NGAME RFIs 8_6.docx

Next Generation Ammunition Munition Equipment (NGAME)

RFP FA853226RB002

RFIs

1. I would appreciate some additional information and clarification regarding the recent update posted to SAM.gov for the referenced pre-solicitation. I noted the following statement was added to the listing: "NGAME will not accept any foreign participation. Direct awards will be restricted to entities with a valid U.S. CAE code. The Buy American Act requires that all end items be manufactured in the United States." Could you please clarify the intended scope of the phrase "will not accept any foreign participation"? Specifically, we would like to understand whether this restriction applies solely to the prime contractor and place of manufacture of the end items, or whether it also extends to engineering, design, development, manufacturing, or other performance activities conducted by affiliated entities located outside the United States. Our company maintains engineering and manufacturing capabilities in Austria, and we are seeking to determine whether those resources could be utilized in support of contract performance, provided that all applicable solicitation requirements, domestic sourcing requirements, and U.S. export control regulations are satisfied. Additionally, could you clarify whether this acquisition is subject to any restrictions that would preclude products, components, or services originating from Trade Agreements Act (TAA) designated countries, or whether the government intends to apply sourcing requirements beyond the standard Buy American Act and TAA framework?

A foreign company may participate, but they need to have a registered CAGE code for the US. The Buy American Act requires manufactured end products to be produced in the US as long as 55% of the cost is associated with work done in the US. Additionally, the Buy American Act only applies to the Prime contractors and subcontractors. To be TAA compliant as well as Buy American compliant, the foreign country just has to be on the designated country list. Components are allowed to be produced OCONUS, as long as the company resides in a country listed in the Buy American Act IAW the TAA. The end product must be assembled in the US. The RFP posted on sam.gov has been updated. The statement of no foreign participation was inaccurate and has been removed.

2. Section J lists three attachments: Combined Sections L and M, the Statement of Objectives, and the Ordering Guide. Combined Sections L and M also references “RFP Attachment I,” which appears to contain the NGAME Self-Scoring Matrix, Work Sample Cover Sheet, Price Submission, List of Fill-In Clauses and Provisions to Complete, and PIEE submission instructions. These materials were not included in the solicitation package available to the offeror. Will the Government provide RFP Attachment I and all required forms and instructions?

The NGAME self-score matrix and Price submission list has been uploaded to sam.gov. I am working on an amendment now to update some of the wording in Section L&M which includes removing the PIEE submission wording and Work Sample Cover Sheet. You may have your own coversheet for each work sample, we don’t have anything specific for that. I will have the other attachments completed and uploaded by EOB Monday 5 August and will upload them to sam.gov.

3. Combined Sections L and M requires a current CMMC Level 2 status in the SPRS as of the proposal due date. Please confirm whether a Level 2 assessment conducted by a Certified Third-Party Assessment Organization (C3PAO) must be completed by the proposal due date, or whether a current CMMC Level 2 self-assessment satisfies the proposal eligibility requirement.

Self Assessment is sufficient- if the score is below 110- you must submit a Plan of Action for obtain the required score.

4. For Categories 1 and 2, when qualifying work was performed by an integrated team that included the offeror, original equipment manufacturers, subcontractors, and other contributors, what documentation does the Government consider sufficient to demonstrate the offeror’s specific role, responsibilities, and contribution toward successful contract performance and the resulting deliverables?

You can provide the government contract number under which the work was completed and a snip of the SOW/PWS etc showing what work was completed and invoices etc submitted for that work. The amounts can be redacted.

5. Section L requires evidence of prior work to be submitted “in the original format as it was originally delivered.” It also requires Volume II to be submitted as one combined PDF file and requests an electronic Microsoft Word copy of the technical proposal. Please confirm whether both a combined PDF and separate Word document are required for the technical proposal volume.

A combined PDF is sufficient.

6. [Redacted] submitted a proposal as a Prime contractor with a number of subcontractors. We are currently creating a proposal for the solicitation, as a Prime; one of subcontractors wants to also submit a proposal as a Prime, while keeping his status with us as a subcontractor. Is this allowed under the contracting mechanism you have in place?

A subcontractor under one teaming agreement may propose as a Prime contractor. If there’s not an “official” teaming agreement, same rules apply. The subcontractor is able to submit their own independent proposal. The Prime proposing must have an approved DD2345 with their company name. They cannot use one for another company.

7. Question: Each Work example is a cover page (1), plus content Pages (2), no limit on artifacts. Is it safe to assume that the artifacts are limited so that that total page count does not exceed 30 pages?

Volume II page limit is 30 pages. The Work Sample Cover Sheet, Self Scoring Matrix, and anything like a table of contents or acronyms page are not included in the page count. There’s no limit on artifacts. We don’t need a bunch of “fluff”, just send us proof via artifacts that you are capable of performing what you are giving yourself credit for on the self-score matrix.

8. The work was not for the US government, but for very regulated and safety critical industries e.g., oil and Gas. Can we use these examples of Industrial Materials Handling Equipment as suitably qualified Work Examples, or will they just get thrown out? (we fully understand that the relevancy and substantiation is our responsibility) Work samples are required to be from work performed as a Prime or subcontractor on another US Government contract. Any examples submitted outside of that will not be reviewed for the NGAME requirement.

9. Work Examples: Qualified expertise. Is it acceptable for an company employee to have relevant experience from a previous company where he was responsible and accountable for the costing, design, prototyping, manufacture, and testing of Industrial Material Handling Equipment?

No, the experience and qualifications must follow the company, not an employee.