SOF-PR_ _Rotary_Program_Industry_Day_Briefing_13_Jun_2016V1.pptx

Industry Day SOF/PR & Rotary Program Ron Trawick Program Manager

AFLCMC/WIUWB

13 Jun 2016

Special Operations Forces/Personnel Recovery Division

Industry Day Agenda Day 1 0800 – Introductions/Safety Briefing – Ron Trawick

– Opening Remarks – Mr. Ronnie Carter

– Briefing/Discussions – Steve Albritton, Ron Trawick, and Jill Thornton 0930 – Break 0945 – Continue Discussions 1130 – Lunch 1230 – One-on-one Question & Answer Sessions 1600 – End of day

Industry Day Agenda Day 2 0800 – One-on-one Question and Answer Sessions 1130 – Lunch 1230 – One-on-one Question and Answer Sessions 1600 – End of Industry Day

SOF/PR & Rotary Division MISSION: One stop shop for cradle-to-grave weapon system management for all Special Operations Forces and Personnel Recovery (SOF/PR) aircraft and USAF helicopters.

MOTTO: Supporting Tonight’s Fight…Today!

Directs development, testing, and fielding of new systems to meet operational requirements.

Provided depot maintenance, modification, repair, engineering services, and contracting support for all fielded systems.

SOF/PR & Rotary Platforms Fixed Wing

AC-130U/W/J

EC-130J

HC-130N/P/J

MC-130H/P/J

Rotary Wing

HH-60G

TH-1H

UH-1N

SOF/PR Supports multiple Lead Commands – ACC, AETC, AFGSC, AFMC, AFRC, AFSOC, ANG, PACAF, & USAFE

Proposed IDIQ Contract Contract Type – Multiple Award Contract Small Business Competitive Approximate ceiling - $525M

Term – One (1) year Basic Ordering Period with Four (4) Optional Ordering Periods Five (5) Years for Performance

Primary NAICS 336411 – Manufacturing or Assembling Complete Aircraft, Developing Prototypes, Aircraft Conversions (Major Mods), and Complete Aircraft Overhaul

Secondary NAICS 541330 – Engineering Services

Contract Scope Engineering Studies, Analysis and Testing Manufacturing/Fabrication Non-Recurring Engineering Modification Integration Parts Provisioning Airworthiness Documentation Development Technical Data Development Trial and Kit Proof Installations Aircraft Test Support Full-Rate Kit Production Installation of Aircraft Modification kits Contractor Logistics Support

Expectations for Potential Contractors Must be a Small Business

Ability to complete 51% of the work Defined at Delivery/Task Order Level

Possess Helicopter (HH-60G, UH-1N, TH-1H) and C-130 aircraft experience

Ability to team with other companies, large and small to meet the requirements of the contract

Discussion Questions

Are there any questions on the tasks as written in the PWS?

Being an IDIQ contract – In your opinion, would your company be able to propose the proper skill sets and costs structure across 5-years, given the wide diversity the Government is seeking?

In your opinion, does your small business have the infrastructure, to include facilities and manpower, to successfully execute requirements defined in the PWS across both Fixed Wing and Rotary platforms simultaneously?

In your opinion, will small business be able to assemble partners to enable the lead/prime contractor to eliminate any deficiency within the lead/prime company to allow successful execution of tasks? What do you see as the limitations to adding partners?

Given the requirement for the prime contractor to perform 51% of the effort, tracked at each order level, in your opinion will small business be successful in accomplishing this while delivering IAW each order?

In your opinion, should a prime business establish a Program Office in close proximity to RAFB in order to effectively execute the contract? Can you propose this as an FFP CLIN?

The estimated ceiling value is ~$525M, is maintaining small business status a concern to your company?

If the SPO expanded the PWS to include additional organizations or other agencies beyond WIU, would that impact your ability to propose, either positively or negatively?

In your opinion, how would small business structure themselves to rapidly expand either within or through contractual arrangements to successfully propose on multiple orders across different program offices or even other services?

If the SPO established decentralized ordering, effectively establishing multiple Government Program Offices, how would this affect your ability to effectively propose?

SOF/PR & Rotary Program

Questions image3.jpeg image4.png image5.jpeg image6.jpeg image7.jpeg image8.jpeg image9.jpeg image10.jpeg image11.jpeg image12.jpeg image13.jpeg image14.jpeg image1.png image2.jpeg