Attachment_2_Sustainment_Technical_Acceptability_Matrix.pdf

PDF 35 KB Posted

Attached to
HH-60G Degraded Visual Environment System(DVES)
Solicitation number
FA8552-18-R-0005
Issued by

About this file

Sustainment Technical Acceptability Matrix

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Attachment_2_Sustainment_Technical_Acceptability_Matrix.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Section_L_09182018.pdf PDF
PaveHawk_DVES_SRD_1_1.pdf PDF
DVES_PWS_Rev_2.pdf PDF
FA855218R00050005.pdf PDF
FA8552-18-R-0005_Round_2_Questions.pdf PDF
FA855218R00050004.pdf PDF
Section_M_Evaluation_Factors_for_Award_09042018.pdf PDF
FA8552-18-R-0005_Round_1_Questions.pdf PDF
Amended_CDRLs_3_Sep_2018.pdf PDF
Attachment_2_Sustainment_Technical_Acceptability_Matrix.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_3_Cost_Models.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
DVES_PWS_Rev_1.pdf PDF
Section_L_Instructions_Conditions_and_Notices_to_Offerors_09042018.pdf PDF
Attachment_1_Cross_Reference_Matrix.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
FA855218R00050003.pdf PDF
FA855218R00050002.pdf PDF
TMCR_Attachment_4_TOLCVP_(DVES).pdf PDF
TMCR_Attachment_3_TOLCMP_(DVES).pdf PDF
TMCR_Attachment_2_Functionality_Matrix_(DVES).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
TMCR_Attachment_1_AF_Business_Rules_(DVES).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
DVES_Tech_Doc_Release_Agreement.pdf PDF
FA855218R00050001-Amendment.pdf PDF
Attachment__4_Total_Resources_Volume.XLSX XLSX spreadsheet
FORM_158_Packaging_Requirements.pdf PDF
Section_M_Evaluation_Factors_For_Award.pdf PDF
CDRLS_A01B_A01L.pdf PDF
DVES_Government_Technical_Data_List.pdf PDF
CDRLS_A001_A00A.pdf PDF
Special_Packaging_Instructions.pdf PDF
Signed_19_30143_QASP.PDF PDF
DVES_Tech_Doc_Release_Agreement.pdf PDF
CDRLS_A019_A01A.pdf PDF
PaveHawk_DVES_SRD_Final.pdf PDF
Attachment_3_Cost_Model_Spreadsheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
CDRLS_A00M_A00X.pdf PDF
FA855218R0005-Final.pdf PDF
DVES_PWS_Final_9_Jul.pdf PDF
Attachment_1_Cross_Reference_Matrix.pdf PDF
CDRLS_A00B_A00L.pdf PDF
CDRL_A018_TMCR.PDF PDF
Section_L_Instructions_Conditions_and_Notices_to_Offerors.pdf PDF
CDRLS_A00Y_A017.pdf PDF
DD254_Solicitation.pdf PDF
Show all 44

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

RFP FA8552-18-R-0005

ATTACHMENT 2

SUSTAINMENT TECHNICAL ACCEPTIBILITY MATRIX

TECHNICAL

RQMTS DOC

Section L

Section M

Threshold Requirement Proposal Specification (Offeror Completes)

SRD para 3.7.1 II.C.2.d II.C.1.d N/A

SRD para 3.7.1.1 II.C.2.d II.C.1.d Storage life of 5 years SRD para 3.7.1.2 II.C.2.d II.C.1.d Predicted MTBF 350 hours SRD para 3.7.1.3 II.C.2.d II.C.1.d Observed MTBF 350 hours SRD para 3.7.2 II.C.2.d II.C.1.d N/A

SRD para 3.7.2.1 II.C.2.d II.C.1.d MTTR of 45 minutes

SRD para 3.7.2.2.1 II.C.2.d II.C.1.d

Integrated diagnostics to provide system status information and to detect and isolate all faults that degrade DVES functions (software & hardware) and operations

SRD para 3.7.2.2.3 II.C.2.d II.C.1.d Utilizes existing data bus maintenence ports

SRD para 3.7.2.2.4 II.C.2.d II.C.1.d Maintenance/diagnostic data preserved despite power loss, reboot, sanitization, etc.

SRD para 3.7.2.2.5 II.C.2.d II.C.1.d Interfaces with existing downloadable data interfaces

SRD para 3.7.2.2.6 II.C.2.d II.C.1.d Maintenance and diagnostic data unclassified

SRD para 3.7.2.3 II.C.2.d II.C.1.d Contains Power-up BIT, Continuous BIT, Initiated BIT, and Maintenance

BIT

SRD para 3.7.2.3.1 II.C.2.d II.C.1.d BIT shall detect and report all DVES faults within 2 seconds

SRD para 3.7.2.3.2 II.C.2.d II.C.1.d DVES BIT isolates faults with 95% probability at field level

SRD para 3.7.2.3.3 II.C.2.d II.C.1.d DVES BIT isolates faults with 99% probability at intermediate level maintenance

SRD para 3.7.2.3.4 II.C.2.d II.C.1.d 98% of all faults detected and isolated to the repairable, adjustable, or replaceable assembly

SRD para 3.7.2.3.5 II.C.2.d II.C.1.d BIT logs faults to existing HH-60G fault diagnostics system

SRD para 3.7.2.3.6 II.C.2.d II.C.1.d Detected faults recorded with time stamps

SRD para 3.7.2.3.7.1

II.C.2.d II.C.1.d

Fault information used as the basis of fault isolation to the LRU or interconnect wiring (if applicable) shall be provided for USAF incorporation into unit level technical manuals

3.7.2.3.7.2

II.C.2.d II.C.1.d

Fault designation and associated cockpit displays and data records shall be in plain English to preclude the use of fault codes or cross-referencing of multiple codes

3.7.2.3.7.3

II.C.2.d II.C.1.d

BIT of any kind shall be described by text, tables, and diagrams as required to achieve a reasonable understanding at the Field Level and include all faults detected in any BIT mode

3.7.2.3.7.4

II.C.2.d II.C.1.d

Each fault detected shall be described in functional path operating characteristics, detection thresholds, time to set, and requirements for reset or clearing the fault detected

SRD para 3.7.2.3.8 II.C.2.d II.C.1.d

DVES False Alarms (FA) and software reloads will be considered failures and are to be included in the computation of software reliability. A false alarm is a fault detected during normal operations that cannot be repeated during the fault isolation process. Two false alarm types will be included, Type 1 and Type 2

3.7.2.3.8.1

II.C.2.d II.C.1.d

A Type 1 false alarm is a Can Not Duplicate (CND) case. CND rates shall not exceed 2% of faults detected

3.7.2.3.8.2

II.C.2.d II.C.1.d

A Type 2 false alarm is a fault detected and isolated to a LRU when it does not have an actual fault. A Type 2 false alarm is a Re-Test OK

(RTOK). LRU RTOK shall not exceed 1% for units received for BIT indicated failures

SRD para 3.7.2.4 II.C.2.d II.C.1.d The maintenance and checkout of

DVES shall not require a conditioned environment

SRD para 3.7.2.5 II.C.2.d II.C.1.d

DVES shall be designed in modular LRU architecture so that maintenance personnel can easily identify, remove, and replace failed components

SRD para 3.9.3 II.C.2.d II.C.1.d N/A

SRD para 3.9.3.1 II.C.2.d II.C.1.d

DVES maintainability features shall meet requirements of MIL-STD-

1472G Sections 5.8 Physical accommodation and 5.9

Maintenance accessibility

SRD para 3.9.3.2 II.C.2.d II.C.1.d

The system shall be maintainable for all field maintenance actions by the median 90 percent of all USAF military maintainers, as expressed by four multivariate representative cases in Table 3-10, under day/night/all weather conditions, while accommodating maintainers wearing arctic clothing or the chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear (CBRN) gear as shown in Table 3-11

SRD para 3.9.3.3 II.C.2.d II.C.1.d

Routine maintenance actions for removal, replacement, and alignment of DVES shall require no more than the existing HH-60G line maintenance tool kit (e.g. the

General Mechanics Tool Kit (NSN:

5180-01-587-8129) and/or an

Electrical Repairer Tool Kit (NSN:

5180-01-587-8128)). Use of embedded boresight and calibration devices and aids are permitted

SRD para 3.9.3.4 II.C.2.d II.C.1.d

Removal and replacement of DVES shall be accomplished without requiring removal of other components or equipment excluding shrouds or a radome – if equipped

SRD para 3.9.3.5 II.C.2.d II.C.1.d

Each LRU shall be equipped with sufficient design features (as per

MIL-STD-1472G, Section 5.9, design for the maintainer) to aid inspection, removal and replacement. The type of handles / grips required should be considered in conjunction with the weight, size, center of gravity (CG), and angle of the equipment, and below lift/distance/twist/frequency information

SRD para 3.9.3.6 II.C.2.d II.C.1.d

Any equipment assembly requiring more than a single maintainer lift shall be prominently labeled with the weight of the object and lift limitation (e.g. “two-maintainer lift only”) based on analysis of specific

LRU maintainer tasks using limits as per Table 3-12 and Table 3-13

SRD para 3.9.3.7 II.C.2.d II.C.1.d

Any DVES component with data storage that requires transportation back to the vendor for maintenance/repair shall include a function to completely and irrevocably erase all mission-related data on that device

The Sustainment Technical Acceptability Matrix will be utilized to evaluate the technical acceptability of Subfactor Four: Sustainment. Requirements information has been provided in columns 1-4. The offeror shall complete column 5 with the projected performance of the offeror’s technical solution in regard to the requirement. The offeror shall provide any necessary details, explanations, and evidence to support the projected performance specification in column 5.

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

RFP FA8552-18-R-0005

File details come from the government source that posted it.