Questions and Answers Set 2 McLaughlin B017.docx

DOCX document 22 KB Posted

Attached to
FA8604 Materials Handling System/McLaughlin Air National Guard Base, West Virginia MMHS
Solicitation number
FA860424RB017
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a set of questions and answers related to a Request for Proposal (RFP) for a Materials Handling System at the McLaughlin Air National Guard Base in West Virginia (Solicitation Number FA8604-24-R-B017). The RFP covers the performance, design, fabrication, installation, and testing requirements for the materials handling system. Key details include:

The RFP has 22 line items and requires contract completion within 300 days of award. It is a 100% small business set-aside with a NAICS code of 333922. Evaluation will be based on Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA). The questions and answers address details such as the use of bollards, column protectors, pallet rack configurations, and tying requirements. The RFP solicitation documents are available on SAM.gov, and proposals are due by 4:00 PM EDT on 16 August 2024. The contracting office is the Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Lifecycle Management Center at Wright Patterson Air Force Base.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

FA8604-22-R-B017

McLaughlin ANGB Question Set #1 29 July 2024 Question/Answer Response:

Questions on the base portion of this RFP – Q: App “A” – mini mezz(s) – drawing shows (2) column protectors on the corners of the plan north run of cabinets.

Will bollards be accepted?

A: Since the modular cabinets do not necessary have columns per se, bollards for the area of the mini-mezz would be acceptable to protect the modular cabinets from forklift impact.

Q: App “B” pallet rack – P1 & P2 – 3.2.10. calls out for (6) 12” “column protectors” on the plan south 3 runs of rack – Again – would Bollards be accepted?

A: Column protectors shall be as specified in 3.2.10.

Q: Assuming all the white unmarked boxes (appear to be rack) on the drawings that are unnamed are existing GFE equipment?

A: All white/grayed boxes along the perimeter of the main warehouse are GFE. All racks to be provided are named/typed.

Q: App “B” pallet rack – over aisle ties – rather than adding 24” extensions – would 18[‘] (216”) frames in those locations be accepted?

A: 18’ (feet) tall frames (which are 24” taller than the balance of the frames) would be an acceptable equivalent as it will provide the clearances provided by 24” bolt-on extensions.

Q: App “B” pallet rack – over aisle ties- assuming ties only across the (2) 54” aisles – (10) total - and not tying the back to back row to the southern most single row (108” aisle)?

A: Correct. The back-to-back rows do not need to be tied to the single row.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .