAL PRICE

7. DD 250 REQ 9. DIST STATEMENT 10. FREQUENCY 12. DATE OF FIRST SUBMISSION 14. DISTRIBUTION

REQUIRED

LT D R/ASR

(See Block 16)

ASREQ

(See Block16)

A (See16) N/A (See Block 16) Draft Reg. Repro

Block 4: Contractor format is acceptable. MIL-HDBK-6870A shall be considered for guidance. The required content for this submittal is described on the following page.

Block 8: Government will have 30 calendar days for review and comment.

The Contractor shall have 15 calendar days to incorporate Government comment and resubmit for approval.

Blocks 10, 12, and 13: Revisions as required.

Block 14: Distribution to addresses is the responsibility of the JMM BRU CDRL Manager. Submittal shall be in digital format using Microsoft Office applications unless otherwise dictated by the nature of the data. All unclassified deliveries shall be submitted via the Program’s IDE. For classified deliverables, submit 2 hard copies and a CD ROM to the JMM BRU Program Office.

DD Form 1423-1 JUN 90 Previous editions are obsolete. Page 1 of 2

A. CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO.

Item 0005

B. EXHIBIT

E

C. CATEGORY

MGMT

D. SYSTEM/ITEM

The purpose of this NDT/I Plan is to define and document all aspects of utilizing nondestructive testing to achieve JMM BRU performance and life goals. The NDT/I Plan shall describe the Program’s approach to non-destructive testing and inspection during manufacturing, testing and in-service operations. The following areas shall be addressed:

• NDT/I personnel and training requirements;

• Operational relationships between NDT/I and other organizational elements;

• NDT/I Processes and Procedures;

• Subcontractors and suppliers NDT/I;

• Implementation requirements for new technologies;

• NDT/I records, delivery and retention requirements;

• NDT/I Support Equipment (SE) equipment;

• Application of NDT/I to component;

• Full-scale and flight-testing;

• Requirements for NDT/I during the service life of the BRU;

• Acceptance and Reject criteria for all metallic and non-metallic undergoing NDT/I for validation;

• NDI for first article and static article testing;

• Full-scale fatigue testing

DD Form…

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .