Contractor_Questions.docx

DOCX document 19 KB Posted

Attached to
C-5 Engineering Requirements Review Support Program Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA8525-16-R-0002
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Lifecycle Management Center Robins Air Force Base

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to C-5 Engineering Requirements Review Support Program, newest first.
File Type Posted
16-92801_PWS_Final_1_Dec_2015.pdf PDF
Contractor_Questions_Update_2.docx DOCX document
FA852516R0002_______0002.pdf PDF
ppi_tool.accdb —
Contractor_Questions.docx DOCX document
FA852516R0002_______0001.pdf PDF
RFP_Atch_13-DD_Form_1423_CDRL_A005 1 .pdf PDF
RFP_Atch_11-DD_Form_1423-CDRL_A003 1 .pdf PDF
RFP_Atch_18-DD_Form_1423_CDRL_C003 1 .pdf PDF
RFP_Atch_10-DD_Form_1423_CDRL_A002 1 .pdf PDF
RFP_Atch_3-Consent_Form.doc DOC document
RFP_Atch_9-DD_Form_1423_CDRL_A001 1 .pdf PDF
RFP_Atch_12-DD_Form_1423_CDRL_A004 1 .pdf PDF
RFP_Atch_7-PPI_for_Offerors.docx DOCX document
RFP_Atch_8_-_Price_Model_11-03-15.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
RFP_Atch_5-Transmittal_Letter.doc DOC document
FA852516R0002_FBO.pdf PDF
RFP_Atch_1-PWS 1 .pdf PDF
Wage_Determination.pdf PDF
RFP_Atch_15-DD_Form_1423_CDRL_A007 1 .pdf PDF
RFP_Atch_19-DD_Form_1423_CDRL_C004 1 .pdf PDF
RFP_Atch_2-RFP_Relevancy_Table.doc DOC document
RFP_Atch_16-DD_Form_1423_CDRL_C001 1 .pdf PDF
RFP_Atch_14-DD_Form_1423_CDRL_A006 1 .pdf PDF
RFP_Atch_20-DD_Form_1423_CDRL_C005 1 .pdf PDF
RFP_Atch_6-Authorization_Letter.doc DOC document
RFP_Atch_4-PP_Questionnaire.doc DOC document
RFP_Atch_17-DD_Form_1423_CDRL_C002 1 .pdf PDF
Show all 28

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

1. Can you provide the Historical CME data?

· No. The requirement has changed significantly enough that there is not an adequate comparison between this and previous efforts.

2. As both Travel (CLIN 0009) and Contractor Furnished Parts/Materials (CLIN 0008) are Cost Reimbursable – No Fee CLINS, will the Government provide plug numbers for each to use in proposal preparation?

· No the Government will not provide plug numbers as these CLINs will not be included in the Total Evaluated Price (TEP). Contractor should propose what will be needed for CLINs. See Attachment 8.

3. The due date stated is Saturday, December 5, 2015. Please confirm.

· FA8525-16-R-0002 is extended to 15 Dec 2015.

4. Can you provide the productive hours to utilize for pricing purposes?

· No, it is up to the contractor to provide the appropriate number of hours for each labor category.

5. How are we to include subcontractor pricing in the proposal – should it be reflected in the fully burdened rates provided by the Prime or should it be included in the Material Subcontracts (items and/or services) CLINs?

· Yes, it should be reflected in the fully burdened rates.

6. As the effort will be awarded under an IDIQ arrangement, please confirm how the 50% small business performance (52.219-14) will be assessed—at an aggregate for all orders or on each task order?

· It will be at an aggregate for the total contract effort.

7. Does the 12 point font requirements include graphics, or can text in and around graphics be smaller?

· Font in and around graphics may be no smaller than 8 pts.

8. Please clarify if the past performance requirement requires 3 past performance exemplars each from the offeror and any critical subcontractors, or is the max for each team 3?

· 3 for each prime and 3 for each critical subcontractor

9. Does the customer plan to transition to the new Risk Management Framework during the POP?

· TBD, still researching.

10. Of the five applications listed on PWS page 18 Table 1, are each registered separately in EITDR with independent C&A packages or are they combined under one C&A package?

· TBD, still researching.

11. What are the Approval To Operate (ATO) expiration dates for each of the application packages?

12. For clarification, is the Offeror responsible for entering a critical subcontractor’s past performance into the PPI tool, or can the subcontractor? Attachment 7 includes screen shots that lead us to believe the subcontractor can enter its information, but Section L is a little unclear.

13. Attachment 7 says the PPI tool is to be accessed through FBO and the solicitation posting but we are unable to locate any such link. Please clarify how the tool is to be accessed.

14. Please clarify that the reference to a PWS Section 4.2.8.3.7 under 4.2.8 is intended to read 4.2.8.2.7

· It should read 4.2.8.2.7, PWS will be updated to reflect this

15. Attachment 8 CLINs X001 list PWS Paragraph 4.2.8.4 – this paragraph does not appear in the PWS. Please explain what work this is in reference to or if it is not applicable?

· Attachment will be updated

16. PWS Tasks 4.2.3, 4.2.9, 4.3.1, 4.3.2 and 4.3.3 are not included in any of the CLINS in Attachment 8. Where should the cost of these tasks be included?

· TBD, still researching.

17. 4.2.7.1, what documentation is required for proof of ABET accredited degrees? Can a resume be used that lists the engineering school that an engineer graduated from or do you need to include degrees for all the engineers that will ERR? Will the documentation count against the tech proposal page count?

· Yes a resume is sufficient. Yes, it will count against the page count.

18. Is the anticipated award time frame available?

· The Government is working towards a 31 March 2016 award date.

19. Will the incumbent contract be extended past January? If so, to when?

· Yes, for two months.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .