Solicitation - FA813726R0004.pdf

(See ).

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair) IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

9. FOR

INFORMATION CALL:

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid and "bidder".

SOLICITATION

1. SOLICITATION NUMBER

5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NUMBER

CODE

6. PROJECT NUMBER

8. ADDRESS OFFER TO

4. CONTRACT NUMBER

7. ISSUED BY

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS (Title, identifying number, date)

11. The contractor shall begin performance within

12a. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES", indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12b.)

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

a. Sealed offers in original and

b. An offer guarantee

c. All offers are subject to the (1) work requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

d. Offers providing less than

STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 12/2022)

Prescribed by GSA - FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(d) calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due will not be considered and will be rejected.

is, is not required.

local time containing offers shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.

(date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers will be publicly opened at that time. Sealed envelopes copies to perform the work required are due at the place specified in Item 8 by (hour) award, YES NO notice to proceed. This performance period is mandatory negotiable.

calendar days and complete it within calendar days after receiving

a. NAME b. TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

12b. CALENDAR DAYS

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID (IFB)

INVITATION FOR BID

NEGOTIATED (RFP)

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

3. DATE ISSUED PAGE OF PAGES

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

17. The offeror agrees to perform the work required at the prices specified below in strict accordance with the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted calendar days after the date offers are due. (Insert any number equal to or greater than the minimum requirement by the Government in writing within stated in Item 13d. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13d.)

OFFER (Must be fully completed by offeror)

AMOUNTS

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT

NUMBER

DATE

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR (Include ZIP Code)

CODE FACILITY CODE

15. TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include area code)

16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS (Include only if different than Item 14.)

20a. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN OFFER (Type or print)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT

26. ADMINISTERED BY

30a. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN (Type or print)

31c. DATE

STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 12/2022) BACK

31b. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BY

31a. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.) Your offer on this solicitation is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award consummates the contract, which consists of (a) the Government solicitation and your offer, and (b) this contract award. No further contractual document is necessary.

30b. SIGNATURE 30c. DATE

28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT (Contractor is required to sign this document and return and deliver all items or perform all work requirements identified on this form and any continuation sheets for the consideration stated in this contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be governed by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certifications, and specifications incorporated by reference in or attached to this contract.

copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees to furnish

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

ITEM

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO THE UNITED STATES

CODE AT

27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY

10 U.S.C. 3204(a) ( ) 41 U.S.C. 3304(a) ( )

20b. SIGNATURE 20c. OFFER DATE

Section A - Solicitation/Contract Form Multiple Award Construction (MAC) Basic Ordering Agreement (BOA) FY26 Invitation

NAICS: 236210

Size Standard: USD 45,000,000.00 Annual receipts

Product Service Code: Z2QA

FA813726R0004

Section B - Supplies or Services & Prices or Costs

Section C - Description/Specifications/Statement of Work

Requirements Basic Ordering Agreement (BOA) invitation: for Construction Services at Tinker AFB, Oklahoma.

Section D - Packaging and Marking

Section E - Inspection and Acceptance

Section F - Deliveries or Performance Delivery terms and period of performance will be determined on each individual order.

Overall Contract Delivery Period

From date of lead time event to beginning of performance 10 Calendar Days Date of Award Receipt

From date of lead time event to completion of performance 10 Calendar Days Date of Award Receipt

Overall Contract Delivery Period

Section G - Contract Administration Data

Section H - Special Contract Requirements

Section I - Contract Clauses

Section J - List of Attachments

Number Attachment Name Attachment Description Reference Identifier Date Line Item

01 Experience Matrix Experience Matrix 02 Dec

MACB Provision and Clause Matrix

MACB Provision and Clause Matrix 02 Dec

SECTION A

Executive Summary

Executive Summery 15 Dec

MACB NOTICE

OF INTENT-

SYNOPSIS_FY26

Notice of Intent - Synopsis 15 Dec

Statement of Work, 26 May 2021

Statement of Work 26 May

Section K - Representations, Certification, & Other Statements

Section L - Instructions, Conditions, & Notices to Offerors or Quoters

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS (ITO)

1.0 General Instructions

1.1. The government plans to award a single construction order for the project described in the Order Proposal Request (OPR) in accordance with (IAW) the statement of work (SOW), drawings, and specifications. This ITO shall take precedence should there be any conflict between the Basic Ordering Agreement (BOA)and this ITO.

1.2. This acquisition will utilize Lowest Priced Technically Acceptable (LPTA) Source Selection procedures with technical proposals IAW the Multiple Award Contract (MAC) BOA procedures and in accordance with FAR Part 15.3 as supplemented. For construction projects with an estimated magnitude less than $10M the government will not use the mandatory procedures as prescribed in DFARS215.300. This ITO provides general guidance for preparing proposals as well as specific instructions on the format and content of the proposal. The offeror's proposal must include all data and information requested by this ITO. Non-conformance with the instructions provided in this ITO may result in an offeror's proposal being determined ineligible for award. The offer shall be compliant with the requirements as stated in the OPR and its attachments for this construction project.

1.3. The offeror's completed proposal shall consist of the completed and signed OPR, to include any amendments issued, with a cover letter delineating any exceptions taken to the OPR terms and conditions with accompanying rationale. However, offerors are cautioned that any noncompliance with the terms and conditions of the OPR may cause their proposal to be determined ineligible for award.

1.4. Submit only one proposal for the project, if multiple proposals or proposal options are submitted, it may cause your submission to be technically unacceptable. Your proposal, to include work plan, price, and bid bond must be provided to this office not later than the response stated on the SF 1442, block 13a, or amendment if applicable.

1.5. The Procurement Contracting Officer (PCO) is the sole point of contact for this acquisition. Exchanges of information between government and offerors will be controlled by the PCO.

1.6. Email may be used to transmit the proposal and must include "Company Name, Source Selection Information - See FAR 2.101and 3.104" in the subject line of the email. When submitting source selection information via email, file suppression utilities, to include but not limited to zip files, will not be accepted.

1.7. Proposals may be submitted using DoD SAFE at the following website: https://safe.apps.mil/req.php.

1.8. Do not provide any password protected files as part of the proposal. The electronic copies of the proposal shall be submitted in a format readable by Microsoft(MS) Word 2007, 2010, or 2013, MS Excel 2007, 2010 or 2013, MS-Power Point2007, 2010, or 2013, and MS-Project 2013, and Adobe Acrobat Portable Document Format (PDF), as applicable. Do NOT submit any documents in PDF format that are copied as "images."

When creating PDF files always create to enable textual search and copy functions.

1.9. The PCO will promptly notify offerors of any decision to exclude them from the competitive range, whereupon they may request and receive a debriefing IAW FAR 15.505. Offerors excluded from the competitive range may request a pre-award debriefing or they may choose to wait until after the source selection decision to request a post-award debriefing. However, offerors excluded from the competitive range are entitled to no more than one debriefing. The PCO will notify unsuccessful offerors in accordance with FAR 15.503. Upon such notification, unsuccessful offerors may request and receive a debriefing. Offerors desiring a debriefing must make their request IAW the requirements of FAR 15.505 or 15.506, as applicable.

1.10. If an offeror believes that the requirements in these instructions contain an error, omission, or are otherwise unsound, the offeror shall immediately notify the PCO in writing with supporting rationale as well as the remedies the offeror is asking the PCO to consider as related to the omission or error. The offeror is reminded that the government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussions. This reservation includes matters of additional submittals of the initial proposal.

1.11. If this OPR is amended, all terms and conditions that are not amended remain unchanged and in full force and effect. Offerors shall acknowledge receipt of any amendment and provide confirmation upon submission of the offeror's proposal. Any unacknowledged amendments in the offeror's proposal will render the offeror ineligible for award.

1.12. Proposals and modifications to proposals shall be submitted in via previously mentioned methods addressed to the contracting specialist /contracting officer at the address shown on OPR and showing the time and date specified for receipt, the OPR number, and the name and address of the offeror.

1.13. The government intends to award without exchanges; therefore, the proposal should contain the offeror's best terms. However, the government reserves the right to conduct exchanges if deemed in its best interest. Exchanges are interactions between the PCO and the offeror and may address any aspect of the proposal. Offeror responses to exchanges will be considered in making the award selection decision.

1.14. Each page containing proprietary information should be so marked.

1.15. Each page should contain the legend "CUI SOURCESELECTION INFORMATION-SEE FAR 2.101 and 3.104" at the bottom of each sheet.

2.0. Factor 1 - Technical

FA813726R0004

https://safe.apps.mil/req.php.

2.1. In the Technical Volume of the proposal, address your proposed approach to meeting the minimum performance or capability requirements of the technical requirements identified in the OPR. The technical proposal should be specific and complete. Legibility, clarity, and coherence are very important. Your responses will be evaluated against the technical subfactors defined in Attachment 2 - Evaluation Factors for Award. Using the instructions provided below, provide as specifically as possible the actual methodology you would use for accomplishing/satisfying the technical subfactors. All the requirements specified in the OPR are mandatory. By your proposal submission, you are representing that your company will perform all the requirements specified in the OPR. Mererecitation of the OPR requirements, or phrases that refer to the government's SOW, without sufficient supporting information as to how work will be accomplished will not be accepted. Narratives shall provide detail of sufficient level to allow one skilled in engineering and the building trades to make a sound decision as to the technical viability of the proposal. The technical volume shall include:

a) Technical Volume Cover Sheet. The technical order volume shall include a cover sheet containing date, OPR number, project number and title, offeror contact information, and assertion the proposal meets or improves the mandatory completion date stated in the OPR.

b) Project Narrative. The project narrative shall clearly demonstrate the offeror's understanding of the project scope by including the following information:

1) Project synopsis (description)

2) Proposed method of accomplishing the work

3) Type of site field verification performed

4) Anticipated user impacts

5) Protection of government property during construction

6) Supplemental drawings/sketches

7) In-house design calculations

8) Estimating notes

9) Take-off calculations to justify quantities used in proposal (includes Subcontractor's calculations)

10) Manufacturer supplied drawings / calculations

11) Catalog/product technical information

12) Assumptions

13) Clarifications and exceptions

14) Supporting documentation

2.2. Technical Subfactor 1: Capability and Management

2.2.1. Describe capability and commitment to support an on-site management team, including a sole source of responsibility for both design and construction of this project.

2.2.2. Describe how your organization will manage, supervise, and coordinate the subcontractor's work and who in the organization will be responsible for this management and coordination.

2.2.3. Discuss which resources are available but will not be present at the site.

2.2.4. Describe the role of the design team in response to this project.

2.2.5. Describe how warranty support, unforeseen site conditions, design errors, etc. will be handled by your organization.

2.2.6. Provide a Team List of the primary point of contacts.

2.3. Technical Subfactor 2: Schedule and Planning

2.3.1. The offeror shall include a proposed construction schedule that meets or improves the mandatory completion date stated in the OPR. The offeror's proposed schedule shall demonstrate a reasonable and realistic sequence of activities which represent all work to be performed throughout the entire order performance period, while considering the major work elements from the detailed cost proposal, as well as submittal reviews, mobilization, material delivery times, anticipated weather delays, and final inspection/closeout.

2.3.2. In developing the schedule, note that there will be submittals; milestones (such as final inspections); and construction-related permits/requests (such as Outage/Closure Requests or Excavation Permits) that will require longer lead times for Government coordination/approval.

2.3.3. Specific timelines for staging area approvals, airfield waivers, outage requests and other Government approvals are provided in the order's SOW section "Coordinating With Government Activities".

3.0. Factor 2 - Price

3.1. In the price volume, the offeror shall provide a fully supported cost proposal. Compliance with these instructions is mandatory and failure to provide all the required data may result in an offeror being determined ineligible for award. The offeror shall provide a detailed cost proposal describing each element of the design and construction effort. Design and construction costs shall be provided IAW the contract line item (CLIN) structure as requested in the OPR. The order proposal shall provide the following supporting documentation so that the government team can evaluate the reasonableness of your proposed cost/price. All pricing information shall be addressed ONLY in the Price Proposal and Order Documentation volumes. Workhour estimates, and material kinds and quantities may be used in other volumes only as appropriate for presenting rationale for alternatives or design and tradeoff decisions.

3.2. The Pricing Volume shall include the following:

a) Price Volume Cover Sheet. The price volume shall include a cover sheet containing date, OPR number, project number and title, offeror contact information, CLIN prices and the total price.

b) Detailed Cost Proposal

1) Design cost proposals shall include proposed labor categories, labor hours per category, and labor rates per category. The design costs shall be submitted as a total design price with a breakout of design and non-design costs that demonstrates compliance with DFARS 236.606-70, Statutory Fee Limitation.

2) Construction cost proposals shall be broken out/subtotaled per the divisions defined by the Construction Specifications Institute (CSI) Master Format System. The offeror shall submit construction cost proposals utilizing AF Form 3052, Construction Cost Estimate Breakdown, or a contractor generated equivalent that provides the same information.

3) Construction cost proposals shall be detailed enough for government reviewers to determine the contractor's understanding of the work to be performed and that the proposal is complete (includes all work items included in the order). Cost proposals shall be broken down to at least CSI Level IV.

c) Price Supporting Documentation. The offeror shall provide supporting documentation which demonstrates how the offeror arrived at the proposed price. Documentation the offeror shall submit are listed below. This includes but is not limited to:

1) Subcontractor quotes

FA813725R0008

2) Supplemental drawings/sketches

3) In-house design calculations

4) Estimating notes

5) Take-off calculations to justify quantities used in proposal (includes subcontractor calculations

6) Manufacturer supplied drawings/calculations

7) Catalog/product technical information

8) The government reserves the right to ask for additional details during the evaluation of offeror's proposals for the purpose of clarification. Any request that would result in a proposal change will be accomplished through formal discussions.

d) Price Assumptions

e) Clarifications and Exceptions

f) Subcontractor quotes. Pricing for subcontracted work shall comply with the following requirements:

1) Subcontractor quotes shall provide the same level of detail and include supporting documentation as described in section 3.2(b), "Detailed Cost Proposal".

2) Subcontractor quotes should be based on the best value offered from at least two vendors.

3) Contractor shall provide a copy of the quotes as part of the proposal package.

4) In the event that the minimum of two (2) acceptable vendors cannot be obtained(only one supplier, potential suppliers/subcontractors are unresponsive correspond with 'no bid', etc.), a justification for the single quote shall be submitted as a part of the proposal package.

3.3. Offeror's pricing proposal will be evaluated for reasonableness, balance, and realism. Unreasonable and/or unrealistic proposed prices, initially or subsequently, may be grounds for eliminating a proposal from competition. Additionally, unbalanced pricing may pose an unacceptable risk to the government and may render an offeror's proposal ineligible for award. The offers should be sufficiently detailed to demonstrate their price reasonableness and balance. The burden of proof for credibility of proposed prices rests with the offeror.

3.4. The government will evaluate proposals for reasonableness to include completeness. For completeness, offerors must propose pricing for all CLINs except for those labeled as "not separately priced (NSP)". Normally, price reasonableness is established through adequate price competition, but may also be determined through proposal analysis techniques. The burden of proof for credibility of proposed costs/prices rests with the offeror.

Offerors shall provide sufficient rationale describing how prices were developed (such as assumptions, historical data, projections, expertise, management decisions, etc.).

3.5. The government will evaluate proposals for balance. The offeror is cautioned against submitting an offer that exhibits unbalanced pricing.

Unbalanced pricing may increase performance risk and could result in payment of unreasonable or unrealistic prices. An offer could be so grossly unbalanced that acceptance of the offer would be tantamount to allowing an advanced payment. For this acquisition, balanced pricing is determined with respect to CLIN pricing variance.

3.6. The government will evaluate the proposals for compliance with DFARS 236.606-70, Statutory Fee Limitation, as applicable, if design is part of the contract requirement. If applicable, the offeror shall clearly state the design and non-design fees in accordance with DFARS 236.606-70.

3.7. FAR 12.209 gives the requirement to establish price reasonableness in accordance with 13.106-3 (Simplified Acquisition Procedures), 14.408-2 (Sealed Bidding), or 15.4 (Contract Pricing by Negotiation), as applicable. FAR Part 15applies to this acquisition. IAW FAR15.403-3-1(b), prices based on adequate price competition do not require submission of certified cost or pricing data. In accordance with FAR 15.403-3(a), however, information other than certified cost or pricing data may be required to support price reasonableness. FAR 15.403-3(a)(1)provides for obtaining information other than certified cost or pricing data if needed to determine price reasonableness. Therefore, the FAR does not preclude the requirement for obtaining other than certified cost or pricing data under certain circumstances and the government reserves the right to obtain data as appropriate. Should the PCO determine proposed prices to appear unreasonable or the possibility that an offeror does not fully understand the requirement, the offerors may be required to support price reasonableness via other than certified cost or pricing data. If, after receipt of proposals, the PCO determines that there is insufficient information available to determine price reasonableness and none of the exceptions in FAR 15.403-1 apply, the offeror shall be required to submit certified cost or pricing data.

3.8. All dollar amounts shall be rounded to the nearest cent. All rates shall be rounded to four decimal places to the right of the decimal point.

3.9. Provide assumptions regarding usage of all government property as reflected in your pricing proposal.

4.0. Order Volume

4.1. The purpose of this volume is to provide information to the government for preparing the order document and supporting file. The offeror's proposal shall include a signed copy of the Model Order.

4.2. The offeror shall provide required information to complete clauses as required. Offerors shall ensure that all clauses and provisions that require "fill-in" information are appropriately completed, including the proposed prices associated with the contract line items in the Schedule of the OPR.

4.3. Bid Guarantee (Bond): A bid guarantee(minimum of 20% of proposal) is required IAW FAR 28.101-1. Failure to furnish a bid guarantee in the proper form and amount may be a cause for rejection of your bid.

4.4. The proposal acceptance period (validity) is specified on the SF 1442, block 13d of the model contract/solicitation. The offeror shall make a clear statement in the proposal documentation that the proposal is valid until this date.

4.5. The offeror shall provide a statement the offeror has completed the annual representations and certification electronically via the SAM website at https://www.sam.gov/SAM/. After reviewing the SAM database information, the offeror verifies by submission of this offer that the representation and certifications currently posted electronically.

4.6. Provide the name, title, telephone number, and email address for the company/division point of contact regarding decisions made with respect to your proposal and who can obligate your company contractually. Also, identify those individuals authorized to negotiate with the government.

4.7. The offeror shall provide the name, title, telephone number, and email address for the company's point of contact for contractor performance assessment reports.

Section M - Evaluation Factors for Award Section M - Evaluation Factors for Award

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

1.0. Basis for Order Award

1.1. This acquisition will utilize Lowest Priced Technically Acceptable (LPTA) Source Selection procedures, with technical proposals, in accordance with FAR Part 15.3 as supplemented. For construction projects with an estimated magnitude less than $10M the government will not use the mandatory procedures as prescribed in DFARS 215.300. Technical tradeoffs will not be made, and no additional credit will be given for exceeding the technical requirements. The government will only evaluate one proposal from each offeror. Award will be made to the responsible offeror whose proposal is technically acceptable, conforms to all Order Proposal Request (OPR) requirements, to include terms and conditions, representations and certifications, technical requirements, and also provides the best value to the government based on the results of the evaluation. The government reserves the right to award without discussions or exchanges. Therefore, each initial offer should contain the offeror's best terms from both a price and technical standpoint. However, the government reserves the right to conduct discussions if determined necessary by the Procurement Contracting Officer (PCO).

1.2. The Source Selection Authority (SSA) will base the source selection decision on an integrated assessment of proposals against all source selection criteria in the OPR. While the government evaluation team and the SSA will strive for maximum objectivity, the evaluation and selection process, by its nature, is subjective and, therefore, professional judgment is implicit throughout the entire process.

1.3. The government intends to select one contractor for this acquisition. However, the government reserves the right not to award an order at all, depending on the quality of the proposals, prices submitted, and the availability of funds.

1.4. The government will consider throughout the evaluation, the "correction potential" of any proposal aspect evaluated as "unacceptable". The judgment of such "correction potential" is within the sole discretion of the government. The correction potential is based on the amount and/or complexity of the correction(s) needed to meet government requirements.

1.5. If discussions are conducted, the government will establish a competitive range comprised of the most highly rated proposals. During the evaluation process multiple competitive range determinations may be made that eliminate offerors from the competition. The competitive range determination can be based on Technical, Price, or a combination of both factors. A competitive range determination may eliminate offerors based on their initial proposal evaluation results, after discussions (if necessary), prior to issuance of the Final Proposal Revision (FPR) request, or for efficiency at any other time prior to the award decision. If offerors are excluded from the competitive range, they may request a debriefing IAW FAR

15.505 or 15.506.

1.6. The government intends to award without discussions but reserves the right to conduct discussions if necessary. Therefore, it is imperative that offerors submit their best terms initially. However, if during the evaluation period it is determined to be in the best interest of the government to hold discussions, the government will determine if responses to Evaluation Notices (ENs) received during discussions will be considered formal proposal revisions, or if offerors will be required to include EN responses in the FPR. The Request for FPR letter will include specific instructions on how offerors will submit FPRs. The government also reserves the right to request Draft FPRs during discussions.

1.7. Offerors are required to meet all OPR requirements, to include terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and Statement of Work (SOW) requirements, in addition to those identified as factors and subfactors. Failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the OPR may result in the offeror being ineligible for award. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the OPR terms and conditions and must provide complete supporting rationale. The government reserves the right to determine any such exceptions unacceptable, and therefore, the proposal ineligible for award.

2.0. Technical Rating

2.1. The technical rating reflects the evaluation of the acceptability of the offeror's technical approach for meeting the government's requirement.

Technical evaluations will be conducted beginning from the lowest proposed total evaluated price to the highest proposed total evaluated price until two proposals are determined technically acceptable. The government will not evaluate additional proposals for technical acceptability.

2.2. Each offeror's written technical proposal shall be evaluated, based on the subfactors below, to determine if the offeror provides a sound and compliant approach that meets the requirements of the OPR, inclusive of the SOW, drawings, specifications, and the documents as requested in the ITO and demonstrates a thorough knowledge and understanding of those requirements and their associated risks. The technical proposal shall address each of the following subfactors in sufficient detail.

2.2.1. Technical Subfactor 1, Capability and Management. This subfactor is met when the offeror sufficiently demonstrates and describes how the offeror will meet the capability and management requirements to complete the construction and administrative requirements with little potential for disruption of schedule, increased cost, or degradation of performance. The evaluation will include the offeror's proposal to meet the following:

a) Sufficient description of commitment to support an on-site management team, including a sole source responsibility for both design and construction of this project.

b) Sufficient approach to manage, supervise, and coordinate all subcontractor's work and state who in the organization is responsible for this management and coordination.

c) Sufficient description of resources that are available but will not be present at the site.

d) Sufficient description of the design team in response to this project.

e) Sufficient description of how warrant support, unforeseen site conditions, design errors, etc., will be handled by your organization.

2.2.2. Technical Subfactor 2, Schedule and Planning. This subfactor is met when the offeror sufficiently demonstrates and describes how the offeror can schedule and plan the construction project that will meet or improve the mandatory completion date with little potential for disruption of schedule, increased cost, or degradation of performance. The evaluation will include the offeror's proposal to meet the following:

a) Sufficient construction schedule that meets the mandatory completion date stated in the OPR. The schedule shall demonstrate a reasonable and realistic sequence of activities which represent all work to be performed throughout the entire order performance period, while considering the major work elements from the detailed cost proposal, as well as submittal reviews, mobilization, material delivery times, anticipated weather delays, and final inspection/closeout.

b) Sufficient detail within the schedule that considers submittals, milestones (such as final inspections), and construction related permits/requests (such as Outage/Closure Requests or Excavation Permits) that will require longer lead times for Government coordination/approval.

c) Sufficient detail within the schedule that provides specific timelines for staging area approvals, airfield waivers, outage requests and other Government approvals as provided in the SOW Section "Coordinating with Government activities".

2.3. The technical rating reflects the evaluation of the acceptability of the offeror's technical approach for meeting the government's requirement. The offeror's proposal shall be evaluated to determine whether the proposal is acceptable or unacceptable, using the ratings and descriptions outlined in the table below. One technical rating will be assigned to each technical subfactor. In order to be considered awardable, there must be an "acceptable" rating in every subfactor.

Adjectival Rating Description Acceptable Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

3.0. Price

3.1. Price proposals will be evaluated for (1) reasonableness, (2) balanced pricing, and (3) realism. Offerors whose price is determined to be unreasonable will not be considered for award. Additionally, an offeror's price may be rejected, if it contains unbalanced pricing to the extent it poses an unacceptable risk to the government.

3.2. The proposed prices will be evaluated for reasonableness to include completeness. Analysis of price proposals will be performed using one or more of the techniques defined in FAR 15.404-1(b)(2) in order to determine price reasonableness. Reasonableness must represent a price to the government believes a prudent person would pay in the conduct of competitive business. Normally, price reasonableness is established through adequate price competition, but may also be determined through price analysis techniques as described in FAR 15.404-1(b)(2). The proposal will be evaluated for completeness to ensure the offeror has proposed pricing for all CLINs except for those labeled not separately priced (NSP).

3.3. Offerors' proposals will be reviewed for balanced pricing. The government will evaluate any supporting information provided by the offeror explaining variances that appear unbalanced. Evaluated offers that are determined to be unbalanced may be deemed ineligible for award by the PCO if a determination is made that lack of balance poses an unacceptable risk to the government. Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable total price, the price of one or more line items is significantly over or understated as demonstrated by application of price analysis techniques, such that:

a) There is reasonable doubt the offer would result in the lowest overall cost to the government, even though it is the lowest priced offeror; or

b) The offer is so grossly unbalanced; its acceptance would be tantamount to allowing an advanced payment.

3.4. As applicable, the offeror's proposal will be evaluated for compliance with DFARS 236.606-70, Statutory Fee Limitation, if the contract includes architect-engineer services for the preparation of designs, plans, drawings and specifications.

3.5. If requested by the PCO, data other than certified cost and pricing data shall be evaluated to support a determination of reasonable and balanced pricing. This information will only be requested if all other sources have been insufficient to support a determination of reasonable and/or balanced pricing.

3.6. All proposed dollar amounts shall be rounded to the nearest cent. All rates proposed as a percentage shall be rounded to four decimal places to the right of the decimal point. If any pricing proposal deviates from this format, the government will apply the specified format to determine the extended pricing and Total Evaluated Price (TEP). Compliance with instructions regarding rounding will be verified during evaluation.

3.7. Pricing proposals will be reviewed for compliance with the ITO.

3.8. The TEP will be calculated as the sum of the offeror's proposed prices for all CLINs and all options (as applicable). TEP will be used for evaluation purposes only. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the government to exercise such options.

CP 405 739 4040, 7858 5TH ST STE 1

TINKER AFB, OK 73145-9125

UNITED STATES

HAILIE REYES, Email: sara.hinds.2@us.af.mil Telephone: 312-555-5555 Sara Hinds, Email: sara.hinds.2@us.af.mil Telephone: 312-555-5555

Project Location: Tinker AFB, OK

Basic Ordering Agreement (BOA) invitation: for Construction Services at Tinker AFB