ATTACHMENT_3_HUD_SOO.pdf

Attachment 3

FA821114R0001

T-38C AVIONICS COMPONENT

INTEGRATION (AvCI)

STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES (SOO)

Heads-Up Display (HUD)

System Replacement & Integration

T-38 Systems Program Office (SPO)

AFLCMC/WLDMA

Hill AFB UT 84056

Date 23 October 2014

Page ii of iv

Table of Contents 1 Overview

1.1 Purpose

1.2 Background

2 Objectives

2.1 Development Concept

2.2 Notional Development Schedule

2.3 Key Performance Parameters

3 Scope of Work

3.1 Administration

3.2 Program Management

3.3 Data Rights

3.4 Quality Assurance

3.5 Corrosion Prevention and Management

3.6 Configuration Management

3.7 Risk Management

3.8 Software Management

4 Engineering Change Proposal

4.1 ECP Content

5 Test and Test Support Activities

5.1 System Test and Integration

5.2 Primary Flight Reference Endorsement

5.3 Developmental Test (DT) and Force Development Evaluation (FDE)

6 Certifications and Approvals

6.1 Authority to Test and Authority to Operate

6.2 Platform Information Assurance

6.3 Airworthiness

6.4 CNS-ATM

7 Formalize Change after Successful Test

Page iii of iv

7.1 Finalize configuration and Release Documents

8 Hardware and Production and Delivery

8.1 A Kits - Aircraft Modification Kit

8.2 B Kits – System LRUs

8.3 Production Schedule

8.4 Packaging

8.5 Contract Field Team

9 Diminishing Manufacturing and Material Shortages (DMSMS)

9.1 DMSMS Management

9.2 DMSMS Reporting

9.3 DMSMS Mitigation

10 Government Furnished Equipment

10.1 Systems Integration Lab (SIL)

11 Associate Contractor Agreement

12 Conditions and Assumptions

13 Compliance Directives and Reference Documents

13.1 T-38C Performance Requirements

13.2 Department of Defense Instructions

13.3 Air Force Instructions & Directives

13.4 Air Force Manuals & Pamphlets

13.5 Military Standards and Specifications

13.6 Military Handbooks

13.7 Civilian Aviation Directives

14 Deliverables:

15 Technical Data Package (TDP)

Page iv of iv

Table of Tables Table 2-1 Heads-Up Display System Components

Table 2-2 Notional Development schedule

Table 6-1 Minimum Documents Required for ATT/ATO

Table 8-1 T-38C Aircraft locations

1 Overview

1.1 Purpose

This SOO provides the basis for a priced proposal to develop and integrate a replacement, overhaul or refurbishment solution for the T-38C Heads-Up Display (HUD) system. The requirement is to provide a single operational and fully integrated solution to ensure system supportability throughout the T-38C lifecycle currently projected to be the end of

2029. The solution shall include all drawings, technical data and Time Compliance

Technical Order (TCTO) information outlining installation requirements. Required documentation shall be based on the Offeror’s proposed solution and system change classification in accordance with MIL-HDBK-61.

1.2 Background

The current HUD system on the T-38C was designed approximately 20 years ago and is currently in use on 456 aircraft. Diminishing Manufacturing and Material Shortage

(DMSMS) reporting indicates that the current HUD system will be difficult to support beyond CY2017. The HUD system includes three Line Replaceable Units (LRUs), the Pilot

Display Unit (HUD-PDU), HUD Power Supply Unit (HUD-PSU), and Up Front Control Panel

(UFCP). The rate at which the parts are becoming obsolete has been accelerating dramatically in recent years, creating supportability issues for the T-38C aircraft and mission.

2 Objectives

2.1 Development Concept

The concept of development (replacement, overhaul or refurbishment) shall be Form-Fit-

Function Interface (F3I). To minimize impact to the T-38C mission, the Government requires, to the extent possible, an F3I replacement for all components developed.

Although F3I is one of the primary objectives, it is understood that some variance may be required. The intent is to negate any impact to cockpit configuration and minimize any impact to avionics system operation and aircrew workload. Variance in the equipment bay(s) may be necessary but should not exceed T-38C weight and balance limitations or standard engineering practices.

Installation of components into the aircraft will be the responsibility of the Government.

The Government desires that the modification is accomplished at the field level via Time

Compliance Technical Order (TCTO) to reduce aircraft downtime and programmed maintenance impact. Field Level TCTOs are limited to approximately 25 man-hours.

Proposals shall provide an estimate of the time required for equipment retrofit. If the estimate exceeds 25 man-hours, the contractor shall provide a recommended retrofit solution. The current components that comprise the “HUD System” are listed below in

Table 2-1.

Table 2-1 Heads-Up Display System Components

Part Number Description Supplier CAGE Unit(s)

Per Assembly

4452-1000-01 HEAD UP DISPLAY (HUD)

ELOP Electro Optical

Industries LTD

SC067 1

4477-1000-80 HUD POWER SUPPLY UNIT

ELOP Electro Optical

Industries LTD

SC067 1

4453-1000-00

UP-FRONT CONTROL PANEL

(UFCP)

ELOP Electro Optical

Industries LTD

SC067 2

2.2 Notional Development Schedule

Table 2-2 depicts a notional schedule. The contractor will use this schedule as a basic timeline for development of the Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) required in Section 4 and Material Fielding plan for this effort. It is understood by the Government that there will be deviations from what is depicted in Table 2-2 based on the Offeror’s proposed solution.

Table 2-2 Notional Development schedule

2.3 Key Performance Parameters

The HUD system (new development, overhauled or refurbished) shall meet or exceed the current system specifications. Refer to the following documents.

2.3.1 T-38C System Performance Specification, Revision H, dated 14 February 2011, (Attachment 2)

2.3.2 Drawings 71J267011_76301 (Sheet 1 – 4 and Drawing Change Notice)

2.3.3 Form-Fit-Function & Interface Specification, 71_267011a1, 71_267011b1

3 Scope of Work

3.1 Administration

3.1.1 The Contractor shall perform administrative functions, to include scheduling meetings, arranging facilities, providing status reports, documenting official decisions and actions assigned, and maintaining charter documents, records, and databases referenced within this document.

3.1.2 The Contractor shall appoint a primary Point of Contact (POC) for this contract. This individual shall be the primary representative and have the Contractor’s full authority to act on matters pertaining to the performance of the services under this contract.

3.1.3 To meet the requirements of this contract the contractor shall be required to develop and deliver information to the Government in accordance with the Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL). Where possible the contractor shall submit one CDRL to encompass the program requirements. (e.g. Configuration Management Plan should include the HUD, MDP, ADS-B, VHF Nav/Comm development and integration and overall T-38C avionics system management)

3.1.4 All documents sited in this PWS refer to the base document but shall include the latest revision. Document may be available on ASSIST or other Government document repository sites. (https://assist.dla.mil/online/start/index.cfm) (http://www.e-publishing.af.mil/) (http://www.e-publishing.af.mil/otherpublishingsites.asp)

3.2 Program Management

3.2.1 The Contractor shall develop and deliver an Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) (CDRL

A014)

3.2.2 The Contractor shall develop and maintain an Integrated Master Schedule (IMS). (CDRL

A001)

3.2.3 Kickoff Meeting: The Contractor shall host a kickoff meeting within 30 working days after receipt of order (ARO) and provide meeting minutes within five working days of meeting (CDRL A017)

3.2.4 The Contractor shall host Technical Interchange Meetings (TIM). TIMs will be conducted, at an expected frequency of two per year. Levels of participation will be based on the subject matter. Meeting minutes shall be provided within five working days of the conclusion of the meeting. (CDRL A017)

3.2.5 The Contractor shall host Program Management Reviews (PMR). PMRs shall be utilized to brief program status to Government Systems Program Office personnel. The

Government will coordinate/notify the Contractor of the meeting schedule. There will be a maximum of two meetings per year. The PMR location will alternate between the https://assist.dla.mil/online/start/index.cfm http://www.e-publishing.af.mil/ http://www.e-publishing.af.mil/ http://www.e-publishing.af.mil/otherpublishingsites.asp

Contractor’s facility and a government facility. Meeting minutes shall be provided by the Contractor within 5 working days of the conclusion of the meeting. (CDRL A003)

3.3 Data Rights

3.3.1 The Government requires Unlimited or Government Purpose Rights for all developed items, components, processes, computer software, and technical data used in the execution of this contract.

3.3.2 Software procured by the Contractor shall have the licensing agreement(s) assigned or transferred to the Government, giving the Government the same direct rights against suppliers that the Contractor would have.

3.3.3 The Contractor shall obtain prior written approval from the Procuring Contracting

Officer (PCO) prior to committing to the use of any private and mixed funds developed items, components, processes, computer software, and technical data which it:

A. Intends to deliver with Limited Rights

B. Intends to deliver with Government Purpose License Rights

C. Intends to deliver with Restricted Rights

D. May have less than Unlimited Rights

E. Will use in the performance of this Contract

F. Cannot meet the requirements outlined in paragraph 3.3.1 through 3.3.2

3.4 Quality Assurance

3.4.1 The Contractor shall implement and maintain a Quality Assurance (QA) program IAW

AS9100 and AS9110 standards as applicable. As part of this QA program the Contractor shall maintain a responsive surveillance system that continually monitors, documents, and corrects deficiencies in processes and procedures. When requested, the Contractor shall allow the Government access to their QA program documents and processes.

3.4.2 The Contractor shall submit a Quality Control Plan. (CDRL A025)

3.4.3 The Contractor Quality Organization shall provide support of requirement peer reviews, monitoring of activities to ensure processes are being followed, review of products generated (e.g., System Change Description) and support of meetings (staff, program status, Technical Interchange, etc.) to ensure compliance with established Contractor quality standards.

3.4.4 Contracting Officer Representative (COR): The Program Office COR(s) will review and approve Contractor submitted metrics and deliverables for purposes of billing and acceptance. Program Office CORs must receive and concur with Contractor-submitted metrics prior to DCMA acceptance of invoices in Wide Area Work Flow (WAWF).

3.4.5 The Contractor will be notified by letter upon contract award of the Primary and

Alternate CORs assigned to this contract.

3.5 Corrosion Prevention and Management

3.5.1 Using MIL-HDBK-1568 as a guide, develop a Corrosion Prevention and Control

Management Plan. (CDRL A034)

3.5.2 Identify production manufacture and repair facility corrosion prevention and control procedures. (AC 43.206 - Inspection, Prevention, Control, and Repair of Corrosion on

Avionics Equipment or equivalent)

3.6 Configuration Management

3.6.1 Using MIL-HDBK-61 for guidance, the Contractor shall develop, implement and maintain a Configuration Management Plan (CMP) that describes how the T-38C configuration documentation is to be maintained during the Contract Period of Performance (PoP).

The plan shall describe the processes to: (CDRL A006)

A. Maintain the existing configuration identification

B. Establish configuration control to evaluate proposed engineering changes and determine affected items and means of approval

1. The Contractor shall perform a Physical Configuration Audit (PCA) to ensure the design matches the specifications of the equipment being delivered to the Government.

2. The Contractor shall perform a Functional Configuration Audit (FCA) to ensure that the equipment being delivered to the Government meets the documented performance specifications and meets or exceeds the performance specifications specified in the T-38C System Performance

Specification.

C. Provide updates to Technical Orders/Technical Manuals in accordance with TM-86-

01N, Attachment 9 of this proposal (CDRL A029)

D. Provide updates to engineering drawings (CDRL A033)

E. Provide change documentation and update the Technical Data Package (TDP) as required for this effort. The TDP is defined in Section 15 of this document. (CDRL

A029)

F. Provide for and deliver to the Government the necessary Configuration Status accounting documents (CDRL A037)

3.6.2 The Contractor shall ensure suppliers maintain configuration control IAW Contractor developed Configuration Management Plan and Engineering Change Proposal

3.7 Risk Management

3.7.1 The Contractor shall develop the criteria, methods, and procedures used for identifying critical risks associated with the implementation of this Contract. Using the latest

Department of Defense (DoD) Risk Management Guide as reference, the Contractor shall implement a risk management process and provide a Risk Management Plan (RMP) that efficiently identifies, analyzes, mitigates, and tracks potential impacts to mission success.

3.7.2 The Contractor shall develop, implement, and maintain a RMP using AFI 63-101/20-101, AFMCI 63-1201 and AFPAM 63-128 as guidance. The RMP will be delivered to and approved by the Government. (CDRL A002)

3.7.3 The Contractor’s RMP shall identify risk, assess or analyze risk and implement procedures to reduce or eliminate risk to achieve program goals.

3.7.4 The Contractor’s RMP shall be implemented by Integrated Product Teams and managed as part of systems engineering/program management processes.

3.7.5 The Contractor shall provide on-going identification, analysis, abatement, and risk tracking.

3.7.6 The Contractor shall maintain a system risk summary and provide regular status reporting of key risk areas to the Government Program Manager.

3.8 Software Management

3.8.1 The Contractor shall design, fabricate, integrate, test, and evaluate the hardware, software, facilities, personnel subsystems, training, and the principle items necessary to satisfy program requirements, and to support and operate the system. This includes the requirements analysis, design, coding and unit testing, component integration and testing, and Computer Software Configuration Item (CSCI) level testing for software. This also includes system development and operational test and evaluation, software quality, configuration management, and support for software.

3.8.2 The Contractor shall develop and maintain a Software Management Plan. (CDRL A021)

4 Engineering Change Proposal

4.1 ECP Content

4.1.1 The ECP shall be Firm Fixed Price (FFP).

4.1.2 The Contractor shall conduct necessary system and design reviews and provide meeting minutes within five working days (CDRL A017). The minimum requirements are:

A. Systems Requirements Review (SRR)

B. Preliminary Design Review (PDR)

C. Critical Design Review (CDR)

D. Test Readiness Review (TRR)

E. Production Readiness Review (PRR)

4.1.3 The ECP shall contain an Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) to encompass all

Government/Contractor interrelationships. (CDRL A001)

A. The IMS shall integrate the tasks of all Government stakeholders and the

Contractor’s teams.

B. The IMS shall use critical path methodology to define and emphasize the program’s critical elements.

C. The IMS shall contain all control points (milestones) and all requirements for reviews, audits, and meetings required by this SOO.

4.1.4 The ECP shall provide a detail system design and include integration into the current T-

38C avionics system.

4.1.5 The ECP shall identify all hardware components by manufacturer, manufacturer source/cage code, manufacture part number, quantity and nomenclature

4.1.6 Software items required to integrate and test the solution shall be identified by developer, developer source/cage code, title, and version identification number. All software executable code, source code (including developer notes) shall be delivered with Unlimited Rights to the Government. (CDRL A005)

4.1.7 The ECP shall Identify and define any environmental qualification testing that may be required to include additional testing that may be required for Commercial Off-The-

Shelf (COTS) or Non-Developmental Items (NDI) that do not meet the T-38C specifications.

4.1.8 The contractor shall develop the overall ESOH risk management approach for the HUD replacement as part of the Systems Engineering (SE) Process per MIL-STD-882 and

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).

4.1.9 The Contractor shall perform weight and balance computations of proposed configurations and provide the results to the Government program office and

Government engineering for determination and approval.

4.1.10 The Contractor shall provide drawing and Technical Order (TO) changes for all TOs affected by the aircraft system changes. The contactor shall comply with TM-86-01N, Air

Force Technical Manual Contract Requirements (TMCR). The Contractor shall:

A. Provide mark-ups in accordance with TM-86-01N for all TOs and aircrew flight manuals affected by the aircraft system changes. (CDRL A029)

B. Provide all required changes to the Technical Manuals and installation drawings.

(CDRL A033)

C. Prepare and deliver a Time Compliant Technical Order (TCTO) for the installation of the HUD system into the T-38C (CDRL A029)

4.1.11 The Contractor shall provide information and technical support during development of the Technical Engineering Review Board (TERB) and Configuration Control Board (CCB) documentation and provide telephone support during these meetings.

5 Test and Test Support Activities

5.1 System Test and Integration

5.1.1 All performance/environmental test results shall meet or exceed current T-38C

Performance Specifications. Test reports shall be delivered to the Government Program

Office. (CDRL A036)

5.1.2 Bird strike testing shall be planned for and conducted unless waived by the

Government. The contractor shall provide an analysis and recommendation report to the Government. The Government will make a determination as to whether Bird Strike testing is necessity. Minimum determining factors: (CDRL A036)

Combiner glass is unable to fold down in the same manner and with the same forces as the current HUD combiner glass

Combiner glass materials or thicknesses change

Unable to determine whether combiner glass will cut through the windscreen or break into lethal ballistic projectiles

(See ATP-T-38 for Bird-Resistant Laminated Front Windshield Transparencies for T-38

Aircraft para 3.2.1.1.1).

5.1.3 The developed system and all proposed replacement equipment shall meet or exceed the Mean Time Between Failure (MTBF) rate(s) identified in the Form-Fit-Function &

Interface Specification.

5.1.4 The Contractor shall identify requirements for any additional test or support equipment and deliver requirements to the Government. (CDRL A038)

5.1.5 The Contractor shall install and evaluate the HUD system for proper fit in the aircraft.

5.1.6 The HUD system installation procedures and hardware configurations shall comply with

USAF aircraft hardware and maintenance practices. Reference: 1-1A-XX series Technical

Manuals.

5.1.7 The Contractor shall develop new or adapt existing Acceptance Test Procedures (ATP) for the HUD system. (CDRL A036) The Government will provide current system test procedures.

5.1.8 Using the Systems Integration Lab (SIL), the Contractor shall perform the T-38C Avionics

ATP for the HUD system equipment and deliver the resulting test report to the

Government. (CDRL A036)

5.2 Primary Flight Reference Endorsement

5.2.1 HUD system requires HQ AF/A3O Primary flight Reference (PFR) endorsement. The contractor shall prepare the PFR Endorsement Package for submission and assist the

Government in the approval process.

5.2.2 The contractor shall ensure the HUD system meets the requirements of MIL-STD-1787C for positioning, arrangement of flight information elements and symbology. The Flight

Symbology Development Group (FSDG) may require, at a minimum, one visit to see a fully functional simulation of the actual cockpit presentation.

5.3 Developmental Test (DT) and Force Development Evaluation (FDE)

5.3.1 The Contractor shall prepare and deliver a pre-DT release letter and configuration memo. (CDRL A015)

5.3.2 The Contractor shall provide inputs to the test team at Edwards AFB for the DT test plan.

5.3.3 The Contractor shall install and evaluate the HUD system for proper fit in the aircraft.

5.3.4 The Contractor shall perform on-aircraft ground operational checkout in accordance with the current T.O. 1T-38C-2-12 procedures or newly developed procedures as required.

5.3.5 The Contractor shall perform on-aircraft Electromagnetic Compatibility/Interference

(EMC/EMI) Safety of Flight (SOF) testing and deliver the test report to the Government.

(CDRL A036)

5.3.6 The Contractor shall provide engineering support during DT flight tests at Edwards AFB.

5.3.7 The Contractor shall prepare and deliver a pre- Force Development Evaluation (FDE) release letter and configuration memo.

5.3.8 The Contractor shall assist the test team at Randolph AFB in the development of the FDE test plan.

5.3.9 The Contractor shall provide engineering support during FDE at Randolph AFB.

5.3.10 The Contractor shall support all Government system test review boards, as required.

6 Certifications and Approvals

6.1 Authority to Test and Authority to Operate

The Contractor shall develop and coordinate the documents below with the T-38 Systems

Program Office (SPO) and other government agencies to ensure systems(s) receive

Authority to Test (ATT) and Authority to Operate (ATO). (CDRL A029)

Table 6-1 Minimum Documents Required for ATT/ATO

Document Purpose

Time Compliance Technical Order Installation instruction and required support

Program Introduction Document Test organization requirements and objectives e.g.

instrumentation requirements, data analysis plan

Deficiency Reports Make the test organization aware of potential issues to assign risk

Suggested Flight Test Plans for all phases of testing (DT, FDE)

Test techniques, test points, limitations, and management information

6.2 Platform Information Assurance

The Contractor shall provide information and technical support during the development of the update to the USAF Platform Information Technology (PIT), Architecture Analysis

Report (AAR) for the T-38C Talon. (CDRL A039)

6.3 Airworthiness

6.3.1 The Contractor shall provide support for airworthiness risk assessment activities.

6.3.2 The Contractor shall comply with all relevant Airworthiness requirements cited in MIL-

HDBK-516B and provide documentation of compliance to the Government and assist with the following processes or approvals: (CDRL A040)

A. Impact Assessment

B. Modified Airworthiness Certification Criteria

C. Risk Assessment

D. System Program Office Engineering and T-38 Chief Engineer approval

E. Air Force Material Command, Director of Engineering Approval

6.4 CNS-ATM

6.4.1 The contractor shall provide technical assistance and act as the T-38C Subject Matter

Expert (SME) for all CNS/ATM compliance requirements. The contractor is responsible for all processes and administration to support the Government in obtaining a CNS/ATM

Type 2 Data Chain Letter of Acceptance (LOA) and all applicable certifications required for any hardware/software development, sustainment and operation efforts. (Reference

AFI63-137)

6.4.2 The contractor shall maintain and update as required for certification currency, all T-38C

CNS/ATM documentation throughout the period of performance IAW AFI63-137. At a minimum, CNS/ATM documentation consists of the following: (CDRL A015)

A. T-38C RNAV/RNP/VNAV Tailored Performance Matrixes (TPMs)

B. T-38C Data Compliance Plan

C. T-38C NavData Architecture

D. T-38C RNAV/RNP/VNAV Performance Assessment (PA)

7 Formalize Change after Successful Test

7.1 Finalize configuration and Release Documents

7.1.1 The Contractor shall prepare release documents for Government approval.

7.1.2 The Contractor shall deliver final drawings and final TCTO(s) requirements.

7.1.3 The Contractor shall acquire final release approval from the Government.

7.1.4 The Contractor shall provide all final system documentation and deliverables to the government.

8 Hardware and Production and Delivery

The contractor shall provide the necessary Kits/materials to modify 456 aircraft. The

Contractor shall deliver a list of all procurable hardware to include: (CDRL A042)

8.1 A Kits - Aircraft Modification Kit

8.1.1 A Kits will include all components and hardware required to modify the T-38C aircraft to accept the new HUD system.

8.2 B Kits – System LRUs

8.2.1 B Kits will include HUD system LRU components (Packaged Separately).

8.3 Production Schedule

8.3.1 The Contractor shall provide a projected schedule for kit production and delivery assuming quantities sufficient to modify 456 T-38C aircraft. The schedule should highlight ramp up periods and maximum monthly deliveries once full rate production is achieved.

8.3.2 The Contractor shall provide an equipment fielding/basing plan. (CDRL A010)

8.4 Packaging

8.4.1 All kits will be packaged in accordance with ASTM D 3951-98 (2004)

8.5 Contract Field Team

8.5.1 This is an optional requirement to be exercised at Government discretion.

8.5.2 The Contract shall provide an estimate for system installation by a contractor provided contract field team.

8.5.3 The estimate shall be a Firm-Fixed-Price for a single team to retrofit the aircraft by operating location and should coincide with the Material Fielding Plan. Once an operating location is completed the team will move to the next location. For estimating purposes use table 8-1.

Table 8-1 T-38C Aircraft locations

Operating Locations

(July 2014)

Command

*Assigned

Aircraft

COMBS

Columbus AFB, MS AETC 87 YES Laughlin AFB, TX AETC 65 YES Randolph AFB, TX AETC 90 YES Sheppard AFB, TX AETC 123 YES Vance AFB, OK AETC 66 YES Holloman AFB, NM AFMC 4 NO Edwards AFB, CA AFMC 11 NO Patuxent River, MD USN 10 NO

Number of aircraft may change due to unforeseen circumstances

9 Diminishing Manufacturing and Material Shortages

(DMSMS)

9.1 DMSMS Management

9.1.1 The Contractor shall acquire and deliver the HUD System Bill of Materials (BOM). (CDRL

A035)

9.1.2 The Contractor shall ensure all BOM information is entered into the Government and

Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP).

9.1.3 The Contractor shall develop and submit a DMSMS Management Plan for managing the potential loss of manufacturers or supplier(s) of parts and/or material required for performance of this SOO. At a minimum, the plan shall address the following: (CDRL

A008)

A. Means and approach for providing the Government with information regarding obsolescence and DMSMS issues

B. Planned resolution of discovered DMSMS issues

C. Parts list screening

D. Parts list monitoring

E. Communication with and availability of information to the Government

F. Means and approach for establishing obsolescence and DMSMS solutions

G. Process for data entry and extraction from predictive tools used. GIDEP shall be used and is the minimum requirement.

9.2 DMSMS Reporting

9.2.1 The Contractor shall prepare and submit to the Government a report upon discovery or notification of any obsolescence issues affecting components utilized in the replacement

HUD system. (CDRL A007)

9.2.2 The Contractor shall continue to update the report provided in paragraph 9.2.1 until the issue is successfully mitigated. (Successfully mitigated is defined as “no impact to the

Government or future supportability of the HUD system”.)

9.3 DMSMS Mitigation

9.3.1 The Contractor shall be responsible for the costs of investigating part availability, inter-changeability and substitutability, locating part replacement, vendor interface, engineering efforts, testing requirements, drawing changes, and all other actions associated with this SOO/ECP.

9.3.2 During the period of performance the Contractor shall prevent any additional costs from being incurred by the Government due to obsolescence.

10 Government Furnished Equipment

10.1 Systems Integration Lab (SIL)

10.1.1 The Contractor shall have use of the T-38C Systems Integration Lab (SIL), located at the

Boeing St. Louis facility. The use shall be on a non-interference basis and shall be scheduled in advance to preclude schedule and performance conflicts.

10.1.2 Location of SIL:

The Boeing Company

5890 N. Lindbergh Blvd.

Hazelwood, MO 63402

10.1.3 Current T-38C avionics system Acceptance Test Procedures will be provided by the

Government to the awardee.

11 Associate Contractor Agreement

Offeror shall enter into Associate Contractor Agreement (ACA) in the accomplishment of this requirement. The agreement shall include the basis for sharing information, data, technical knowledge, expertise, and/or resources essential to the accomplishment of the

AvCI Program Task Orders which shall ensure the greatest degree of cooperation for the development of the program to meet the terms of the contract. (IAW Clause H040 of the basic AvCI contract)

12 Conditions and Assumptions

Preliminary Test (PT), and Developmental Test (DT) will be conducted at Edwards AFB, CA.

The Government will provide aircraft, pilots, fuel, and facilities during the test period.

FDE will be conducted at Randolph AFB, TX. The Government will provide aircraft, pilots, fuel, and facilities during the test period.

13 Compliance Directives and Reference Documents

The Contractor’s shall be familiar with and use the following documents for reference when executing the requirements within this document.

13.1 T-38C Performance Requirements

T-38C System Performance Specification, Revision H, dated 14 Feb 2011.

13.2 Department of Defense Instructions

DoDI 8510.01, Risk Management Framework (RMF) for DoD Information

Technology (IT) (DIACAP)

DoD Directive 4715.1E – Environment, Safety, and Occupational Health

13.3 Air Force Instructions & Directives

AFI 33-200, IA Management

AFI 33-210, Air Force Certification and Accreditation (C&A) Program (AFCAP)

AFI 62-601, USAF Airworthiness and Airworthiness Bulletins

AFPD 62-6, USAF Airworthiness

AFI 63-101 Integrated Life Cycle Management

AFI 63-131 Modification Management

AFI 63-137, Assurance of Communications, Navigation, Surveillance/Air Traffic

Management (CNS/ATM) Navigation Safety, and Next Generation Air

Transportation System (NEXGEN) Performance.

AFMCI 63-1201 Implementing Operational Safety, Suitability, and Effectiveness

(OSS&E) and Life Cycle Systems Engineering

13.4 Air Force Manuals & Pamphlets

AFM 36-2234, Instructional Systems Development, Courseware Development

Standards HQ AETC/A3F

AFPAM 63-119, Certification of System Readiness for Dedicated Operational

Testing

13.5 Military Standards and Specifications

MIL-STD-882, Department Of Defense Standard Practice for System Safety

MIL-STD-411, Aircrew Station Alerting Systems

MIL-STD-461, Requirements for the Control of Electromagnetic Interference

Characteristics of Subsystems and Equipment

MIL-STD-464, Electromagnetic Environmental Effects Requirements for Systems

MIL-STD-704, Aircraft Electric Power Characteristics

MIL-STD-1472, Human Engineering

MIL-STD-1787, Aircraft Display Symbology

MIL-DTL-5096, Manuals, Technical: Inspection and Maintenance Requirements;

Acceptance and Functional Check Flight Procedures and Checklists; Inspection

Work Cards; and Checklists; Preparation of

MIL-DTL-38804, Time Compliance Technical Order Specification

MIL-DTL-38807, Technical Manuals - Illustrated Parts Breakdown

MIL-STD-38784, Standard Practice for Manuals, Technical: General Style and

Format Requirements

AFGS-87219B, Electrical Power Systems, Aircraft (Attachment 7)

AFGS-87256, Integrated Diagnostics

13.6 Military Handbooks

MIL-HDBK-516, Airworthiness Certification Criteria

MIL-HDBK-419A, Grounding, Bonding, and Shielding for Electronic Equipment and Facilities, Volume 1 & 2

MIL-HDBK-454B, General Guidelines for Electronic Equipment

MIL-HDBK-1568, Materials and Processes for Corrosion Prevention and Control in Aerospace Weapons Systems

MIL-DTL-5920G, Manuals, Technical: Sample Basic Weight Checklists and Loading

Data

MIL-DTL-5096G, Manuals, Technical: Inspection and Maintenance Requirements;

Acceptance and Functional Check Flight Procedures and Checklists, Inspection

Work Cards, and Checklists, Preparation of (Attachment 5)

13.7 Civilian Aviation Directives

AS 9100C Quality Management Systems - Requirements for Aviation, Space and

Defense Organizations

AS 9110 Quality Maintenance Systems – Aerospace – Requirements for

Maintenance Organizations

Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circular, AC 20-153A, Acceptance of

Aero Data Processes and Associated Databases

Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics, RTCA/DO-200A, Standard for

Processing Aeronautical Data and AC 20-153A, Acceptance of Aeronautical Data

Processes and Associated Databases

14 Deliverables:

CDRL

Number

Number

Short Name Full Name Paragraph DID

A001 IMS Integrated Program Management

Report (IPMR)

3.2.2, 4.1.3 DI-MGMT-81861

A002 RMP Contractor’s Risk Management Plan 3.7.2 DI-MGMT-81808

A003 Status Report Contractor’s Progress, Status and

Management Report

3.2.5 DI-MGMT-80227

A004 Report Manhour Estimate, Technical Cost

Proposals

DI-FNCL-81116

A005 Software Applications Computer Software Product End Items 4.1.6 DI-MCCR-80700

A006 CMP Contractor’s Configuration Management

Plan

3.6.1 DI-CMAN-80858B

A007 Obsolescence Report Progress Report (Studies) 9.2.1 DI-ADMN-81313A

A008 DMSMS Management

Plan

Diminishing Material Shortages and

Material Management Plan

9.1.3 DI-MGMT-81949

A009 Engineering Analysis Human Engineering System Analysis

Report

DI-HFAC-80745B

A010 Material Fielding and

Basing Plan Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) 8.3.2 DI-MGMT-80004A

A011 CAP Corrective Action Plan DI-RELI-80254

A012 Database Database Design Description (DBDD) DI-IPSC-81437A

A013 Analysis Producibility Analysis Report DI-MGMT-80797

A014 ECP Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) 3.2.1 DI-CMAN-80639C

A015 Evaluation Primary

Flight Reference

Endorsement Package

Technical Report-Study/Services 5.3.1, 6.4.2 DI-MISC-80508B

A016 Block Upgrade Process Management Plan DI-MGMT-80004A

A017 Meeting Minutes and

Action Items Report, Record of Meeting/Minutes 3.2.3, 3.2.4, 4.1.3 DI-ADMN-81505

A018 System Change

Description

Revisions to Existing Government

Documents

DI-ADMN-80925

A019

Specification Change

Notices SCN, Requirements Change

Notice

Specification Change Notices (SCN) DI-CMAN-80643C

Number

Number

Short Name Full Name Paragraph DID

A020 AvCI Avionics

Roadmap

Management Plan DI-MGMT-80004A

A021 Software

Management Plan Management Plan 3.8.2 DI-MGMT-80004A

A022 Courseware Delivery Web-Based Courseware DI-SESS-81699

A023 ATD Software Changes Computer Software Product End Items DI-MCCR-80700

A024 Safety and Health

Mgmt Report

Contractor's Progress, Status and

Management Report

DI-MGMT-80227

A025 Quality Control Plan Management Plan 3.4.1 DI-MGMT-80004A

A026 Safety Plan Environmental Health and Safety Plan

(HSP)

DI-ENVR-81375

A027 Phase-in/out

Transition Plan

Management Plan DI-MGMT-80004A

A028 Government Owned

Equipment Inventory Checklist/Record (ICL/R) DI-MISC-81191A

A029 Document Changes Document Changes 3.6.1.C, 3.6.1.E, 4.1.10.A, 4.1.10.C, 6.1

DI-MISC-80358

A030 DAL Data Accession List (DAL) DI-MGMT-81453A

A031 Property Management

Plan Management Plan DI-MGMT-80004A

A032 Safety Accident/Incident Report DI-SAFT-81563

A033 Drawings Product Drawings/Models and

Associated Lists

3.6.1 D, 4.1.10 B DI-SESS-81000E

A034 Corrosion Prevention Corrosion Prevention and Control Plan 3.5.1 DI-MFFP-81403

A035 Data for Forecasting Source Data for Forecasting DMSMS 9.1.1 DI-SESS-81656

A036 ATR Acceptance Test Report (ATR) 5.1.1, 5.1.2, 5.1.7, 5.1.8, 5.3.5

DI-QCIC-81891

A037 CSA Configuration Status Accounting

Information

3.6.1 F DI-CMAN-81253A

A038 Equipment

Requirements List

Maintenance Test and Support

Equipment Requirements List

5.1.4 DI-SESS-80294B

A039 Sys. Architectural

Analysis

DoD Architecture Framework

Documentation

6.2 DI-MGMT-81644B

A040 Specifications Airworthiness Specification 6.3.2 DI-SESS-81766

A041 Airworthiness Report Airworthiness Certification Criteria

Report

DI-SESS-81768

A042 Procurable Hardware Provisioning Parts List Section 8 DI-SESS-81715

A043 Corrective Action Plan Contractor’s Correction Action Plan DI-MGMT-80501

Number

Number

Short Name Full Name Paragraph DID

A044 50/50 Reporting 10 USC 2466 (50/50) Requirements

Report

DI-MGMT-81749A

A045 Cost-Per-Flight Hour

Report Technical Report-Study/Services DI-MGMT-80508B

15 Technical Data Package (TDP)

1. T-38C Avionics System Performance Specifications

2. T-38C ATD Performance Specifications

3. List of Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) at Suppliers/Vendors

4. GFE List Supplement, Equipment at L-3 DS

5. T-38 System Integration Lab – Avionics

6. T-38 System Integration Lab – Test Equipment

7. T-38 System Integration Lab – Computing Equipment

8. Equipment Planned for T-4 Engine Test Cell

9. Training Support Equipment (Items used for Courseware support)

10. GFE TCNO Computers

11. List of Aircraft Panels in Storage at COMBS facilities

12. Group A Parts Inventory and Consumption

13. Group B Inventory and Consumption

14. T-38C Air Vehicle Drawings

15. T-38C Avionics System Architecture Diagram

16. T-38C Form Fit Function & Interface (F3I) Specifications

17. T-38C Interface Control Documents (ICDs) T-38C Avionics Architecture Diagram

18. GFI T-38C Air Vehicle Technical Manuals

19. List of Software Components

20. T-38C Contractor Furnished Test Equipment List

21. DMSMS Data from predictive Tools/Database

22. ACMI Parameters

23. List of MFL/PFL

24. ATD Equipment at Contractor

25. T-38C ATD Drawings

26. T-38C ATD Architecture Diagram

27. ATD System Interface Control Documents (ICD)

28. GFI T-38C ATD Technical Manuals

29. IMIS Historical Data