DRAFT_PWS_-_FTS_(Umbrella_Contract)_-_Config_Control.docx

AIR FORCE OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION CENTER (AFOTEC)

FIGHTER TEST SERVICES (FTS)

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS)

25 February 2015

1.0 SCOPE

The objective of this acquisition is to obtain Operational Test and Evaluation (OT&E) services in response to task orders issued by the contracting officer related to the OT&E of proposed 4th and 5th generation fighter systems and programs. Services include a broad range of engineering, technical, and analytical test services in support of OT&E activities. OT&E activities include integrated test functions for Air Force and Multiservice fighter aircraft acquisition programs; test design; test planning, execution, and reporting; post test data analysis; cybersecurity evaluation, digital test tool development and associated tool training; special studies and analysis; and research and development of test capability requirements, shortfalls, and solutions. The contractor will work in a joint and combined test team environment where F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) OT&E products are developed and coordinated with the United States (US) Air Force (USAF), US Navy (USN), US Marine Corps (USMC), United Kingdom (UK) Air Warfare Centre (AWC), Royal Netherlands Air Force (RNLAF) and Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) team members. Additionally, the contractor will work in an environment that produces products for F-22 and 4th and 5th generation fighter aircraft updates and modifications.

The scope of this acquisition is to provide engineering, technical and analytical services to support accomplishment of AFOTEC Detachment 1 (Det 1), Edwards Air Force Base (AFB), CA and Detachment 6 (Det 6), Nellis AFB, NV, OT&E activities using the following core competencies:

Table 1. Core Competencies Core Competencies*

Cybersecurity (including requirements, assessments, and knowledge of Department of Defense (DoD) cyber defense and provision of computer network defense services, functional and technical DoD network capabilities and limitations (to include Internet Protocol, telephony, satellite, Tactical Data Link, Radio Frequency, Integrated Air and Missile Defense System (IAMDS), Industrial Control Systems (ICS), & mobile communications), and Platform Integrated Technology systems and required certification actions/responsibilities (such as Risk Management Framework (RMF) & the DoD Information Assurance Certification and Accreditation Process (DIACAP)).

4th and 5th Generation Fighter Maintainability and Supportability

Crypto-key Management

Aerospace Ground Equipment (AGE)

Support Equipment (SE)

Fighter Airframe and Powerplant

Aircraft Structures

Fighter Aircraft Avionics, Electrical, and Environmental Systems

Fighter Weapons Loading and Alternate Mission Equipment (AME)

Fighter Life Support and Survival Equipment

Computerized Maintenance Management Systems

Fighter Logistics (home station and deployed)

Maintenance Training Systems

Joint Reliability and Maintainability Evaluation Team (JRMET)

Reliability, Maintainability, and Availability Analysis

Information Operations (IO); specifically Information Assurance (IA) and Electronic Warfare (EW)

Interoperability

Low Observable (LO) Mission Planning

Fighter LO Employment, Tactics, Concept of Operations (CONOPS)

Advanced Sensors (Advanced Electronically Scanned Array (AESA)Radar, Radio Frequency (RF), Electro-Optical (EO), Infra-Red (IR))

Sensor Fusion

Fighter Performance

Fighter Datalinks (Link 16, Intra-Flight Data Link (IFDL), Multi-function Advanced Data Link (MADL)

Aircrew Training Systems

Scenario Development including red/blue capabilities

Logistics Composite Model (LCOM) experience and operation

Multirole Fighter Aircrew (Offensive Counter Air (OCA), Defensive Counter Air (DCA), Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses (SEAD)/Destruction of Enemy Air Defenses (DEAD), Electronic Warfare (EW), Close Air Support (CAS))

Software Engineering/Programming/Database Management

Fighter Test Instrumentation and Real-time/Post flight data processing

Mission Level, Man-in-the-Loop Modeling and Simulation (Requirements and Verification, Validation and Accreditation (VV&A))

Fighter Weapons Effectiveness Analysis

Air-to-Air Range Infrastructure (AARI)

Intel/Operations Debriefing

Range Training Officer/Kill Removal Officer (Red Flag, Cope Thunder or similar)

Range Requirements/Coordination/Scheduling

Operations Analysis (including Math/Statistics/Design of Experiments (DOE), data analysis)

Flight Test Execution and Analysis

Net-Centric Warfare Systems Integration(to include working knowledge of cyber and electronic warfare integration capabilities with 4th and 5th generation data link systems)

*Not in order of importance

The Contractor shall support task orders for various test and evaluation efforts and phases, consisting of various sizes and complexities of Department of Defense (DoD) related systems. A system is understood to be an assembly or combination of interrelated elements (hardware, software, materiel, training, tactics, or procedures) working together toward a common objective or performance requirement.

Each task order shall direct tasks in one or more areas specified in Section 3.0 of this PWS. The potential places of performance include Edwards AFB, CA, Nellis AFB, NV, HQ AFOTEC at Kirtland AFB, NM, any Det 1 or Det 6 Geographically Separated Unit (GSU) or Operating Location (OL), any Government test range, and contractor facilities. Current OL and GSU locations include Fort Worth, TX, Arlington, VA, Norfolk, VA, Marietta, GA, and Patuxent River, MD. This PWS applies only to Det 1 and Det 6 Fighter Programs.

Each approved task order may identify: the objective, scope, specific work location(s), background, applicable documents, technical requirements, desirable skill set (core competency), period of performance and required schedule, data items, deliverables, government property, and any other considerations for each task.

In rendering services to the identified tasks, outputs may take the form of information, advice, opinions, alternatives, analyses, evaluations, recommendations, and/or services to complement the Government's technical expertise in accomplishing its mission

Background. The overarching functions of Test and Evaluation (T&E) are to mature system designs, manage risks, identify and help resolve deficiencies as early as possible, and ensure systems are operationally mission capable (i.e., effective and suitable). AFOTEC is responsible for planning, executing, and reporting independent OT&E. AFOTEC supports Air Force, DoD and other government agencies by:

· Testing and evaluating new weapon system capabilities in operationally realistic battlespace environments to provide independent, fact-based, decision-quality data to inform decision makers on a range of accurate, balanced, and timely assessments of effectiveness, suitability, and mission capability.

· Conducting and/or participating in the following types of testing: Initial Operational Test and Evaluation (IOT&E); Follow-on Operational Test and Evaluation (FOT&E): Multi-Service OT&E (MOT&E); Qualification OT&E (QOT&E); Operational Utility Evaluation (OUE) and others as defined in AFI 99-103.

· Achieving positive effects on air, space and cyberspace capabilities through early influence of capability requirements development, early acquisition strategy/planning efforts, integrated development/operational testing, and timely operational test reporting.

· Directly supporting Air Force Goals: Sustain air, space, and cyberspace capabilities; and, foster Air Force Smart Operations across the Total Air Force.

AFOTEC Det 1, headquartered at Edwards AFB, CA, serves as the lead Operational Test Agency (OTA) for the multi-service, multi-national F-35 Operational Test and Evaluation (OT&E). In addition to AFOTEC, the F-35 JSF Operational Test Team (JOTT) consists of IOT&E participants from other OTAs that include the United States Navy/United States Marine Corps (USN/USMC) Commander, Operational Test and Evaluation Force (COMOPTEVFOR), the United Kingdom (UK) Air Warfare Centre (AWC), the Royal Netherlands Air Force (RNLAF) and the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF). The F-35 OT&E will consist of multiple Operational Assessments (OA), OT&E, and Initial Operational Test and Evaluation (IOT&E). Associate Contractor Agreements (ACA) may be required as detailed in the task orders.

AFOTEC Det 6, headquartered at Nellis AFB, NV, is the lead for all other AFOTEC fighter and fighter systems OT&E to include the F-22, F-15C, F-15E, F-16, and A-10 aircraft and related systems such as targeting pods and data links.

2.0 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

Applicable guidance consists of Department of Defense, Air Force and AFOTEC documents associated with requirements definition, acquisition, and test and evaluation. The contractor shall use the most current version. Key documents applicable to this PWS are listed in the table below. The government documents cited as references in this PWS are available electronically and will be provided by AFOTEC only if not readily available from publically accessible sources. Each task order will identify unique guidance not contained herein.

Table 2. Applicable Documents Table

3.0 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS

The contractor shall perform requirements within the service task areas listed in this section. Task orders will identify specific tasks for completion within a specific period of time. The contractor shall initiate no work under a task order without written approval by the contracting officer. These efforts apply to new and legacy fighter aircraft and associated systems.

3.1 Management Requirements. The contractor shall:

3.1.1 Prepare task order proposals in support of task order performance requirements in accordance with the task order procedures set forth in Section H. Identify and propose mitigation for any organizational conflict of interest associated with supporting each task order. Task management costs, both direct and indirect, shall be reflected for each task order. The contractor shall identify an appropriate management approach for each task order and shall be required to submit corrective management plans as necessary.

3.1.2 Be responsible for overall responsiveness, cost control and reporting, adherence to schedule, ability to adapt to schedule changes, responsible and cooperative behavior, data management, technical quality of work, management of contractor team's efforts including level of understanding of AFOTEC's mission and commitment to customer satisfaction.

3.1.3 Maintain a Quality Control Program (QCP) that ensures the government receives the level of quality that is consistent with the requirements specified in each task order.

3.1.4 Be responsible for a risk plan, including risk identification and mitigation associated with supporting each task order.

3.1.5 Include a management method for information flow/sharing between Det 1 and Det 6 task orders.

3.2 Test Capabilities. Test capabilities consist of infrastructure (ranges, simulators, labs, instrumentation, etc.), modeling and simulation tools, data management and analysis tools, and analytical methodologies and techniques used to support OT&E. Test capability activities are the formal processes of identifying/developing test capability requirements, shortfalls, and solutions. Activities include identifying test capability requirements, documenting existing test capabilities, identifying shortfalls, performing trade-off analyses, and recommending approaches to solve issues. The contractor shall:

3.2.1 Perform analysis of test capabilities. Activities include: identifying test capability requirements, documenting existing test capabilities, identifying shortfalls, performing trade-off analyses, and recommending approaches to solve issues.

3.2.2 Identify, develop, modify, verify, and/or validate modeling and simulation tools such as constructive tools that represent real world entities by means of computer models, virtual tools involving real people operating simulated systems and live tools involving real people operating real systems.

3.2.3 Participate, develop, and/or update modeling and simulation (M&S) verification, validation, and accreditation (VV&A) plans and/or reports.

3.2.4 Train government personnel in the operation, interpretation of outputs, and maintenance of contractor developed test tools such as computer software, applications, instrumentation, and models and simulations.

3.2.5 Identify, develop, and/or apply analytical techniques, methodologies, and tools for OT&E.

3.2.6 Develop and/or integrate Commercial Off the Shelf (COTS) based data and graphical analysis tools that are capable of high fidelity mission data replay using any combination of aircraft, M&S, and/or range instrumentation truth data.

3.2.7 Provide system level/test methodology training in Subject Matter Expert (SME) areas to appropriate government personnel using continuity books, briefings, and on-the-job training.

3.2.8 Identify and document modifications to Air-to-Air Range Infrastructure (AARI) graphical displays, user interfaces, and weapon models beyond existing AARI toolsets to meet test execution and data requirements. Work on-site with AARI development team.

3.2.9 Maintain configuration management of developed and modified M&S, analysis, and data processing tools.

3.2.10 Identify, develop, recommend, and/or integrate test capabilities for ranges, and ways to use test capabilities to answer operational questions.

3.2.11 Identify, develop, recommend, and/or integrate test capabilities for cyber test ranges, and ways to use test capabilities for red and blue team activities to answer operational questions.

3.2.12 Provide input to assist with developing and coordinating annual forecasts for munitions, missiles, targets, and expendables.

3.2.13 Develop an instrumentation plan for the System Under Test (SUT). Identify instrumentation system requirements and document system design in an Interface Control Document (ICD) or appropriate document.

3.2.14 Perform fighter weaponeering including weapons analysis, air-to-ground weapons, air-to-air weapons, and fighter expendables and countermeasures.

3.2.15 Develop inputs for the delivery of combined OT&E briefings and debriefings for program/OT&E events.

3.3 Test Planning. Test planning focuses on developing test designs/concepts, supporting program/technical reviews, developing test plans, developing Data Management and Analysis Plans (DMAP), establishing deficiency reporting, supporting test readiness reviews, and developing briefings. The contractor shall:

3.3.1 Provide input to develop red and blue team planning.

3.3.2 Provide input to develop and/or revise the evaluation framework.

3.3.3 Provide input to develop and/or revise the Initial Test Design (ITD) and the Test Concept.

3.3.4 Provide input in developing critical operational issues (COIs), measures of effectiveness (MOE) and measures of suitability (MOS).

3.3.5 Provide input in developing operational test scenarios.

3.3.6 Analyze and submit test methodologies, identify test risks and limitations and propose mitigation strategies, and test readiness and support requirements needed to complete the OT&E plan.

3.3.7 Provide input into developing test methodologies and test scenarios for AFOTEC, Director of Operational Test and Evaluation (DOT&E), and program special interest items.

3.3.8 Provide input to develop and/or revise OT&E test plans, data management and analysis plans (DMAPs), detailed test procedures, test planning briefings, and schedules.

3.3.9 Provide input to develop and/or revise the basis of estimate for test resources (e.g. test resource plan) to accomplish the test design.

3.3.10 Review for test and evaluation considerations and document feedback on program documents such as the: Program Management Directive (PMD), any capabilities documents, System Threat Assessment Report (STAR), Test and Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP), Lifecycle Management Plan (LCMP), Program Protection documents, and concepts of operations, maintenance, and employment.

3.3.11 Provide input to develop and/or revise AFOTEC portions of test documentation such as test team charters, test and evaluation master plans (TEMPs), and integrated test plans.

3.3.12 Participate as an Integrated Test Team member to gain knowledge of Integrated Developmental Test/Operational Test (IDT/OT) activities.

3.3.13 Identify OT&E test planning requirements and design priorities in order to eliminate redundancies between the DT&E and the OT&E program.

3.3.14 Perform site surveys on potential test sites and prepare site preparation requirements such as defining site specific installation, integration, preparation of environmental permit plans, and integration of AFOTEC equipment with equipment available from other agencies or host areas.

3.3.15 Provide environmental health and safety planning services for test programs addressing occupational health, and environmental concerns.

3.3.16 Identify and describe data requirements and specific data processing and analysis tools needed to complete the Data Management and Analysis Plan (DMAP).

3.3.17 Review and incorporate joint and combined Lessons Learned from other OT&E efforts into Det 1 and Det 6 test plans and execution.

3.3.18 Develop, propose staff coordination, and provide configuration control for OT&E Test Plans, briefings, reports and other related program documents. All product timelines shall be linked to program requirements or current OT schedule.

3.3.19 Develop program introduction documents (PIO) for the appropriate range support.

3.3.20 Provide input in developing the Joint Reliability and Maintainability Evaluation Team (JRMET) charter.

3.3.21 Prepare and track status of deficiency reports.

3.3.22 Support Readiness to Test (RTT) planning, tracking, resolution, and checklist items.

3.3.23 Prepare for the conduct of OT&E control room White Force Command and Control Operations during test trials. Define white force tasks (i.e. white force commander, kill removal officers, lead analyst, and observers), task rehearsals, and post-trial debriefing efforts.

3.3.24 Develop and/or present talking papers or briefings on OT&E efforts to various meetings and conferences.

3.4 Test Execution. Test execution consists of all activities associated with executing the OT&E plan with identified resources. The contractor shall:

3.4.1 Provide field operations services such as deployment/redeployment, requesting/scheduling/tracking of test equipment resources, identifying/preparing test equipment, and calibrating test instrumentation and site support equipment with on-site equipment and power.

3.4.2 Provide safety services such as ground, flight, and environmental protection support in compliance with safety, occupational health, and environmental concerns/regulations.

3.4.3 Participate in the execution of test plans, data management and analysis plans, and detailed test procedures.

3.4.4 Use, develop, modify, and/or maintain the required automated data collection/reduction systems to include developing interfaces with existing digital information stored on available databases. Analyze content for interoperability and compatibility with existing information and data systems.

3.4.5 Conduct OT&E control room White Force Command and Control Operations during test trials including white force tasks (i.e. white force commander, kill removal officers, analyst, and observers) task rehearsals, and post-trial debriefing efforts.

3.4.6 Participate in and collect data from DT&E operations to support Integrated DT/OT.

3.5 Test Evaluation. Test evaluation determines if the system under test meets the warfighter's mission needs, in addition to system requirements as outlined in the program requirement documents. The contractor shall:

3.5.1 Collect, compile, review, and analyze test data.

3.5.2 Run computer models and simulations and analyze/characterize the resulting output.

3.5.3 Conduct studies, analyses and evaluations on operation effectiveness, suitability and mission capability of weapon system programs undergoing OT&E.

3.5.4 Conduct analyses and evaluations for AFOTEC, DOT&E, and program special interest items.

3.5.5 Participate in the Joint Reliability and Maintainability Evaluation Team (JRMET) and attend on-going meetings to provide subject matter expertise on the accuracy and completeness of the JRMET process and charter.

3.6 Test Reporting. Test reporting consists of communicating the analysis and evaluation of test results. Test reporting may be required in any multimedia format. The contractor shall:

3.6.1 Prepare test documentation for inclusion in OT&E reports.

3.6.2 Participate with government personnel in the research and preparation of audio, animation, video, graphics, and still pictures and insert into test plans, reports and associated briefings.

3.6.3 Prepare and/or present briefings as a part of the report coordination process.

3.6.4 Prepare lessons learned reports.

3.6.5 Participate in the development of quick-look, interim, and final reports.

3.6.6 Brief SME areas to associated audiences as pertaining to quick-look, interim, and final reports.

3.7 Program Protection Support Service Requirements. The contractor shall support the program protection support service requirements of this effort. The contractor shall:

Follow public laws, Country Memorandums of Understanding (MOU), DoD, Air Force, and AFOTEC regulations that require the protection of information. This protection shall be built into all joint and combined OT&E activities.

3.7.1 Provide input for the conduct of program security risk assessments to include threat and vulnerability analyses.

3.7.2 Provide inputs for the development and implementation of plans to mitigate security risks, which may include foreign country participation, test range operations, education, training, and countermeasures.

3.7.3 Participate in the efforts to provide security support such as the monitoring and execution of International Traffic in Arms Regulation (ITAR) requirements, information security, computer security, communications security, and operations security.

4.0 SERVICE SUMMARY ITEMS

Contracting Officer Representatives (CORs) will use Table 3 as a guide when identifying service summary items in Task Orders.

Table 3. Service Summary

5.0 GENERAL INFORMATION, DELIVERABLES, SCHEDULES, AND REPORTING

5.1 Government Furnished Property-Base Support. When the Task Order requires the Contactor to work in a Government facility, the Government may furnish or make available working space, equipment, and network access. Copies of required materials cited in the RFP, PWS, DD Form 254, and/or in the Task Order may be provided to the contractor in hard copy or soft copy. All materials will remain the property of the Government and will be returned to the COR upon request or at the end of the Task Order period of performance.

5.2 Travel Requirements. Contractor employees may be required to travel to various locations both CONUS and outside the continental United States (OCONUS) in performance of Task Orders. For OCONUS travel, contractor employees shall possess passports, visas, and medical clearance for designated operations areas. The Government will not directly reimburse the contractor for these types of expenses. Travel will be cost reimbursable (no fee) in accordance with the Joint Travel Regulation (JTR). Contractors will not be required to price any travel costs on task orders. Ceilings will be established at time of award of each individual task order where the ceilings shall be inclusive of all indirect costs.

5.3 Transition. It is anticipated that some important work will be in progress through the phase-in and phase-out periods of this contract. Interruptions or delays to the work would impact the mission. It is essential that attention be given to minimizing the interruption. Therefore, the contract must provide for maximum cooperation between successor and incumbent while ensuring that no work receives inadequate attention during phase-in/phase-out. The contractor shall plan for the transfer of work control delineating the method for processing and assigning tasks during phase-in/phase-out.

5.3.1 Phase-In. As a successor, the FTS contractor shall ensure a smooth transition with the incumbent Fighter OTES contractor during the phase-in period. The contractor shall develop plans for assumption of awarded Task Orders. The contractor must provide an orderly transition of work acceptance and accomplishment so that impact to the program is minimized.

5.3.2 Phase-Out. The FTS incumbent shall ensure a smooth transition with the successor during the phase-out period, prior to completion of contractual performance. The contractor shall aid the successor in the development of plans, procedures and methods for assumption of all on-going work. The contractor must provide an orderly transition of work acceptance and accomplishment so that full control by the successor is achieved by the end of the new phase-in period.

5.4 Associate Contractor Agreements. The Contractor may enter into Associate Contractor Agreements (ACA) for portions of individual Task Orders requiring joint participation in the accomplishment of the Government's requirement. The agreements shall include the basis for sharing information, data, technical knowledge, expertise, and/or resources essential to the integration of Task Order requirements, which shall ensure the greatest degree of cooperation to meet the terms of the Task Order.

5.5 Period of Performance. The ordering period for FTS will be five years from the date of contract award.

5.6 Contract Data Requirements List (DD Forms1423). Data and documents to be delivered under each authorized task order shall include one or more of the data items listed and on the DD Form 1423. Deliverable reports specific to each task order will be specified in each individual task order.

6.0 SECURITY REQUIREMENTS

6.1

6.1 Security

6.1.1 The contractor shall comply with all security requirements in accordance with DD Form 254, DoD Contractor Security Classification Specification.

6.1.2 The contractor will require access to classified and Special Access Program source data up to and including Top Secret Special Compartmental Information (SCI). The contractor must have a Top Secret Security Clearance current within five years and be SAP and SCI eligible. The contractor must have a current clearance in place by the first day of the task order.

6.1.3 The contractor shall provide the Government with required information for program access requests to include justifications, letters of compelling need, and any other information to support program access packages. The contractor must ensure they are accurate and complete IAW applicable guidance.

6.1.4 The contractor submits classified visit requests via the Joint Personnel Adjudication System (JPAS) in support of tasks within the DoD. Classified visits outside of the DoD require Visit Authorization Letters in accordance with the National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual. Direct requests must be approved by AFOTEC with coordination by the COR/test manager prior to travel.

6.1.5 Report to an appropriate authority any information or circumstances of which they are aware may pose a threat to the security of DoD personnel, contractor personnel, resources and classified or unclassified defense information. Contractor employees shall be briefed by their immediate supervisor upon initial on-base assignment.

6.1.6 Any failure to adhere to security regulations will result in a security incident and will be processed according to DoDM 5200.01, Volume 3, SAF/AQ Security Pamphlet 5, AFI 31-401, AFMAN 14-304, JAFAN 6.0, 1-301a (10), and/or DoD 5105.21-M-1.

6.2 Safeguarding Information . The contractor shall:

6.2.1 Comply with DoD 5400.7-R, Chapter 4, DoD Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Program, and AFI 33-332, Privacy Act Program requirements. These regulations set policy and procedures for the disclosure of records to the public and for marking, handling, transmitting and safeguarding FOUO material.

6.2.2 Report to an appropriate authority any information or circumstances of which they are aware may pose a threat to the security of DOD personnel, contractor personnel, resources and classified or unclassified defense information. Contractor employees shall be briefed by their immediate supervisor upon initial on base assignment.

7.0 SAFETY REQUIREMENTS

7.1 Safety Considerations. The contractor shall plan for and implement safety procedures and protective equipment to reduce/negate injury to personnel engaged in activities supporting this contract. Safety areas of concern include but are not limited to ground, flight, occupational, and environmental safety. Contractor will comply with all applicable OSHA, Federal, State and Local regulations.

7.2 Program Safety Considerations. The contractor shall support field events. Contractor employees shall be trained and certified IAW applicable OSHA standards as required. The contractor shall maintain current training records and/or certificates of completion and provide them to the Government upon request.

8.0 ORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST

In accepting and performing the work required by this task order, and all amendments thereto, the contractor certifies that the requirements of clause AFFARS 5352.209-9000, Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI) have been or will be adhered to. The contractor must immediately bring any OCI issues to the attention of the Procuring Contracting Officer and the Contracting Officers Representative for a determination of whether a mitigation plan is required.

9.0 CONTRACTOR FULL-TIME EQUIVALENT REPORTING

CONTRACTOR Full-Time Equivalent Reporting: The contractor shall report ALL contractor labor hours (including subcontractor labor hours) required for performance of services provided under this contract for AFOTEC via a secure data collection site. Data will be collected and reported at both the task order and specific program level. The contractor is required to completely fill in all required data fields at http://www.ecmra.mil. Reporting inputs will be for the labor executed during the period of performance for each Government fiscal year (FY), which runs 1 October through 30 September. While inputs may be reported any time during the FY, all data shall be reported no later than 31 October* of each calendar year. Contractors may direct questions to the CMRA help desk.

*Reporting Period: Contractors are required to input data by 31 October of each year.

Uses and Safeguarding of Information: Information from the secure website is considered to be proprietary in nature when the contract number and the contractor identity are associated with the direct labor hours and direct labor dollars. At no time will any data be released to the public with the contractor name and contract number associated with the data.

User Manuals: Data for Air Force service requirements must be input at the Air Force CMRA link. However, user manuals for government personnel and contractors are available at the Army CMRA link at http://ww.ecmra.mil.

Table 4. CDRL SUMMARY

3.1

Installation Plan

3.3. 13, 3.4.1, 3.4.4

3.3.13, 3.3. 14, 3.4.2

3.3.13, 3.3. 14, 3.4.2

3.3. 13, 3.3.14, 3.4.2

3.3. 13, 3.3.14, 3.4.2

3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6

Report Brief 3.6

Report 3.6

NIA

3.2.2, 3.2.6, 3.2.10, 3.4.4

3.2.2, 3.2.6, 3.2.10, 3.4.4

3.2.2, 3.2.6, 3.2.10, 3.4.4

3.2.2, 3.2.6, 3.2.10, 3.4.4

3.2.2, 3.2.6. 3.2.10, 3.4.4

3.2.2, 3.2.6, 3.2.10, 3.4.4

3.2.2, 3.2.6, 3.2.10, 3.4.4

3.2.2, 3.2.6, 3.2.10, 3.4.4

3.2.2, 3.2.6. 3.2.10, 3.4.4

3.2.2, 3.2.6, 3.2.10, 3.4.4

3.2.2, 3.2.4, 3.2.6, 3.2.10, 3.4.4

3.2.2, 3.2.6, 3.2.10, 3.4.4

3.2.2, 3.2.6, 3.2.10, 3.4.4

3.2.2, 3.2.6, 3.2.10, 3.4.4

Data Item Description (DID) documents can be found at: http://quicksearch.dla.mil/