RFP_Attch_1_FACTS.pdf

RFP FA8526-12-R-30668

ATTACHMENT #1

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Present/Past Performance “FACTS Sheet”

(TO BE COMPLETED BY OFFEROR)

A. Complete a separate FACTS Sheet for each relevant contract, no more than both sides of four (4) 8

1/2 x 11 inch pages. See Clause L-900 para (D)(2) of this RFP for detailed instructions and limits on number and recency of contracts. Provide frank, concise comments regarding present/past performance on the program identified in C. below.

B. (1) Name (Company/Division), (2) Address: (3) CAGE Code

C. PROGRAM TITLE and CONTRACT NUMBER:

D. NAME OF CONTRACTING ACTIVITY OR CUSTOMER:

E. CONTRACT TYPE(S) – PLEASE LIST ALL THAT APPLY (firm fixed price, time & materials, etc.)

F. CONTRACT $_____ VALUE: (If you performed work as a subcontractor, identify your contract $ value and the PRIME’s contract $ value, if known.)

1. Original contract $ value and current $ value:

2. Estimated value at completion and primary causes of changes:

3. If Award Fee Contract, what percentages of the fee have been awarded in each of last

5 years?

G. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF EFFORT AS: PRIME SUBCONTRACTOR

1. As a part of this narrative description, highlight portions considered most relevant to the current acquisition; addressing how and to what extent the proposed effort relates to the program identified in C. above. To supplement the data provided in response to this paragraph, complete the following regarding relevancy of the effort identified in paragraph B to the proposed effort.

Category Proposed Effort Fill-in for the Effort Identified in para. C above (Offeror completes)

1. Nature of Business Area(s) Involved

Development, production, repair, services similar in scope and magnitude of effort and complexities that will be required

2. Required Levels of Technology

Electrical systems, integrated electronic controls, hydraulic systems, tight tolerance machining, specially adapted test tooling supporting structural testing.

3. Materials and Production Processes

Machining, welding and heat treat (as applicable) low carbon common and structural steels, AISI 300 series stainless steels and 17-4PH steels

4. Performance Location Facility 1: address/prototype Facility 2: production

5. Contract Type(s) FFP

6. Quantities produced, # repaired or other quantitative data

11 ea basic year, plus option quantity (See Schedule B)

7. Program Similarity

a. Electrical Power

b. Electronic circuit cards

c. Functional Performance Testing of Completed Item

d. Machining

e. Structural Load Testing

e. Welding

f. Manufacturing

g. Hydraulics

Production, installation, test on 208V-440V, 50-400 HZ, 3 phase power and 240V-120V, 50-60HZ, 1 phase power

Efforts that employed commercial-off-the-shelf circuit cards exclusively must identify as such. Offeror should cite circuit card tests by type: continuity tests, isolation tests, high-potential tests and power-on tests

Straight line towing, braking and towing maneuvering tests on pavement at speeds of up to 20 mph. Testing also includes tests of manual and electro-hydraulic systems including integrated electronic control system. NOTE: Tow testing requires reasonably level (3% grade max) paved surface (asphalt, concrete or combination) approximately 460 x 90 ft or variation thereon that supports testing IAW ATP 2230 in the item TDP. Offeror should provide a top level breakdown of past test requirements for each item submitted as comparable in whole or in part.

Machined feature tolerances as tight as +.0003/-.0025 inch

Controlled application of external loads in the 25,000 to 40,000 lbs range on the completed item and involved one or more other load conditions at lesser loads.

NOTE: Structural testing requires an overhead clearance of not less than (NLT) 198 inches (plus additional clearance for load test tooling including any portion of the dummy engine above top of cradle, overhead cranes, etc.) for external application of 40,000 lb load to the test item (including dead weight of dummy engine and cradle). Offeror should state loads employed in past efforts and provide a brief description of test condition(s).

Material in the .090 – 2.00 inch stock/feature thickness range included low carbon common and structural steels, AISI 300 series stainless steels and 17-4PH steels End items measure a nominal 118 inches

(W) x 414 inches (tow bar at tow height) and an overall extended height of 148 inches (or larger with tooling for testing)

End item hydraulic system utilizing 3000

(or greater) psig rated servo-hydraulic components and both solid and flex-line plumbing.

8. Program Phase

9. Other

2. This paragraph shall also include details to support your record for on time delivery, technical quality and cost control for this effort identified in paragraph C. above.

4. If you are small business, indicate your compliance with FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns, by completing the following. That is, when subcontracting possibilities existed on this effort, did you award subcontracts to small business concerns, veteran-owned small business concerns, service-disabled veteran-owned small business concerns, HUBZone small business concerns, small disadvantaged business concerns, and women-owned small business concerns to the fullest extent consistent with efficient contract performance? If FAR 52.219-8 was NOT included in this effort, whenever subcontracting possibilities existed in the performance of this effort, address whether or not it was your policy to utilize small business concerns, veteran-owned small business concerns, service-disabled veteran-owned small business concerns, HUBZone small business concerns, small disadvantaged business concerns, and women-owned small business concerns to the fullest extent consistent with efficient contract performance.

Utilization of Small Business Concerns Small Business No subcontracting possibilities In compliance Not in compliance (address why)

H. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE (POP): (If you performed work as a subcontractor, identify your POP, and the PRIME’s POP, if known)

1. Original schedule and current schedule:

2. Estimate at completion:

3. How many times changed and primary causes of changes:

I. PRIMARY POINTS OF CONTACT: (The offeror is responsible for exerting its best efforts to ensure that current information is provided for all individuals.)

Name and Office Symbol Phone Number FAX Number

1. Procuring Contracting Officer DSN & Comm DSN & Comm

2. Program Manager DSN & Comm DSN & Comm

3. Administrative Contracting Officer DSN & Comm DSN & Comm

4. Other (Please Specify) DSN & Comm DSN & Comm

J. If the offeror is a newly formed entity who either has no prior contracts or does not possess relevant corporate past performance, but does have key personnel with relevant past performance while employed by another company, specify by name such key individual(s) who will participate in the proposed effort under this acquisition who also participated in the program identified in C. above, and indicate their contract role. Describe how participation of these key personnel contributed to the success of the previous effort and how this indicates probability of success on the proposed effort.

K. Use this space to address any aspect about this program considered unique. Describe quality awards or certifications that indicate the offeror possesses a high-quality process for developing and producing the product/service required.

L. Summarize contract issues relative to the number and severity of quality deficiencies recorded/contract discrepancy reports issued, cure notices, show cause letters, termination for default or cause, disputes, claims, latent defects; and, corrective actions taken for the contract listed in paragraph C. above.

M. Additionally, for those efforts where you are cognizant of unfavorable and/or marginal past performance ratings/reports previously assessed by customers or clients, but feel that significant progress has been made but not yet credited or formally documented, provide the program name, contract number, customer location and a narrative explaining "fixes" made to date, or any other information regarding the unfavorable/marginal assessment. It is not presumed that performance has been perfect. Rather, the proposal should contain evidence of your ability to isolate the root causes of problems and should describe programs or actions taken to resolve those causes.

Demonstrated corrective actions (not just planned or promised), and the overall work record will be considered. Problems not addressed, but found by the Government during the evaluation of the information in this volume, will be assumed to still exist. Note: In the case of Contractor Performance Assessment Report System (CPARS), if your input has already been provided and the rationale/ circumstances have not changed, DO NOT repeat them here.

N. Was this contract effort (as identified in paragraph C. above) submitted as a past performance source of data for a previous WR-ALC procurement. Yes No . If yes, identify the buyer and/or contracting officer, their phone number and office symbol and solicitation number of the procurement for which this effort was submitted.

PLEASE NOTE: The Government is not bound by the offeror's opinion of relevancy. The Government will perform an independent assessment of relevancy of the data provided or obtained.

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY