RFP_Atch_2-RFP_Relevancy_Table.doc
DOC document 78 KB Posted
- Attached to
- C-5 Engineering Requirements Review Support Program Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA8525-16-R-0002
About this file
RFP Relevancy Table
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 28
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFP # FA8525-16-R-0002
ATTACHMENT 2
RELEVANCY TABLE
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Present/Past Performance “RELEVANCY TABLE”
(TO BE COMPLETED BY OFFEROR, JOINT VENTURE MEMBER, AND CRITICAL SUBCONTRACTOR, FOR EACH EFFORT IDENTIFIED IN THE PPI TOOL)
RELEVANCY TABLE
(Complete with each effort identified for evaluation in the PPI Tool) Request the offeror/joint venture member/critical subcontractor complete a separate Relevancy Table for each effort identified for evaluation in the PPI Tool. This table, in addition o th the information provided by the offeror in the PPI Tool, will assist the PCO in evaluating the relevancy of the proposed effort to the instant requirement. Offeror/joint venture member/critical subcontractor shall only complete column three. Offeror’s/joint venture member’s/critical subcontractor’s answers are applicable only to the effort identified inthe PPI Tool, not the offeror’s/joint venture member’s/critical subcontractor’s proposed solutions to the instant effort. Please be as specific as possible with the fill-in information provided.
CONTRACTOR:
CAGE CODE:
CONTRACT NUMBER:
PROGRAM TITLE:
CONTR AGENCY/CUSTOMER:
| Category |
| Fill-in for the Proposed Effort (GOVT has completed this column) |
(DO NOT CHANGE)
Fill-in for the Effort Identified in para. B Above (Offeror/Joint Venture Member/Critical Subcontarctor completes) The effort required:
| 1. Nature of Business Area(s) Involved |
| CASS, CAMP or MSG-3 derived maintenance program support |
| Yes or No |
| FMECA Analysis |
| Yes or No |
Sytems Safety Analysis
Yes or No
| C&A Compliance Support |
| Yes or No |
| Maint./Supply Data Support |
| Yes or No |
| T.O./Tech Data Development |
| Yes or No |
| SVWC Development |
| Yes or No |
| Other (specify) |
| Yes or No |
| 1B. Nature of Business Area(s) Marketplace |
| Commercial |
| Yes or No |
| Government |
| Yes or No |
| 3. Type of System Technology |
| Large Transport Aircraft (identify) |
| Yes or No |
| Other Aircraft (identify) |
| Yes or No |
| Other System (identify) |
| Yes or No |
| 4. Processes Implemented |
| MSG-3 |
| Yes or No |
| RCM |
| Yes or No |
| HVM |
| Yes or No |
| Other (list type) |
| Yes or No |
4. Performance Location
Specify Location:
5. Contract Type(s)
Specify Type:
6. Extent of subcontractor involvement
Yes or No
If yes, state nature of involvement:
| 7. Certifications, Qualifications, Industry Memberships |
| List the items pertaining to your company and personnel |
| ABET accredited engineer or EIT or PE |
| Yes or No |
| IAM-3/IAT-3 CISSP |
| Yes or No |
| A4A Membership |
| Yes or No |
| Other (list type) |
| Yes or No |
| 8. Program Complexity |
| Standard Visual Workcard (SVWC) development |
| Yes or No |
| Tech data development in accordance with MIL-STD-38784 |
| Yes or No |
| Techsight/X, and Serna packages |
| Yes or No |
| Engineering analysis of maintenance tasks and task intervals |
| Yes or No |
| Support and sustainment of IDE software application |
| Yes or No |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .