ATTACHMENT 5 PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE.doc
DOC document 66 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Hazardous Material Management System Analyst Support Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA8201-08-R-0040
About this file
Attachment 5 Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment 1 PWS for HMMS Program 22 May 08.docx | DOCX document | |
| FA8201-08-R-0040.rtf | RTF text file | |
| Attachment 3 Consent Letter.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment 4 Client Authorization Letter.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment 2 Past Performance Information Sheet.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment 6 Past Performance Questionnaire Letter.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment 7 Quality Assurance Plan.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHEMENT # 5
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104 A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
Contractor’s Name:
Address: __________________________
Telephone Number:
Fax Number:
Point of Contact:
Project Title or Brief Description of Work:
Contract Number Provided by Offeror:
Dollar Amount:
Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror:
*Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
Contractor performed as the ( Prime Contractor ( Sub-Contractor ( Key Personnel.
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Name of Respondent:
_____________________ Title:
Address: _____________________
Telephone Number: ___________________ _____________________________
Fax Number:
Email Address:
C. FAX COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO:
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 1 to 6 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF 1 OR 2.
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| UNKNOWN CONFIDENCE |
| NO CONFIDENCE |
| LIMITED CONFIDENCE |
| SATISFACTORY CONFIDENCE |
| SUBSTANTIALCONFIDENCE |
| No performance record is identifiable or the the offeror’s performance record is so sparse tht no confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. |
| Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to succesfully perform the required effort. |
| Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has an expectation that the offeror will succesfully perform the required effort. |
| Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: ________________________ CONTRACT NUMBER________________
The contractor:
| 1. |
| Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 2. |
| Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 3. |
| Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 4. |
| Home office participated in solving significant local problems. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 5. |
| Followed approved quality control plan. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6. |
| Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 7. |
| Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 8. |
| Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 9. |
| Identified problems as they occurred. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 10. |
| Suggested alternative approaches to problems. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 11. |
| Displayed initiative to solve problems. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 12. |
| Developed realistic progress schedules. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 13. |
| Met established project schedules. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 14. |
| Provided timely resolution of warranty defects. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 15. |
| Was responsive to contract changes. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 16. |
| Provided adequate project supervision. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 17. |
| Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work-in-progress increased. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 18. |
| Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 19. |
| Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 20. |
| Cooperated with Government personnel after award. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 21. |
| How would you rate the contractor's overall performance? |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 22. |
| Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.” |
| YES/NO |
| 23. |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.” |
| YES/NO |
| 24. |
| Is the contractor rated in CPARS? |
| YES/NO |
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: ________________________ CONTRACT NUMBER_______________
Remarks:___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
� The government enters the following information based on list of references provided by the offeror. The offeror will enter this information if the solicitation requires him to submit questionnaires to the references.
� If desired, the “Unknown Confidence” rating may be numerically placed in the questionnaire form between “Little Confidence” and “Satisfactory Confidence”.
� Include this information on each page of the questionnaire form to ensure there is no mix up in information among contracts surveyed for respective primes/subs, etc.
� While these questions are generic and will work as written in many acquisitions, consider them as they relate to each individual acquisition and tailor them as needed and appropriate. Also, when tailoring the form, consider leaving space between questions for comments.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .