Attachment1.doc

DOC document 60 KB Posted

Attached to
Universal Hydraulic Test Stands Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA8533-10-R-20138
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Lifecycle Management Center Robins Air Force Base

About this file

Present/Past Performance FACTS Sheet

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Universal Hydraulic Test Stands, newest first.
File Type Posted
Q As 22 June.pdf PDF
FA853310R20138______0003.pdf PDF
Q As 8 June.pdf PDF
FA853310R20138______0002.pdf PDF
PD_Revision_01_4June2010.pdf PDF
Proposal_Requirements_and_Basis_for_Award_June_2010.pdf PDF
FA853310R20138______0001.pdf PDF
EDL_Electric.pdf PDF
ELINSC001-C004.pdf PDF
ELINSB001-B004.pdf PDF
ELINSD001-D005.pdf PDF
Attachment2.doc DOC document
Attachment4.doc DOC document
EDL_Diesel.pdf PDF
ELINSG001-G002.pdf PDF
Attachment6.doc DOC document
ELINSE001-E002.pdf PDF
FinalUHTSSOW.pdf PDF
PD07WRGBZOENF10.pdf PDF
Attachment3.doc DOC document
ELINSA001-A003.pdf PDF
Attachment5.doc DOC document
ELINF001.pdf PDF
FA853310R20138_17may.pdf PDF
Show all 24

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) FA8533-10-R-20138

ATTACHMENT 1

Past/Present Performance “FACTS Sheet”

(TO BE COMPLETED BY OFFEROR)

Pursuant to the RFP Provision, “Proposal Requirements,” the offeror shall complete a FACTS Sheet for each of the three efforts it identified in its Volume III.

A. OFFEROR:

1. Name (Company/Division)

2. Address

3. CAGE Code

B. Contract Number or Project Title:

C. Role of Offeror in Effort: ______ Prime Contractor ______Subcontractor

Note that the information provided in this FACTS Sheet shall reflect the role that the offeror performed in the effort, i.e. an offeror who performed as a subcontractor shall identify the contract type, dollar value, description, etc. of its subcontract with the prime contractor.

D. Name of Customer:

E. Customer Points of Contact:

Name: ___________________________________ Telephone Number: ________________________ E-Mail Address: __________________________

Name: ___________________________________ Telephone Number: ________________________

E-Mail Address: __________________________

F. Contract Type(s) – (Firm Fixed Price, Time & Materials, Cost Reimbursable, etc.)

G. Contract Dollar Value. Describe any changes in dollar value that may have occurred from time of contract award to the conclusion of the effort or the present, whichever is applicable:

Initial Dollar Value:

H. Period of Performance (identify any changes that may have occurred from time of contract award to the conclusion of the contract or the present, whichever is applicable:

I. The offeror shall provide a detailed and comprehensive description of work on this Contract/Effort for which it was responsible:

Category:
Offeror to provide information specific to the program described on this FACTS Sheet (Use additional pages as needed):

1. Nature of Business Area(s) Involved, i.e. design work, manufacturing work, etc.

2. Technology Utilized in Work

3. Detailed Description of Item involved

4. Total Weight of Item

5. Quantity and description of fluid systems in Item

6. Flow and pressure combinations of each fluid system in Item

7. Quantities of Items produced, repaired or other quantitative data

8. Program Similarity to the UHTS program encompassed in this solicitation

9. Program Complexity Comparison to the UHTS program encompassed in this solicitation

10. Present status of Program, e.g. testing or full production, etc.

J. Discuss the offeror’s compliance with FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns. That is, under the effort discussed in this FACTS Sheet, did the offeror carry out the policy of the United States in the awarding of subcontracts to small business concerns, veteran-owned small business concerns, service-disabled veteran-owned small business concerns, HUBZone small business concerns, small disadvantaged business concerns, and women-owned small business concerns to the fullest extent consistent with efficient contract performance? This is applicable to all offerors, including small businesses.

K. If the offeror is a newly formed entity that either has no prior contracts or does not possess relevant corporate past performance, but does have key personnel with relevant past performance while employed by another company, specify by name, such key individual(s) who will participate in the proposed effort under this acquisition who also participated in the program identified in B. above, and indicate their contract role. Describe how participation of these key personnel contributed to the success of the previous effort and how this indicates probability of success on the proposed effort.

L. Summarize contract issues relative to the number and severity of quality deficiencies recorded/contract discrepancy reports issued, cure notices, show cause letters, termination for default or cause, disputes, claims, latent defects; and, corrective actions taken for the contract listed in paragraph B. above.

N. Additionally, for those efforts where the offeror is cognizant of unfavorable and/or marginal past performance ratings/reports previously assessed by customers or clients, but feel that significant progress has been made but not yet credited or formally documented, provide the program name, contract number, customer location and a narrative explaining "fixes" made to date, or any other information regarding the unfavorable/marginal assessment. This narrative portion is limited to one (1) additional page beyond the FACTS sheet required page limitation.

It is not presumed that the offeror's performance has been perfect. Rather, the proposal should contain evidence of the offeror's ability to isolate the root causes of problems and should describe programs or actions taken to resolve those causes. Demonstrated corrective actions (not just planned or promised), and the overall work record will be considered. Problems not addressed by the offeror, but found by the Government during the evaluation of the information in this volume, will be assumed to still exist. Note: In the case of Contractor Performance Assessment Report System (CPARS), if your input has already been provided and the rationale/ circumstances have not changed, DO NOT repeat them here.

O. Was this contract effort (as identified in paragraph B. above) submitted as a past performance source of data for a previous WR-ALC procurement. Yes No . If yes, identify the contracting personnel and phone numbers.

PLEASE NOTE: The Government is not bound by the offeror's opinion of relevancy. The Government will perform an independent assessment of relevancy of the data provided or obtained.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .