ATTACHMENT_L-5_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf

SECTION L ATTACHMENT 5

PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor: ________________________________________________________________________

B. Contractor Cage Code: _________________________________

C. Contract number: ______________________________________

D. Contract type: ______________________________

E. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____

F. Period of performance: _________________________________________________________

G. Initial contract cost: $____________________________

H. Current/final contract cost: $_______________________________

I. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:

J. Description of service provided:

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or agency name: __________________________________________________________

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable): __________________________________________

DRAFT

C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other

Commands:

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Evaluator's name: __________________________________________________________________

B. Evaluator's title: ___________________________________________________________________

C. Evaluator's phone/fax number: ________________________________________________________

Length of time (number of years/months) evaluator worked on subject contract: ____________________

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

CODE PERFORMANCE RATING

A ACCEPTABLE - Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

U UNACCEPTABLE - Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the Offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, or information was not available. Do not know.

Technical Performance A U N/A

T1 How did the contractor meet the technical requirements of the specification?

T2 How was the quality of technical system operations & maintenance testing and certification efforts?

T3 How was the quality/integrity of technical data/report preparation efforts?

T4 How adequate/effective was the System Engineering Process?

T5 How did the contractor implement current quality processes, standard practices for computer hardware design, operation, maintenance, upgrades and configuration control?

T6 How did the contractor implement current standard practices for computer software design, operation, maintenance, upgrades and configuration control?

T7 How adequate/effective were the contractor’s environmental safety procedures?

Program Management A U N/A

P1. How effective was overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage, control and deliver on-time)?

P2. How reasonable and cooperative was the contractor when dealing with program staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)?

P3. How timely and effectively did the contractor resolve contract problems without extensive customer guidance?

P4. How well did the contractor understand/comply with customer objectives and technical requirements?

P5. How successfully did the contractor respond to emergency and/or surge situations?

P6. How did the contractor manage quality/effectiveness of sub-contracted efforts?

P7. How effective was the contractor’s material management (including

Government Furnished Property or Material)?

P8. Of what benefit to the customer were contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors?

P9. To what degree did the contractor implement responsive/flexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support?

Transition/phase-in A U N/A

T1. How smoothly did the contractor transition resources and personnel?

T2. How effective was the contractor in maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts?

Employee Retention/Attraction A U N/A

E1. How effectively was the contractor able to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort?

E2. How effectively was the contractor able to retain a qualified workforce on this effort?

Small and Small Disadvantaged Business Participation A U N/A

S1. To what degree was the contractor able to meet or exceed small business and small disadvantaged business goals set forth in the approved subcontracting plan?

S2. How effectively did the contractor manage small business participation to meet technical performance?

Cost Performance A U N/A

C1 How accurately did the contractor forecast contract costs?

C2 How well did the contractor meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs?

C3 How successfully did the contractor alert the Government of unforeseen costs before they occurred?

C4 How sufficient and timely was the contractor’s cost reporting?

2. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated U (Unacceptable) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).

3. Government Contracts Only: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes___ Default___ Convenience___ Pending Terminations___

No ___

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules).

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

Evaluator’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

Mailing Address: Chad Galioto, 6072 Fir Ave, Hill AFB, UT 84056

E-Mail to: Chad.galioto@us.af.mil and casey.hodson@us.af.mil mailto:Chad.galioto@us.af.mil mailto:casey.hodson@us.af.mil