Attachment_3_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 22 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Transient Alert Industry Day /Draft Request for Proposal Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA805916R0001
About this file
TA Services Draft Request for Proposal - Attachment 3
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| TA_Industry_Day_Questions_and_Answers-FINAL.pdf | ||
| TA_Services_Industry_Day_Attendance_List.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| TA_Services_Industry_Day_FINAL.pptx | PPTX presentation | |
| Draft_RFP_FA8059-16-R-0001.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment_6_-_WD_05-2098_(Rev.-19).docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_2_-_Proposal_Cover_Sheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| FA8059-16-R-0001.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment_1_-_TA_Services_IDIQ_PWS.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_5_-_TA_Services_Pricing_Worksheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment_4_-_Sample_Task_Order_PWS.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
MEMORANDUM FOR
FROM: 771 ESS/EGB
SUBJECT: Request for Past and Present Performance Evaluation When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR2.101 and FAR 3.104
TO:
1. You have been identified as a point of contact for a past performance evaluation of the firm listed on the attached questionnaire. This firm is currently being considered for a Transient Alert Service strategic sourcing contract with the 771st Enterprise Sourcing Squadron, Air Force Installation Contracting Agency, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH.
2. Your Prompt attention to this questionnaire will be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions concerning this request, please contact TSgt Joshua Samples at 431-278-6421 or email joshua.samples@us.af.mil.
| JOSHUA SAMPLES, TSgt, USAF |
| Contracting Officer |
Attachments:
1. Past and Present Performance Questionnaire
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
A. UGENERAL INFORMATIONU: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
Contractor’s Name: ____________________ Telephone Number: ____________________
Address: __________________________ Fax Number: _________________________
__________________________ Point of Contact: ______________________
Project Title and Brief Description of Work: _____________________________________*
Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ___________________ Dollar Amount: ________*
Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: ______________________* Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.
* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
B. URESPONDENT INFORMATIONU:
Name of Respondent: _____________________ Title: ____________________________
Address: _____________________ Telephone Number: ____________________
_____________________________ Fax Number: _________________________
_____________________________ Email Address: _______________________
C. UEMAIL COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TOU: XXXXXXXXXXX@us.af.mil and XXXXXXXX@us.af.mil
D. UPERFORMANCE INFORMATIONU: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.
E
Exceptional G
Good S
Satisfactory M
Marginal U
Unsatisfactory N
Neutral
| Performance meets/met contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| Performance meets/met contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| Performance meets/met contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory. |
| Performance does not meet/did not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| Performance does not meet/did not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against. |
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: _______________ CONTRACT NUMBER: _______________
Note: Include this information on each page of the questionnaire form to ensure there is no mix up in information among contracts surveyed for respective primes/subs, etc.
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
| The contractor: |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| 1. |
| Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the |
technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
| 2. |
| Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if |
necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.
| 3. |
| Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements. |
| 4. |
| Home office participated in solving significant local problems. |
| 5. |
| Followed approved quality control plan. |
| 6. |
| Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements. |
| 7. |
| Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures. |
| 8. |
| Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies. |
| 9. |
| Identified problems as they occurred. |
| 10. |
| Suggested alternative approaches to problems. |
| 11. |
| Displayed initiative to solve problems. |
| 12. |
| Developed realistic progress schedules. |
| 13. |
| Met established project schedules. |
| 14. |
| Provided timely resolution of warranty defects. |
| 15. |
| Was responsive to contract changes. |
| 16. |
| Provided adequate project supervision. |
| The contractor: |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| 17. |
| Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work-in-progress increased. |
| 18. |
| Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner. |
| 19. |
| Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task. |
| 20. |
| Cooperated with Government personnel after award. |
| 21. |
| How would you rate the contractor's overall performance on this contract? |
| 22. |
| Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.” |
YES/NO
| 23. |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.” |
YES/NO
Remarks:______________________________________________________________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .