Crash Survivable Recorder SOW_25Apr23.pdf

TRAINING AIRCRAFT DIVISION

STATEMENT OF WORK

FOR CRASH SURVIVABLE RECORDER RAPID FIELDING

FOR THE T-6 AIRCRAFT

Prepared for:

Mobility Directorate, Training Aircraft Division

Tinker AFB, OK JPATS T-6 Programs

Prepared by:

T-6 Integrated Product Team Training Aircraft Division

Program Office Tinker AFB, OK and

PMA273

Patuxent River, MD

Revised

25 April 2023

Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION (Aircraft and ATDs)

1.1 Background (Aircraft and ATDs)

1.2 Scope

2 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS (Aircraft and ATDs)

2.1 Government Documents

2.1.1 Specifications and Standards

2.1.2 Other Government Documents, Drawings, and Publications

2.2 Non-Government Documents

2.3 Availability of Government Specifications and Standards

2.4 Availability of Other Government Documents, Drawings, and Publications

2.5 Order of Precedence

3 REQUIREMENTS

3.1 Systems Engineering (Aircraft and ATDs).1.2

3.1.1 Systems Engineering Management Plan (Aircraft)

3.1.2 Interface Control Document (Aircraft)

3.2 Sustaining Engineering (Aircraft)

3.2.1 Counterfeit Prevention Plan (CPP) (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.2.2 Deficiency Reporting (Aircraft)

3.2.3 Field Maintenance Support (Aircraft)

3.2.4 Program Office Support (Aircraft)

3.2.5 Transition Planning (Aircraft)

3.3 Program Management (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.3.1 Program Manager (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.3.2 Program Management Plan (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.4 Integrated Product Development (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.4.1 Integrated Master Plan (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.4.2 Integrated Master Schedule (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.4.3 Weekly Program Status Meetings (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.4.4 Subcontract Schedule Management and Reporting (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.4.5 Work Breakdown Structure (Aircraft)

3.5 Over Target Schedule/Restructure (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.6 Risk Management Program (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.7 Supply Chain Risk Management (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.8 Failure Reporting Analysis & Corrective Action Taken (Aircraft)

3.9 Technical Review(s) (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.9.1 Production Readiness Review (PRR)

3.10 Program Management Review (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.10.1 Post Award Conference (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.11 Configuration Management (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.11.1 Configuration Management (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.11.2 Request for Variance (RFV) (Aircraft)

3.11.3 Engineering Change Proposals (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.11.4 Notice of Revisions (Aircraft)

3.11.5 Contract Change Proposals (CCPs) (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.11.6 Data Management (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.12 Aircraft Modification Requirements (Aircraft)

3.12.1 Acceptance of Aircraft (Aircraft)

3.12.2 Ground Operating Procedures (GOPs) (Aircraft)

3.12.3 Mishap Incident (Aircraft)

3.12.4 Corrosion Control Management (Aircraft)

3.12.5 Aircraft Modification (Aircraft)

3.12.6 Post Installation (Aircraft)

3.12.7 Aircraft Delivery (Aircraft)

3.12.8 Occupational Safety and Health, and Hazardous Material Management (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.13 Logistics Support Requirements (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.13.1 Integrated Logistics Support (Aircraft)

3.13.2 Fabrication and Delivery (Aircraft)

3.13.3 DMSMS (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.13.4 Support Equipment (SE) (Aircraft)

3.13.5 Operator and Maintenance Training (Aircraft)

3.13.6 Base Site Survey (Aircraft)

3.13.7 Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) Inventory (Aircraft)

3.13.8 Packing, Packaging Preservation and Transportability (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.13.9 Initial Spare Kits (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.13.10 Aircraft Installation Configuration Audit (Aircraft)

3.13.11 Calibration (Aircraft)

3.13.12 Government Furnished Property (GFP) Resources (Aircraft)

3.14 Aircrew Training Devices (ATDs)

3.14.1 ATD Technical Meetings and Reviews

3.14.2 Critical Design Review (CDR)

3.14.3 Test Activities

3.14.4 Test Planning

3.14.5 GAT Test Readiness Reviews (TRRs)

3.14.6 Government Acceptance Testing (GAT)

3.14.7 Deficiency Reports (DRs)

3.14.8 Physical Configuration Audits (PCAs)

3.14.9 Material Support/Provisioning

3.15 Security Management (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.15.1 Common Access Card (CAC) (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.15.2 Security Incidents and Violations (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.15.3 Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.15.4 Covered Defense Information (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.15.5 Operations Security (OPSEC) (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.15.6 Cybersecurity (Aircraft and ATDs)

4 DATA RIGHTS (Aircraft and ATDs)

5 GOVERNMENT EQUIPMENT/GOVERNMENT INFORMATION (ATDs)

5.1 ATD Government Furnished Equipment

6 CSR GROUP A/B DELIVERY ADDRESSES (Aircraft)

7 CSR GBTS DELIVERY ADDRESSES (ATDs)

8 CSR NOTIONAL INSTALLATIONS SCHEDULE (Aircraft)

8.1.1 USN

8.1.2 USAF/USA

9 OVER & ABOVE (O&A) (Aircraft and ATDs)

10 TRAVEL & G&A (Aircraft and ATDs)

11 UNITED STATES FEDERAL HOLIDAYS

11.1 Federal Holidays

11.2 Emergencies/Closures/Weather Days

11.2.1 Government Installation Closure – Duty Hours

11.2.2 Government Installation Closure – Non-Duty Hours

11.3 Down Days

12 WARRANTIES (Aircraft and ATDs)

13 SERVICE SUMMARY (Aircraft and ATDs)

14 CDRL LIST

15 ACRONYM LIST

1 INTRODUCTION (Aircraft and ATDs)

This Statement of Work (SOW) defines the effort required to execute Rapid Fielding (RF) activities pertaining to the T-6A/B/D Crash Survivable Recorder (CSR). The RF effort will replace the Integrated Data Acquisition and Recorder System (IDARS) impacted by Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Materiel Shortages (DMSMS) through modification of the fleet of T- 6A/B/D trainer aircraft. The JPATS Ground Based Training System (GBTS) Program Office (PO) will also require a CSR technical solution to be designed, developed, integrated, tested, procured, and installed in all applicable Aircrew Training Devices (ATDs). Note: The Contractor is required to only install the CSR technical solution in Air Force ATDs. The local Navy CLS Provider will perform installation of kits in Navy ATDs.

1.1 Background (Aircraft and ATDs)

The T-6 Texan II is a commercial derivative of the Beechcraft Model 3000 (referred to as the Model 3000 in this document) aircraft with a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Type Certificate number A00009WI. The aircraft is a short-range, single-engine turbo-prop aircraft used for basic pilot training and Combat Systems Officer (CSO) training. T-6 Main Operating Bases (MOBs) with aircraft, Operational Flight Trainers (OFT), Instrument Flight Trainers (IFT), Unit Training Devices (UTD), and Egress Procedures Trainers (EPT) with quantities assigned are identified in Table 1.

Table 1 (MOBs w/ Aircraft, OFT, IFT, UTD, EPT Quantities)

Base/Location T-6A T-6B T-6D Test A/C

Static Display OFT IFT UTD EPT

Randolph AFB, TX 41 0 0 0 0 3 4 1 1 Laughlin AFB, TX 103 0 0 0 0 6 7 5 1 Vance AFB, OK 99 0 0 0 0 5 7 5 1 Columbus AFB, MS 99 0 0 0 0 6 6 4 1 Sheppard AFB, TX 76 0 0 0 0 3 4 3 1 CSO Pensacola, FL 24 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 1 NAS (NFO) Pensacola, FL** 43 0 0 0 0 2 0 5 1

NAS Whiting Field, FL** + 0 147 0 0 0 9 0 7 1 NAS Corpus Christi, TX** 0 97 0 0 0 6 0 5 1 Redstone Arsenal, AL 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 Textron Beech Field, KS 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 NAS Patuxent River 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tinker AFB, OK 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 OEM Factory, Broken Arrow, OK 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1* 0

Totals 485 250 4 1 1 43 29 36 9

* A Randolph AFB T-6A UTD physically located at the OEM’s factory in Broken Arrow, OK serving as a test asset. Subject UTD will be a candidate for relocation in March 2024 as part of the Air Forces’ future modifications.

****Contractor ATD installations are not required at NAS sites, as local CLS Provider will perform installation of kits. The Contractor shall procure and deliver ATD kits, with installation instructions, for these sites

+ An NAS Whiting Field T-6B UTD physically located at the OEM’s factory in Broken Arrow, OK serving as a test asset requires Contractor ATD installation of the CSR kit

The CSR system that will reside in the T-6 Avionics Bay records and protects aircraft in-flight information to aid in the determination of mishap causal factors. The CSR system combines the functions of both a flight data recorder and flight instrument recorder, including aircraft performance, aircraft system status and cockpit voice recording, into a single digital data retention system, which is designed to survive or avoid the destructive forces of an aircraft crash.

In order to comply with SECDEF Memo of 22 June 06, Reducing Preventable Accidents, the current T-6A/B/D Flight Data Recording capability, the Integrated Data Acquisition and Recorder System (IDARS) (P/N’s 173361-01-01 and 173361-02-01) must be replaced. AFI 63-101/20-101 Integrated Life Cycle Management (9 May 2017), Chapter 5, directs each Air Force weapon system that requires AF airworthiness approval to evaluate and integrate aircraft information requirements. This replacement will provide the T-6A/B/D with a Crash Survivable Recorder (CSR) system with the minimum crash survivable data collection capability as outlined in AFI 63- 133 Aircraft Information Program (Change 1, 4 November 2010) and OPNAV Instruction 13210.1B Naval Aviation Policy for Aircraft Avionics Safety Systems (15 April 2014). The required parametric and acoustic information is defined in AFPAM63-129 Air System Development and Sustainment Engineering Processes and Procedures (3 February 2020) and Recommended Technical Specifications for Flight Information Recorders Installed in Naval Aircraft (Rev 0101). This information will support accident investigation efforts and will help determine the root cause of mishaps. Determination of mishap root causes is vital in preventing future mishaps, meeting SECDEF aircraft mishap reduction goals and preserving combat capability.

1.2 Scope

This RF effort is a one-time modification utilizing a single integrator to permanently install Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) SA00219MC into the fleet of 485 T-6A, 1 T-6A Test, 1 T- 6A Static Display, 251 T-6B and 4 T-6D trainer aircraft. Additionally, the RF effort will require a technical solution to be designed, developed, integrated, tested, procured, and installed for 43 T- 6 Operational Flight Trainers (OFT), 29 T-6 Instrument Flight Trainers (IFT), 36 T-6 Unit Training Devices (UTD), and 9 T-6 Egress Procedure Trainers (EPT). Note: The Contractor is required to only install the CSR technical solution in Air Force ATDs. Except for a single T-6B UTD located at Broken Arrow, Oklahoma, the NAS onsite Navy CLS Provider will perform installation of kits in Navy ATDs. The Contractor shall begin production upon contract award date and execution may not exceed 5 years.

2 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS (Aircraft and ATDs)

2.1 Government Documents

2.1.1 Specifications and Standards

The following Government specifications and standards form a part of this SOW to the extent specified herein. If a newer version of any the specifications or standards identified below have been published, then they shall be used to execute the CSR program tasks as stated in this SOW.

The latest revision at the time of contract award shall be used.

DOCUMENT ID TITLE

Military Standard (MIL-STD)-129R Change 2

Marking for Shipment and Storage

Military Standard (MIL-STD)-130N Change 1

Identification Marking of US Military Property

Military Standard (MIL-STD)-881D Work Breakdown Structures for Defense Material Items

Military Standard (MIL-STD)-882E System Safety Military Standard (MIL-STD)-1366E Transportability Criteria Military Standard (MIL-STD)-1472G Human Engineering Military Standard (MIL-E)-7016F Electric Load and Power Source Capacity, Aircraft, Analysis of Military Standard (MIL-STD)-2073E Change 4

Military Packaging

Military Standard (MIL-STD)-31000B Technical Data Package

2.1.2 Other Government Documents, Drawings, and Publications

The following Government documents, drawings, and publications form a part of this SOW to the extent specified herein. The latest revision at the time of contract award shall be used.

DOCUMENT ID TITLE

AS5553D Counterfeit Prevention Plan (CPP) BS25301 Rev 3 Flight Training Device (FTD) Program Unique

Specification Document (PUSD), dated 1 July 1997 revised 15 June 2010 (T-6A)

BS25507A Procedural Training Device (PTD) Program Unique Specification Document (PUSD), dated 15 March 2008 (T-6A)

BS372573 REV 1 Flight Training Device (FTD) Program Unique Specification Document (PUSD), dated 15 June 2010 (T-6B)

BS25302 Systems Specification, JPATS GBTS, Revision A dated 6 October 2000

2.2 Non-Government Documents

The following non-Government documents, drawings, and specifications form a part of this SOW for reference herein. Applications for copies should be addressed to the originator of each subject document.

DOCUMENT ID TITLE

American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Standard Y14.38M

Abbreviations and Acronyms for Use on Drawings and Related Documents 2013

American National Standards Institute (ANSI)/Electronic Industries Association (EIA) Standard 632

Processes for Engineering a System

ANSI/Government Electronics Information Technology Association (ANSI/GEIA) Standard 0009

Reliability Program Standard for Systems Design, Development, and Manufacturing

International Organization for Standards (ISO)/American Society of Quality (ASQ) ANSI/ISO/ASQ Standard 9001-2008

Quality Management Systems and Requirements

National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Special Publication (SP) 800-60 Vol 2 Rev 1, D.11.3

Appendices to Guide for Mapping Types of Information and Information Systems to Security Categories (Air Transportation and Information Type)

NIST SP 800-30 Rev 1 Guide for Conducting Risk Assessments NIST SP 800-53 Rev 4, Appendix E (Table E-1)

Security and Privacy Controls for Federal Information Systems and Organizations (Assurance and Trustworthiness)

SAE International Standard AS5553D Counterfeit Electronic Parts; Avoidance, Detection, Mitigation, and Disposition

SAE Aerospace Recommended Practices 4761

Guidelines and Methods for Conducting the Safety Assessment Process on Civil Airborne Systems and Equipment

American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) D3951-18

Standard Practice for Commercial Packaging

2.3 Availability of Government Specifications and Standards

Unless otherwise indicated, copies of the specifications, handbooks, and standards cited in 2.1.1 are available from the Standardization Document Order Desk, 700 Robbins Avenue, Building 4D, Philadelphia PA 19111-5094 or the ASSIST Internet site at http://quicksearch.dla.mil/.

2.4 Availability of Other Government Documents, Drawings, and Publications

Requests for copies of any documents not listed or provided will be submitted to the Government with a reason the document is needed and how long the document will be needed. The Government will review all request and provide written notification of approval or disapproval.

http://quicksearch.dla.mil/

2.5 Order of Precedence

Unless otherwise noted herein or in the contract, in the event of a conflict between the text of this document and the references cited herein, the text of this document takes precedence. Nothing in this document, however, supersedes applicable laws and regulations unless a specific exemption has been obtained.

3 REQUIREMENTS

The Contractor shall maintain its Systems Engineering function and oversee the production of the CSR system. The Contractor shall use their Engineering Management function to plan and control technical program tasks, define system parameters, and integrate engineering specialties into the production process. The systems engineering process shall provide flexibility to incorporate requirements and minimize technical risk. The Contractor shall perform the necessary tasks to ensure the CSR PIPFS compliance Matrix are met.

The Contractor shall provide the technical expertise to plan, monitor, measure, evaluate and manage the CSR production effort. The Contractor shall plan, manage, and integrate all program activities to ensure compliance with the contract requirements for the manufacturing and installation of a CSR system capability into the T-6 aircraft.

3.1 Systems Engineering (Aircraft and ATDs).1.2

The Contractor shall use Systems Engineering principles to support and maintain operational performance goals, identify, and mitigate performance risks, minimize program cost, investigate anomalies, and to document support processes for supply chain management. The Contractor shall ensure systems engineering principles are considered and followed for each modification and configuration change.

3.1.1 Systems Engineering Management Plan (Aircraft)

The Contractor shall implement and maintain a Systems Engineering Management Plan (SEMP) IAW IEEE 15288.1-2014. A SEMP will be maintained for the aircraft. The SEMP identifies and defines the organization(s), activities, overall tasks, principles and objectives of System Engineering Management required to manage and control the integration, testing, production and maintenance of T-6 CSR Rapid Fielding Program aircraft. The Contractor shall follow the T- 6A/B/D CSR System Engineering Management Plan (SEMP) (SRC document number N710CSRA021-001) for aircraft.

3.1.2 Interface Control Document (Aircraft)

The Contractor shall provide the required changes to the T-6A/B/D CSR Interface Control Document (ICD) (SRC document number N710CSRA014-001) for aircraft and deliver IAW CDRL B038, DI- SESS-81248B, Interface Control Document.

3.2 Sustaining Engineering (Aircraft)

The Contractor shall provide engineering support for the T-6 aircraft with the CSR modification during the Period of Performance. Contractor support shall include:

3.2.1 Counterfeit Prevention Plan (CPP) (Aircraft and ATDs)

The Contractor shall develop and implement a Counterfeit Prevention Plan (CPP) (CDRL B040, Counterfeit Prevention Plan, DI-MISC-81832) in compliance with SAE Standard AS5553D to prevent the inclusion of counterfeit parts or parts embedded with malicious logic into products intended for sale to the Government. As part of the CPP, the Contractor shall provide Certificates of Conformance (CoC) as well as acquisition traceability for Original Component Manufacturers (OCMs) and franchises/distributors in the supply chain.

The Contractor shall require their vendors, suppliers, and subcontractors to participate in the counterfeit prevention and supply chain risk mitigation activities.

3.2.2 Deficiency Reporting (Aircraft)

The Contractor shall respond to deficiencies found with the CSR components and integration IAW TO 00-35D-54 "USAF Deficiency Reporting, Investigation and Resolution." CDRL B001, DI- MGMT-80258C, Acquisition and Sustainment Data Package (ASDP) Material Improvement Project (MIP) Report, Deficiency Report (DR). Responses to Deficiency Reports (DRs), including repair/replace the deficiency if found to be a manufacturing or installation deficiency.

3.2.3 Field Maintenance Support (Aircraft)

The Contractor shall provide technical assistance and response when field maintainers find that repairs are needed beyond what CSR technical data supports to perform field/maintenance repairs, IAW TO 00-25-107, Maintenance Assistance. The Contractor shall submit maintenance and repair instructions as assigned by USG IAW CDRL B002, DI-MISC-80508B, Technical Report Study/Services, Maintenance Report.

3.2.4 Program Office Support (Aircraft)

The Contractor shall respond to T-6 Program Office inquiries about status of Deficiency Reporting and Field Maintenance Support by answering technical support questions on an as required basis up to a maximum of two (2) hours per month regarding CSR from the Program Office.

3.2.5 Transition Planning (Aircraft)

The Contractor shall support transition planning for sustainment to the Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) and Sustainment Engineering and Program Management (SEPM) contract holder. The sustainment transition will allow the OEM and SEPM the ability to analyze data and provide sustaining engineering support for the CSR units.

3.3 Program Management (Aircraft and ATDs)

The Contractor shall prepare and submit Contractor Progress, Status, and Management Reports IAW CDRL B003, DI-MGMT-81904/T, Contractor Progress Status and Management Report, for both Aircraft and ATDs. The Contractor shall prepare and submit an agenda, briefing slides, minutes, and action items for each formal, technical, or programmatic meeting as specified in this SOW IAW CDRL B004, DI-ADMN-81249C, Meeting Agenda, CDRL B005, DI-ADMN- 81250C, Meeting Minutes and CDRL B006, DI-ADMN-81373, Presentation Materials, for both Aircraft and ATDs. For ATDs, the Contractor’s efforts shall encompass the overall planning, directing, integrating, and controlling of the ATD CSR technical solution to design, develop, integrate, test, procure and install. Note: Except for a single Navy T-6B UTD located at Broken Arrow, Oklahoma, the Contractor is required to only install the CSR technical solution in Air Force ATDs. The NAS onsite Navy CLS Provider will perform installation of kits in Navy ATDs.

3.3.1 Program Manager (Aircraft and ATDs)

The Contractor shall provide internal management and control on all matters related to this SOW, from conception to final completion. The Contractor shall track program progress, and immediately report (apart from status reports) to the PM and PCO any activity and/or deliverable which will not be achieved as scheduled, citing the cause, contributing factors, impacts, and resolutions to get back on schedule in writing (email acceptable). The Contractor shall provide programmatic support for the entire acquisition effort. Contractor Progress, Status, and Program Management Reports shall be provided monthly IAW CDRL B003, DI-MGMT-81904/T, Contractor Progress, Status, and Management Report, for both Aircraft and ATDs.

The Contractor shall provide all manpower, material, equipment, components, skills, expertise, and knowledge, to meet all required T-6 aircraft and ATD modifications, to complete the contract fully and successfully. The Contractor shall identify and maintain a single point of contact for all tasks required for the program.

The Contractor shall ensure the USG is provided access to the Contractor’s T-6 CSR work areas any time work is being performed.

The Contractor shall establish and maintain effective working relationships with the T-6 Program Office (PO), T-6 GBTS PO, and the OEM of the components being installed. The Contractor shall provide Associate Contractor Agreements (ACA) or subcontracting arrangements for OEMs Textron and Flight Safety, and component vendors.

The Contractor shall initiate all contract changes via a contract change proposal IAW CDRL B007, DI-ADMN-81401C, Contract Change Proposal (CCP).

3.3.2 Program Management Plan (Aircraft and ATDs)

The Contractor shall prepare a Program Management Plan (PMP) that coordinates all activities related to this SOW to ensure successful completion. The PMP shall be presented to the USG for review and approval, and shall illustrate an overall accomplishment plan, allocating responsibilities, and identifying interdependencies and agreements with all parties involved to systematically accomplish the SOW effort. This initial plan will serve as the basis for this work effort, providing a reference to track progress thereby giving the Contractor’s PM a way to measure program accomplishments and delays. The Contractor shall plan for, organize, manage, and control configuration management efforts to meet project objectives and document the results. All schedule, management, engineering, configuration and development issues shall be coordinated and reported to the USG IAW CDRL B008, DI-MGMT-81797/T, Program Management Plan.

3.4 Integrated Product Development (Aircraft and ATDs)

To facilitate management of the T-6 CSR Rapid Fielding Program, the Contractor’s program team shall be organized into Integrated Product Teams (IPTs), each responsible for specific elements of product development, deployment, and support. The Contractor’s IPTs shall jointly develop, maintain, and use a Contractor Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) that is completely integrated with the IMP and SOW. The IMS shall follow the guidance in the DoD IMP and IMS Preparation and Use Guide, Version 0.9, dated 21 October 2005, IAW CDRL B009, DI-MGMT-81861C/T, Integrated Program Management Data and Analysis Report (IMPDAR).

3.4.1 Integrated Master Plan (Aircraft and ATDs)

The Contractor shall develop, update, and maintain the Integrated Master Plan (IMP) to reflect changes in the program. Contractor shall use the IMP as a tool to manage the T-6 CSR Rapid Fielding Program effort. Contractor shall deliver to the USG IAW CDRL B009, 3.4, Integrated Program Management Data and Analysis Report (IMPDAR).

3.4.2 Integrated Master Schedule (Aircraft and ATDs)

The Contractor shall develop an Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) IAW CDRL B009, DI-MGMT-81861C/T, Integrated Program Management Data and Analysis Report (IMPDAR), that depicts the projects original, current and baseline schedules for all the USG activities, major milestones, and key events. The IMS shall be submitted within 30 calendar days of the official Procurement Contracting Officer request with an IMS review no later than 14 calendar days after submission to the Government. The IMS shall reflect/identify any changes in schedule, dates, milestones, and events. The IMS shall include at a minimum, discrete tasks/activities, consistent with all authorized work, and relationships necessary for successful contract completion.

Subcontractor(s) discrete work shall be incorporated as tasks within the prime IMS at a level necessary for a realistic critical path. The IMS is a single integrated network that also contains significant external interfaces, USG furnished equipment/information/property and relationship dependencies for the entire contractual effort. The Contractor shall maintain the IMS and present updates at each monthly meeting.

All tasks in the Contractor’s IMS shall be logically networked with predecessors and successors.

The Contractor’s IMS shall contain the planned Events, Accomplishments, Criteria and Tasks from contract award through completion of the contract. If scheduled performance occurs on a USG installation, the Contractor’s IMS shall observe all federal holidays and local base closure procedures. Task completion in the Contractor’s IMS shall be updated to the USG IAW CDRL B009, DI-MGMT-81861C/T, Integrated Program Management Data and Analysis Report

(IMPDAR).

3.4.2.1 IMS Minimum Requirements (Aircraft and ATDs)

Show the scheduled activities in support of the CSR contract and other major activities and program meetings.

The IMS shall include prime Contractor(s), major subcontractor(s), and Government activities with details to the lowest manageable work unit.

The IMS shall provide milestones to at least key program/project events such as technical reviews, program reviews, testing activities, and ready-for-training (RFT).

The IMS is not to be merely a task listing but shall clearly show dependencies between all listed activities to show order of precedence and dependencies.

The IMS shall clearly show dependencies upon external influences such as data, documentation, GFP, Government personnel and actions, and subcontractor tasks.

Any changes to the contractual milestones within the IMS shall be made only with the approval of the Procurement Contracting Officer (PCO).

The IMS shall be submitted in Microsoft Project and Adobe PDF

3.4.3 Weekly Program Status Meetings (Aircraft and ATDs)

The Contractor shall prepare and conduct a weekly program meeting with the USG Program Manager and GBTS Program Managers via telecom to include overall program status, including schedule and performance of all phases of the effort. The purpose of these meetings shall be to review overall program status, to discuss and mutually resolve any issues to include but not limited to installation efforts. The following information shall be discussed during the weekly status updates.

a) Integrated Master Schedule (IMS), which shall include a 90-calendar day look-ahead of significant upcoming events to include briefing of any issues or concerns with tasks on the critical path

b) Identification of major problems/deficiencies with impact and recommended solutions

c) Aircraft installation performed, total and accomplished the prior week

d) Material Management Status, long lead components and equipment status

e) ATD Program Status

f) Contract Action Status

g) Current Technical Status

h) Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) look-ahead. Delinquent Contractor deliveries shall be reported

i) Risks, Issues and Opportunities

j) Sub-Contractor status

k) Staffing issues

l) Action Items to include status of all program action items

The Contractor shall submit an agenda and briefing slides, 24 hours before the weekly meeting IAW CDRL B004, DI-ADMN-81249C, Meeting Agenda, and CDRL B006, DI-ADMN-81373, Presentation Materials. Meeting Minutes and Action Items shall be submitted NLT three (3) days after meeting conclusion IAW CDRL B005, DI-ADMN-81250C, Meeting Minutes.

3.4.4 Subcontract Schedule Management and Reporting (Aircraft and ATDs)

The Contractor shall manage all subcontracts, to include the timely award of the subcontract, the integration of the subcontractor plans into IMS, and the monitoring of the subcontractor staffing plans, including the execution of those staffing plans to the required levels with the required skills.

The Contractor shall incorporate the supplier’s activities in the IMS. The Contractor shall coordinate with the government regarding government attendance to subcontractor meetings. The Contractor shall notify the USAF of subcontractor meetings as agreed upon for attendance in advance to allow for Government attendance planning. Government attendance of meetings will be mutually agreed upon between the Contractor and the Government.

3.4.5 Work Breakdown Structure (Aircraft)

The Contractor shall submit a Level 3 WBS IAW guidance MIL-STD-881E and shall be incorporated in the IMS. The Contractor shall prepare and deliver a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) IAW CDRL B010, DI-MGMT-81334D, Contract Work Breakdown Structure.

3.5 Over Target Schedule/Restructure (Aircraft and ATDs)

The Contractor may conclude the baseline no longer represents a realistic plan in terms of schedule execution. In the event the Contractor determines an Over Target Schedule (OTS)/restructuring action is necessary, the Contractor shall obtain written Government approval from the Government Contracting Officer prior to implementing an OTS/restructuring action. The request shall also include detailed implementation procedures as well as an implementation timeframe. The Contractor shall not implement the OTS/restructuring prior to receiving written approval from the Contracting Officer.

3.6 Risk Management Program (Aircraft and ATDs)

The Contractor shall maintain an overall risk management program to identify potential sources of cost, schedule, and performance and to determine risk levels. The Contractor shall ensure that risk is factored into decisions on integration design and solution alternatives.

The Contractor’s Risk Management Plan shall define the process to identify the risks to schedule and technical performance as they relate to the IMS and overall objectives of the program. The Contractor’s Risk Management Plan shall be provided IAW CDRL B011, DI-MGMT-81808/T Contractor’s Risk Management Plan and shall use the risk management related sections of AFI 63- 101 (Acquisitions and Sustainment Life Cycle Management) and AFPAM 63-128 (Guide to Acquisition and Sustainment Life Cycle Management) as guides. An initial risk assessment shall be conducted between the Government and Contractor at the Contractor’s facility prior to the creation of the initial Risk Management Report. For each moderate and high-level risk, the Contractor shall coordinate with the Government to develop a mitigation strategy to minimize the impact on overall program schedule and performance. The Contractor shall provide Government access to the Contractor-maintained risk tool used to develop and track risks. The Government and the Contractor shall conduct a monthly-integrated Risk Management Board. The Risk Management Report shall be provided IAW CDRL B012, DI-MGMT-81809/T Risk Management Status Report.

3.7 Supply Chain Risk Management (Aircraft and ATDs)

The Contractor shall update and continue to manage supply chain risks and include the supply chain risks in the Risk Management Report IAW CDRL B012, DI-MGMT-81809/T, Risk Management Status Report. The Contractor shall monitor supply chain risks relative to the products and services provided by the prime Contractor, its suppliers, and Sub-contractors and provide updates as requested.

3.8 Failure Reporting Analysis & Corrective Action Taken (Aircraft)

The Contractor shall maintain a closed loop Failure Reporting Analysis & Corrective Action System (FRACAS) in support of the CSR production.

The Contractor shall perform failure analysis on Lot Acceptance Testing failures, as required, to determine the root cause, implement and validate corrective actions, and eliminate or minimize recurrence. The Contractor shall maintain records of failure analyses. The Contractor shall investigate if the test failure is a system failure or a “No Test” condition and notify the government of the findings. The Contractor shall provide the Government artifacts substantiating their findings. The Contractor shall submit Failure Analysis and Corrective Action Reports IAW CDRL B013, DI-SESS-81927, Failure Analysis and Corrective Action Report (FACAR).

3.9 Technical Review(s) (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.9.1 Production Readiness Review (PRR)

The Contractor shall conduct PRRs for Aircraft and ATDs IAW IEEE 15288.2-2014 at the Contractor’s facility to ascertain that the system design is ready for production and that the supplier has accomplished production planning. The USG Program Manager, Contractor in coordination with the USG Program Manager, shall schedule and conduct a PRR. Contractor shall document performance of the PRR in the appropriate monthly status report.

The Contractor shall confirm the PRR CDRLs are complete and delivered as required by the CDRL. Other products may be added as necessary:

a) Request for Variance (RFV) IAW CDRL B018, DI-SESS-80640E Request for Variance (Aircraft Only)

b) Risk Management Status Report IAW CDRL B012, DI-MGMT-81809/T, Risk Management Status Report (Aircraft and ATDs)

The PRR shall confirm that:

a) The Contractor’s production planning is sufficient to implement the product baseline within expected delivery schedules at targeted costs. (Aircraft and ATDs)

b) All required processes, materials, and skills required for production have been demonstrated in a pilot line environment. (Aircraft and ATDs)

c) The technical data package (TDP) is complete to the extent needed to support Full Rate

Production for aircraft and Full Rate Production for ATDs, such as drawings, comprehensive software documentation, specifications, standards, performance requirements, quality assurance (QA) provisions, and packaging details. (ATDs)

Additional Exit Criteria:

None

3.10 Program Management Review (Aircraft and ATDs)

The Contractor shall conduct quarterly Program Management Reviews (PMR) conducted via telecom with at least one mid-program review being held in-person at the Contractor’s facility.

During these reviews, the Contractor shall present schedule, risk and technical performance status of all phases of the effort. These meetings shall include a 90-day inch stone look ahead, Configuration Management Plan, CDRL status and any new program discussion items. The Contractor shall submit an agenda and briefing slides, 24 hours before the weekly meeting IAW CDRL B0004, DI-ADMN-81249C, Meeting Agenda and CDRL B006, DI-ADMN-81373, Presentation Materials. Meeting Minutes and Action Items shall be submitted NLT three (3) days after meeting conclusion IAW CDRL B005, DI-ADMN-81250C, Meeting Minutes.

3.10.1 Post Award Conference (Aircraft and ATDs)

The Contractor shall conduct a PAC within 30 calendar days of contract award. The PAC shall be conducted at the Contractor’s facility. The purpose of the PAC is to establish the framework of the Contractor and Government interaction during the performance period of the contract.

The PAC shall address the following subjects:

a) Introduction and contract overview

b) SOW review

c) System requirements overview

d) Software requirements overview

e) Initial risk plan

f) Review of test and evaluation requirements

g) Review of data requirements/CDRL requirements

h) Review of Integrated Logistic Support (ILS) requirements

i) Review of IMS (milestones and deliverables)

j) Review of delivery schedules

k) Review of configuration management processes and procedures

l) Review of quality control processes and procedures

m) Systems engineering overview

3.11 Configuration Management (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.11.1 Configuration Management (Aircraft and ATDs)

The Contractor shall maintain its Configuration Management (CM) system to ensure proper product identification, documentation and traceability, baselines, change management (tracking, reporting, and implementation accountability), interface management, and maintenance of the Contractor’s Technical Data Package (TDP). Contractor shall use Military Handbook Configuration Management Guidance, MIL-HDBK-61B and EIA-649-1A, Configuration Management Requirements for Defense Contracts, as guidance. Contractor shall submit a copy of their CM plan IAW CDRL B015, DI-SESS-80858D, Supplier’s Configuration Management Plan for review and government approval.

For the aircraft, the CM system shall satisfy the following requirements:

a. Maintain hardware and software baseline requirements as reflected by PMA-273 Configuration Management Plan (14 January 2021) and JPATS Configuration Management Plan (10 Jan 2022). This baseline shall include hardware drawings and software programs and code that represent the delivered end items. The Contractor shall maintain its design configuration baseline by updating formal documentation (e.g., specifications, drawings, and documents) that describes the as-built configuration of the CSR (N710-100 Rev B) in accordance with CDRL B016, DI-SESS-81830, As Built Configuration List – Common (ABCL-C).

Verify system requirements have been incorporated and implemented into the evolving (detailed) baseline.

Include a change control system to identify, evaluate, disposition, and implement proposed hardware and software changes to the established baseline.

The Contractor shall submit a Data Accession List (DAL) identifying Contractor internal data which has been generated by the Contractor in compliance with the work effort described in this Statement of Work (SOW). The DAL shall be submitted IAW CDRL B017, DI-MGMT-81453B, Data Accession List (DAL).

As part of the review of configuration management processes and procedures for the aircraft, the Contractor shall present their approach to tracking the status of all FAA-issued Airworthiness Directives, Service Bulletins, and Advisory Data in accordance with CDRL B014, DI-MISC- 81241, Airworthiness Directives/Service Bulletins/Advisory Data. Notification of changes to Commercial and Government Furnished Equipment/Software.

3.11.2 Request for Variance (RFV) (Aircraft)

The Contractor shall submit a RFV if a departure from the contractually specified baseline configuration is identified IAW CDRL B018, DI-SESS-80640E, Request for Variance (RFV). If the Government determines that the variance would be permanently acceptable, then the Contractor shall submit an ECP to accomplish the change. If the RFV is for the benefit of the Contractor, the Contractor shall provide, as part of the RFV documentation, equitable consideration based on either (or both) the quantity of items affected by the RFV or the extent the affected items do not meet the Government's contractual requirements. The Contractor shall obtain the Government’s approval before submitting a reoccurrence RFV with the same nonconformance.

The Contractor shall perform a safety impact assessment for all Major/Critical variances and submit CDRL B019, DI-SAFT-80102C, Safety Assessment Report (SAR) in conjunction with each RFV IAW CDRL B018.

3.11.3 Engineering Change Proposals (Aircraft and ATDs)

If changes are required, the Contractor shall submit a Class I and/or Class II Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) to document changes in performance or design from the approved baseline. The Contractor shall prepare the ECP(s) and submit IAW CDRL B020, DI-SESS-80639E, Engineering Change Proposal (ECP). For the aircraft only, The Contractor shall perform a safety impact assessment, to include an impact assessment on the CSR FAA Type Certificate(s), and submit it in conjunction with each ECP IAW CDRL B019, DI-SAFT-80102C, Safety Assessment Report

(SAR).

3.11.4 Notice of Revisions (Aircraft)

Notice of Revisions shall be submitted concurrently with ECP submittals IAW CDRL B021, DI- SESS-80642E, Notice of Revision (NOR).

3.11.5 Contract Change Proposals (CCPs) (Aircraft and ATDs)

The Contractor shall generate CCPs for changes to contract or delivery order requirements other than those contained in specifications and engineering drawings IAW CDRL B007, DI-ADMN- 81401C, Contract Change Proposal (CCP). The submitted CCP shall include a forecast schedule of activities leading up to accomplishment of the contract change.

3.11.6 Data Management (Aircraft and ATDs)

The Contractor shall electronically deliver all contractual data using the Lifecycle Management Process-Integrated Data Environment (LCMP-IDE) application or USG approved alternative application. The Contractor shall ensure that at least two (2) Contractor personnel have LCMP- IDE access throughout the period of performance. The Contractor shall complete LCMP-IDE training required by the USG.

The Contractor shall work with the government to ensure that at least two (2) Contractor personnel obtain and possess Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) certification from an accepted Government source. The Contractor shall complete the training offered by the Government on the government directed system. The Contractor shall prepare, maintain, and track the contract data status, schedule, and ensure timely data deliveries.

3.12 Aircraft Modification Requirements (Aircraft)

The Contractor shall install STC SA00219MC on the quantity of aircraft at each location listed in Table 1-1 IAW applicable TCTO/TD. The Contractor’s Contract Field Teams (CFT) shall perform all modifications IAW FAA regulations, procedures, and processes.

3.12.1 Acceptance of Aircraft (Aircraft)

The Contractor shall accept each aircraft provided for modification IAW procedures identified below:

Access to the aircraft for modification will be supplied to the Contractor no later than 3 hours after request to the USG. The aircraft shall be managed under the GFR/GGFR approved Contractor procedures at the installation facility.

The Contractor shall perform an initial inspection to verify configuration in the area to be modified, accounting for any issue that would prevent installation of TCTO/TD modification. If issues are discovered, the contractor shall immediately notify the COR and T-6A PO to determine action required to address the issue.

The Contractor shall perform a pre-modification inspection outlined in applicable TCTO/TD.

Within one (1) working day of aircraft delivery to the CFT; the Contractor shall conduct an Aircraft Acceptance Inspection to establish the conditional baseline of the provided aircraft. Once complete, the Contractor shall annotate any adverse conditions of the aircraft that will impede modification completion. The Contractor shall provide the data (a description of the adverse conditions) to the COR and T-6A PO immediately and no later than close of business day, written notification will suffice or email (Contractor format is acceptable). The COR and T-6A PO will work with base maintenance to provide a replacement aircraft within one (1) working day if an adverse condition exists.

The Contractor shall be responsible for any aircraft and equipment damage incurred during T-6 CSR modification while in the Contractors possession.

3.12.2 Ground Operating Procedures (GOPs) (Aircraft)

Ground Operating Procedures (GOPs) are the Contractor’s internal policies and detailed procedures, to include tool control and FOD prevention, safety, and quality procedures, which provide the guidance and instructions for all CFT activities. To meet the minimum standard for submission of GOPs at the Basic contract level, the Contractor shall ensure all GOPs are submitted to the USG GFR/GGFR a minimum of thirty (30) calendar days prior to the start of any labor performance or as directed within the SOW for compliance review and are approved in writing prior to the start of any labor performance IAW CDRL B039, DID OT-2023-30005, Contractor’s Ground Operating Procedures. All contractor modification/work procedures shall be performed under the GFR/GGFR approved Contractor procedures at the USAF/USN/USA installation facility.

3.12.3 Mishap Incident (Aircraft)

Per AFI 91-202 and FAA 49CFR830.5 the Contractor shall immediately notify the COR and T- 6A PO in the event of a mishap or reportable incident involving the aircraft while operating under contract. The Contractor shall cooperate with the USG or the Safety Investigation Board for any mishap involving the system and by providing access to personnel and evidence/data requested IAW CDRL B022 DI-MGMT-82188, Accident Incident Report.

3.12.4 Corrosion Control Management (Aircraft)

Contractor shall visually inspect all accessed areas of aircraft for signs of corrosion and report any findings to the T-6 PO for corrective action IAW TO 1-1-689-3. Contractor shall report findings to the T-6 PO upon completion of the access phase via email, Contractor format is acceptable, no later than close of business on the day of discovery.

3.12.5 Aircraft Modification (Aircraft)

The Contractor shall complete the modification as per the TCTO/TD rescission date.

The Contractor shall perform the T-6 aircraft modification IAW STC SA00219MC and applicable

TCTO/TD.

The Contractor shall utilize parts which have FAA PMA certificates or FAA 8130-3 Forms in the CSR installation A-kits and B-kits, as appropriate. The Contractor shall provide the FAA PMA certificates and FAA 8130-3 Forms to the USG Contracting Officer Representative (COR).

The Contractor shall use new wiring for A-kits production/installation and remove any existing unused wiring as a result of the CSR modification effort per TCTO/TD.

The Contractor shall complete the installation of CSR A-kits and B-kits into T-6 production aircraft listed in Table 1 to meet the USG’s FOC date.

The Contractor shall report any aircraft damage identified during modification to the USG.

The Contractor shall provide a list of affected aircraft installation areas. The Contractor shall only gain access to areas of the aircraft required to complete this modification. Maintenance practices shall be in place and used to ensure remaining systems and wiring are not affected by this modification.

The Contractor shall return to the USG all permanently removed items, such as LRUs and any other USG owned property, or otherwise comply with USG directed disposition/disposal instructions.

3.12.6 Post Installation (Aircraft)

The Contractor shall perform a detailed post-modification inspection outlined in applicable TCTO /TD. The Contractor shall perform the Operational Checkout IAW STC SA00219MC installation requirements to demonstrate that the installation meets or exceeds all functional and operational requirements. The Contractor shall document any functional discrepancies found during aircraft modification that affect equipment not installed as part of the T-6 CSR Rapid Fielding Program.

3.12.7 Aircraft Delivery (Aircraft)

The Contractor shall transfer possession of the aircraft back to the USG for acceptance. The Contractor shall coordinate with the USG Representative for inspection and acceptance and release of the aircraft.

3.12.8 Occupational Safety and Health, and Hazardous Material Management (Aircraft and ATDs)

The Contractor shall fully support and comply with all OSHA and local site facilities safety and environmental laws and regulations concerning HAZMAT handling, storage, use, reuse, minimization, and disposal. For ATDs, the CSR solution shall not generate or use Class I or Class II ozone depleting substances while installing, maintaining, operating, or disposing of the system.

The Contractor shall submit a Safety and Health Plan and corresponding site safety checklist to the contracting officer 10 days after contract award IAW CDRL B023 DI-SAFT-82313, Environmental, Safety, and Occupational Health (ESOH) Plan. The Contractor's plan shall include appropriate measures to ensure the Contractor reacts promptly to investigate, correct, and track alleged safety & health violations and/or uncontrolled hazards in Contractor work areas.

The Contractor shall comply with DAFMAN 91-203 at USAF locations.

3.13 Logistics Support Requirements (Aircraft and ATDs)

3.13.1 Integrated Logistics Support (Aircraft)

The Contractor shall follow the Crash Survivable Recorder (CSR) for the T-6A/B/D Aircraft Integrated Logistics Support Plan (ILSP) (SRC document number N710CSRA052-001) for aircraft.

The Contractor shall be responsible for ensuring kits are delivered to appropriate supply activity site according to annual schedule. Coordinate with supply activity for issuance of kits according to modification schedule. The Contractor is responsible for inventory of kit once received.

3.13.2 Fabrication and Delivery (Aircraft)

The Contractor shall be responsible for assuring the following requirements are met; a label shall be affixed to the CSR unit to annotate Recorder Independent Power Supply (RIPS) and Underwater Locator Beacon (ULB) battery install dates. The RIPS and ULB Battery expiration dates shall be added to the FAA Form 8130-3 and the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) Form 1. The CSR units shall be delivered with at least 54 months of life between kit delivery and RIPS expiration. The CSR units shall be delivered with at least 60 months of life between kit delivery and the ULB Battery expiration.

3.13.3 DMSMS (Aircraft and ATDs)

The Contractor shall be responsible for resolving…