Attachment_1_FACTS_Sheet_Revised.docx

REVISED FACTS SHEET

RFP FA8523-11-R-23465

ATTACHMENT 1

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Present/Past Performance “FACTS Sheet” (TO BE COMPLETED BY OFFEROR, JOINT VENTURE PARTNER, AND IF APPLICABLE, CRITICAL SUBCONTRACTOR)

Complete a separate FACTS Sheet for each relevant contract. See Clause L-900, paragraph D of this RFP for detailed instructions and limits on number and recency of contracts. Provide frank, concise comments regarding present/past performance on the program identified in B. below.

A. OFFEROR: (Including: (1) Name (Company/Division), (2) Address: (3) CAGE Code)

B. PROGRAM TITLE and CONTRACT NUMBER:

C. NAME OF CONTRACTING ACTIVITY OR CUSTOMER:

D. CONTRACT TYPE(S) – PLEASE LIST ALL THAT APPLY (firm fixed price, time & materials, etc.)

E. CONTRACT $ VALUE: (If you performed work as a subcontractor, identify your contract $ value and the PRIME’s contract $ value, if known.)

1. Original contract $ value and current $ value:

2. Estimated value at completion and primary causes of changes:

3. If Award Fee Contract, what percentages of the fee have been awarded in each of last 3 years?:

F. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF EFFORT AS: _____ PRIME _____ SUBCONTRACTOR

1. As a part of this narrative description, highlight portions considered most relevant to the current acquisition; addressing how and to what extent the proposed effort relates to the program identified in B. above. To supplement the data provided in response to this paragraph, complete the following regarding relevancy of the effort identified in paragraph B to the proposed effort. This is limited to two pages beyond the page limitation of the FACTS sheet information.

1. Nature of Business Area(s) Involved Group #1:

The above paragraph is in harmony with a disciplined systems engineering process and a configuration management program, which shall be followed to support and meet JSSMO’s engineering requirements. Air Force databases and their vital data must be used to drive engineering processes, controls, and decisions.

2. Nature of Business Area(s) Involved Group #2:

8. Program Complexity:

a. Requires Group #1 business areas provided on-site support while adjusting or tailoring to support and meet customer’s requirements and/or processes.

b. Requires Group #2 business areas provided on-site support while adjusting or tailoring to support and meet customer’s requirements and/or processes.

c. Demonstrates experience using Government systems to support Group #1 & #2 business areas such as CCaR, System Metric and Requirements Tool (SMART), the Government-Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP), IHS 4D Online Bill of Materials (BOM), Q-Star, DO43 system, DO35 system, and other systems identified within the PWS.

2. This paragraph shall also include details to support your record for on time delivery, technical quality and cost control for this effort identified in paragraph B. above.

3. If you are small business, or, if you are a large business and a Small Business Subcontracting Plan per FAR 52.219-9 was NOT required by this effort, indicate your compliance with FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns. Even if FAR 52.219-8 was NOT included in this effort, when subcontracting possibilities existed, did you award subcontracts to small business concerns, veteran-owned small business concerns, service-disabled veteran-owned small business concerns, HUBZone small business concerns, small disadvantaged business concerns, and women-owned small business concerns to the fullest extent consistent with efficient contract performance?

No subcontracting possibilities

In compliance

Not in compliance (address why)

G. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: (If you performed work as a subcontractor, identify your POP, and the PRIME’s POP, if known)

1. Original schedule and current schedule:

2. Estimate @ completion:

3. How many times changed and primary causes of changes:

H. PRIMARY POINTS OF CONTACT: (The offeror is responsible for exerting its best efforts to ensure that current information is provided for all individuals.)

I. If the offeror, joint venture partner, or critical subcontractor (if applicable) is a newly formed entity who either has no prior contracts or does not possess relevant corporate past performance, but does have key personnel with relevant past performance while employed by another company, specify by name such key individual(s) who will participate in the proposed effort under this acquisition who also participated in the program identified in B. above, and indicate their contract role. As stated in clause L-900, paragraph D(1) of the subject RFP, any such key personnel submitted on a FACTS sheet shall be defined as those with the responsibility for staffing and retention for the company performing the work in any previous roles referenced. Describe how participation of these key personnel contributed to the success of the previous effort and how this indicates probability of success on the proposed effort.

J. Use this space to address any aspect about this program considered unique. Describe quality awards or certifications that indicate the offeror possesses a high-quality process for developing and producing the product/service required.

K. Summarize contract issues relative to the number and severity of quality deficiencies recorded/contract discrepancy reports issued, cure notices, show cause letters, termination for default or cause, disputes, claims, latent defects; and, corrective actions taken for the contract listed in paragraph B. above.

L. Additionally, for those efforts where the offeror is cognizant of unfavorable and/or marginal past performance ratings/reports previously assessed by customers or clients, but feel that significant progress has been made but not yet credited or formally documented, provide the program name, contract number, customer location and a narrative explaining "fixes" made to date, or any other information regarding the unfavorable/marginal assessment. This narrative portion is limited to one (1) additional page beyond the FACTS sheet required page limitation. It is not presumed that the offeror's performance has been perfect. Rather, the proposal should contain evidence of the offeror's ability to isolate the root causes of problems and should describe programs or actions taken to resolve those causes. Demonstrated corrective actions (not just planned or promised), and the overall work record will be considered. Problems not addressed by the offeror, but found by the Government during the evaluation of the information in this volume, will be assumed to still exist. Note: In the case of Contractor Performance Assessment Report System (CPARS), if your input has already been provided and the rationale/ circumstances have not changed, DO NOT repeat them here.

M. Was this contract effort (as identified in paragraph B. above) submitted as a past performance source of data for a previous WR-ALC procurement. Yes No . If yes, identify the buyer and/or contracting officer, their phone number and office symbol and solicitation number of the procurement for which this effort was submitted.

PLEASE NOTE: The Government is not bound by the offeror's opinion of relevancy. The Government will perform an independent assessment of relevancy of the data provided or obtained.

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY