Attachment_9___Past_Performance_Relevancy_Baseline.docx
DOCX document 24 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Pre-Solicitation: Full and Open CLS Sustainment services for the AEWS AN/FPS-117 Radar System
- Solicitation number
- FA8217-25-AEWS_Open_CLS
About this file
The document is an Attachment 9 Past Performance Relevancy Baseline that provides a detailed scoring matrix for evaluating contractor past performance across three key categories: Magnitude and Contract Type, Complexity, and Similarity of Scope. The baseline establishes specific criteria for determining the relevance of a contractor's previous work, with clear distinctions between relevant and non-relevant performance.
The evaluation matrix focuses on three primary assessment areas: (1) Total contract value (with a $15M threshold), (2) Performance complexity (including geographical locations and radar system expertise), and (3) Scope similarity (including service type, arctic location experience, and personnel qualifications). Contractors will be scored on factors such as multi-location performance, PESA/AESA radar system experience, arctic service provision, and minimum performance period (three years or more). This baseline will likely be used in the upcoming solicitation for Contractor Logistics Support (CLS) services for the AN/FPS-117 Long Range Radar System to objectively evaluate potential contractors' past performance credentials.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment_11___Awardable Task Order PWS.pdf | ||
| Attachment_3___Section_L_Instructions_Conditions_and_Notices_to_Bidders.pdf | ||
| Attachment_10___Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_4___Section_M_Evaluation_Factors_for_Award.pdf | ||
| Attachment_8___Past_Performance_Information_Sheet.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_7___Preaward_Survey_of_Prospective_Contractors.pdf | ||
| Solicitation - FA821725RB004.pdf | ||
| Pre-RFP Questions.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| PWS Attachments.zip | ZIP file | |
| Attachment 1_Basic Contract PWS.pdf | ||
| Attachment_6___Pricing_Matrix__Worksheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment_5___Cross_Reference_Matrix.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment_2___CDRLs.pdf |
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 9 Past Performance Relevancy Baseline
Section L: Relevancy Baseline
| Section L4.3 – 4.3.3 and Table L.4 |
| Relevant |
| Not Relevant |
Category 1: Magnitude and Contract Type
| Total Task Order/Contract Value |
| equal to or greater than $15M |
| less than $15M |
Category 2: Complexity
| Performance |
| · Performance at multiple geographical locations concurrently. |
· Performance on PESA/AESA Radars and sub-systems
· Performance at only a single geographical location at any discreet period of time
· Performance on Non PESA/AESA Radar and sub-systems
Category 3: Similarity of the Scope
| Type of Service |
| · Similarity of products developed and service/support for remote arctic locations |
· Personnel with knowledge, skills and ability referenced in PWS sections 2.7 and 3.1
· Experience outside of providing direct development, service or support in arctic locations
· Experience not relevant to PWS sections 2.7 and 3.1
| Performance Period |
| · A minimum of three-years of performance is complete. |
| · Less than three-years or no performance is complete |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .